Law / United States / Rhode Island

Identity Theft Protection Act of 2015, risk-based information security program

R.I. Gen. Laws secs. 11-49.3-2, 11-49.3-5

In force.

A security baseline statutes rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Security

What it requires

  • This binds a municipal agency, a state agency, or a person, defined broadly to include an individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, association, corporation, joint venture, business, legal entity, trust, estate, cooperative, or other commercial entity, that stores, collects, processes, maintains, acquires, uses, owns, or licenses personal information about a Rhode Island resident.
  • Implement and maintain a risk-based information security program with reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to your size and scope, the nature of the information, and the purpose for which it was collected, to protect the information from unauthorized access, use, modification, destruction, or disclosure and to preserve its confidentiality, integrity, and availability.NIST CSF 2.0GV.PO-01NIST CSF 2.0PR.DS-01
  • Do not retain personal information longer than reasonably required to provide the requested services, meet the purpose for which it was collected, or comply with a written retention policy or a legal requirement; destroy it securely, for example by shredding, pulverization, incineration, or erasure, regardless of the medium it is stored in.NIST CSF 2.0ID.AM-08
  • If you disclose personal information about a Rhode Island resident to a nonaffiliated third party, require by written contract that the third party implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices of the same kind, appropriate to its own size and scope, the nature of the information, and the purpose for which it was collected.NIST CSF 2.0GV.SC-05
  • A reckless violation of this duty is a civil violation of up to $100 per record; a knowing and willful violation is up to $200 per record. Only the Attorney General may bring an action.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST Privacy Framework
  • ID.DE-P3Contracts with data processing ecosystem parties are used to implement appropriate measures designed to meet the objectives of an organization’s privacy program.
  • CT.DM-P5Data are destroyed according to policy.
  • PR.DS-P5Protections against data leaks are implemented.
NIST CSF 2.0
  • GV.PO-01Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context, cybersecurity strategy, and priorities and is communicated and enforced
  • GV.SC-05Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritized, and integrated into contracts and other types of agreements with suppliers and other relevant third parties
  • ID.AM-08Systems, hardware, software, services, and data are managed throughout their life cycles
  • PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
CIS Controls
  • 3.10Encryption of sensitive data as it crosses networks.
  • 3.11Encryption of sensitive data where it is stored on servers and applications.
  • 6.8Access rights defined by job role, and kept up to date.
  • 7.1A documented, reviewed approach to finding and handling weaknesses.
FINOS AIGF
1 more
ENISA NIS2 guidance
  • 2.1Risk management framework
  • 3.1Incident handling policy
  • 4.1Business continuity and disaster recovery plan
  • 6.2Secure development life cycle
  • 6.5Security testing
  • 6.10Vulnerability handling and disclosure
2 more
  • 9.1Cryptography
  • 11.2Management of access rights

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework, and in the NIST CSF 2.0, line by line beside each duty above. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

CIS Critical Security Controls® (CIS Controls®) v8.1 © Center for Internet Security, Inc. Safeguard numbers are used under a CIS Controls Supporter License; the one-line descriptions beside them are our own, not CIS text.

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureNo

Penalty structure

R.I. Gen. Laws sec. 11-49.3-5 sets two tiers per record (mapped here to a person's compromised record): $100 for a reckless violation of the chapter (subsection (a)) and $200 for a knowing and willful violation (subsection (b)), the figure recorded here. The chapter states no aggregate cap.

Rule
Per violation only
As of
Currency
USD
Per violation unit
Person
Per violation amount
200

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

The Attorney General may bring an action in the name of the state against a business or person believed to have violated this chapter, where proceedings would be in the public interest (R.I. Gen. Laws sec. 11-49.3-5(c)).

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

A municipal agency, a state agency, or a person who or that stores, collects, processes, maintains, acquires, uses, owns, or licenses personal information about a Rhode Island resident must implement and maintain a risk-based information security program with reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the size and scope of the organization, the nature of the information, and the purpose for which it was collected, to protect the personal information from unauthorized access, use, modification, destruction, or disclosure and to preserve its confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Personal information may not be retained longer than reasonably required to provide the requested services, meet the purpose for which it was collected, or comply with a written retention policy or legal requirement. It must be destroyed securely, including by shredding, pulverization, incineration, or erasure, regardless of the medium.

A municipal agency, state agency, or person that discloses personal information about a Rhode Island resident to a nonaffiliated third party must require by written contract that the third party implement and maintain the same kind of reasonable security procedures and practices. Sec. 11-49.3-5 makes each reckless violation of the chapter a civil violation of up to $100 per record.

Each knowing and willful violation is a civil violation of up to $200 per record, brought solely by the Attorney General; no private right of action was found in the text read. Both sections originate in P.L. 2015, ch. 138 and P.L. 2015, ch. 148. Public Law 2015, chapter 138, enacted , provides that it takes effect one year following the date of passage. No source stating the resulting day has been located.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app crawls the web, trains models, deploys a chatbot, sends automated outreach, makes high-risk automated decisions, processes voice recordings, processes biometric data, processes personal data, serves under-18s, operates a social platform, ships a mobile app, distributes a software product, generates content with AI, publishes adult content, operates an app store, reuses other publishers' content, records calls, records text chat or tracks devices.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .