Law / Guatemala

Guatemala

6 of 8 named instruments researched to a stage, across three of the ten areas of law we track: 5 in force and 1 proposed. As of .

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 3
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

Privacy law3 instruments, 2 in force, 1 proposed

Research summary (161 words)

Guatemala has no comprehensive data-protection statute. The constitutional habeas data right (Constitución Política, art. 31) lets a person know what state records hold about them and demand correction, but reaches only government-held files, not the private sector.

The Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública (Decreto 57-2008), a transparency statute, carries Guatemala's operative personal-data rules: article 9 defines datos personales and datos sensibles, article 31 bars any obligated entity from disseminating or commercializing personal data without the data subject's express written consent and bars commercializing sensitive data outright, and article 64 criminalizes commercializing or distributing personal data without that consent, with five to eight years' imprisonment and a fine of fifty thousand to one hundred thousand quetzales.

Iniciativa de Ley 6105, a bill that would enact Guatemala's first general personal-data-protection law with rights of access, rectification, cancellation and opposition, was referred to the Congressional Commission on Transparency and Probity on and has not advanced to a plenary vote.

Comprehensive regime

Iniciativa de Ley 6105, Ley de Protección de Datos

Iniciativa de Ley 6105, Ley de Protección de DatosText of the bill and its exposición de motivos as filed with the Dirección Legislativa, Congreso de la República de Guatemala

Proposed. proposed Not law. It binds no one unless it is enacted.

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Iniciativa 6105 would enact Guatemala's first general personal-data-protection statute, naming as its object the principles, rights, duties, and procedures governing the protection of personal data by any natural or legal person, public or private, for profit or not, that processes personal data.

It builds on the internationally recognized ARCO rights (access, rectification, cancellation, and opposition) and defines terms including base de datos, custodio de la base de datos, bloqueo de datos, and consentimiento. Deputy José Alejandro De León Maldonado presented the bill to the plenary, which referred it to the Comisión de Transparencia y Probidad for study and opinion.

That commission issued a favorable opinion (dictamen favorable) on and sent the bill to the plenary to decide.

What it requires

Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública, Decreto 57-2008 (personal-data provisions)

Decreto Número 57-2008, Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública, arts. 9, 31-32, 61-67Decreto Número 57-2008, official consolidated text published by the Archivo General de Centroamérica (Guatemala's national archives)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Decreto 57-2008 is principally a freedom-of-information statute, but article 9 defines datos personales as any information concerning an identified or identifiable natural person and datos sensibles as data touching a person's racial or ethnic origin, political ideology, religious belief, health, sexual life, or other intimate matters.

Article 31 bars an obligated entity from disseminating, distributing, or commercializing personal data held in its information systems without the data subject's express written consent, and expressly and absolutely prohibits commercializing sensitive data by any means.

Article 32 lists narrow exceptions to the consent requirement, including statistical, scientific, or general-interest purposes where the data cannot be linked back to the individual, and transmission between obligated public entities for the exercise of their duties.

Article 64 makes it a crime, punishable by five to eight years' imprisonment and a fine of fifty thousand to one hundred thousand quetzales, for anyone to commercialize or distribute personal data or sensitive personal data protected by the law without the titleholder's express written authorization, where the data does not come from public registries, without prejudice to civil liability for resulting damages.

Article 65 similarly punishes unauthorized alteration or destruction of personal data held in a public institution's files or electronic records with the same penalty range.

What it requires

Data subject rights

Constitución Política de la República de Guatemala, Art. 31 (habeas data)

Const. Pol. de la República de Guatemala, art. 31 (acceso a archivos y registros estatales)Constitución Política de la República de Guatemala

In force since . Binds government bodies.

What this law does

Article 31 gives every person the right to know what information state files, records, or any other form of state registry holds about them, the purpose for which that information is used, and the right to its correction, rectification, and updating. The article separately bars records or files of political affiliation, except those the electoral authorities and political parties themselves keep.

The right reaches only archivos and registros estatales, the state's own records, so it does not on its own terms bind a private-sector data controller.

What it requires

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (242 words)

Guatemala has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

The Código Penal's computer-crimes chapter (arts. 274 'A' to 274 'G', added by Decreto 33-96) criminalizes destroying or altering computer records and programs, creating a personal-data bank without authorization, using computerized records for commercial or fiscal fraud, and, closest to an unauthorized-access provision, using another's computerized records or entering their data bank or electronic archives without authorization; none of the seven sub-articles requires defeating a technical access control the way some jurisdictions' computer-misuse statutes do, and no reported case addresses whether reading a public, unauthenticated page falls within 'sin autorización'.

No Guatemalan court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper. The Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos (Decreto 33-98, as amended) protects a compilation or database as a collection of works only where the selection or arrangement of its contents is an original creation, and that protection never extends to the underlying data or material itself; Guatemala has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception.

Decreto 33-98 confers no separate sui generis database right beyond that compilation-copyright layer. The Código Penal's unauthorized-copyright-reproduction offense (art. 274, as reformed) carries one to six years' imprisonment and a fine of fifty thousand to seven hundred fifty thousand quetzales.

No Guatemalan statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Código Penal, Decreto 17-73, Arts. 274 'A' a 274 'G' (Delitos Informáticos)

Decreto Legislativo No. 17-73 (Código Penal), arts. 274 A a 274 G, Delitos InformáticosCódigo Penal de Guatemala

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Articles 274 'A' through 274 'G' were added to the Código Penal by Decreto 33-96 and punish seven distinct computer-related acts. Article 274 'A' punishes destroying, erasing, or otherwise rendering useless computer records, with the penalty raised by a third when the information is necessary for a public service or is an official record. Article 274 'B' punishes altering, erasing, or rendering useless the instructions or programs computers use.

Article 274 'C' punishes copying or reproducing computer instructions or programs without the author's authorization. Article 274 'D' punishes creating a data bank or computerized record with data that could affect a person's privacy. Article 274 'E' punishes using computerized records or programs to hide, alter, or distort information required for a commercial activity, a duty to the State, or a person's financial statements.

Article 274 'F', the provision closest to a general unauthorized-access offense, punishes using another's computerized records without authorization, or entering, by any means, their data bank or electronic archives without authorization; it does not on its own terms require defeating a technical security measure. Article 274 'G' punishes distributing or circulating destructive programs or instructions capable of harming computerized records, programs, or equipment. No commencement clause or commencement notice for Decreto 33-96 has been located.

What it requires

Database right

Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos, Decreto 33-98 (compilations, databases, and technological measures)

Decreto Número 33-98, arts. 16 y 35, bases de datos y compilacionesDecreto N° 33-98

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 16(b) protects anthologies, dictionaries, compilations, databases and similar works as derivative works, without prejudice to the copyright in the underlying original works, where the selection or arrangement of the material is itself an original creation.

Article 35 confirms that compilations or databases, whether machine-readable or in any other form, are protected as collections of works under the statute, but that protection does not extend to the data or material contained in the compilation, and does not prejudge any copyright existing in that material.

Articles 133 quinquies and 133 sexties, added by Decreto 11-2006, prohibit circumventing an effective technological measure that controls access to a protected work and manufacturing or trafficking in circumvention devices or services, subject to enumerated lawful exceptions.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (201 words)

Guatemala has no press-publisher neighbouring right, mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining regime, or dedicated hot-news doctrine; the operative law is the general copyright exception structure of the Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos (Decreto 33-98, as amended).

Article 25 removes copyright protection from the informational content of current news published by any medium, while keeping the protection over the text and graphic representations in which that news is expressed, so an aggregator may restate the facts of a news item freely but reproducing a publisher's own wording or images remains within the copyright the article preserves.

Article 66 separately permits, without the rightsholder's authorization and without payment, but with an obligation to name the source and the author if known, reproducing and distributing by press, broadcast, or cable articles from newspapers or periodicals on current economic, political, or religious topics where the outlet has not specifically reserved the right, reproducing brief fragments of works seen or heard during a current event to the extent the informational purpose justifies, and including fragments of another's already-divulged work by way of citation, for teaching or research purposes.

No Guatemalan statute or reported case addresses hyperlinking or framing directly, and no text-and-data-mining opt-out mechanism exists.

Snippet reproduction

Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos, Decreto 33-98 (news content and lawful-use exceptions)

Decreto Número 33-98, art. 66, usos lícitos y noticias de actualidadDecreto N° 33-98

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 25 states that copyright protection does not apply to the informational content of current news published by any medium, but does apply to the text and the graphic representations in which that news appears.

Article 66 permits, without the rightsholder's authorization or payment, but with an obligation to name the source and the author if indicated, reproducing and distributing, by press, broadcast, or cable, newspaper or periodical articles on current economic, political, or religious topics that carry no specific reservation of rights.

The same article also permits reproducing and making available to the public, on the occasion of reporting a current event, fragments of works seen or heard in the course of that event, to the extent the informational purpose justifies, and permits communicating to the public, for informational purposes about current events, political or judicial speeches and similar works delivered publicly, while the speaker keeps the exclusive right to publish them for other purposes.

It further permits including fragments of another's already-divulged written, sound, audiovisual, or plastic-arts work in one's own work by way of citation or for analysis, for teaching or research purposes.

What it requires

Where nothing was found3 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Guatemala has no AI-transparency, AI-risk-obligation, AI-training-data, prohibited-practice, governance, or sector-specific AI statute.

A National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (Estrategia Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial, ENIA) is under co-creation by the Comisión Presidencial de Gobierno Abierto y Electrónico with United Nations Development Programme support; as of September 2026 the process was in its second of three phases (visioning and priorities, running 1 March to ), with a governance-framework phase scheduled to run through , and had produced no adopted strategy, policy, or legal instrument.

As of .

Cybersecurity law

Guatemala has no product-security-requirements, vulnerability-and-incident-reporting, sector-specific cyber-resilience, or general reasonable-security statute reaching a software or platform provider.

Its enacted personal-data statute, the Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública (Decreto 57-2008), is a transparency act whose personal-data provisions (arts. 9, 31-32, 61-67) are documented as this jurisdiction's privacy-topic instrument; it sets a consent-and-non-commercialization duty over personal data rather than a standalone safeguards or security-programme duty of the kind this topic covers.

Iniciativa de Ley 6105, the general data-protection bill referred to the Congressional Commission on Transparency and Probity on and not yet advanced to a plenary vote, would add a data-security principle requiring the party responsible for a personal-data database to adopt technical and organizational measures proportionate to the data held, principally sensitive data, and to notify the data subject when sensitive data is taken without authorization or shows sufficient indication that its security has been compromised.

That article is a comprehensive regime's own security-of-processing clause, so it belongs to this jurisdiction's privacy-topic finding rather than this one, and in any event the bill remains an unenacted proposal with no effective date. No pending bill creating a standalone cybersecurity, product-security, or incident-reporting duty was located.

The Código Penal's computer-offense articles (Decreto 17-73, arts. 274 'A' through 274 'G', added by Decreto Número 33-96 of 1996) punish destroying or altering computer records or programs, copying computer instructions or programs without the author's authorization, creating a database or computer record capable of affecting a person's privacy, using computer records or programs to conceal or falsify information required for a commercial activity or a duty owed to the State, using another person's computer records or entering another's databases or electronic files without authorization, and distributing destructive programs or instructions.

Every one of these offenses binds the person who attacks, copies from, or misuses a system rather than that system's own operator or manufacturer, so they establish no duty this topic covers; the same articles are documented as this jurisdiction's scraping-topic instrument, not a security-topic presence. No statute or decree establishing a national computer emergency response team, a national computer security incident response team (CSIRT), or any other cyber-incident-coordination body with statutory backing was located.

Whether an administratively created body of that kind (sometimes referred to abroad as CSIRT-GT) operates without a governing statute could not be confirmed or ruled out here.

Whether Guatemala's bank regulator, the Superintendencia de Bancos, or its central bank, the Banco de Guatemala acting for the Junta Monetaria, maintains a binding information-security or cybersecurity circular reaching a software or platform provider serving the banking sector is likewise not confirmed in the primary text located here: the Superintendencia de Bancos's own regulatory-text page serves only a challenge screen that does not resolve, and the Banco de Guatemala's site, though reachable, exposes no index of Junta Monetaria resolutions or normativa pages among those located here, so their content is not described in this finding.

The sector-regime dimension therefore remains an open question rather than a confirmed absence. With no located instrument, there is no enforcement body or enforcement record to report against this topic in this jurisdiction.

As of .

Age gating law

Guatemala has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code. Guatemala's principal child-protection statute, the Ley de Protección Integral de la Niñez y Adolescencia (Decreto 27-2003), contains no reference to the internet or an online service anywhere in its text.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Guatemala AI law
  • No current case law for Guatemala privacy law
  • No current case law for Guatemala scraping law
  • No current case law for Guatemala cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Guatemala communications law
  • No current case law for Guatemala content moderation law
  • No current case law for Guatemala product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Guatemala digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Guatemala age gating law
  • No current case law for Guatemala reuse law
Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.