Copyright Act 1956 (UK), as extended to Guyana, reporting-current-events exception
Copyright Act 1956 (UK) (4 & 5 Eliz. 2 c. 74) s. 6, as extended with modifications to British Guiana by the Copyright (British Guiana) Order 1966 (S.I. 1966 No. 79)
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force since 5 February 1966.
A snippet reproduction rule.
As of 5 September 2026.
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Section 6 of the Copyright Act 1956 (UK) permits, without the copyright owner's consent, fair dealing with a literary, dramatic, or musical work for the purpose of reporting current events in a newspaper, magazine, or similar periodical, provided the use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgment. The same section separately permits fair dealing for research, private study, criticism, or review.
Section 9 extends the same fair-dealing structure to artistic works for research, private study, criticism, or review. The section carries no headline-length or short-extract cap distinct from the fair-dealing test, and no reported Guyanese decision applies it to a systematic news aggregator rather than an individual quoting or reporting on a published work.
Guyana has no dedicated press-publisher neighbouring right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive Article 15 creates; the 1966 Order extending the 1956 Act to British Guiana modifies other named sections and schedules of the Act for local application but the located text does not show section 6 or section 9 among the sections it modifies.
When LexLint raises it
aggregates_content
Read the law
Copyright Act 1956 (UK), as enacted, legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
extended to British Guiana by the Copyright (British Guiana) Order 1966, WIPO Lex
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.