Makes justice decisions, in Sweden

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Arts. 13(2)(f), 14(2)(g), 15(1)(h) and 22 · Read the law's page

• Give a person in Sweden a path to obtain human intervention, express their view, and contest a decision made solely by automated processing that produces a legal or similarly significant effect on them.
• Do not subject a person in Sweden to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects concerning them or similarly significantly affects them, unless the decision is necessary for entering into or performing a contract with them, is authorised by Union or Member State law that also lays down suitable measures to safeguard their rights, or rests on their explicit consent, under GDPR Article 22(1) and (2).
• Do not base a solely automated decision with legal or similarly significant effects on a person in Sweden on the special categories of personal data in GDPR Article 9(1), unless they gave explicit consent or the processing is necessary for reasons of substantial public interest on the basis of proportionate Union or Member State law, and suitable measures to safeguard their rights are in place, under GDPR Article 22(4).
• If you make solely automated decisions about a person in Sweden of the kind GDPR Article 22(1) and (4) describe, including profiling, tell them so and give them meaningful information about the logic involved and the significance and envisaged consequences for them: when you collect their data, within the Article 14(3) period where you obtained it from someone else, and in answering their access request, under GDPR Articles 13(2)(f), 14(2)(g) and 15(1)(h).

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council

• Tell a person when they are interacting with an AI chatbot.
• Disclose that synthetic media content was generated or manipulated by artificial intelligence.
• Complete a conformity assessment for a high-risk AI system used in an area such as employment, credit, or education.
• Maintain human oversight over a high-risk AI system used in an area such as employment, credit, or education.
• Provide an explanation of decisions made by a high-risk AI system used in an area such as employment, credit, or education.
• Disclose a summary of the training data used for a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk.
• Report incidents involving a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk.

Lagrådsremiss En ny produktansvarslag · Read the law's page

• The draft Produktansvarslag excludes free and open-source software that you develop or supply outside a business activity (Ch. 1, Sec. 1).
• If you develop, manufacture or produce a product, software included, or put your name, trade mark or another mark on it to present yourself as its maker, you answer as its manufacturer for damage a safety deficiency in it causes (Ch. 1, Sec. 4; Ch. 3, Sec. 1).
• Keep supplying the software updates and upgrades needed to keep the product safe while it is within your control: a deficiency due to your software or a related service is not excused because it arose after you placed the product on the market (Ch. 1, Sec. 4; Ch. 3, Sec. 5, second paragraph).
• Meet the product safety rules that apply to your product: they count in deciding whether it has a safety deficiency, and failing a rule meant to prevent the damage presumes a deficiency (Ch. 2, Secs. 2 and 4).
• Account for what your product learns or acquires after release: the effect of any ability to keep learning or to acquire new features is weighed in deciding whether it has a safety deficiency (Ch. 2, Sec. 2(4)).
• Be ready to produce a document or an object when a court orders it under the Code of Judicial Procedure; failing to do so presumes the product has a safety deficiency (Ch. 2, Sec. 4(1)).
• If you manufacture outside the European Economic Area, your importer, your representative or, where there is neither, your provider of distribution services answers for the product (Ch. 3, Sec. 1(3) and (4)).
• If you substantially change a product outside its manufacturer's control and then supply it, you answer as its manufacturer (Ch. 3, Sec. 4).
• If you distribute a product, or provide an online platform that lets a consumer conclude a distance contract with a trader, refer the injured person to the liable person established in the European Economic Area or to your own supplier within one month, or you answer for the product (Ch. 3, Secs. 2 and 3).
• Be able to show that you did not put the product on the market, that the deficiency probably did not exist then, that it results from compliance with product safety rules, or that scientific and technical knowledge made it impossible to discover (Ch. 3, Sec. 5).
• Do not rely on a contract term that is worse for the injured person than the Act: it has no effect against that person (Ch. 1, Sec. 5).

SOU 2025:12 (Statens offentliga utredningar 2025:12)

Statens offentliga utredningar 2025:101, Anpassningar till AI-förordningen · Read the law's page

• As proposed, SOU 2025:101 would designate Post- och telestyrelsen (PTS) as the coordinating market surveillance authority and single point of contact under the EU AI Act, with Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY) handling market surveillance of the Article 5 prohibited-practices and Article 50.3 transparency duties.