Catalog / Processes voice recordings / LXD-1209

Processes voice recordings, in Slovenia

Each law's tag says when it binds: since in force proposed proposed

Criminal Code (KZ-1), Article 137, Unjustified Eavesdropping and Sound Recordingsince 2 lines

137. člen Kazenskega zakonika (KZ-1) · Read the law's page

  • Do not, without justification, use special devices to listen to a conversation or statement not meant for you or to record its sound, and do not relay it to a third person, play such a recording to them or otherwise let them become directly acquainted with it (article 137, paragraph 1).
  • Do not record the sound of a confidential statement of another person that is addressed to you without that person's consent in order to misuse it, and do not relay such a statement or play such a recording to a third person (article 137, paragraph 2).
Electronic Communications Act (ZEKom-2), Article 214, Confidentiality of Communications and Recordingsince 6 lines

214. člen Zakona o elektronskih komunikacijah (ZEKom-2) · Read the law's page

  • Do not monitor or intercept communications as a third person who is not a user taking part in the communication, whether by listening, intercepting, recording, storing or passing them on, without the consent of the users concerned, unless this Act allows it or it is strictly needed to carry the message (article 214, paragraph 5).
  • Do not record or store communications without the prior consent of the participants where such processing is not usual and the participants cannot expect it because of the nature of the communication (article 214, paragraph 6).
  • You may record communications and the related traffic data in the course of lawful business practice to provide evidence of a market transaction or other business communication only if the parties are told in advance about the recording, its purpose and how long the recording is kept (article 214, paragraph 7).
  • Delete a recorded message immediately, and at the latest when the time in which the transaction can lawfully be challenged runs out (article 214, paragraph 7).
  • Give the notice of recording by the same type of medium and in the same form as the recorded communication (article 214, paragraph 8).
  • If you are an operator, keep the confidentiality of the content of communications, the related traffic and location data, and facts about interrupted or unestablished connections, also after your activity ends, obtain information about communications only as strictly needed to provide the public communications service, and tell the subscriber or user at contract conclusion or service start when you must obtain content or record or store communications (article 214, paragraphs 1 to 4).
Whistleblower Protection Act (ZZPri), Articles 7 and 9, Recording of Oral and Telephone Reportssince 4 lines

7. člen, 9. člen Zakona o zaščiti prijaviteljev (ZZPri) · Read the law's page

  • Enter each oral report in the register by an accurate record of its content (article 7, paragraph 2).
  • Record an oral report as audio only with the whistleblower's consent, and document a report made by telephone by recording the call only after prior notice and with the whistleblower's consent (article 7, paragraph 2).
  • Give the whistleblower the chance, if they wish, to check, correct and confirm with their signature the record of an oral report (article 7, paragraph 2).
  • Set up an internal reporting channel, with a dedicated e-mail address and telephone number or other contact details, if you are a public- or private-sector entity with 50 or more employees (article 9, paragraphs 1 and 2).
Zakon o odgovornosti za proizvode z napako (draft Act on Liability for Defective Products, EVA 2026-2030-0038), transposing Directive (EU) 2024/2853proposed10 lines

Zakon o odgovornosti za proizvode z napako · Read the law's page

  • If you develop or make software, have it developed or made, or present yourself as its manufacturer, you answer as the manufacturer; free and open-source software developed or supplied outside a commercial activity is not a product (draft Arts. 5(1) point 3 and 6(1)).
  • Keep supplying the software updates and upgrades needed to keep the product safe while the product is under your control; where you kept control of the product, you cannot rely on the Article 10(1) point 2 excuse (that the defect probably did not exist when you placed the product on the market) for a defect that results from software, an update or upgrade, a missing safety update, a connected service or a substantial modification (draft Arts. 9(2) and 10(2)).
  • Judge safety against all the circumstances, including cybersecurity requirements, what the product can go on to learn or acquire after it is placed on the market, a recall, and the effect of other products used with it (draft Art. 8(2)).
  • Keep records you could produce: on a claimant's plausible claim the court orders you to disclose the relevant data and documents available to you, and failing to do so presumes the product defective (draft Arts. 18(1) and 19(1) point 1).
  • Meet the mandatory safety requirements that protect against the harm suffered: a product that does not meet them is presumed defective (draft Art. 19(1) point 2).
  • If you are a manufacturer outside the EU, your importer, your authorized representative or your fulfilment service provider answers for the product in your place; a distributor or online platform answers too if no such person can be identified and it does not name one within one month of the injured person's request (draft Arts. 11 and 12).
  • If you substantially modify a product without the manufacturer's consent and then make it available on the market or put it into use, you answer as the manufacturer of the modified product (draft Art. 6(2) and (3)).
  • Do not rely on a contract term to limit or exclude your liability to an injured person: a term departing from the Act's rules on liability to the injured person's detriment is null (draft Art. 16).
  • Be ready to prove a draft Article 10(1) excuse: that you did not place the product on the market or put it into use, that the defect probably did not exist then, that it results from complying with legal requirements, that the objective state of scientific and technical knowledge did not allow it to be discovered, or, for a component maker or a person who substantially modified the product, the component and modification excuses (draft Art. 10(1)).
  • Keep the claim periods in view: three years from the day the injured person learned or should have learned of the defect, the damage and who caused it; ten years from placing the defective product on the market or putting it into use; 25 years for latent personal injury (draft Art. 15).

Revisions

An entry gets a new revision when a law in it is added, removed, amended or reworded in the law library. The ID stays the same.

  1. Revision 1, : the entry was first published.

See also

Page updated .