Law / Solomon Islands

Solomon Islands

7 of 10 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the ten areas of law we track: 7 in force. As of .

When each starts7 of 7 carry a date. Earlier is before 2014.
Before 2014: 4 instruments (4 in force) earlier 2014: 0 instruments 2015: 0 instruments ’15 2016: 0 instruments 2017: 0 instruments 2018: 1 instrument (1 in force) 2019: 0 instruments 2020: 2 instruments (2 in force) ’20 2021: 0 instruments 2022: 0 instruments 2023: 0 instruments 2024: 0 instruments 2025: 0 instruments 2026: 0 instruments ’26 today

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 1
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law 4
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

Privacy law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (231 words)

Solomon Islands has no comprehensive data-protection statute and no dedicated data-protection supervisory authority.

Its closest personal-data rules sit in Part 11 (Relations with Consumers) of the Telecommunications Act 2009, which binds a telecommunications service provider's collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure of a consumer's information, lets the Telecommunications Commission order a service provider to retain or stop retaining specified consumer information beyond a specified period, requires the service provider to take reasonable steps to keep a consumer's communications confidential, and gives a consumer the right to inspect and correct the service provider's records about them.

A contravention of the consent duty in section 72(1) or the confidentiality duty in section 73(2) is itself a criminal offence under Part 19 of the Act, carrying a fine or imprisonment, and failing to comply with a Commission order on retention under section 72(3) is a separate offence under the same Part.

These duties run to a licensed telecommunications service provider in its dealings with its own consumers, not to personal-data processing generally, so they do not reach a business collecting personal data outside the telecommunications sector, and the Act states no breach-notification duty, no cross-border-transfer rule, and no heightened rule for sensitive or biometric data.

A comprehensive data-protection and privacy bill has reportedly been in development with international donor support, but it has not been introduced to Parliament, and its provisions are not verified here.

Comprehensive regime

Telecommunications Act 2009, Confidentiality and Consent Duties

Telecommunications Act 2009 (Solomon Islands), Part 11 (Relations with Consumers), ss. 72-74Official text of the Telecommunications Act 2009, hosted by the Telecommunications Commission of Solomon Islands, the Act's own regulator

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 72(1) bars a telecommunications service provider from collecting, using, maintaining, or disclosing information about a consumer for any purpose without that consumer's consent, subject to a narrow exception permitting disclosure of a consumer's name, address, and listed telephone number in a directory.

Section 72(3) lets the Telecommunications Commission order a service provider to retain, or to stop retaining beyond a specified period, specified information relating to a consumer, including billing information. Section 120(1)(k) makes failing to comply with an order made under section 72(3) an offence.

Section 72(4)-(6) requires the information to be accurate and complete, lets a consumer inspect the provider's records about them and require correction or removal of incorrect information, and requires the provider to disclose the purpose of collection and not use the information for an undisclosed purpose.

Section 73(1) requires a service provider to take all reasonable steps to ensure the confidentiality of a consumer's communications, and section 73(2) bars intercepting, monitoring, altering, or modifying the content of a message except as authorised under section 97 or another law. Section 120(1)(j) of Part 19 makes a contravention of section 72(1) or section 73(2) an offence, and section 121 sets the penalty.

Section 74 preserves the lawful access rights of government authorities under other Solomon Islands law, so the confidentiality duty does not itself restrict lawful government access. These duties bind a person licensed as a telecommunications service provider in that person's dealings with its own consumers; the Act does not create a general personal-data duty reaching a business outside the telecommunications sector. Section 4 provides that the Act binds the Crown, so these duties are not confined to private service providers.

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (340 words)

Solomon Islands has no scraping-specific statute, so general law addresses each dimension separately, and much of it is untested. No court has ruled on whether crawling a public, unauthenticated web page is lawful, and no Solomon Islands court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper.

The Telecommunications Act 2009 creates an offence for intentionally and without right accessing telecommunications facilities by infringing a security measure with the intent of obtaining telecommunications data, and for intercepting by technical means a transmission not intended for the accused; because the Act's own scope is the regulation of licensed telecommunications service providers, whether these offences reach a general web server or application outside the telecommunications sector, as opposed to a telecommunications operator's own network and subscriber data, is unsettled, and no reported case addresses the point.

No dedicated cybercrime statute has been identified. The Copyright Act (Chapter 138) permits fair dealing with a work for research or private study, and separately for criticism, review, or reporting current events, but Solomon Islands has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception, so training a model on scraped copyrighted text finds support, if any, only in the narrower research-or-private-study ground.

"Literary work" under the Copyright Act is defined to include any written table or compilation, so a compilation of scraped data attracts ordinary copyright protection rather than a separate sui generis database right, and no broader database right has been identified.

Solomon Islands has no comprehensive data-protection statute; the Telecommunications Act 2009 gives a telecommunications service provider's own consumer a consent and confidentiality right over information the provider holds about them, but that duty runs to the regulated service provider in its dealings with its consumers, not generally to whoever collects personal data, so it does not by itself reach personal data scraped from a public Solomon Islands website by an outside party.

No Solomon Islands statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Telecommunications Act 2009, Unauthorised-Access and Interception Offences

Telecommunications Act 2009 (Solomon Islands), Part 19 (Offences), s. 120Official text of the Telecommunications Act 2009, hosted by the Telecommunications Commission of Solomon Islands, the Act's own regulator

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 120(1) makes it an offence to, among other things: intentionally and without right or with dishonest or otherwise wrongful intent, access the whole or any part of any telecommunications facilities by infringing a security measure, with the intent of obtaining telecommunications data (paragraph (b)); or intercept by technical means a transmission not intended for the accused or for public reception, except as authorised (paragraph (c)).

Paragraph (d) separately makes it an offence to damage, delete, deteriorate, alter or suppress telecommunications data without right and with dishonest or otherwise wrongful intent, where this results in serious harm. Paragraph (e) makes it an offence to seriously hinder the functioning of any telecommunications facilities by inputting, transmitting, damaging, deleting, deteriorating, altering or suppressing telecommunications data, without right and with dishonest or otherwise wrongful intent.

Section 121 sets the penalty. The Act's stated purpose is to regulate the telecommunications sector and establish the Telecommunications Commission, and section 120's operative terms are "telecommunications facilities" and "telecommunications data" rather than a computer system generally. Section 1 provides that the Act commences on a date appointed by the Minister by notice in the Gazette. Legal Notice No. 561 of 2009 appoints as that date.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law4 instruments, 4 in force

Research summary (316 words)

No dedicated cybersecurity, cybercrime or data-protection statute is recorded for Solomon Islands: WIPO Lex's Solomon Islands member profile lists nine national laws and none is one. Its security duties for a private-sector duty-bearer sit in a general sector statute and in Central Bank prudential standards.

Section 72(1)(b) of the Telecommunications Act 2009 requires a telecommunications service provider to apply appropriate security safeguards to prevent the collection, use, maintenance, or disclosure of a consumer's information; paragraph (a) of the same subsection, the consent duty, sits in this jurisdiction's privacy topic, and the Act's Part 19 offences against unauthorised access to and interception of telecommunications facilities are an intruder-offence chapter held under its scraping topic rather than a duty on the operator.

No Telecommunications Commission of Solomon Islands network-security regulation, code of practice, or licence condition binding operators was found: the Commission's published Legislation, National Policy, and Technical Reports library lists only the Act itself, the National ICT Policy, the National Broadcast Policy, and two technical reports on submarine cable pricing and access.

For a financial institution licensed or deemed licensed by the Central Bank of Solomon Islands, Prudential Guideline No. 13 on Information Technology Security Risk Management, effective , requires it to mitigate internal and external IT security threats, keep an incident response plan, and report its IT security risks to the Central Bank, and Prudential Guideline No. 20 on Cybersecurity, effective , requires a board-approved cybersecurity risk management framework under a Chief Information Security Officer and notice to the Central Bank within sixty minutes of becoming aware of a material information security incident.

Both guidelines make a breach subject to a monetary penalty without stating its amount. Solomon Islands has no comprehensive data-protection statute, so there is no security-of-processing article inside a comprehensive regime to name here; the privacy topic records that gap. The Copyright Act (Chapter 138) carries no security-relevant provision.

Sector security regimes

Central Bank of Solomon Islands Prudential Guideline No. 13 on Information Technology Security Risk Management

Prudential Guideline No. 13, paras. 9 to 19 (Central Bank of Solomon Islands)Prudential Guideline No. 13 on Information Technology Security Risk Management as published by the Central Bank of Solomon Islands

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Prudential Guideline No. 13 on Information Technology Security Risk Management applies to financial institutions licensed and deemed licensed by the Central Bank of Solomon Islands. A financial institution must mitigate in its information technology security risk management existing internal and external threats such as unauthorised access to critical financial data, service interruptions, impersonating clients and theft or alteration of information.

It must have a proper plan in place to respond to an adverse event, and must submit to the Central Bank a copy of its IT security risks, including risk profiles, exposure analysis and incident analysis. A financial institution that fails to comply is considered in breach and shall be subject to a monetary penalty, and the Central Bank shall pursue the corrective measures in section 16 of the Financial Institutions Act 1998 (as amended). The guideline was issued on and its effective date is .

What it requires

Central Bank of Solomon Islands Prudential Guideline No. 20 on Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity Risk Management Framework

Prudential Guideline No. 20, paras. 7 to 110 (Central Bank of Solomon Islands)Prudential Guideline No. 20 on Cybersecurity as published by the Central Bank of Solomon Islands, the supervisor that issued it

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Prudential Guideline No. 20 on Cybersecurity, which describes itself as a Prudential Standard, applies to financial institutions licensed and deemed licensed by the Central Bank of Solomon Islands under the Financial Institutions Act 1998 (as amended) or any other relevant laws, and is issued under section 28(1) of the Central Bank of Solomon Islands Act 2012.

A financial institution must have a framework for cybersecurity risk management, which should be an integral part of its enterprise risk management framework, and the framework must be documented, approved by the board and reviewed regularly. It must have a designated cybersecurity risk management function headed by a Chief Information Security Officer or an equivalent senior officer.

It must obtain information about technical vulnerabilities of its information systems in a timely fashion and must test and evaluate security updates before installing them on critical systems. A financial institution that fails to comply is considered in breach and may be subject to a monetary penalty, and the Central Bank may pursue the corrective measures in section 16 of the Financial Institutions Act 1998 (as amended). The standard's effective date is .

What it requires

Telecommunications Act 2009, Security Safeguards for Consumer Information

s. 72(1)(b), Telecommunications Act 2009 (Solomon Islands)Official text of the Telecommunications Act 2009, hosted by the Telecommunications Commission of Solomon Islands, the Act's own regulator

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Section 72(1) of Part 11 (Relations with Consumers) binds a telecommunications service provider with two duties under the same subsection: paragraph (a) bars collecting, using, maintaining, or disclosing a consumer's information without consent, already researched as this jurisdiction's privacy row, and paragraph (b), researched here, separately requires the service provider to apply appropriate security safeguards to prevent the collection, use, maintenance, or disclosure of that information.

Section 120(1)(j) of Part 19 makes a contravention of section 72(1), covering both paragraphs, a criminal offence, and section 121 sets the penalty. Section 113(2) of Part 18 separately makes any contravention of the Act, including of paragraph (b), a civil violation. Section 117 lets a person who sustained loss or damage from a violation sue in court to recover an amount equal to that loss from the person who committed or is vicariously liable for it.

Section 119 bars proceeding against the same contravention as both an offence and a violation. The Telecommunications Commission of Solomon Islands enforces the Act generally, including this duty, and no order, direction, or regulation implementing paragraph (b)'s safeguards standard was found in the Commission's own published library. Section 1 sets the Act's own commencement as a date the Minister appoints by notice in the Gazette. Legal Notice No. 561 of 2009 appoints as that date.

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

Central Bank of Solomon Islands Prudential Guideline No. 20 on Cybersecurity, Incident Notification to the Central Bank

Prudential Guideline No. 20, paras. 111 and 112 (Central Bank of Solomon Islands)Prudential Guideline No. 20 on Cybersecurity as published by the Central Bank of Solomon Islands, the supervisor that issued it

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Under paragraph 112 of Prudential Guideline No. 20 on Cybersecurity, a financial institution licensed or deemed licensed by the Central Bank of Solomon Islands must notify the Central Bank as soon as possible but not later than sixty minutes after becoming aware of an information security incident that materially affects or has the potential to materially affect, financially or non-financially, the institution or the interests of depositors.

Paragraph 111 also requires quarterly reporting on all cybersecurity incidents in the format prescribed in Appendix I. A financial institution that fails to comply is considered in breach and may be subject to a monetary penalty, and the Central Bank may pursue the corrective measures in section 16 of the Financial Institutions Act 1998 (as amended). The standard's effective date is .

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (210 words)

Solomon Islands has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the general copyright framework of the Copyright Act (Chapter 138) is the only law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content.

Its general exceptions provision permits fair dealing with a literary, dramatic or musical work for the purpose of reporting current events in a newspaper, magazine or similar periodical, or by means of broadcasting or in a cinematograph film, if accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement, alongside separate fair dealing grounds for research, private study, criticism and review.

The provision carries no headline-length or short-extract cap distinct from the fair-dealing and acknowledgement conditions themselves, and no reported Solomon Islands decision applies it to a systematic news aggregator rather than a single report of a current event.

"Literary work" is defined to include any written table or compilation, so a compilation of news content attracts ordinary copyright protection rather than a separate sui generis database right, and the Act, dated to 1988, carries no machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation or opt-out mechanism.

No statute or case law addresses whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public, or whether framing or inline display changes the answer, and no hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law has been identified.

Where nothing was found2 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Solomon Islands has no AI-transparency, AI risk-obligation, AI training-data, AI-prohibited-practice, AI-governance, or AI sector-specific statute, and no bill of that kind has been located as introduced to Parliament.

A comprehensive data-protection and privacy bill has reportedly been in development with international donor support, but it targets personal-data handling generally rather than AI systems specifically, has not been introduced to Parliament, and is described further under the privacy topic rather than here.

As of .

Age gating law

Solomon Islands has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code.

The Child and Family Welfare Act 2017 (No. 3 of 2017) establishes a child-protection and welfare administration system, covering reporting of concerns, care and protection orders, and adoption consent, but its text contains no reference to the internet, an online service, or an age-verification or age-gating duty on a service provider.

The Penal Code (Amendment) (Sexual Offences) Act 2016 (No. 3 of 2016) criminalises producing, possessing, or distributing child exploitation material and related conduct against a child, defined for that offence as a person under fifteen years of age, but it imposes no age-verification or age-gating duty on a publisher or platform; its offences run to the person who commits the underlying conduct, not to a service's access controls.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Solomon Islands AI law
  • No current case law for Solomon Islands privacy law
  • No current case law for Solomon Islands scraping law
  • No current case law for Solomon Islands cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Solomon Islands communications law
  • No current case law for Solomon Islands content moderation law
  • No current case law for Solomon Islands product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Solomon Islands digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Solomon Islands age gating law
  • No current case law for Solomon Islands reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here1 instrument

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of the Solomon Islands comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

60 minutes
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of the Solomon Islands

60 minutes

Central Bank of Solomon Islands Prudential Guideline No. 20 on Cybersecurity, Incident Notification to the Central Bank

Prudential Guideline No. 20, paras. 111 and 112 (Central Bank of Solomon Islands)security law, in force since

The sentence the clocks are read from

Notify the Central Bank of Solomon Islands as soon as possible, and not later than sixty minutes, after becoming aware of an information security incident that materially affects or has the potential to materially affect, financially or non-financially, your institution or the interests of depositors (para. 112).

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.