Sends faxes, in Slovenia

226. člen Zakona o elektronskih komunikacijah (ZEKom-2) · Read the law's page

• Use automated calling and communication systems that make calls to a subscriber's telephone number without human intervention (such as automatic dialers, SMS and MMS), telefaxes or electronic mail for direct marketing only with the subscriber's or user's prior consent (article 226, paragraph 1).
• You need no prior consent to use a buyer's e-mail address, obtained from the buyer of your products or services, for direct marketing of your own similar products or services, but you must clearly and expressly offer a free and simple way to refuse when you obtain the address and with every message, where the buyer did not refuse at the start (article 226, paragraph 2).
• The consent rules in article 226, paragraphs 1 and 3 apply to subscribers who are natural persons (article 226, paragraph 4).
• Do not send direct-marketing e-mail, contrary to the law on electronic commerce, that hides or disguises the identity of the sender on whose behalf it is sent or has no valid address to which the recipient can send a request to stop such messages, and do not send direct-marketing e-mail that invites recipients to visit websites contrary to that law (article 226, paragraph 5).
• You can use the e-mail address of natural persons for direct marketing where a legal person publishes that address publicly as its contact e-mail address (article 226, paragraph 6).

226. člen, 217. člen Zakona o elektronskih komunikacijah (ZEKom-2) · Read the law's page

• Use automated calling and communication systems that make calls to a subscriber's telephone number without human intervention (such as automatic dialers, SMS and MMS) for direct marketing only with the subscriber's or user's prior consent (article 226, paragraph 1).
• Use other electronic communications means for direct marketing, including voice calls, only with the subscriber's or user's consent, and make refusing consent free of charge for them (article 226, paragraph 3).
• At each marketing or research call, respect the prohibition on using the subscriber's personal data for commercial or research calls that is marked in the latest published electronic directory (article 217, paragraph 5, applied through article 226, paragraph 3).
• The consent rules in article 226, paragraphs 1 and 3 apply to subscribers who are natural persons (article 226, paragraph 4).

ZVOP-2, Arts. 80-84, 105 · Read the law's page

• Process biometric personal data of a person in Slovenia in the private sector only where it is necessary for your activity, the safety of people or property, or the protection of classified data or trade secrets, with the processing operations certified under ZVOP-2 Article 52, and use biometrics to verify a customer's identity only where a law, the contract or the customer's explicit consent provides for it, under ZVOP-2 Article 83.
• Before starting to process biometric personal data in the private sector, send the Information Commissioner a description of the intended processing and the reasons for introducing it, and begin the biometric measures only after receiving its decision allowing them, unless the measures are carried out as ZVOP-2 Article 83(3) provides (data under the customer's exclusive control and certified under Article 52), under ZVOP-2 Article 83(5), (6), (7) and (9).
• Do not deploy automated license-plate recognition or a biometric-recognition system on a public surface in Slovenia, under ZVOP-2 Article 80.

Zakon o odgovornosti za proizvode z napako · Read the law's page

• If you develop or make software, have it developed or made, or present yourself as its manufacturer, you answer as the manufacturer; free and open-source software developed or supplied outside a commercial activity is not a product (draft Arts. 5(1) point 3 and 6(1)).
• Keep supplying the software updates and upgrades needed to keep the product safe while the product is under your control; where you kept control of the product, you cannot rely on the Article 10(1) point 2 excuse (that the defect probably did not exist when you placed the product on the market) for a defect that results from software, an update or upgrade, a missing safety update, a connected service or a substantial modification (draft Arts. 9(2) and 10(2)).
• Judge safety against all the circumstances, including cybersecurity requirements, what the product can go on to learn or acquire after it is placed on the market, a recall, and the effect of other products used with it (draft Art. 8(2)).
• Keep records you could produce: on a claimant's plausible claim the court orders you to disclose the relevant data and documents available to you, and failing to do so presumes the product defective (draft Arts. 18(1) and 19(1) point 1).
• Meet the mandatory safety requirements that protect against the harm suffered: a product that does not meet them is presumed defective (draft Art. 19(1) point 2).
• If you are a manufacturer outside the EU, your importer, your authorized representative or your fulfilment service provider answers for the product in your place; a distributor or online platform answers too if no such person can be identified and it does not name one within one month of the injured person's request (draft Arts. 11 and 12).
• If you substantially modify a product without the manufacturer's consent and then make it available on the market or put it into use, you answer as the manufacturer of the modified product (draft Art. 6(2) and (3)).
• Do not rely on a contract term to limit or exclude your liability to an injured person: a term departing from the Act's rules on liability to the injured person's detriment is null (draft Art. 16).
• Be ready to prove a draft Article 10(1) excuse: that you did not place the product on the market or put it into use, that the defect probably did not exist then, that it results from complying with legal requirements, that the objective state of scientific and technical knowledge did not allow it to be discovered, or, for a component maker or a person who substantially modified the product, the component and modification excuses (draft Art. 10(1)).
• Keep the claim periods in view: three years from the day the injured person learned or should have learned of the defect, the damage and who caused it; ten years from placing the defective product on the market or putting it into use; 25 years for latent personal injury (draft Art. 15).