Law / Eritrea

Eritrea

All 4 named instruments researched to a stage, across three of the ten areas of law we track: 4 not yet in force. As of .

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 2
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

Privacy law2 instruments, 2 not yet in force

Research summary (213 words)

Eritrea has no comprehensive data-protection statute and no dedicated data-protection supervisory authority.

Personal-data protection rests instead on two narrower instruments: the Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015) gives a person a civil claim against the unauthorized exhibition, reproduction, or sale of their photograph or image, and makes the contents of a confidential letter or other communication addressed to another person inviolable without that addressee's consent; and the Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015) makes it a criminal offence to intercept, open, or otherwise interfere with a telephone call, letter, electronic message, or other private communication addressed to another person, without lawful authority.

Both codes were issued by the Ministry of Justice on ; neither code's own text states a Gazette-publication or commencement date, and a legal-research guide (GlobaLex, New York University School of Law) describes the Government of Eritrea as having announced the enactment of the 2015 codes while the Transitional Civil Code and Transitional Penal Code of 1991, themselves derived from the 1960s Ethiopian codes, remain described as the primary source of law.

Neither code establishes a lawful-basis or purpose-limitation framework, a controller or processor duty, a data-subject access or deletion right, a cross-border transfer restriction, or a breach-notification duty, and Eritrea has no biometric-specific statute.

Data subject rights

Civil Code of the State of Eritrea, Personality Rights (Image and Correspondence)

Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), arts. 26-30 (Image and Privacy; Inviolability of Correspondence)Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), official English text hosted by WIPO Lex

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 26 provides that the photograph or image of a person may not be exhibited in a public place, reproduced, or offered for sale without that person's consent. Article 27 excuses the consent requirement where the reproduction is justified by the person's notoriety, the public office they held, the requirements of justice or the police, a scientific, cultural, or didactic interest, or where the image concerns facts, events, or ceremonies of public interest or that took place in public.

Article 28 lets the person demand that an unauthorized exhibition or offer for sale be stopped, and lets the Court award damages, capped at the enrichment the user derived, with moral-prejudice damages available if the use does not stop once demanded.

Article 30 makes the contents of a confidential letter, electronic message, or other private communication inviolable: the addressee may not divulge its contents without the author's consent, though the addressee may produce it in judicial proceedings on a showing of a legitimate interest. The Civil Code was issued by the Ministry of Justice on , and the Library of Congress describes the Eritrean government's position on whether the 2015 codes have taken effect as unclear.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Penal Code of the State of Eritrea, Violation of Privacy

Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), art. 298 (Violation of Privacy)Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015)

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 298(1) makes it an offence to intentionally, and without lawful authority, intercept, open, or otherwise interfere with a telephone call, letter, electronic message, or other private communication addressed to another person, or, having learned facts by mistakenly opening a communication not addressed to oneself, to divulge those facts or profit from them.

Violation of privacy is a Class 2 petty offence, punishable with imprisonment of 1 to 6 months or a fine of 5,001 to 20,000 Nakfas, set in intervals of 1,000 Nakfas. Article 298(2) makes prosecution conditional on the victim preferring charges. Article 3 of the Penal Code ties the Code's own entry into force to its publication in the Gazette of Eritrean Laws; the Code's own text does not state that Gazette date and carries no proclamation number of its own.

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 not yet in force

Research summary (216 words)

Eritrea has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

The Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015) criminalizes unauthorized use of a computer, including obtaining an unauthorized computer service, intercepting a function of a computer system, or altering, destroying, or interfering with data, but the base offence's own heading and its first paragraph tie the conduct to an unauthorized computer service, so a scraper that reads a public, unauthenticated page without defeating any access control falls outside a plain reading of the provision; no reported Eritrean case has tested the point.

Eritrea has no reported court decision construing the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper. The Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015) gives an author an incorporeal ownership right in a work of the mind and no text-and-data-mining exception, but Eritrea has not enacted a copyright statute conferring a sui generis database right, and its related-rights provisions do not reach a compiled database as such.

Eritrea has no comprehensive data-protection statute; the personal-data protections that exist are described under the privacy topic. No statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, and neither the Penal Code nor the Civil Code assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or states an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Penal Code of the State of Eritrea, Unauthorized Use of a Computer

Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), arts. 374-375 (Unauthorized Use of a Computer)Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015)

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 374(1) makes it an offence for a person to intentionally obtain, directly or indirectly, any unauthorized computer service; intercept, by an electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical, or other device, any function of a computer system; alter or destroy data in a computer, render data meaningless, useless, or ineffective, or obstruct, interrupt, or interfere with the lawful use of data; or permit another person access to a computer password enabling such an offence, or otherwise deny or interfere with an entitled person's access to data.

Unauthorized use of a computer is a Class 2 petty offence, punishable with imprisonment of 1 to 6 months or a fine of 5,001 to 20,000 Nakfas, set in intervals of 1,000 Nakfas. Article 375 makes the same conduct against a public or financial institution a Class 8 serious offence, aggravated unauthorized use, punishable with imprisonment of 3 to 5 years, with no fine stated.

Because the offence's own heading and article 374(1)(a) tie the conduct to an unauthorized computer service, a scraper reading a public, unauthenticated page without defeating any access control falls outside a plain reading of the provision; the Council of Europe's Octopus Cybercrime Community country profile for Eritrea describes this Penal Code as the jurisdiction's substantive law on illegal access, illegal interception, and data interference, and does not identify any separate cybercrime statute.

Article 3 of the Penal Code brings the Code into force on the date of its publication in the Gazette of Eritrean Laws, and no Gazette publication day for it has been located.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 not yet in force

Research summary (211 words)

Eritrea has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognized hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located statute or case law on hyperlinking or framing.

The Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), Title IV, Chapter 1 (Copyright), lets a newspaper or review reproduce articles of topical interest in the press unless reproduction was expressly reserved, with the source always stated, and lets daily news articles that are mere press information be freely reproduced; it separately lets a person quote from a lawfully communicated work, including quotations from newspaper, weekly, or periodical articles in the form of press reviews, where the quotation conforms to social custom and its extent is justified by its purpose, with no fixed length cap. The Code predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists.

The 2015 Civil Code was issued by the Ministry of Justice on and, per a corrected translation held by WIPO Lex, renumbered the copyright articles that a repealed 1993 extract of the Provisional Civil Code had carried at articles 1647-1674; whether the 2015 Code has itself entered into force, as against the still-cited Transitional Civil Code of 1991, has not been confirmed.

Snippet reproduction

Civil Code of the State of Eritrea, Copyright, Press and Quotation Exceptions

Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), Title IV, Chapter 1, arts. 1157-1174 (Copyright)Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), official English text hosted by WIPO Lex

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 1157 gives the author of a work of the mind an incorporeal property right by the mere fact of its creation, and article 1158 lists literary, musical, figurative, and other works, including computer programs, as works of the mind.

Article 1168 lets articles of topical interest published in newspapers and reviews be reproduced in the press, whether printed or broadcast, unless the reproduction was expressly reserved, on condition the source is always clearly stated, and lets daily news articles on current events that are mere press information be freely reproduced; it also allows including a work in a short recording, showing, or announcement of it in a photographic, film, radio, or television report of current affairs.

Article 1169 lets the press freely reproduce speeches delivered in political assemblies, public meetings, or official ceremonies for fifteen days after they were made. Article 1171 provides that the author cannot forbid analyses and press reviews of the work.

Article 1172 provides that the author cannot forbid quotations from a lawfully communicated work where the quotation conforms to what may reasonably be accepted by social custom and the number and length of the passages quoted are justified by the purpose to be achieved, and states expressly that quotations include quotations from articles appearing in daily or weekly newspapers, weeklies, or other periodicals in the form of press reviews, with no fixed length or headline cap and not confined to short extracts.

Article 1161 excludes official legislative, administrative, or judicial texts from copyright protection and lets them be freely reproduced. The 2015 Civil Code renumbered the copyright articles that a repealed 1993 extract of the Provisional Civil Code had carried at articles 1647-1674. No Gazette-publication or commencement date for the Civil Code has been located.

What it requires

Where nothing was found3 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Eritrea has no AI-transparency, AI-risk-obligation, AI-training-data, AI-prohibited-practices, AI-governance, or AI-sector-specific statute.

Eritrea is a member state of the African Union and is within the scope of the African Union Continental Artificial Intelligence Strategy, a non-binding framework the AU Executive Council approved in July 2024 that creates no enforceable domestic obligation; Eritrea has not enacted implementing legislation, appointed an AI authority, or published a national AI strategy referencing it, and the Strategy's own document page carries no Eritrea-specific text.

The Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015) contains no artificial-intelligence, automated-decision, or algorithm provision; its trafficking offence (article 315) addresses procuring or trafficking a person into producing or performing in pornography, not a computer-generated or AI-generated depiction reaching any person, so it is not a ban on an AI practice.

As of .

Cybersecurity law

No product-security, vulnerability-and-incident-reporting, sector cyber-resilience, or baseline reasonable-security statute reaching a software product, connected device, or ordinary data-holding business was located for Eritrea.

The Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), read in full against these terms, creates no market-placement security requirement for a product or device, no duty to report an exploited vulnerability or a security incident to an authority or to users, and no general information-security-programme obligation; its only computer-facing offense is unauthorized use of a computer at articles 374 and 375, which binds the person who accesses a system without authorization rather than the operator or manufacturer of one, and is this jurisdiction's scraping-topic computer-misuse finding rather than a security-topic one.

The Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), also read in full, uses the word security only in its law-of-obligations sense, a hypothec, a suretyship, an arbitral tribunal's interim-measure security, and names a computer program only as a category of copyrightable work, with no product- or system-security duty attached to either.

Electricity Proclamation No. 141/2004, the one located sector statute governing a class of critical infrastructure, sets no cybersecurity, sabotage-resistance, or incident-reporting duty on the grid operator or on any system connected to it.

WIPO Lex's member profile for Eritrea lists two national laws in total, the 2015 Civil Code and a 1993 provisional commercial and civil code extract, plus the Constitution as a framework instrument, and carries no telecommunications, electronic-transactions, or information-technology statute; the FAOLEX collection that separately holds Eritrea's Penal Code and its Investment, Environmental, Land, and Electricity proclamations carries no additional instrument of that kind either.

The Council of Europe's Octopus Cybercrime Community country profile for Eritrea describes the Penal Code as Eritrea's substantive law on illegal access, illegal interception, and data interference and names no separate cybersecurity, product-security, or critical-infrastructure statute.

Eritrea has no comprehensive data-protection statute and no breach-notification duty of any kind, so there is no privacy-topic row to name as this jurisdiction's counterpart to a security-topic safeguards duty, and no enforcement body, penalty, or published enforcement record exists for a subject-matter that has no governing statute.

As of .

Age gating law

Eritrea has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code, and no numbered bill, Gazette citation, or public draft text proposing such a regime is known.

The Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), read in full, defines a child offender as a person under twelve years of age and a juvenile offender as a person twelve or more and under eighteen at the time of an alleged offence, and separately criminalizes sexual offences, trafficking, and neglect involving a minor, but its text contains no reference to the internet, a website, social media, or an application store, and no provision addresses an online service, a platform, a distributor, or a device maker.

The Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), also read in full, sets the general age of majority and the organs that protect a minor's civil capacity, such as a guardian and a family council, and its copyright provisions address reproducing a printed work in digital form, including on the internet, without attaching an age-verification, access-control, or minor-protection duty to that reproduction.

Eritrea has enacted no telecommunications, electronic-transactions, information-technology, broadcasting, or press-specific statute of any kind: the WIPO Lex member profile for Eritrea lists two national laws in total, the 2015 Civil Code and a 1993 provisional commercial and civil code extract, plus the 1997 Constitution as the jurisdiction's sole framework instrument, and no additional national law naming a communications medium, a digital service, or a minor's access to one.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Eritrea AI law
  • No current case law for Eritrea privacy law
  • No current case law for Eritrea scraping law
  • No current case law for Eritrea cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Eritrea communications law
  • No current case law for Eritrea content moderation law
  • No current case law for Eritrea product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Eritrea digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Eritrea age gating law
  • No current case law for Eritrea reuse law
Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.