Law / Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinea

7 of 10 named instruments researched to a stage, across two of the ten areas of law we track: 7 in force. As of .

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 6
  3. Scraping law
  4. Cybersecurity law
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

Privacy law6 instruments, 6 in force

Research summary (137 words)

Equatorial Guinea's comprehensive personal-data regime is Ley Núm. 1/2016, de 22 de julio, de Protección de Datos Personales, which binds any controller or processor of personal data in both the public and private sectors.

The Órgano Rector de Protección de Datos Personales is the law's own named supervisory authority, but the law creates it only by a future decree, and no source located confirms that decree has issued, so enforcement runs through the Ministry of Telecommunications and New Technologies under Article 35 in the meantime.

A second 2016 statute, Ley Núm. 2/2016, de 22 de julio, de Conservación de Datos en las Comunicaciones Electrónicas y Redes de Comunicación, obliges providers and operators of electronic communications services and public communications networks to retain the data their services generate, a data-retention law that sits outside the personal-data rows above.

Comprehensive regime

Ley de Protección de Datos Personales

Ley Núm. 1/2016, de 22 de julio, de Protección de Datos PersonalesLey Núm. 1/2016

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 2 applies the Law to the personal data of any citizen recorded on any medium, in both the public and the private sector. It applies when the processing is carried out or used by means located in the national territory, or when Equatoguinean law applies to a controller not established in the country.

Article 6 allows only personal data that is adequate, accurate, truthful, pertinent, complete and not excessive for determined, explicit and legitimate purposes to be collected for processing, and prohibits obtaining it by fraudulent or unlawful means. Article 7 bars keeping personal data in a form that identifies the data subject for longer than the purposes for which it was collected or recorded require.

Article 8 requires processing carried out on behalf of third parties to be governed by a written contract, signed by the parties, stating that the processor will process the data only on the controller's instructions. Article 10 requires the clear, undeniable and unquestionable consent of the data subject for the processing of personal data, subject to listed exceptions for administrative activity, contracts and public-service sources.

Article 10 lets that consent be revoked for a justified reason, without retroactive effect. Article 11 requires the file controller and any processors to adopt the technical and organizational measures needed to keep personal data secure, preventing its alteration, loss, or unauthorized processing or access. Article 12 binds the controller, the processor and everyone involved in processing to professional secrecy and confidentiality at all times.

Article 17 lets private persons create personal data files by obtaining the corresponding administrative concession or authorization from the competent body. Article 20 requires the project of any private file to be notified beforehand to the Órgano Rector de Protección de Datos Personales. Article 39 classes as a minor infraction the failure to request the registration of a personal data file in the General Data Protection Register.

The transitional provision gives personal data files that exist when the Law enters into force six months to comply with it. The Law's own final provision ties commencement to twenty days after its publication in the Official Gazette, and no source stating the day of that publication has been located. The Law is dated at Malabo on .

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Ley de Protección de Datos Personales, comunicación internacional de datos

Ley Núm. 1/2016, arts. 27-28 (comunicación internacional de datos)Ley Núm. 1/2016

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 27 bars personal data that has been processed, or obtained for processing, from being communicated, assigned or transferred to countries that do not provide a level of legal protection comparable to the Law's, unless the Órgano Rector de Protección de Datos Personales gives its prior authorization. Article 27 provides that the level of protection of the destination country is assessed in light of all the circumstances of the transfer and the category of data requested.

Article 28 exempts transfers resulting from treaties or conventions to which Equatorial Guinea is a party, transfers to which the data subject has given unequivocal consent, transfers for international judicial assistance or for medical prevention, diagnosis or care, transfers necessary or legally required for a public interest, money transfers under specific legislation, transfers made from a public register at the request of a person with a legitimate interest, and transfers necessary for a contract in the data subject's interest.

What it requires

Data subject rights

Ley de Protección de Datos Personales, derechos de los interesados

Ley Núm. 1/2016, arts. 13-14, 22, 24 (derechos de los interesados)Ley Núm. 1/2016

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 9 requires the persons from whom personal data is requested to be informed beforehand, expressly, concisely and without ambiguity, when the data is requested. They must be told the purpose and consequences of the collection, the destination of the data and its recipients, whether answering is mandatory or optional, the effects of refusing, the existence of files or processing, and the identity and address of the controller or its representative.

Article 13(a) provides that, within a period of twelve months, the data subject may request and obtain free of charge, by consultation or in writing, a copy of the information on their personal data under processing, the origin of that data and the communications made or planned. Article 13(d) lets the data subject rectify and request the cancellation of inaccurate or incomplete personal data, and obliges the controller to give effect to the request within fifteen days from its date.

Article 13(e) gives data subjects the right to compensation for the damage or injury the controller or processor causes them, enforceable before the ordinary jurisdiction for privately held files. Article 14 lets the controllers of files held for police or tax purposes deny the rights of access, rectification, objection or cancellation.

Article 22 gives data subjects a free right to have their personal data excluded from publicly accessible sources or advertising activity, a matter to be resolved within five days of receiving the complaint or request. Article 24 requires a provider of credit-information services that records payment-default data to notify the data subject, within fifteen days, of the data included in its files and to inform them of the right to obtain information on all of it.

Article 24 also gives data subjects the right to object to the processing of their personal data in those services, which must be cancelled and removed from processing on their simple, free request.

What it requires

Ley de Protección de Datos Personales, impugnación de valoraciones

Ley Núm. 1/2016, art. 13(b) (impugnación de valoraciones)Ley Núm. 1/2016

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 13(b) gives the data subject the right to obtain from the file controller information on the criteria used to assess their personal data and behavior and on the program used in processing, and to challenge any administrative act or decision that implies an assessment of their conduct, characteristics or personality.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Ley de Protección de Datos Personales, tutela, inspección y régimen sancionador

Ley Núm. 1/2016, arts. 29-47 (órgano rector y régimen sancionador)Ley Núm. 1/2016

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 15 names the Órgano Rector de los Datos Personales, to be created by decree, as the body that protects the rights derived from personal data protection. Article 16 gives every person the right to bring actions before the courts of the ordinary jurisdiction against those who violate the Law or deny them a right. Article 35 assigns the power to sanction under the Law to the Ministry of Telecommunications and New Technologies, within its functions, against any infringer.

Article 35 gives the Órgano Rector de Protección de Datos Personales a sanctioning power of its own within its competences. Article 35 allows an appeal (Recurso de Alzada) against the Minister's sanctioning resolutions to the Council of Ministers within thirty days from notification. Article 36 requires file controllers and those responsible for processing to attend the inspecting officials and give them due collaboration in their functions.

Article 38 classifies infractions as minor, serious and very serious. Article 42 sets fines of 200,000 to 500,000 FCFA for a minor infraction, 500,001 to 5,000,000 FCFA for a serious one, and 5,000,001 to 15,000,000 FCFA for a very serious one, alongside non-monetary sanctions such as suspension of a file's processing, sealing of premises, seizure of equipment, permanent closure of premises, disqualification and cancellation of a file's registration.

Article 42 lets the sanctioning body, in serious and very serious cases, require the controllers of public or private files to stop the unlawful use, communication, assignment or transfer of the data.

What it requires

Sensitive categories

Ley de Protección de Datos Personales, datos sensibles

Ley Núm. 1/2016, art. 10 (datos sensibles)Ley Núm. 1/2016

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 10 allows personal data relating to race, tribe or ethnicity, health, sex life, or religious, political or union creed to be obtained or processed only with the data subject's express written consent, except in files specially established for that purpose and linked to political parties, religious confessions, trade unions and similar associations or foundations.

Article 10 allows personal data on the commission of criminal or administrative offences to be included only in the files of the competent bodies of the General State Administration, in the cases their governing rules provide. Article 10 permits processing where necessary for medical prevention or diagnosis, healthcare or medical treatment, or the management of health services, provided a health professional bound by professional secrecy carries it out.

Article 10 also permits that processing where necessary to safeguard the vital interest of the data subject or another person who is physically or legally unable to consent. Article 41 classes as a very serious infraction processing or transferring data on freedom of conscience, political affiliation or ideology, health, sex life, race, tribe or ethnicity, or religion without the data subject's express written consent.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (231 words)

Equatorial Guinea has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code. As a member state of the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI), its copyright regime is the Bangui Agreement's Annex VII (Propiedad Literaria y Artística), which applies directly as the Organization's uniform substantive law rather than through separate domestic transposition.

Annex VII Article 8 grants an author the exclusive right to reproduce, translate, adapt, distribute, and publicly perform a work, subject to the exceptions at Articles 10 to 24; Article 15 lets any person, without the author's authorisation or payment, reproduce by print or audiovisual press an economic, political, or religious article published in a newspaper or periodical, or a broadcast work of the same character, wherever the reproduction, broadcast, or communication-to-the-public right has not been expressly reserved, provided the source and the author's name (where it appears in the source) are credited.

That exception is not capped at a headline-length or short-extract threshold and is not confined to the press industry, and no reported Equatoguinean decision applies it to a systematic news aggregator rather than a traditional press summary.

Annex VII contains no press-publisher neighbouring right distinct from ordinary copyright, no hot-news or misappropriation doctrine, no statute or case addressing hyperlinking or framed display, and no machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive Article 15 or a text and data mining (TDM) opt-out mechanism would create.

Snippet reproduction

Bangui Agreement, Annex VII, Free Use for Informational Purposes

Acuerdo de Bangui por el que se establece una Organización Africana de la Propiedad Intelectual Acta de 14 de diciembre de 2015, Anexo VII (Propiedad Literaria y Artística), art. 15Acuerdo de Bangui (Acta de 14 de diciembre de 2015), Spanish text, WIPO Lex treaty record for the African Intellectual Property Organization

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Annex VII Article 8 gives an author the exclusive right to reproduce, translate, adapt, distribute, and publicly perform a work.

Article 15 carves out a free-use exception for informational purposes: without the author's authorisation or any payment, but subject to crediting the source and the author's name where the source states it, any person may reproduce by print or audiovisual press an economic, political, or religious article published in a newspaper or periodical, or a broadcast work of the same character, in any case where the right of reproduction, broadcast, or communication to the public has not been expressly reserved; reproduce or make accessible, for reporting a current event, a work seen or heard in the course of that event, to the extent the informational purpose justifies; and reproduce by print or audiovisual press a political speech, lecture, address, or sermon delivered in public, or courtroom pleadings, for informational purposes, unless the author has expressly reserved the right.

Authors retain the right to publish a collection of such works. Equatorial Guinea is a signatory government named in the 2015 Act and an OAPI member state, so Annex VII applies to it directly as the Organization's uniform copyright law.

What it requires

Where nothing was found4 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Equatorial Guinea has no enacted statute or regulation binding any person on AI transparency, risk management, training-data, prohibited practices, governance, or sector-specific AI duties.

The Ministry of Transport, Telecommunications and Artificial Intelligence Systems is drafting an Artificial Intelligence Law (Anteproyecto de Ley de Inteligencia Artificial), which as of August 2025 proposed a National Authority for Artificial Intelligence and Data (ANIAD) as an autonomous regulator, but the draft had not been published for public consultation or introduced in the legislature.

Equatorial Guinea is also one of the African Union member states that signed the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence at the Global AI Summit on Africa in Kigali on , a political declaration of principles and commitments on AI talent, data, compute infrastructure, markets, investment, governance, and institutional cooperation; it creates no enforceable duty for a private party and binds signatory governments only in the sense of a policy commitment.

As of .

Scraping law

Equatorial Guinea has no scraping-specific statute, and the general Penal Code in force, the consolidated 1963 Código Penal applied under the post-independence subsidiary-legislation decree, carries no computer-misuse, unauthorised-access, or computer-fraud offence of any kind; the text nowhere refers to a computer, a computer system, or an informatics offence.

A draft law reviewed by the Chamber of Deputies' legislative commission, whose cybercrime articles the commission adopted in April 2024, would criminalise unauthorised access to computer systems, illegal interception of communications, computer fraud, identity impersonation online, and unlawful use of personal data; as of September 2026 it remained before the legislature and no enacted text had been located.

No reported Equatoguinean decision addresses the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper. No sui generis database right, and no reported unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine reaching scraping, has been identified, and no statute or case assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or states an AI-training-specific rule.

Equatorial Guinea's Ley n.º 1/2016 de Protección de Datos Personales, hosted by the Ministry of Public Function and Administrative Reform, is the jurisdiction's personal-data statute, and no supervisory authority for it has been identified as operational. Its operative articles are printed in the official electronic-laws compilation, and Article 2 applies the Law to the personal data of any citizen recorded on any medium, in both the public and the private sector.

Equatorial Guinea's copyright regime, the Bangui Agreement's Annex VII as an African Intellectual Property Organization member state, carries only the traditional press-reporting and quotation exceptions and no text-and-data-mining opt-out mechanism.

As of .

Cybersecurity law

Equatorial Guinea has no enacted standalone product-security statute, vulnerability or incident-reporting duty, sector cyber-resilience regime, or general reasonable-security baseline statute reaching a software or platform provider. A cybercrime bill has been reported to be moving through Equatorial Guinea's parliamentary process since 2023; its enactment is not confirmed in any located government or gazette source, so it is recorded here as a pending development rather than as law.

The Ministry of Public Function and Administrative Reform publishes the fullest public register of national laws located, and it carries no cybersecurity or cybercrime title among the laws it lists. Law No. 2/2017 on Electronic Signatures and Electronic Documents requires every certification service provider to draw up a certification practice statement that details, among other things, its technical and organizational security measures.

Equatorial Guinea's banking sector sits within the Central African Economic and Monetary Community, whose regional supervisor, the Commission Bancaire de l'Afrique Centrale under the Banque des Etats de l'Afrique Centrale, could hold IT-risk or cybersecurity directives for licensed financial institutions; none of LexLint's declared activities expresses a financial entity, so no such directive is described here even if one exists.

Equatorial Guinea's Law No. 1/2016 on the Protection of Personal Data is a comprehensive data-protection statute and is documented as this jurisdiction's privacy-topic instrument; any security-of-processing clause inside it is that statute's own provision and is not repeated here.

As of .

Age gating law

Equatorial Guinea has no adult-content age-verification law, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code. Ley 7/2024, de 23 de diciembre, por la que se regula el uso de las redes sociales, los delitos informáticos y la ciberdelincuencia, prohibits a user under 14 from accessing and belonging to social networks without the consent of a parent, guardian or legal representative.

The prohibition is addressed to users, and the law states no age-verification mechanism for a platform. That law enters into force 90 days after its publication in the Boletín Oficial del Estado or the official media.

The consolidated 1963 Código Penal in force, applied under the post-independence subsidiary-legislation decree, carries no reference to pornography, obscene material, or an online or telecommunications service of any kind, so it imposes no age-gating or age-verification duty on a private service, exhibitor, or distributor.

Ley 1/2016, de 22 de julio, de Protección de Datos Personales, is a data-protection statute whose only reference to age concerns the age of the data subject when police-purpose data is cancelled, and it sets no access-control duty. Ley 1/2017, de 10 de enero, de Comunicaciones por Internet, requires access providers to inform customers about the tools that filter and restrict access to content and services harmful to youth and children (Article 21).

The same law classes the failure to remove data harmful to youth and children as a very serious infraction (Article 48), and it imposes no age-verification duty on a service.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Equatorial Guinea AI law
  • No current case law for Equatorial Guinea privacy law
  • No current case law for Equatorial Guinea scraping law
  • No current case law for Equatorial Guinea cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Equatorial Guinea communications law
  • No current case law for Equatorial Guinea content moderation law
  • No current case law for Equatorial Guinea product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Equatorial Guinea digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Equatorial Guinea age gating law
  • No current case law for Equatorial Guinea reuse law
Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.