Law / United States /
Texas
Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, business duty to protect sensitive personal information
Tex. Bus. & Com. Code sec. 521.052
In force since .
A security baseline statutes rule binding private bodies.
- Obligation class
- Security
What it requires
- This binds any business that collects or maintains sensitive personal information (an individual's name combined with a Social Security number, driver's license or government-issued identification number, or a financial account, credit, or debit card number together with any required access code; or information that identifies an individual and relates to the individual's physical or mental health, health care, or payment for health care) in the regular course of business; a financial institution as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 6809 is exempt.
- Implement and maintain reasonable procedures, including taking any appropriate corrective action, to protect that sensitive personal information from unlawful use or disclosure. The statute states no further content for what 'reasonable' requires beyond this general standard.NIST CSF 2.0PR.DS-01
- Destroy or arrange for the destruction of customer records containing sensitive personal information no longer to be retained, by shredding, erasing, or otherwise modifying the information to make it unreadable or indecipherable through any means.NIST CSF 2.0ID.AM-08
- There is no private right of action for a violation of this duty; only the attorney general may enforce it, seeking a civil penalty of $2,000 to $50,000 per violation and injunctive relief under Section 521.151.
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.
In the frameworks
- NIST Privacy Framework
- NIST CSF 2.0
- CIS Controls
- FINOS AIGF
- AIR-PREV-007Legal and Contractual Frameworks for AI Systems
- AIR-PREV-008Quality of Service (QoS) and DDoS Prevention for AI Systems
- AIR-PREV-012Role-Based Access Control for AI Data
- AIR-PREV-014Encryption of AI Data at Rest
- AIR-PREV-017AI Firewall Implementation and Management
- AIR-PREV-020MCP Server Security Governance
1 more
- AIR-DET-001AI Data Leakage Prevention and Detection
- ENISA NIS2 guidance
Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework, and in the NIST CSF 2.0, line by line beside each duty above. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law
CIS Critical Security Controls® (CIS Controls®) v8.1 © Center for Internet Security, Inc. Safeguard numbers are used under a CIS Controls Supporter License; the one-line descriptions beside them are our own, not CIS text.
If you get it wrong
Criminal exposureNo
Private right of actionNo
Penalty structure
Civil penalty under Section 521.151(a) for a violation of this chapter generally, recoverable only by the attorney general; the statute names no aggregate cap for this per-violation penalty. Section 521.151(a-1)'s separate penalty of up to $100 per individual, capped at $250,000 per breach, punishes a failure to comply with the breach-notification duty at Section 521.053(b), which is this jurisdiction's privacy row, not this one.
- Rule
- Per violation only
- As of
- Minimum
- 2,000
- Currency
- USD
- Per violation unit
- Violation
- Per violation amount
- 50,000
Who enforces it
Enforcement body
The attorney general may bring an action to recover the civil penalty and to enjoin a violation of this chapter under Section 521.151. Section 521.152's deceptive-trade-practice private action reaches only a violation of Section 521.051, a different duty, not this section.
What this law does
A business must implement and maintain reasonable procedures, including taking any appropriate corrective action, to protect from unlawful use or disclosure any sensitive personal information it collects or maintains in the regular course of business. A business must also destroy or arrange for the destruction of customer records containing sensitive personal information no longer to be retained, by shredding, erasing, or otherwise rendering it unreadable or indecipherable.
A financial institution as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 6809 is exempt from the destruction duty, and the section states no further content for what 'reasonable' requires beyond the general standard.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app crawls the web, trains models, deploys a chatbot, sends automated outreach, makes high-risk automated decisions, processes voice recordings, processes biometric data, processes personal data, serves under-18s, operates a social platform, ships a mobile app, distributes a software product, generates content with AI, publishes adult content, operates an app store, reuses other publishers' content, records calls, records text chat or tracks devices.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .