Law / Cayman Islands

Cayman Islands

10 of 12 named instruments researched to a stage, across five of the ten areas of law we track: 10 in force. As of .

When each starts8 of 10 carry a date, 2 do not. Earlier is before 2014.
Before 2014: 1 instrument (1 in force) earlier 2014: 0 instruments 2015: 0 instruments ’15 2016: 3 instruments (3 in force) 2017: 0 instruments 2018: 0 instruments 2019: 4 instruments (4 in force) 2020: 0 instruments ’20 2021: 0 instruments 2022: 0 instruments 2023: 0 instruments 2024: 0 instruments 2025: 0 instruments 2026: 0 instruments ’26 today

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

  1. AI law 1
  2. Privacy law 4
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law 2
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

AI law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (161 words)

The Cayman Islands has no AI-transparency, AI-risk-obligations, AI-training-data, AI-governance, or AI-sector-rules statute in force.

The Penal Code (2019 Revision) bans an indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph of a child, defining a pseudo-photograph as an image made or produced by computer-graphics or otherwise which appears to be a photograph, and child pornography as including a realistic image representing a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct; this reaches a computer-generated or AI-synthesised depiction with no real child involved.

The government has been developing AI policy since early 2026: a draft Civil Service Artificial Intelligence Policy remained in final signoff at the Office of the Deputy Governor and unpublished as of the most recent reporting found, and the Premier told Parliament in a written answer that a draft AI legislative framework, not yet decided as a standalone Act or amendments to existing law, was targeted for Q2 2027; neither has produced a tabled bill or published policy text as of this review.

AI prohibited practices

Penal Code 2019 Revision, indecent photographs and pseudo-photographs of children

Penal Code (2019 Revision), ss. 224(1), 228A-228B (indecent photographs and pseudo-photographs of children)Penal Code (2019 Revision), Government of the Cayman Islands, archived copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://legislation.gov.ky/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/1975/1975-0012/PenalCode_2019%20Revision.pdf

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 228A makes it an offence, liable on conviction on indictment to fifteen years' imprisonment, to possess, take, make, distribute or show an indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph of a child.

A pseudo-photograph is defined as an image, whether made or produced by computer-graphics or otherwise, which appears to be a photograph, and is treated as showing a child if the impression it conveys is that the person shown is a child, even where some physical characteristics shown are those of an adult.

Section 228B separately criminalises making, publishing, transmitting, distributing, selling, advertising, importing, exporting, possessing or accessing child pornography, defined to include a realistic image representing a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct, whether or not the image depicts an actual child.

The making, possession or access offence carries fifteen years' imprisonment, and the transmission, distribution, sale, advertising, import or export offence carries twenty-five years. The Bill for the Penal Code (Amendment) Law, 2012 provided for new sections 228A to 228D of the Code. The same Bill amended section 224 of the Code to define child pornography and other terms.

The Penal Code (2019 Revision) records the Penal Code (Amendment) Law, 2012 (Law 21 of 2012) as commencing on .

What it requires

Privacy law4 instruments, 4 in force

Research summary (137 words)

The Cayman Islands' comprehensive personal-data statute is the Data Protection Act (2021 Revision), consolidating the Data Protection Law, 2017 (Law 33 of 2017), in force from and enforced by the Office of the Ombudsman.

It binds a data controller established in the Islands, or processing personal data in the Islands, to eight data protection principles, gives data subjects access, rectification, objection and automated-decision-making rights, a statutory cause of action for compensation, and restricts transfer of personal data outside the Islands unless the receiving country or territory ensures an adequate level of protection.

The Act's sensitive personal data category does not name biometric or genetic-derived identifiers beyond genetic data itself, and its only publicity-based carve-out reaches information a controller is itself obliged by enactment to make public, not personal data that is merely publicly accessible.

Breach notification

Data Protection Act 2021 Revision, personal data breach notification

Data Protection Act (2021 Revision), s. 16 (personal data breaches)Data Protection Act (2021 Revision), Office of the Ombudsman

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

On a personal data breach, a data controller must, without undue delay and no more than five days after it should reasonably have become aware of the breach, notify both the affected data subject and the Ombudsman, describing the nature and consequences of the breach, the measures taken or proposed to address it, and the measures recommended to the data subject to mitigate adverse effects. Failing to notify is an offence.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Data Protection Act 2021 Revision, application, principles and data subject rights

Data Protection Act (2021 Revision), Law 33 of 2017, ss. 1-14 (application, principles and data subject rights)Data Protection Act (2021 Revision), Office of the Ombudsman

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Act binds a data controller established in the Islands, or one processing personal data in the Islands otherwise than in transit, to collect personal data fairly and lawfully, hold it only for specified purposes, keep it accurate, and secure it against unauthorised access.

A data subject may access personal data held about them, require a controller to stop processing or to stop processing for direct marketing, and object to a decision based solely on automated processing of their personal data that significantly affects them. A person who suffers damage from a data controller's contravention of the Act has a statutory cause of action for compensation.

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Data Protection Act 2021 Revision, cross-border transfer of personal data

Data Protection Act (2021 Revision), Schedule 1 (eighth principle) and Schedule 4 (transfers to which the eighth principle does not apply)Data Protection Act (2021 Revision), Office of the Ombudsman

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The eighth data protection principle bars transferring personal data to a country or territory that does not ensure an adequate level of protection for the rights and freedoms of data subjects. Schedule 4 lists transfers to which this principle does not apply, including a transfer with the data subject's consent, one necessary to perform a contract with the data subject, one made on terms the Ombudsman approves as ensuring adequate safeguards, and one the Ombudsman has itself authorised.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Data Protection Act 2021 Revision, Ombudsman enforcement, monetary penalties and offences

Data Protection Act (2021 Revision), ss. 52-57 (Ombudsman investigatory powers, monetary penalties and offences)Data Protection Act (2021 Revision), Office of the Ombudsman

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Office of the Ombudsman enforces the Act. A judge may grant the Ombudsman a warrant to enter and search premises and inspect or seize equipment and documents where there are reasonable grounds to believe a data controller has contravened the data protection principles or committed an offence.

The Ombudsman may serve a data controller with a monetary penalty order, capped at two hundred and fifty thousand dollars, for a serious contravention likely to cause substantial damage or distress, after a twenty-one day notice-of-intent period. A general offence under the Act is liable, except where the Act otherwise provides, to a fine of ten thousand dollars on summary conviction or twenty thousand dollars on conviction on indictment.

What it requires

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (200 words)

Open-web crawling of a public unauthenticated page is not addressed by a computer-misuse statute in the Cayman Islands: no Computer Misuse Act, Cybercrime Act, or equivalent unauthorised-access offence was found in the current Acts index of the Cayman Islands Legislation portal or in the Penal Code (2019 Revision), whose only computer-related provisions (sections 225, 228A-228C) are scoped to child pornography.

Copyright law is the United Kingdom's Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, Part 1, as extended to the Cayman Islands by the Copyright (Cayman Islands) Order 2015, subject to named exclusions and modifications; within Part 1, a database is protected as a literary work in its own right alongside a table or compilation, with no separate sui generis database right extended to the Islands, and section 29A permits copying a work for text and data analysis for non-commercial research by a person with lawful access, a term purporting to restrict which is unenforceable.

Personal data collected by scraping falls within the Data Protection Act (2021 Revision) researched under the privacy topic. No unfair-competition or misappropriation doctrine, and no statute or case law addressing the legal weight of a robots.txt instruction or an AI-training-specific rule, was identified in the legislation read.

Cybersecurity law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (690 words)

The Cayman Islands has no enacted product-security or connected-device statute: no law requires a manufacturer to meet security requirements before or after placing a software product or connected device on the Cayman Islands market was located, and no voluntary IoT security labelling scheme comparable to Singapore's Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme was found either.

The Islands also have no general reasonable-security or information-security-programme statute reaching a business simply because it holds covered information; the nearest analogue is the Data Protection Act (2021 Revision) Schedule 1, Seventh Principle, which requires that appropriate technical and organisational measures be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data, and section 16, which requires a data controller to notify both the affected data subject and the Ombudsman of a personal data breach without undue delay and no later than five days after the controller should reasonably have become aware of it; both are this jurisdiction's own privacy-topic security-safeguards principle and breach-notification duty and are not repeated here.

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has, since May 2020 and most recently reissued in April 2023, a binding Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities and a companion Statement of Guidance, made under section 34(1)(a) of the Monetary Authority Act, which lets the Authority, after private sector consultation, issue rules or statements of principle or guidance concerning the conduct of licensees and their officers and employees.

The Rule applies to entities regulated by the Authority, including controlled subsidiaries as defined in the Banks and Trust Companies Act, but excepting Regulated Mutual Funds and Private Funds, and requires a regulated entity to establish, implement and maintain a documented cybersecurity framework designed to identify, measure, assess, report, monitor and control cybersecurity risks and to respond to and recover from cybersecurity breaches with a material impact on its operations; makes a regulated entity's governing body ultimately responsible for cybersecurity, including approval of a written cybersecurity risk management strategy and a comprehensive cybersecurity framework; requires immediate written notification to the Authority of an incident with a material impact or the potential to become one, no later than 72 hours after discovery; and requires notification to affected persons where a cyber attack breaches non-public information or disrupts a utilised service.

Every one of these duties binds only an entity the Authority has already licensed or otherwise regulates under one of its sectoral Acts; the Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities is filed as rows of its own.

Separately, the Information and Communications Technology Act (2026 Revision) defines "critical ICT infrastructure" as ICT systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, that are so vital to the Islands that their incapacity or destruction would have a debilitating impact on security, national economic security, or national public health or safety, and gives the Utility Regulation and Competition Office (OfReg) the function of setting up, managing and controlling the Cayman Islands cyber incident response team (CIRT-KY), whose role is to promote and enhance the security and resilience of critical ICT infrastructure, of developing and maintaining cyber security strategies, and of making regulations relating to critical ICT infrastructure after consultation with the Minister.

No regulation made under that power, and no instrument designating a person as an operator of critical ICT infrastructure or imposing a security or incident-reporting duty on one, was located: as drafted this is an enabling power and a description of OfReg's and CIRT-KY's own functions, not yet a duty running to a private operator, and CIRT-KY's public activity to date reads as a voluntary alerting and incident-response service rather than a mandatory reporting regime.

The Cayman Islands Computer Misuse Law (2015 Revision) criminalises unauthorised access to, and unauthorised modification of, computer material by an intruder and is this jurisdiction's scraping-topic computer-misuse row, not repeated here; its current sections name no distinct critical-infrastructure offence. The Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities requires regulated entities to establish, implement and maintain a documented cybersecurity framework.

The Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities requires a regulated entity to notify the Authority in writing of a material incident immediately and no later than 72 hours following its discovery.

Sector security regimes

CIMA Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities, Cybersecurity Framework and Governance

Cayman Islands Monetary Authority Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities (April 2023), paras. 3, 5, 6 and 9Text of the Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities (April 2023), Cayman Islands Monetary Authority

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities applies to entities regulated by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, including controlled subsidiaries as defined in the Banks and Trust Companies Act. The Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities excepts regulated mutual funds and private funds. The Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities requires regulated entities to establish, implement and maintain a documented cybersecurity framework.

The Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities makes the governing body of a regulated entity ultimately responsible for cybersecurity. Section 34 of the Monetary Authority Act lets the Authority issue rules concerning the conduct of licensees and their officers and employees. Section 34 of the Monetary Authority Act provides that a breach of such rules does not constitute an offence.

The Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities states that the Authority's Enforcement Manual applies whenever a breach of the Rule occurs. No notice stating the day the Rule came into force has been located.

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

CIMA Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities, Notification Requirements

Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities (April 2023), para. 8Text of the Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities (April 2023), Cayman Islands Monetary Authority

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities requires a regulated entity to notify the Authority in writing of a material incident immediately and no later than 72 hours following its discovery. The Rule on Cybersecurity for Regulated Entities requires a regulated entity to notify affected persons if a cyber attack results in the breach of non-public information or disrupts a service that is utilised. No notice stating the day the Rule came into force has been located.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (96 words)

The Cayman Islands has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no platform-to-publisher bargaining code.

Copyright law is the United Kingdom's Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, Part 1, as extended to the Cayman Islands by the Copyright (Cayman Islands) Order 2015, and section 30's fair dealing exceptions for criticism, review, quotation and reporting current events extend with it, requiring a sufficient acknowledgement except where reporting current events by sound recording, film or broadcast makes one impracticable.

No statute or reported Cayman Islands decision addresses hyperlinking, framing, hot-news misappropriation, or a machine-readable text-and-data-mining opt-out specific to news content.

Where nothing was found1 area of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

Age gating law

The Cayman Islands has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code. The Penal Code (2019 Revision) criminalises obscene publications generally at section 157, a general offence rather than an age-verification or access-control duty on a private online service.

The Information and Communications Technology Act (2017 Revision) requires a broadcasting licensee's local programming to protect persons under the age of eighteen among other content standards, a content-standards duty on a licensed broadcaster rather than an age-verification mechanism. The Children Act (2012 Revision) restricts publishing material likely to identify a child involved in court proceedings, a court-reporting restriction rather than an age-gating duty.

No dedicated online-safety, social-media, app-store, or design-code statute imposing a verification or access-control duty on a private online service was located in the current Acts index of the Cayman Islands Legislation portal.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Cayman Islands AI law
  • No current case law for Cayman Islands privacy law
  • No current case law for Cayman Islands scraping law
  • No current case law for Cayman Islands cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Cayman Islands communications law
  • No current case law for Cayman Islands content moderation law
  • No current case law for Cayman Islands product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Cayman Islands digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Cayman Islands age gating law
  • No current case law for Cayman Islands reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here2 instruments

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of the Cayman Islands comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

72 hours
Incident notificationsecurity law
5 days
Breach notificationprivacy law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of the Cayman Islands

5 days

Data Protection Act 2021 Revision, personal data breach notification

Data Protection Act (2021 Revision), s. 16 (personal data breaches)privacy law, in force since

The sentence the clocks are read from

Notify the Ombudsman and each affected data subject of a personal data breach without undue delay and no later than five days after you should, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, have been aware of it, describing the breach, its consequences, and the measures taken or recommended (section 16(1)).

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.