Distributes a software product, in Goiás

Lei Complementar nº 205, de 19 de maio de 2025 · Read the law's page

• Give people accessible, free, prior and easily understood information that an AI system is used for automated decisions, what it is for, and that the interaction is automated (article 8)
• When an automated decision directly affects access to or the exercise of rights, or significantly affects interests, give the user the relevant factual premises the system used so the decision can be contested, subject to industrial and commercial secrecy (article 8, paragraph 2)
• Do not discriminate unlawfully through an automated decision; empirically grounded statistical and risk analysis is not unlawful discrimination, but discrimination on grounds of ethnicity, religious belief, sexual orientation or gender stays barred (article 8, paragraph 6)
• Do not develop, implement or use an AI system whose purpose is contrary to fundamental rights, public order, the guiding principles of the democratic rule of law or the security of public institutions (article 9)
• For an autonomous AI agent operating outside the state sandbox, tell end users that it is artificial and decides autonomously, and keep effective human supervision to identify what could harm fundamental rights (article 44, items I and II)
• Have periodic technical audits of the agent's operational security and ethics carried out by independent accredited third parties when it operates as item II provides (article 44, item III)
• For embedded (edge) AI sold or used in public services, tell end users that it exists and what it can and cannot do (article 48, item I)
• Apply reinforced cybersecurity measures to edge AI, including strong encryption, automatic security updates and vulnerability alert systems (article 48, item II)
• Have periodic independent technical audits of edge AI devices used in critical areas such as health, public security, transport and infrastructure (article 48, item III)
• Provide for human supervision and intervention in edge AI, including remote shutdown in critical or emergency situations where technically feasible (article 48, item IV)
• Keep clear, accessible and auditable technical documentation of an edge AI system's operation, operating limits, potential risks and safety (article 48, item V)
• If you deliver a public service under a concession, permission, agreement or partnership with the state, give users of AI-assisted decisions a reasoned decision, the right to contest and ask for review, and human review on appeal, to the extent applicable; entities in free competition or with no formal arrangement with the state are outside this duty (articles 12 and 13)