Law / Belgium

Act of 30 July 2018 Title 5, Action en Cessation, and GDPR Article 22

Loi du 30 juillet 2018, Arts. 11-17, 209-211, 220; Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Art. 22

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force since 25 May 2018, effective 5 September 2018.

A data subject rights rule binding public and private bodies.

As of 24 August 2026.

What it requires

  • Give a person in Belgium a path to obtain human intervention, express their view, and contest a decision made solely by automated processing that produces a legal or similarly significant effect on them.
  • Expect a Belgian court, on a data subject's or the GBA/APD's action en cessation, to be able to order the cessation of unlawful processing under Act Title 5.

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Articles 12-23 govern access, rectification, erasure, restriction, portability, objection, and the Article 22 right against solely automated decision-making; Belgium adds no sector-specific automated-decision rule beyond that baseline.

What the Act adds, read verbatim, is a domestic enforcement route: Title 5's action en cessation lets the president of the court of first instance, sitting as in summary proceedings, order the cessation of processing that violates the data-protection rules, with standing confined to the data subject and the supervisory authority (Art. 211).

Article 220 implements GDPR Article 80, letting a data subject mandate a qualifying body active in data protection for at least three years to lodge a complaint on their behalf.

When LexLint raises it

  • high_risk_decisions
  • deploys_chatbot
  • crawls_web

Read the law

Moniteur belge, 5 September 2018, Arts. 11-17, 209-211, 220 (verbatim)

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app