Law / Malta

Copyright Act Article 25, Sui Generis Right in Respect of Databases

Copyright Act (Cap. 415), Art. 25

In force since .

A database right rule binding public and private bodies.

Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Extracting or re-utilizing the whole or a substantial part of a database's contents without the maker's consent risks infringing the sui generis database right, independent of any copyright in the database's contents (Art. 25).

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text. Also read by: Case C-762/19 CV-Online Latvia SIA v Melons SIA, judgment of (Fifth Chamber) (recorded ).

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 4.1Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Who enforces it

Settledness

As of
Case link
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62019CJ0762
Case citation
Case C-762/19 CV-Online Latvia SIA v Melons SIA, judgment of (Fifth Chamber)
Open questions
  • Does a crawler's repeated retrieval of small parts of a database extract or re-utilize 'a substantial part' evaluated qualitatively or quantitatively under Article 25, when each request takes only an insubstantial part?
  • Does the repeated and systematic extraction of insubstantial parts 'conflict with a normal exploitation' of a database under the proviso to Article 26(1), where the maker earns revenue only from user visits to the site?

What record it asks for

Logging duty

Article 25 gives the maker of a database that represents a substantial investment the right to authorise or prohibit extraction or re-utilization of its contents. It requires no log or record to be kept.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 25 of the Copyright Act grants the maker of a database who has made a qualitatively or quantitatively substantial investment in obtaining, verifying, or presenting its contents the right to authorise or prohibit extraction or re-utilization of the whole or a substantial part of its contents, irrespective of whether the database or its contents are eligible for copyright protection.

Article 27 sets the term of this sui generis right at fifteen years from the first of January of the year following the database's completion or, if it was made available to the public before that period expires, from the first of January of the year following its first making available.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app crawls the web.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .