Law / Chad

Chad

8 of 15 named instruments researched to a stage, across three of the ten areas of law we track: 8 in force. As of .

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 6
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

Privacy law6 instruments, 6 in force

Research summary (325 words)

Chad's comprehensive personal-data statute is Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015 portant protection des données à caractère personnel, promulgated in N'Djamena on and enforced by ANSICE (Agence Nationale de Sécurité Informatique et de Certification Electronique), the independent administrative authority the law itself designates as its supervisor.

Processing rests on the data subject's consent or one of a limited set of statutory grounds (a legal obligation, a public-interest mission, a contract, or safeguarding the data subject's interest or fundamental rights and freedoms), and separately must be collected for determined, explicit, and legitimate purposes, kept accurate, kept confidential and secure, and retained no longer than the purpose requires.

Biometric data and other sensitive categories, racial or ethnic origin, political opinion, religious or philosophical belief, trade-union membership, sex, health, and sexual life, are prohibited from processing unless the data subject gives explicit written consent or a specific statutory exception applies.

A data subject has rights to information at collection, access to their own data free of charge, objection to processing for legitimate reasons, and rectification or erasure of inaccurate or unlawfully held data.

Transferring personal data outside the CEMAC or CEEAC blocs requires the destination country to offer a sufficient level of protection, prior notification to ANSICE before any such transfer, and, for a destination that does not meet that standard, either a data subject's consent, another statutory ground, or ANSICE's own authorization on the strength of contractual safeguards; this places Chad at the strict end of the transfer-restriction scale.

A controller or subcontractor must notify both ANSICE and the affected data subject without delay of any security breach affecting personal data. Violating most of these duties is a criminal offence carrying imprisonment and a fine, and any person harmed by unlawful processing has a civil right to obtain reparation from the controller.

Chad's separate cybersecurity, electronic-transactions, and ANSICE-establishment statutes are catalogued under this jurisdiction's scraping-topic filing; only the personal-data protection statute is described here.

Breach notification

Loi n°007/PR/2015, obligation de notification des violations de données à l'ANSICE

Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015, art. 61Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://arcep.td/sites/default/files/Loi-N%C2%B007-PR-2015.pdf

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 61 requires the controller, or its subcontractor, to notify both ANSICE and the affected data subject, without delay, of any security breach affecting that person's personal data.

This duty sits alongside article 59's confidentiality obligation and article 60's list of required technical and organizational security measures against alteration, damage, or unauthorized third-party access, and a controller or subcontractor who fails to meet the article 59 through 61 obligations is separately subject to criminal penalty.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Loi n°007/PR/2015, principes directeurs du traitement des données (consentement, licéité, finalité, conservation)

Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015, arts. 1-15Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://arcep.td/sites/default/files/Loi-N%C2%B007-PR-2015.pdf

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 1 sets the law's object as protecting private and professional life against the collection, processing, transmission, storage, and use of personal data, subject to public-order protection, and article 2 applies it to any such operation by a natural person, the State, local authorities, or a public or private legal person.

Article 7 makes processing lawful when the data subject consents, or, absent consent, when it is indispensable to a legal obligation, a public-interest or public-authority mission, a contract to which the data subject is party, or safeguarding the data subject's interest or fundamental rights and freedoms.

Articles 8 through 10 require that collection and processing be lawful, fair, and non-fraudulent, and that data be collected for determined, explicit, and legitimate purposes and not processed incompatibly with them, and be adequate and not excessive for those purposes. Articles 11 through 15 require that data be retained no longer than the purpose requires, kept accurate, and that the controller inform the data subject and keep the data confidential and secure.

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Loi n°007/PR/2015, transfert des données vers un pays non membre de la CEEAC/CEMAC

Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015, arts. 29-32Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://arcep.td/sites/default/files/Loi-N%C2%B007-PR-2015.pdf

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 29 bars a controller from transferring personal data to a country outside the CEMAC and CEEAC blocs unless that State ensures a sufficient level of protection for privacy and fundamental rights and freedoms with respect to the processing the data will or may undergo. Article 30 requires the controller to inform ANSICE before any transfer to such a third country, regardless of that country's adequacy.

Article 31 lets a transfer to a non-adequate country proceed by derogation where the data subject has unambiguously consented, the transfer is necessary to a contract with the data subject or its pre-contractual steps, the transfer is necessary to a contract in the data subject's interest between the controller and a third party, the transfer is necessary or legally required to safeguard an important public interest or to establish, exercise, or defend a legal claim, the transfer safeguards the data subject's vital interest, or the transfer comes from a public register open to public consultation under legislative or regulatory provision.

Article 32 lets ANSICE authorize a transfer or set of transfers to a non-adequate country where the controller offers sufficient guarantees for privacy and fundamental rights and freedoms, including through appropriate contractual clauses.

What it requires

Data subject rights

Loi n°007/PR/2015, droits de la personne concernée (information, accès, opposition, rectification)

Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015, arts. 35-50Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://arcep.td/sites/default/files/Loi-N%C2%B007-PR-2015.pdf

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 35 requires a controller collecting personal data directly from the data subject to provide, at collection, its own identity, the processing purposes, the categories of data, the recipients, the retention period, the existence of access and rectification rights, and any prospect of transfer to a third country; article 36 extends this duty to data not collected directly from the data subject, timed to registration or first communication to a third party.

Article 38 lets any natural person demand, free of charge, confirmation of whether their data is processed, communication of that data and its origin, information on the processing's purposes, legal basis, categories, and recipients, and information on any transfer to a third country; article 39 adds a copy of the data at no more than reproduction cost, and under article 43 the controller may refuse a manifestly abusive request, bearing the burden of proving abuse.

Article 45 gives any natural person the right to object, on legitimate grounds, to processing of their personal data, and specifically to object, free of charge, before their data is first communicated to a third party or used for prospecting on a third party's behalf, except where the processing meets a legal obligation.

Article 46 lets any natural person demand, free of charge, that the controller rectify, complete, update, block, or erase personal data concerning them that is inaccurate, incomplete, equivocal, outdated, or unlawfully collected, used, communicated, or retained, within one month of a written request, on pain of a complaint to ANSICE.

Article 48 has a minor's rights exercised by the parent holding parental authority or the minor's guardian, with the minor associated to the exercise of those rights according to age and maturity.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Loi n°007/PR/2015, sanctions administratives et pénales et recours

Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015, arts. 80-94Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://arcep.td/sites/default/files/Loi-N%C2%B007-PR-2015.pdf

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 80 lets ANSICE warn a controller who fails to meet the law's obligations, order the failure stopped within a set period, and impose a penalty in line with the failure found, its amount fixed by regulation.

Article 81 lets ANSICE, in urgent cases where a treatment or use of personal data violates rights and freedoms, order after adversarial procedure the interruption of a processing operation or the blocking of the data concerned for up to three months, or a temporary or definitive prohibition of a processing operation contrary to the law.

Article 82 punishes an ANSICE member, staff member, or expert who breaches the confidentiality obligation the ANSICE-establishment law binds them to, with three months to one year's imprisonment and a fine of one to ten million CFA francs, or one of those penalties alone; article 83 imposes the same range on a controller, representative, employee, or agent who fails to meet the confidentiality and security obligations of articles 59, 60, and 61.

Article 84 imposes the same range on a controller, representative, employee, or agent who processes data in violation of the collection and purpose-limitation conditions of articles 8 through 12, the sensitive-category conditions of articles 16 through 22 and 24, the information duty of article 35, or the notification formalities of article 65, who fails to respond to an access request under article 38 within one month or knowingly gives inaccurate or incomplete information, who gives incomplete or inaccurate information in an article 70 declaration, who transfers personal data outside the CEMAC or CEEAC blocs in violation of article 29 without satisfying an article 31 ground, or who obstructs ANSICE's verification powers; the same article punishes anyone who uses coercion, violence, threats, gifts, or promises to force a person to disclose information obtained through their article 38 rights or to consent to processing of their data.

Article 88 lets a convicting court bar the offender from managing personal-data processing, personally or through another, for up to two years, and article 89 punishes any breach of that bar, or any repeat offence under article 88, with six months to two years' imprisonment and a fine of one to five million CFA francs, or one of those penalties alone. Article 90 makes the controller or their representative in Chad civilly liable for fines their employee or agent is ordered to pay.

Article 93 gives anyone harmed by unlawful processing or any act inconsistent with the law the right to obtain reparation from the controller, and article 94 lets the controller be exonerated, in whole or part, by proving the harmful act is not attributable to them.

What it requires

Sensitive categories

Loi n°007/PR/2015, traitement des catégories particulières de données (données sensibles et biométriques)

Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015, arts. 16-25Loi n°007/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://arcep.td/sites/default/files/Loi-N%C2%B007-PR-2015.pdf

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 16 prohibits processing biometric data and personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, filiation, political opinion, religious or philosophical belief, trade-union membership, sex, health, or sexual life, unless the data subject gives explicit written consent (withdrawable at any time, at no cost), or the processing falls within a listed exception: a labour-law obligation, protecting the data subject's or another's vital interest, a human-rights association's activity authorized by ANSICE, a social-security purpose, establishing or defending a legal claim, data the data subject has manifestly made public, historical, statistical, or scientific research on conditions ANSICE sets, public-statistics law, preventive medicine or health-service administration under a health professional's supervision, or another important public-interest ground a law permits.

Article 17 confines the processing it covers to cases of the data subject's written consent or of necessity for preventing a concrete danger or repressing a specific criminal offence, and then only under a health professional's responsibility, binding that professional and their staff to professional secrecy.

Article 18 separately prohibits processing genetic data and personal data revealing health-related secrets, subject to a similarly structured list of exceptions, and article 20 requires that any such processing use a unique patient identifier distinct from other identification numbers, interconnectable with another identifying number only with ANSICE's express authorization.

Article 24 confines processing a minor's personal data to the representation rules the law sets for the exercise of a minor's own rights.

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (191 words)

Chad has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

The Code Pénal (Loi n°001/PR/2017), which codifies the offences originally created by Loi n°009/PR/2015 on cybersecurity and cybercrime, criminalises fraudulent access to or interference with a computer system, but its offences turn on accessing a system frauduleusement, so a scraper reading a public, unauthenticated page without defeating any access control falls outside a plain reading of that requirement, and no reported case has tested the point.

No Chadian court decision on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper was located. Loi n°005/PR/2003 on copyright confers no sui generis database right, and Chad has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception; the Law's only relevant carve-outs are the news-of-the-day and facts exclusion and the press-review exception described under the aggregation topic, neither aimed at training-data collection.

No statute or case law establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, or assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or an AI-training-specific rule. Chad's comprehensive personal-data statute, Loi n°007/PR/2015, has no primary text available to check its reach over scraped public personal data, so that reach is not described here.

Computer misuse

Code Pénal, unauthorised access to and interference with a computer system

Loi n°001/PR/2017 du 8 mai 2017 portant Code Pénal Livre 6, Chapitre 2 (De la cybercriminalité), Section 1, Sous-sections 1-2 (art. 429-431), codifying Loi n°009/PR/2015 du 10 février 2015 relative à la cybersécurité et à la lutte contre la cybercriminalitéText of the Code Pénal (Loi n°001/PR/2017) reproduced by droit-afrique.com, an unofficial commercial mirror

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://www.droit-afrique.com/uploads/Tchad-Code-penal-2017.pdf

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 429 punishes any person who accesses or attempts to access, fraudulently, all or part of a computer system, and the same person who fraudulently procures or attempts to procure, for themselves or another, any advantage by entering a computer system. Article 430 punishes fraudulently remaining or attempting to remain in all or part of a computer system, and hindering, falsifying, or attempting to hinder or falsify the operation of a computer system.

Article 431 punishes fraudulently introducing or attempting to introduce data into a computer system. Each offence carries imprisonment of one to five years and a fine of 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 CFA francs, or one of those two penalties only. Because each offence's trigger is fraudulent access, entry, or introduction, a scraper reading a public, unauthenticated page without defeating any access control falls outside a plain reading of these provisions.

This chapter codifies the offences originally created by Loi n°009/PR/2015 on cybersecurity and cybercrime. Article 521 of the Code provides that it is in force on the first day of the third month after its promulgation, and no source stating the resulting day has been located.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (182 words)

Chad has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognized hot-news misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located statute or case law addressing hyperlinking or framing liability specifically.

The relevant instrument is Loi n°005/PR/2003 du 2 mai 2003 sur la protection du droit d'auteur, des droits voisins et des expressions du folklore, which excludes the news of the day and mere facts from copyright protection outright (art. 9), so a bare fact or news item is never protectable regardless of who first reported it.

The same Law lets a person, once a work is lawfully disclosed and its author and source are clearly credited, compile press reviews and reproduce or broadcast current political, social, economic, or religious news articles, even in full, for current-events informational purposes (art. 34(3)); nothing limits that exception to short extracts, and no Chadian court decision applying it to a systematic news aggregator, as opposed to a traditional press review, was located.

The Law predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation entirely, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists either.

Snippet reproduction

Loi n°005/PR/2003 sur la protection du droit d'auteur, press review and current-events exception (art. 34) and news-of-the-day exclusion (art. 9)

Loi n°005/PR/2003 du 2 mai 2003 portant protection du droit d'auteur, des droits voisins et des expressions du folklore, art. 9 and art. 34Official bilingual text of Loi n°005/PR/2003, WIPO Lex

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 9 excludes official legislative, administrative, or judicial texts and their official translations, the news of the day, and mere facts and data from copyright protection outright: a bare fact, or the news of the day as such, is never a protected work under Chadian law, whichever outlet reports it first.

Article 34(3) separately lets any person, once a work has been lawfully disclosed, and provided the author's name and source are clearly credited, make short critical, polemical, pedagogical, scientific, or informative analyses and quotations, compile press reviews, and reproduce or broadcast, even in full, current political, social, economic, or religious news articles and public speeches delivered before political, administrative, judicial, or academic assemblies, and sermons, lectures, and addresses, for current-events informational purposes.

The text does not cap the exception at a headline-length or short-extract threshold and does not confine it to the press industry. The Law names no day for its entry into force, and no Journal officiel issue or commencement notice for it has been located.

What it requires

Where nothing was found3 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Chad has not enacted a binding statute imposing an AI-transparency or output-labeling duty, and no AI-specific prohibition binds a private person.

The Code Pénal (Loi n°001/PR/2017), codifying Loi n°009/PR/2015 on cybersecurity and cybercrime, criminalises producing, distributing, possessing, or facilitating minors' access to child pornography by means of a computer system, but its text names only pornographie infantile without a definition extending that term to a virtual or computer-generated depiction, so it does not read as a duty addressed to AI-generated content specifically.

A presidential decree reorganising the Ministry of Posts and the Digital Economy created a Direction Générale de l'Intelligence Artificielle on with a policy-coordination mandate rather than binding regulatory or enforcement powers, and the government's Programme National de Développement 2026-2030 ('Tchad Connexion 2030') names AI as a strategic priority without creating enforceable private-sector obligations; both bind only government bodies.

On the Minister of Telecommunications, Digital Economy and Digitalization installed a 34-member committee with a 45-day mandate to draft a modernised digital code covering, among other subjects, artificial intelligence; as of this review no draft text has been published, so the reform remains pre-legislative.

As of .

Cybersecurity law

Chad's product-security and cyber-resilience law sits in two 2015 statutes promulgated the same day as its personal-data-protection act, : Loi n° 006/PR/2015 creates the Agence Nationale de Sécurité Informatique et de Certification Electronique (ANSICE), and Loi n° 008/PR/2015 governs electronic transactions.

ANSICE, an independent public administrative agency with financial autonomy, headquartered in N'Djamena, is confirmed in Loi n° 008/PR/2015's own definitions as the «Autorité nationale administrative indépendante chargée de veiller au respect, sur le territoire national, des dispositions de la présente loi» (the independent national administrative authority responsible for ensuring compliance, nationwide, with this law's provisions), and Loi n° 006/PR/2015 gives it a broad missions list spanning cybersecurity coordination, cybercrime policy, personal-data protection, and electronic-transaction certification and audit.

Most of that missions list states ANSICE's own regulatory powers (regulation, control, audit, alerts, accreditation) rather than a duty stated directly on a private operator, and one mission, watching over «la sécurité des systèmes gouvernementaux de l'information et des infrastructures essentielles de l'État» (the security of government information systems and the State's essential infrastructure), binds the State's own systems rather than a private product or service.

ANSICE is funded in part by a levy of 1.5% of tax-exclusive turnover on accredited certification authorities, security auditors, security-software publishers, and other accredited security-service providers, paid into a «Fonds spécial des activités de cybersecurité» (special fund for cybersecurity activities).

The one substantive, currently-binding security-posture regime located reaches a narrow class of licensed operator rather than a general product or platform. Loi n° 008/PR/2015's Title IV governs «prestataires de services de confiance» (trust service providers) established in Chad: electronic-archiving providers, electronic-timestamping providers, registered electronic-mail providers, and qualified electronic-certification providers.

Article 100 requires every one of them to «mettre en œuvre les moyens nécessaires en vue de protéger les données qui leur sont transmises et qu'ils transmettent contre tout accès non autorisé» (implement the means necessary to protect the data transmitted to them and by them against any unauthorized access), and Article 101(c)-(d) requires disclosing to service recipients, before and during the contract, the security measures adopted and the incident-notification procedures in place.

Electronic-archiving providers carry a further, specific duty at Article 108 to protect stored and transmitted data against any fraudulent or accidental harm, to prevent unauthorized access to the equipment, communications systems, and media holding the data, and to «mettre en place les procédures permettant de réagir rapidement aux incidents et limiter leurs effets» (put in place procedures to react rapidly to incidents and limit their effects).

Qualified electronic-certification providers carry the most detailed set, at Article 130: proven reliability, a fast and secure certificate directory and revocation service, timestamped issuance and revocation, verified subscriber identity, security-competent staff, a duty to «utiliser des systèmes et des produits fiables qui sont protégés contre les modifications et qui assurent la sécurité technique et cryptographique des fonctions qu'ils assurent» (use reliable systems and products protected against modification and that ensure the technical and cryptographic security of the functions they perform), measures against certificate forgery, confidentiality during signature-creation-data generation, and a verifiable certificate-storage system where «toute modification technique mettant en péril ces exigences de sécurité soit apparente pour l'opérateur» (any technical modification endangering these security requirements is apparent to the operator).

A provider intending to cease qualified-certification activity must notify the certification authority within thirty days and arrange continuity with another provider guaranteeing an equivalent quality and security level; one ceasing involuntarily or through bankruptcy must notify immediately.

Failing to comply with the law's provisions, including these security duties, or willfully obstructing ANSICE's own oversight missions, is a criminal offense under Article 168, carrying one to ten years' imprisonment and a fine of one to five million CFA francs, and further, related offenses (obstructing an ANSICE control agent, falsely claiming accreditation, refusing required cooperation) carry comparable penalties under Articles 169 to 171; the agents who establish these offenses are ANSICE-mandated and sworn before the Supreme Court.

None of these bound-party classes (trust-service provider, qualified certification provider, electronic-archiving provider) is a role this corpus's activity vocabulary currently expresses, the same treatment already given to Singapore's Cybersecurity Act designated parties and to Bermuda's Monetary-Authority-licensed entities, so this regime is recorded here in prose rather than raised against a declared activity, and a developer whose product touches only these narrow, licensed roles is not reached by the lint on this account.

No general product-security or connected-device market-placement duty binding an ordinary software product or app, and no reasonable-security or information-security-programme statute reaching a business simply because it holds covered data, was located in either statute.

Loi n° 009/PR/2015 on cybercrime prevention and repression is the statute most likely, by the pattern of a comparable regional cybercrime act (Burundi's Loi n° 1/10 binds every network operator and service provider to a security-of-service duty in its own operative chapter), to carry further operator-facing security or incident-reporting provisions, but its content is not described here because it could not be read.

The one located copy, an Internet Archive capture of a file the telecommunications regulator ARCEP formerly hosted, is truncated at exactly 1,048,576 bytes and does not parse as a valid PDF beyond that point; the file itself has since been removed from ARCEP's own site, which answers with a not-found response for it, and no complete copy was found through the regional legal-text repository droit-afrique.com or the Presidency's own site.

Chad's breach-notification duty, Loi n° 007/PR/2015's requirement to notify ANSICE of a personal-data breach, is that jurisdiction's privacy-topic finding and is not restated here. The Code Pénal's unauthorized-access and system-interference offenses are this jurisdiction's scraping-topic computer-misuse row and likewise are not restated here.

Chad's copyright, environmental-protection, and investment-charter statutes named alongside these in the source record are outside this topic's subject matter and are not addressed here.

As of .

Age gating law

Chad has not enacted an adult-content age-verification law, a social-media minor-access restriction, an app-store age-verification requirement, or an age-appropriate design code.

The Code Pénal du Tchad (2017) criminalizes child pornography generally, punishing by one to four years' imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 to 500,000 FCFA the production, distribution, importation, exportation, offering, possession, or other dealing in material depicting a child in explicit sexual activity (art. 362), and separately punishes by one to five years and a fine of 25,000 to 1,000,000 FCFA whoever excites, favors, or facilitates the debauchery of a person who has not yet reached civil majority (art. 363).

Its cybercrime chapter, which absorbs the substance of Loi n°009/PR/2015, punishes producing, distributing, procuring, importing, exporting, or intentionally possessing child pornography by means of a computer system by one to five years and a fine of 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 FCFA (art. 443 to 445), and the same penalty reaches whoever facilitates a minor's access to a pornographic image, document, sound, or representation (art. 445, second paragraph).

Article 446 separately punishes proposing a meeting to a minor child through a communication technology with intent to commit one of those offenses, aggravated to five to ten years and a fine of 2,000,000 to 20,000,000 FCFA where the proposal is followed by an actual meeting.

Each of these provisions addresses the criminality of producing, distributing, possessing, or facilitating access to prohibited content, or of soliciting a minor, rather than imposing an age-verification, age-estimation, or age-gating duty that conditions a service's access on a user's age.

No other located Chadian statute, including the data-protection law (Loi n°007/PR/2015), the electronic-transactions law (Loi n°008/PR/2015), the cybersecurity-agency law (Loi n°006/PR/2015), or the copyright law (Loi n°005/PR/2003), establishes such a duty either. No numbered bill, Journal Officiel citation, or public draft text proposing an age-verification or age-appropriate design regime was located.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Chad AI law
  • No current case law for Chad privacy law
  • No current case law for Chad scraping law
  • No current case law for Chad cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Chad communications law
  • No current case law for Chad content moderation law
  • No current case law for Chad product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Chad digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Chad age gating law
  • No current case law for Chad reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here1 instrument

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Chad comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

The law of Chad

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.