in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force
Scraping law1 instrument, 1 in force
Research summary (185 words)
Sudan has no scraping-specific statute. The Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection and Literal and Artistic Works Act, 2013 protects a computer-readable database only as a compilation, and only where its selection or arrangement of contents is itself original; a database lacking that originality, and the individual data points within an otherwise-protected one, draw no separate right under the Act.
The Act also lets a person in lawful possession of a computer program make one backup copy of it for use if the original copy is lost or damaged.
The Cybercrime Act, 2007 (as amended by the Cybercrime Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2020) is this jurisdiction's other named lead for a computer-misuse finding; the only located copy of that Act reproduces its preliminary provisions (name, application, definitions) but not the operative offence articles that would establish an unauthorised-access or interference offence, so whether it reaches an unauthenticated scrape of a public, unauthenticated page is not established here.
Access-context questions such as robots.txt's legal weight and terms-of-service enforceability are likewise unsettled: no reported case on the point has been located, and no dedicated contract or crawl-signals statute exists.
Article 5(2) extends the Act's copyright protection, without prejudice to the protection of an original work's own author, to derivative works including translations, adaptations, summaries and other transformations, collections of protected or unprotected works, publications of literary, artistic and scientific works, and computer-readable or other databases, on condition that the derivative work is itself original in the selection or arrangement of its contents.
A database whose selection or arrangement of contents is not original draws no protection under this provision, and the individual data points within an otherwise-protected database are not themselves protected merely because the compilation is. Article 34 separately lets a person in lawful possession of a computer program make one copy of that program for use in place of the original if the original copy is lost or damaged.
The text of the Act states no day on which it comes into force, and no Gazette notice or commencement order for it has been located.
Sudan has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no compelled platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located statute or case law addressing hyperlinking or framing liability.
The operative instrument is the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection and Literal and Artistic Works Act, 2013: it excludes the news of current events that is merely press news from copyright protection outright, so a bare news item is never a protected work regardless of who first reported it; it lets any person take excerpts from a lawfully published work for the purpose of clarification, explanation or critique, citing the source and the author's name; it lets a work published in a newspaper or periodical, on a current economic, political or religious discussion, or a broadcast work of the same character, be transmitted to the public or reproduced by newspaper, broadcast or wire transmission, where the right to reproduce or transmit has not been expressly reserved, with the source clearly indicated; and it lets a protected work that is seen or heard during a current event be reproduced or broadcast as part of a news report on that event, to the extent the informational purpose of the report justifies.
None of these provisions is capped at headline length or a short extract, and whether any of them reaches a systematic news aggregator, as opposed to a traditional press review, has not been tested in a reported Sudanese decision. The Act predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation entirely, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists.
Article 6(c) excludes the news of ongoing events that is merely press news from the protection the Act otherwise grants, so such a news item is never a protected work under Sudanese copyright law. Article 27 lets excerpts be taken from a work that has been lawfully published and included in another work, for the purpose of clarification, explanation or critique, within the customary limit the purpose justifies and consistent with fair use, on condition the source and author's name are cited.
Article 28 lets the public be given, or a person reproduce, articles published in newspapers and periodicals on current economic, political or religious discussions, or broadcast works of the same character, by newspaper, broadcast or wire transmission to the public, in cases where the right to reproduce or transmit has not been expressly reserved, with the source clearly indicated.
Article 30 lets a work that is seen or heard during current events be reproduced or broadcast as part of preparing a news report on those events, within the limit the informational purpose sought justifies. The text of the Act states no day on which it comes into force, and no Gazette notice or commencement order for it has been located.
These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.
AI law
Sudan has no AI-transparency, AI-risk-obligations, AI-training-data, AI-prohibited-practices, AI-governance, or AI-sector-rules statute in force.
Sudan's Prime Minister signed a decree on establishing three national agencies under the Ministry of Digital Transformation and Communications, including a Sudanese Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority, alongside a Digital Transformation Authority and a Sudanese Cybersecurity Authority, aimed at building a unified digital system and an institutional framework to regulate public digital services, data management and cybersecurity.
The decree is an institutional and government-facing action creating regulatory bodies; it does not itself impose a binding duty on a developer, deployer or user of an AI system, and neither authority is reported to have issued implementing regulations.
The Cybercrime Act, 2007 (as amended by the Cybercrime Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2020) is named as a lead for any AI-generated-content or deepfake-specific language; the only located copy of that Act reproduces its preliminary provisions (name, application, definitions) but not the content-offence articles listed in its own table of contents, so whether any provision reaches an AI-synthesised or deepfake depiction is not established here.
As of .
Privacy law
Sudan has no comprehensive data protection statute and no appointed data protection authority. Sudan's Constitution protects the right to privacy, including of correspondence, in Section 55, but no implementing legislation gives that guarantee an enforcement mechanism against a private data controller.
Several sectoral statutes touch personal data only indirectly: the Electronic Transactions Act, 2007, the Cybercrime Act, 2007 (amended by the Cybercrime Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2020), and a further Law No. 14 on Information Technology Crime.
The Cybercrime Act's own preliminary provisions state that it applies to offences committed wholly or in part in or outside Sudan whose impact extends to Sudan, but the operative offence provisions that would establish a confidentiality or data-security duty are not reproduced in the available copies of the Act, so whether it binds a private controller to a data protection duty is not established here.
As of .
Cybersecurity law
Sudan's Cybercrime Act, 2007 is an eight-chapter criminal statute whose offences are committed against an information system or network by an intruder rather than duties placed on a product's manufacturer or a service's operator.
Its Chapter Two offences include accessing a site or information system without authorization, tapping, capturing or intercepting a message through an information network without permission, and, having accessed a system by any means, deliberately shutting it down, disabling it, or destroying, erasing or damaging its software, data or information.
No provision of the Act sets a security requirement a software product or connected device must meet before or after it reaches a market, creates a duty to report a vulnerability or a security incident to an authority or to users, or imposes a sector cyber-resilience regime or a baseline reasonable-security duty on a business that holds data; its offences belong to this jurisdiction's computer-misuse finding rather than to this one.
A Cybercrime Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2020 and a further Law No. 14 on Information Technology Crime are named in secondary commentary as related statutes, but no copy of either has been located, so their content is not described here.
The Electronic Transactions Act, 2007 licenses a person or body to practise authentication-of-signature and certificate-issuing services, and the Act's security-shaped duties attach to that licence rather than to a product, a platform, or a business generally.
Article 9 makes the data of an electronic signature and the information presented to a body licensed to issue electronic certificates secret in the hands of that body and of anyone who learns of it through their work, and separately requires the provider of the service running the data-processing system to take the steps and procedures available, by all means and technologies, to protect the information.
Article 19 requires the licensed body to employ approved systems and procedures and staff attested for competence and experience, to give a signatory a channel to report an impediment affecting a signature device and to cancel a compromised signature promptly, to keep records of those it deals with, and to retain the messages behind an issued certificate for whatever period and classification the licensing committee sets.
That committee, established by Chapter VI of the Act, may determine the licensed body's liability for a breach of its duty of care, and may withdraw its licence for non-compliance, and may issue further rules the licensed body must follow; the General Court hears disputes over the Act's application, and Article 28 makes it a criminal offence carrying imprisonment of up to twelve years, a fine, or both to interfere with a system or programme used for an electronic transaction, and imprisonment of up to ten years, a fine, or both for a licensed authentication body itself to supply inaccurate information, disclose a customer's secrets, or contravene the systems and instructions issued under the Act.
No provision of the Act reaches a general software product or platform, and no provision creates an incident-reporting duty running to a regulator; these duties bind only the narrow class of a person or body licensed to provide authentication and certificate-issuing services, a role this corpus's declared activity vocabulary does not currently express, so this regime is recorded here in prose rather than raised against a declared activity, and a developer whose product touches only this narrow, licensed role is not reached by the lint on this account.
Sudan's Prime Minister signed a decree on establishing three national agencies under the Ministry of Digital Transformation and Communications, including a Sudanese Cybersecurity Authority alongside a Digital Transformation Authority and a Sudanese Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority, aimed at building a unified digital system and an institutional framework for public digital services, data management and cybersecurity.
The decree creates a regulator rather than a rule: no implementing regulation from the new Authority is reported, and nothing in the decree itself imposes a security duty on a developer, deployer, operator or manufacturer. Sudan has no comprehensive data protection statute and no breach-notification duty in force, so there is no privacy-topic instrument on this seam to point past here.
Sudan therefore has no product-security requirement for a market-placed product, no vulnerability or incident-reporting duty running to an authority or to users, no general sector cyber-resilience regime, and no baseline reasonable-security statute reaching a business generally; its one security-shaped duty is the licensed-provider regime the Electronic Transactions Act, 2007 places on a person or body licensed to provide authentication and certificate-issuing services.
As of .
Age gating law
Sudan has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code.
The Child Act, 2010 devotes a chapter to child culture that bars publishing, exhibiting, circulating, photographing or possessing printed or artistic visual or audio material concerning a child that addresses lower desires or by nature encourages a child to delinquency (art. 33), bars a cinema house, viewing club or similar place of entertainment from admitting a child during the school day, or at all unless accompanied by a parent or guardian (art. 34), and requires such venues to advertise which shows are prohibited for children (art. 35); these are content-standards and physical-venue admission duties addressed to publishers, cinema managers and venue supervisors, not an age-verification or age-gating duty on an online, on-demand or app-based service, and the Act contains no provision addressing the internet or an online service.
The Press and Printed Press Materials Act, 2009 is referenced in secondary commentary on Sudanese press regulation, but no copy of its text has been found.
The Cybercrime Act, 2007 (as amended by the Cybercrime Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2020) is this jurisdiction's other named lead for a provider duty concerning minors; the only located copy of that Act reproduces its preliminary provisions (name, application, definitions) and its own table of contents naming a public order and morality offences chapter, but not that chapter's operative articles, so whether it reaches age verification or gating is not established here.
As of .
Case law
No current case law for Sudan AI law
No current case law for Sudan privacy law
No current case law for Sudan scraping law
No current case law for Sudan cybersecurity law
No current case law for Sudan communications law
No current case law for Sudan content moderation law
No current case law for Sudan product and AI liability law
No current case law for Sudan digital accessibility law
No current case law for Sudan age gating law
No current case law for Sudan reuse law
AIDrafted with AI
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made
This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched
to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are
counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own
primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal
advice.