Law / Sweden

SOU 2025:101, Proposed National Implementation of the EU AI Act

Statens offentliga utredningar 2025:101, Anpassningar till AI-förordningen

An AI governance rule binding public and private bodies.

Audit expectation
on_request
Who audits it
Regulator

What it requires

  • As proposed, SOU 2025:101 would designate Post- och telestyrelsen (PTS) as the coordinating market surveillance authority and single point of contact under the EU AI Act, with Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY) handling market surveillance of the Article 5 prohibited-practices and Article 50.3 transparency duties.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

Who enforces it

Settledness

As of
Open questions
Does 'AI-förordningen i dess ursprungliga lydelse' in 4 kap. 4 § of the proposed act fix the sanctions to the Regulation as first published, so that a later amendment of the Regulation extends the sanctions only if the Riksdag also amends the act?

What it makes you log

Who may demand the log

Regulator

Logging duty

The proposed section keeps the documentation that Article 18(1) of the Regulation requires of a provider available to the competent authorities for the period that Article sets, even if the provider goes bankrupt, goes into liquidation or ends its business, and requires the provider or its representative in that case to tell the designated authority who is responsible for keeping it and where. It names no log format or content, and the documentation and log duties themselves are the Regulation's own.

Kind
Implicit
As of
Provision
7 kap. 1 § of the proposed act with supplementary provisions to the EU AI Regulation (SOU 2025:101, section 1.1)
Trigger
high_risk_systems

Why the legislator wanted it

As of
Quote
AI-förordningen ställer krav på att leverantörer ska bevara viss dokumentation även efter det att leverantören försätts i konkurs eller upphör med sin verksamhet.
Source link
https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/759c2d42b55843c587bfbc93540f4daa/anpassningar-till-ai-forordningen-sou-2025101.pdf
Source kind
Committee report
Purpose
regulator_supervision

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

The inquiry submitted its report to the Government in October 2025, proposing a new law, still carrying the placeholder citation "lagen (2026:000) med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s förordning om artificiell intelligens", and a new ordinance to designate Sweden's national market surveillance authorities under the EU AI Act. As of October 2026 the Government's page for the report lists a consultation (remiss) opened on and no lagrådsremiss or proposition.

As proposed, Post- och telestyrelsen (PTS) would be the market surveillance authority with the primary, residual responsibility for matters not assigned to another authority. PTS would separately be the coordinating market surveillance authority and the single point of contact under AI Act Article 70.2. Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY) would be responsible for market surveillance of the Article 5 prohibited AI practices, except where that responsibility is assigned elsewhere.

IMY would separately be responsible for market surveillance of the Article 50.3 transparency duties for certain AI system providers. PTS would also be the body establishing regulatory sandboxes for AI under the proposal, alongside IMY and Finansinspektionen for approving real-world testing of high-risk AI systems outside a sandbox. As proposed, a sanktionsavgift (administrative sanction fee) imposed under the future implementing law would be paid to Kammarkollegiet.

Meanwhile, the Government published an assignment on for PTS, IMY, Finansinspektionen, Läkemedelsverket and Swedac to act as national competent authorities under the AI Act.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app makes high-risk automated decisions, deploys a chatbot or generates content with AI.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .