Law / Guyana

Guyana

10 of 12 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the ten areas of law we track: 3 in force and 7 not yet in force. As of .

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 7
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law 1
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

Privacy law7 instruments, 7 not yet in force

Research summary (126 words)

Guyana's National Assembly passed the Data Protection Act 2023 (Act No. 18 of 2023) on , and it was gazetted on . A report of states that the Act's requisite commencement order had not been issued. Guyana's Digital Identity Card Act 2023, whose Commissioner and safeguard duties are created by the Data Protection Act, took effect on under a commencement order published in the Official Gazette on .

Guyana's Data Protection Act is held as one comprehensive-regime row for its principles, lawful-basis, registration and controller duties, and one row each for its sensitive-data, data-subject-rights, automated-decision, cross-border-transfer, breach-notification and enforcement provisions. Outside the Act, no sector-specific privacy law, biometric statute, or cross-border-transfer rule is known.

Breach notification

Data Protection Act 2023, personal data breach notification

Data Protection Act 2023, ss. 65-66 (notification and communication of a personal data breach)Text of Act No. 18 of 2023 as published by the Ministry of Legal Affairs of Guyana (the Data Protection Bill 2023 text

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 65(1) requires the data controller, where there is a personal data breach, to notify the Commissioner without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than seventy-two hours after becoming aware of it, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of any person. Section 65(2) requires a notification made after seventy-two hours to give reasons for the delay.

Section 65(3) requires a data processor to notify the data controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a breach. Section 65(4) lists what the notification describes, including the nature of the breach, the likely consequences and the measures taken. Section 65(6) requires the controller to document every breach.

Section 66(1) requires the controller to communicate a breach likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of persons to the data subject without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than seventy-two hours after becoming aware of it. Section 66(3) lifts that duty in three cases, including where encryption made the data unintelligible.

Section 1 provides that the Act comes into operation on the day the Minister appoints by order, and that different days may be appointed for different provisions. The Act was gazetted on following passage on . No commencement order has been located.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Data Protection Act 2023

Data Protection Act 2023 (Act No. 18 of 2023), not yet commencedText of Act No. 18 of 2023, Parliament of Guyana

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 3(1) applies the Act to a data controller or data processor established in Guyana, and to one not established there that uses equipment in Guyana for processing or whose processing relates to offering goods or services to data subjects in Guyana or monitoring their behavior there.

Section 4(1) requires personal data to be processed lawfully, fairly and transparently, collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes, kept adequate, accurate and no longer than necessary, and processed with appropriate security. Section 4(2) makes the data controller answerable for complying with all of it.

Section 6(1) makes processing lawful only on a listed basis, beginning with the data subject's consent for one or more specific purposes and running through contract, legal obligation, vital interests, public functions and legitimate interests. Section 7 requires the controller to be able to demonstrate consent and to inform the data subject of the right to withdraw it.

Section 51(1) bars a person from operating as a data controller unless registered in the Register of Data Controllers, section 51(3) requires a controller not established in Guyana to nominate a representative established there. Section 57 imposes the same registration rule on data processors.

Section 62 requires a record of processing activities, section 64 requires appropriate technical and organizational security measures, section 67 requires an impact assessment before processing likely to result in a high risk. Section 69 requires a data protection officer in the cases it lists. Section 1 provides that the Act comes into operation on the day the Minister appoints by order, and that different days may be appointed for different provisions.

The National Assembly gazetted the Data Protection Act 2023 as Act No. 18 of 2023 on , following passage on . As of the date below, no commencement order under the Act has been located, and a report of states that the requisite commencement order has not been issued. Guyana's Digital Identity Card Act 2023 came into operation before the Data Protection Act was commenced.

The Digital Identity Card Act's Commissioner and safeguard duties are created by the Data Protection Act, so commentators quoted in that report flagged them as unenforceable while the Data Protection Act was not in force.

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Data Protection Act 2023, transfers of personal data outside Guyana

Data Protection Act 2023, ss. 23-30 (transfers outside Guyana)Text of Act No. 18 of 2023 as published by the Ministry of Legal Affairs of Guyana (the Data Protection Bill 2023 text

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 23 bars the transfer of personal data to a country, territory or international organization outside Guyana unless it provides an adequate level of protection and appropriate safeguards under which the data subject's rights are enforceable and effective legal remedies are available. Section 24 makes adequacy a question of all the circumstances of the case, including the nature of the data, the destination, the law in force there and the supervisory authorities.

Section 25 lists the appropriate safeguards, including binding corporate rules, standard data protection clauses prescribed by the Commissioner with the Minister's approval, and contractual clauses authorized by the Commissioner. Section 26 requires binding corporate rules to be submitted to the Commissioner for authorization.

Section 27 allows a foreign court judgment or administrative decision requiring a transfer or disclosure to be recognized or enforced only if based on an international agreement with Guyana. Section 28 lets a transfer proceed without sections 23 to 25 on listed grounds such as the data subject's consent. Section 29 makes contravening sections 23, 24 or 25 an offence.

Section 1 provides that the Act comes into operation on the day the Minister appoints by order, and that different days may be appointed for different provisions. The Act was gazetted on following passage on . No commencement order has been located.

What it requires

Data subject rights

Data Protection Act 2023, automated individual decision-making including profiling

Data Protection Act 2023, s. 19 (automated individual decision-making including profiling)Text of Act No. 18 of 2023 as published by the Ministry of Legal Affairs of Guyana (the Data Protection Bill 2023 text

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 19(1) gives the data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning the data subject or similarly significantly affects the data subject. Section 19(2) disapplies the right where the processing is necessary for a contract, authorized by a law that lays down suitable safeguards, or based on the data subject's consent.

Section 19(3) requires the controller to implement suitable safeguards in the contract and consent cases. Section 19(4) withdraws those exceptions for sensitive personal data unless it is in the public interest and suitable safeguards are in place. Section 1 provides that the Act comes into operation on the day the Minister appoints by order, and that different days may be appointed for different provisions. The Act was gazetted on following passage on . No commencement order has been located.

What it requires

Data Protection Act 2023, rights of data subjects and information to be provided

Data Protection Act 2023, ss. 11-18 and 20-22 (rights of data subjects)Text of Act No. 18 of 2023 as published by the Ministry of Legal Affairs of Guyana (the Data Protection Bill 2023 text

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 11 gives a data subject the right to be told whether a data controller processes the data subject's personal data, to be given a description of the purposes, categories, recipients, retention period and source, and to be given a copy. Sections 12 and 13 give rights to rectification and erasure. Section 13(2) lists the grounds on which the controller shall erase personal data without undue delay, including withdrawal of consent.

Section 14 gives a right to restriction of processing and section 15 requires the controller to tell each recipient of a rectification, erasure or restriction. Section 16 gives a right to receive personal data in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format and to have it transmitted to another controller. Section 17 gives a right to object, including to processing for direct marketing.

Section 18 lets a data subject require a controller in writing to cease or not begin processing that is causing or likely to cause substantial and unwarranted damage or distress. Sections 20 and 21 require the controller to give the data subject the information they list, at collection or, where the data came from another source, within a reasonable period and at the latest within one month.

Section 22 requires a response without undue delay and in any event within one month of receipt of the request, extendable by two months for complex or numerous requests, free of charge. Section 1 provides that the Act comes into operation on the day the Minister appoints by order, and that different days may be appointed for different provisions. The Act was gazetted on following passage on . No commencement order has been located.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Data Protection Act 2023, the Commissioner, enforcement and offences

Data Protection Act 2023, ss. 4(10), 72-73, 78-85 and 97-99 (the Commissioner, enforcement, compensation and penalties)Text of Act No. 18 of 2023 as published by the Ministry of Legal Affairs of Guyana (the Data Protection Bill 2023 text

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 72 provides that the President appoints a Data Protection Commissioner. Section 73 makes monitoring and enforcing the application of the Act the Commissioner's first function. Section 78 lets the Commissioner serve an enforcement notice on a data controller or data processor that has contravened the Act.

Section 85 makes failing to comply with an enforcement, information or special information notice an offence liable on summary conviction to a fine of one million dollars or imprisonment for three months.

Section 4(10) makes failing to comply with the section 4(1) principles an offence, liable on summary conviction to a fine of five million to fifty million dollars or imprisonment for up to two years, and on indictment to a fine of twenty million to one hundred million dollars or imprisonment for up to five years. Section 97 entitles a person who suffers damage or distress from a contravention to compensation from the controller or processor.

Section 99 lets the Commissioner, after a hearing, order an administrative penalty of up to ten million dollars for contravening sections 53(1), 59(1) and 62 to 69. Section 1 provides that the Act comes into operation on the day the Minister appoints by order, and that different days may be appointed for different provisions. The Act was gazetted on following passage on . No commencement order has been located.

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (222 words)

Guyana has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately. The Cybercrime Act, 2018 (Act No. 16 of 2018) criminalises illegal access to a computer system among a wider set of offences (illegal interception, illegal data interference, illegal system interference, and misuse of devices); how Guyanese courts would read authorisation for a public, unauthenticated page is not settled, and no reported Guyanese case on the point has been located.

No Guyanese court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper. Guyana has no domestic copyright statute; the applicable copyright law is the United Kingdom's Copyright Act 1956, extended with modifications by the Copyright (British Guiana) Order 1966, which predates the concept of a text-and-data-mining exception, so no such exception or machine-readable opt-out exists, and the Act confers no sui generis database right.

Guyana enacted a comprehensive personal-data statute, the Data Protection Act 2023 (Act No. 18 of 2023), but as of the date below no commencement order has brought it into force, so scraped personal data in Guyana is not currently subject to a comprehensive privacy-law overlay; see the privacy topic's Guyana document for that instrument.

No Guyanese statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Cybercrime Act 2018, unauthorised access to a computer system

Guyana, Cybercrime Act, 2018, Act No. 16 of 2018Text of Act No. 16 of 2018, Parliament of Guyana, Official Gazette Legal Supplement

In force since .

What this law does

The Cybercrime Act 2018 (Act No. 16 of 2018) was gazetted , passed by the National Assembly . Illegal access to a computer system, illegal interception, illegal data interference, illegal acquisition of data, illegal system interference, and illegal devices are all offences under the Act.

The Act also creates an offence for child pornography distributed through a computer system, and separately an offence for publishing or transmitting an intimate image of a person without that person's consent. The specific section number, the exact statutory wording, and a confirmed penalty figure for the illegal-access offence itself are not stated here.

A secondary account describes the offences generally as carrying penalties ranging from months to years of imprisonment and substantial fines, without stating the illegal-access offence's own figure. The date recorded as the Act's effective date is its Gazette publication date; no separate commencement clause was located in the sources read, though public reporting of charges and convictions under the Act since 2020 confirms it is in force.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (450 words)

Guyana has no standalone security-topic statute: no market-entry security requirement for a software product or connected device, no free-standing duty to report a vulnerability or a security incident to an authority, and no general reasonable-security baseline statute binding a private business with no sector gate is confirmed in the primary text consulted.

The Cybercrime Act, 2018 (Act No. 16 of 2018), already filed under the scraping topic for its unauthorised-access and related intruder offences, is also reported to create a distinct offence for conduct affecting critical infrastructure, but the only located copy of the Act's gazetted text is an image-only scan whose running header and page number are the only parts that render as machine-readable text, and no secondary source read describes whether the Act attaches any operator-facing duty, a designation power over critical infrastructure paired with a security or audit obligation on the designated operator, or an incident-reporting or data-preservation-cooperation duty on a service provider, beyond that offence category; that gap is unconfirmed rather than ruled out.

The Data Protection Act 2023 (Act No. 18 of 2023), already filed under the privacy topic, has been enacted and gazetted but no commencement order has brought it into force; the same image-only scanning affects the only located copy of its own text, and in any event a security-of-processing provision inside a comprehensive data-protection act is that regime's own clause and stays with the privacy topic's document rather than being restated here.

The Bank of Guyana's Payment Service Providers Guideline No. 2 (March 2025), issued under Part III of the National Payments System Act 2018, lists security risk management, a technology risk assessment and incident management procedures with an escalation matrix among what an applicant for a payment service provider or system operator license must submit; it is a license-application content requirement rather than a standing duty on a licensed provider, so it is not filed as a row.

A separate, general risk-management guideline the Bank issued in 2009 under the Financial Institutions Act 1995 treats a technology failure only as one operational-risk factor among several and imposes no information-security-specific duty. No cybersecurity requirement for critical energy infrastructure is confirmed on the Guyana Energy Agency's own site, checked at both the compliant and browser tier.

Paragraph 116 of Bank of Guyana Supervision Guideline No. 15 provides that, where a licensed financial institution has failed to comply, the Bank may issue specific directives to it and impose any or all of the corrective actions under the Financial Institutions Act.

Paragraph 107 of Bank of Guyana Supervision Guideline No. 15 requires a licensed financial institution to notify the Bank before conducting e-banking or any other internet services, including introducing new technology relating to them.

Sector security regimes

Bank of Guyana Supervision Guideline No. 15, Technology Risk Management

Bank of Guyana Supervision Guideline No. 15, Technology Risk Management, paras. 6 to 8, 17, 24, 25, 76, 102, 107 to 110 and 116Text of Supervision Guideline No. 15

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2025. Publisher's page: https://bankofguyana.org.gy/bog3/images/Publications/supervisionguidelines/Supervision%20Guideline%20No.15%20-%20Technology%20Risk%20Managem…

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Paragraph 6 of the Guideline applies it, as appropriate, to all licensed financial institutions. Paragraph 9 of the Guideline describes the supervisory approach as not a prescriptive and comprehensive approach for all technology risks. Paragraph 25 of the Guideline requires an institution's technology risk management framework to be able to identify the information system assets that need protection and the direct and indirect IT threats.

Paragraph 76 of the Guideline requires a financial institution to implement an appropriate access controls policy for the identification, authentication and authorization of internal and external users. Paragraph 102 of the Guideline requires a financial institution to ensure that the scope, frequency and intensity of technology audits are commensurate with the complexity, sophistication and criticality of its technology systems and applications.

Paragraph 107 of the Guideline requires a licensed financial institution to notify the Bank before conducting e-banking or any other internet services, including introducing new technology relating to them. Paragraph 116 of the Guideline provides that, where an institution has failed to comply, the Bank may issue specific directives to it and impose any or all of the corrective actions under the Financial Institutions Act.

Footnote 10 of the Guideline states that the incident management reporting template in Appendix 3 can also be used to report incidents to the Bank. No commencement notice for the provisions this entry describes has been located.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (154 words)

Guyana has no domestic copyright statute of its own; the applicable copyright law is the United Kingdom's Copyright Act 1956, extended to (British) Guiana with modifications by the Copyright (British Guiana) Order 1966 (S.I. 1966 No. 79), made and entered into force , and it remains the law read as Guyana's own by later legal authority.

Guyana has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the 1956 Act's general fair-dealing exception for reporting current events in a newspaper, magazine, or similar periodical is the only provision reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content, and no reported Guyanese decision applies it to a systematic news aggregator.

The 1956 Act predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists, and no statute or case law addresses whether a hyperlink is a communication to the public or whether framing changes the answer.

Where nothing was found2 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Guyana has no AI-transparency or output-labelling statute, no high-risk AI system obligations, and no AI-training-data or AI-prohibited-practices law as of the date below. Guyana's Data Protection Act 2023 (Act No. 18 of 2023) includes provisions the sources describe as reaching automated decision-making, but that duty attaches to personal data rather than to an AI system as such, so it is researched under the privacy topic rather than here; see the privacy topic's Guyana document.

No other Guyanese statute, bill, or reported case addressing AI-transparency, output-labelling, high-risk system duties, training-data provenance, prohibited AI practices, governance, or sector-specific AI rules is known.

As of .

Age gating law

Guyana has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code as of the date below. The Cybercrime Act 2018 (Act No. 16 of 2018) criminalises producing, distributing, or possessing child pornography through a computer system, but this is a general criminal prohibition addressed to the offender rather than an age-verification or age-gating duty addressed to a service provider.

The Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 2023 (Act No. 12 of 2023), the Protection of Children Act 2009 (Act No. 17 of 2009) and the Sexual Offences Act 2010 (Act No. 7 of 2010) are not described here.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Guyana AI law
  • No current case law for Guyana privacy law
  • No current case law for Guyana scraping law
  • No current case law for Guyana cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Guyana communications law
  • No current case law for Guyana content moderation law
  • No current case law for Guyana product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Guyana digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Guyana age gating law
  • No current case law for Guyana reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here1 instrument

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Guyana comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

72 hours
Breach notificationprivacy law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Guyana

72 hours

Data Protection Act 2023, personal data breach notification

Data Protection Act 2023, ss. 65-66 (notification and communication of a personal data breach)privacy law, enacted, not yet in force

The sentences the clocks are read from

Once the Data Protection Act 2023 is commenced, notify the Commissioner of a personal data breach without undue delay and, where feasible, within seventy-two hours of becoming aware of it, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of any person, and give reasons for any delay beyond seventy-two hours.

As a data processor, notify the data controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a personal data breach.

Communicate a breach likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of persons to the data subject, in clear and plain language, without undue delay and where feasible within seventy-two hours of becoming aware of it, unless encryption or later measures remove the risk or direct communication would take disproportionate effort, in which case communicate publicly.

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.