Law / Cameroon

Cameroon

All 7 named instruments researched to a stage, across five of the ten areas of law we track: 6 in force and 1 not yet in force. As of .

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 2
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law 1
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law 1
  10. Reuse law 1

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

Privacy law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (458 words)

Cameroon's comprehensive personal-data statute is Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024 relative à la protection des données à caractère personnel au Cameroun, promulgated on and published on the Presidency of the Republic's own listing of laws.

It applies to processing carried out by the State, the decentralized territorial authorities, or any other natural or legal person, to the data of any person established, resident, or in transit in Cameroon, to processing by a controller or processor established in Cameroon, and to processing carried out in a territory where Cameroonian law applies under international law or a duly ratified convention.

Processing requires the data subject's prior, free, informed, specific, and unequivocal consent, with exceptions where it is necessary to meet a legal obligation, to perform a public-interest mission, or to preserve a person's health; a minor under 18 additionally needs the backing of a parent or legal representative.

The law prohibits processing data on religious, philosophical, political, or trade-union opinions and activities, racial, ethnic, linguistic, or regional origin, sexual life, and genetic or biometric data in matters of health, and bars processing in banking transactions without the competent administrations' prior authorization.

Any processing needs the data protection authority's prior authorization, a register of processing activities must be kept, and a breach must be notified to the authority and to the data subject without delay. The law describes an independent public data protection authority and leaves its creation, organization, and functioning to a decree of the President of the Republic.

A transfer of personal data to a foreign state or an international organization needs the authority's prior authorization, which turns on a sufficient level of protection at the destination, a signed legal instrument with the destination state, binding security rules for the importing entity, and standard contractual clauses. Existing processing operations had 18 months from promulgation, until , to come into conformity.

Separately, and predating this comprehensive statute, Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010 relative à la cybersécurité et à la cybercriminalité au Cameroun already criminalized a range of personal-data misuse within its own offences chapter: recording or transmitting private or confidential electronic data without the data subject's consent, intercepting personal data in transit between information systems, processing personal data in violation of the prior declaration or authorization formalities that preceded the 2024 law, collecting personal data by unlawful means to harm a person's privacy or reputation, and, at doubled penalties, putting online, storing, or diverting data revealing tribal origin, political or religious opinions, trade-union membership, or morals without the person's express agreement, as well as retaining data in nominative or encrypted form beyond the legal duration stated in the request for opinion or the prior declaration, or disclosing nominative data harming the victim's standing.

Comprehensive regime

Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024 relative à la protection des données à caractère personnel au Cameroun

Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024, certified true copy of the General Secretariat of the Presidency of the Republic of Cameroon, prc.cm

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Cameroon's personal-data protection statute, promulgated on .

It governs any processing of personal data carried out by the State, the decentralized territorial authorities, or any other natural or legal person, and it reaches the data of any person established, resident, or in transit in Cameroon, processing by a controller or processor established in Cameroon, and processing carried out in a territory where Cameroonian law applies under international law or a duly ratified convention (Article 2).

Processing is subject to the data subject's prior, free, informed, specific, and unequivocal consent, with exceptions where it is necessary to meet a legal obligation, to perform a public-interest mission, or to preserve a person's health (Article 9). The consent of a person under 18 is valid only if backed by that of a parent or legal representative (Article 9).

Article 48 prohibits processing data on religious, philosophical, political, or trade-union opinions and activities, racial, ethnic, linguistic, or regional origin, sexual life, and genetic or biometric data in matters of health, and bars processing in banking transactions without the competent administrations' prior authorization.

Any processing is subject to prior authorization from the data protection authority (Article 19), and a controller or processor keeps a register of processing activities (Article 29). On learning of a breach, a controller or processor informs the authority and the data subject without delay (Article 22), and the controller sends the authority an annual report on the security measures it has implemented (Article 27).

The law describes an independent public data protection authority and leaves its creation, organization, and functioning to a decree of the President of the Republic (Article 53).

A transfer to a foreign state or an international organization needs the authority's prior authorization, and before granting it the authority must check a sufficient level of protection at the destination, a signed legal instrument with the destination state, binding security rules for the importing entity, and standard contractual clauses signed by the importing and exporting entities (Article 32).

The law closes with an execution formula and states no day on which it comes into force; it was promulgated on , and Article 73 gives a person processing personal data eighteen months from promulgation, that is until , to comply.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010 relative à la cybersécurité et à la cybercriminalité au Cameroun, article 74 (atteinte à la vie privée et traitement illicite des données à caractère personnel)

Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, art. 74Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, official gazetted text hosted by the Agence de Régulation des Télécommunications (ART.cm)

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 74 of Cameroon's cybersecurity and cybercrime law, sitting in the law's own offences-and-sanctions chapter (Title III, Chapter II, Articles 60 to 89), criminalizes a range of personal-data misuse that predates and now sits alongside the 2024 comprehensive statute.

It punishes recording, fixing, or transmitting private or confidential electronic data without the data subject's consent, and intercepting personal data during its transmission between information systems, with one to two years' imprisonment and a fine of 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 FCFA (alinéas 1 and 2).

It separately punishes processing personal data in violation of the prior formalities required before implementation, with one to three years and a fine of 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 FCFA (alinéa 3), and collecting nominative data by unlawful means to harm a person's privacy or standing, with six months to two years and the same fine range (alinéa 4).

Those alinéa-4 penalties are doubled against a person who puts online, keeps, or stores in computerized memory, without the data subject's express agreement, nominative data revealing tribal origin, political or religious opinions, trade-union membership, or morals, and the doubled penalty also reaches a person who diverts such information in the course of recording, filing, or transmitting it (alinéas 5 and 6).

The highest fine in the article, 5,000,000 to 50,000,000 FCFA (with a lower six-months-to-two-years prison term), punishes retaining information in nominative or encrypted form beyond the legal duration stated in the request for opinion or prior declaration for the automated processing, and the same penalty reaches disclosing nominative data in a way that harms the victim's standing (alinéas 7 and 8). The law was promulgated on .

Its Article 97 orders its registration and publication under the urgent procedure and its insertion in the Journal Officiel in French and English without naming a day of entry into force.

What it requires

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (391 words)

Open-web crawling of public pages carries no dedicated Cameroonian statute.

The applicable computer-misuse authority is Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010 relative à la cybersécurité et à la cybercriminalité au Cameroun, which criminalizes fraudulently accessing or remaining within all or part of an electronic-communications network or information system while causing a serious disruption or interruption of its functioning (article 68), and separately criminalizes accessing without right and in violation of security measures, all or part of a network, system, or terminal equipment in order to obtain information or data (article 69); no Cameroonian court decision construes how authorization is read for a public, unauthenticated page, and the law's own definition of unlawful access turns on the absence of a right or on a security-measure violation, so it does not by its terms exempt a public page reached without circumventing any technical measure.

No statute or case law addresses terms-of-service enforceability (browsewrap versus clickwrap), or whether login or acceptance of terms changes the legal picture; ordinary contract-formation principles under Cameroon's general civil law would be the applicable general law for a contract-formation question, but this is unsettled rather than a specific regime.

Copyright protects a database only as a compilation, never through a separate sui generis right: Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins defines a database as a collection of works, data, or other elements systematized so as to be searchable and processable by computer, and protects as an original composite work a collection of works, including collections of folklore expressions or of simple facts or data, such as encyclopedias, anthologies, and data compilations, reproduced on a machine-exploitable medium or otherwise, where the selection or arrangement of the material constitutes an original work; the underlying facts and data are not protected as such.

Personal-data reach over scraped public personal data is governed by Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024, researched in full under the privacy topic; its scope provisions extend to processing by any natural or legal person over data of a person established, resident, or in transit in Cameroon, without a general publicly-available-data carve-out identified, and processing that reveals a sensitive category, including biometric data, is in principle prohibited.

No specific unfair-competition or misappropriation doctrine addresses scraping, and no case law or regulatory statement gives robots.txt legal weight or addresses AI-training-specific access rules.

Computer misuse

Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010 relative à la cybersécurité et à la cybercriminalité au Cameroun, articles 68-69 (accès frauduleux)

Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, art. 68-69Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, official gazetted text hosted by the Agence de Régulation des Télécommunications (ART.cm)

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Cameroon's primary computer-misuse provisions, sitting in the cybersecurity and cybercrime law's offences-and-sanctions chapter.

Article 68 punishes fraudulently accessing or remaining within all or part of an electronic-communications network or information system by transmitting, damaging, or causing a serious disruption or interruption of the system's or network's functioning, with five to ten years' imprisonment and a fine of 10,000,000 to 50,000,000 FCFA, doubled where data is deleted or modified or the system's functioning is altered as a result.

Article 69 punishes accessing without right, and in violation of security measures, all or part of a network, information system, or terminal equipment connected to another information system, in order to obtain information or data, with five to ten years and a fine of 10,000,000 to 100,000,000 FCFA, the highest fine tier in the law's offences chapter.

Neither article carries an exemption for a search engine, indexer, or host, and neither turns its authorization test on whether the page reached was itself publicly accessible; article 69's own text keys liability to a security-measure violation, which a page requiring no authentication and using no technical access control would not appear to trigger, though no reported Cameroonian decision confirms this reading against a scraper of public pages specifically.

Article 97 provides that the law is to be registered and published under the urgent procedure and then inserted in the Official Gazette in French and English. Under article 4 of Ordonnance n° 72-11 du 26 août 1972, a law published under the urgent procedure is made known to the population by all means, notably radio, and is executory immediately. The English text of the law is dated Yaoundé, . No source located states the day on which the law was made known to the public.

What it requires

Database right

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins, article 4(2)(b) (protection des bases de données)

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000, art. 4(2)(b)Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000, official consolidated text, WIPO Lex (WIPO Lex No. CM001)

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins defines a "base de données" (article 2, definitions no. 12) as a collection of works, data, or other elements systematized so as to be searchable and processed by computer, and protects, as an original composite work without prejudice to any copyright in the pre-existing work (article 4(2)(b)), collections of works, including collections of folklore expressions or of simple facts or data, such as encyclopedias, anthologies, and data compilations, whether reproduced on a machine-exploitable medium or in any other form, where the selection or arrangement of the material constitutes an original work; there is no separate sui generis database right.

The underlying facts and data within a database remain unprotected; only an original selection or arrangement is a protected work.

Infringement (contrefaçon), defined at article 80 to include any exploitation of a literary or artistic work in violation of the law by representation, reproduction, transformation, or distribution by any means, is punished under article 82 by five to ten years' imprisonment and a fine of 500,000 to 10,000,000 FCFA, or either penalty alone, doubled where the offender is the rightsholder's own co-contracting party. Loi n° 2000/011 is dated .

Its last article, article 97, orders that the law be registered and published by the urgent procedure and then inserted in the Journal officiel. The law's final articles state no day of its own for its entry into force. Under article 4 of Ordonnance n° 72-11 du 26 août 1972, a law published by the urgent procedure is brought to the population's knowledge by all means, notably radio, and is executory immediately.

No record of the day on which the law was communicated under that procedure, and no issue of the Journal officiel carrying it, has been located.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (286 words)

Cameroon's cybersecurity and cybercrime statute, Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, carries a security regime for network operators, electronic-communications service providers, certification authorities, and information-system operators, alongside the criminal offenses already documented in the privacy and scraping topics, and its reach is not gated by sector, size, or a government designation.

The law sets no general product-security requirement for a connected device or software product before market placement; its only market-facing technical-approval duty is narrower, requiring that the devices used to create and verify qualified electronic certificates be technologically neutral, standardized, approved, and interoperable, which binds the certification-authority industry rather than a general software or connected-device market.

No provision creates a mandatory duty, with a clock, for a private operator to report an actively exploited vulnerability or a security incident to ANTIC, a computer emergency response team, or its own users; article 7(2) gives the Agency itself a role in monitoring, detecting, and issuing alerts about information-technology and cybercrime risks, which is a function the Agency performs rather than a reporting duty running from an operator to the Agency.

Cameroon's comprehensive privacy statute, Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024, carries its own security-of-processing duties, a data-breach notification to the data-protection authority without delay and to affected persons where their rights are threatened, and an annual security report, which sit in the privacy topic rather than here.

The same 2010 law separately regulates a licensed certification-authority industry, electronic-signature validity, and a root certification authority (articles 8 through 23 and 60); that licensed trust-service business, rather than a general software or platform operator, is who those provisions bind. ANTIC's own website serves only a JavaScript shell, so no separate ANTIC-issued binding security-certification regulation beyond this statute is confirmed.

Security baseline statutes

Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010 relative à la cybersécurité et à la cybercriminalité au Cameroun, articles 6, 7, 13-14, 24, 26-30, 32, 61(3) (mesures de sécurité et audit de sécurité obligatoire par l'ANTIC)

Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, art. 6-7, 13-14, 24, 26-30, 32, 61(3)Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, official gazetted text hosted by the Agence de Régulation des Télécommunications (ART.cm)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 24 requires that the operators of electronic-communications networks and providers of electronic-communications services take all technical and administrative measures necessary to guarantee the security of the services offered, and separately requires them to inform their users of the dangers of using their networks, the specific security risks they face (distributed denial of service, abnormal rerouting, traffic spikes, unusual traffic and ports, passive and active eavesdropping, and intrusions), and the technical means available to secure their communications.

Article 26 separately binds any information-system operator, a term the law defines broadly as an isolated device or a group of interconnected devices carrying out automated data processing under a program, requiring it to adopt standardized systems that let it continuously identify, assess, treat, and manage the risks tied to its information systems' security within the services it offers directly or indirectly, and to put in place technical mechanisms against threats to its systems' permanent availability, integrity, authentication, non-repudiation, data confidentiality, and physical security.

The security mechanisms an information-system operator adopts for this purpose must be approved by Cameroon's National Information and Communication Technologies Agency (ANTIC), which the law calls the Agency, before they satisfy the duty. The same operators must evaluate and revise their security systems as technology evolves, introducing whatever changes their security practices, measures, and techniques need.

Beyond that self-implemented program, networks and information systems are subject to a mandatory, periodic security audit that the Agency itself conducts at least once a year or whenever circumstances require, with confidential audit reports going to the Minister in charge of Telecommunications.

Article 13 separately and expressly subjects the networks and information systems of operators, certification authorities, and providers of electronic-communications services to that same mandatory security audit.

Obstructing, resisting, or preventing that audit, or refusing to provide the information or documents it requires, is a criminal offense carrying one to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 to 1,000,000 FCFA, or either penalty alone, though no provision sets a distinct penalty for an operator's substantive failure to implement the underlying security measures themselves, beyond the Agency's power to withhold approval of a non-compliant mechanism.

What it requires

Age gating law1 instrument, 1 not yet in force

Research summary (222 words)

Cameroon has enacted a broad child-online-protection charter rather than a narrow adult-content-verification or social-media-minor statute. Loi n°2023/009 du 25 juillet 2023 portant charte de protection des enfants en ligne au Cameroun applies to all activities involving children in cyberspace and defines a child as any person under 18 (Articles 2 and 3).

It brings the private sector into the same task as the public authorities, and sets duties for internet access providers, content providers, search-engine providers, social-network promoters, information-system operators, cybercafe managers, online-advertising professionals, and audiovisual-communication operators (Articles 11 to 26).

On the competent authorities' request, access providers, content providers, information-system operators, and social-network promoters must suspend access for a consumer who published content harming a child's dignity and integrity, and search-engine providers must stop indexing such content (Articles 14 and 15).

Online gambling and betting promoters must keep children out through measures that include a visible text barring them, an honor declaration of age with identification data, and online payment (Article 36).

Enforcement combines administrative and criminal sanctions: the body regulating information and communication technologies serves formal notice to comply within 15 days, and if the notice is ignored it imposes a penalty of 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 FCFA (Articles 28 and 29), while criminal sanctions, set from Article 33 onward, range from fines through imprisonment to professional prohibitions and temporary closures.

Age-appropriate design code

Loi n°2023/009 du 25 juillet 2023 portant charte de protection des enfants en ligne au Cameroun

Loi n°2023/009 du 25 juillet 2023Loi n°2023/009 du 25 juillet 2023, certified true copy of the General Secretariat of the Presidency of the Republic of Cameroon, prc.cm

Not yet in force

Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Cameroon's charter for the protection of children online is Loi n°2023/009 of . The charter applies to all activities involving children in cyberspace and defines a child as any person under 18 (Articles 2 and 3).

The private sector shares with the public authorities the task of making the national cyberspace safer for children, and is to take steps when offering services to reduce the availability of, and access to, content harming a child's dignity and integrity (Articles 11 and 12).

On the competent authorities' request, internet access providers, content providers, information-system operators, and social-network promoters must suspend access to the internet, to their content, or to their network for a consumer who published content harming a child's dignity and integrity, and search-engine providers must stop indexing such content (Articles 14 and 15).

Internet access providers, content and search-engine providers, social-network promoters, information-system operators, and cybercafe managers must also report to the competent authorities all acts constituting child pornography and suspend the sites identified as harming a child's dignity and integrity (Article 16).

Internet access providers must make available guides to good practice in cyberspace, reporting mechanisms, and parental-control tools, and content and online-service providers must describe the nature of their content or services and the age groups they are intended for (Articles 20, 21, and 23).

Online gambling and betting promoters who do not keep children out, by a visible text barring them, an honor declaration of age with identification data, and online payment, face one to three years' imprisonment, a fine of 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 FCFA, or both (Article 36).

When a provider breaches its duties, the body regulating information and communication technologies serves formal notice to comply within 15 days, and if the notice is ignored it imposes a penalty of 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 FCFA (Articles 28 and 29).

Criminal sanctions begin at Article 33, with a fine of 25,000,000 to 250,000,000 FCFA for an internet access provider that knows of content harming a child's dignity and integrity and does not report, block, or remove it, and the court may add professional prohibitions and temporary closure of the establishment on a repeat offence.

The law names no day of entry into force: its article 49 orders it registered and published under the urgent procedure and inserted in the Journal Officiel in French and English, and its article 48 leaves the detailed rules of application to separate texts.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (397 words)

Cameroon has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognized hot-news misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no statute or case law addressing hyperlinking or framing liability specifically; each of those dimensions is a sourced absence rather than an unresolved question.

The relevant instrument is Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins, whose neighbouring-rights provisions protect only performers, producers of sound and video recordings, and audiovisual-communication enterprises, not print or online news publishers, so there is no publisher-side neighbouring right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive article 15 creates.

The law permits, once a work has been published with the author's authorization, analyses, press reviews, and short quotations justified by the critical, pedagogical, scientific, or informational character of the work, provided they carry the mention "source" and the author's name where it appears in the source (article 29(1)(d)); it separately permits reproducing and making accessible to the public, for informational purposes and in short excerpts, literary or artistic works seen, heard, or recorded in the course of a current event, by photography, broadcast, or other means of public communication, on the occasion of a report on that event (article 30).

It further permits the press or a broadcaster to reproduce, in the original or in translation, political, social, economic, or religious current-affairs articles, political speeches, and speeches delivered in judicial proceedings, sermons, conferences, and addresses, unless the right of exploitation has been expressly reserved, always subject to clearly indicating the source and the author's name (article 31); this express-reservation proviso functions as an author-side opt-out for that specific exception, the closest Cameroonian law comes to a machine-readable reservation mechanism, though it long predates the concept of one and is not framed as machine-readable.

None of these exceptions is capped at a headline-length or short-extract threshold in the way some jurisdictions' quotation rights are, the article 31 exception is not confined to the press industry, and no reported Cameroonian decision applies any of these provisions to a systematic news aggregator as opposed to a traditional newspaper or broadcaster.

The law predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists, and no statute or case law addresses whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public, or whether framing or inline display changes the answer.

Snippet reproduction

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins, articles 29, 30, 31 (revue de presse, actualité, citation)

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000, art. 29, 30, 31Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000, official consolidated text, WIPO Lex (WIPO Lex No. CM001)

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins permits, once a work has been published with the author's authorization, analyses, press reviews, and short quotations justified by the critical, pedagogical, scientific, or informational character of the work, provided the source and the author's name (where it appears in the source) are indicated (article 29(1)(d)).

It separately permits reproducing and making accessible to the public, for informational purposes and in short excerpts, literary or artistic works seen, heard, or recorded in the course of a current event, by photography, broadcast, or another means of public communication, on the occasion of reporting that event (article 30).

It further permits the press or a broadcaster to reproduce, in original version or in translation, political, social, economic, or religious current-affairs articles, political speeches, speeches delivered in judicial proceedings, and sermons, conferences, and addresses of the same nature, unless the right of exploitation has been expressly reserved by the author or the copyright owner, always subject to clearly indicating the source and the author's name (article 31).

Neighbouring rights under the law protect only performers, producers of sound and video recordings, and audiovisual-communication enterprises, so a print or online news publisher holds no neighbouring right distinct from its ordinary copyright in the articles it publishes. No provision addresses hyperlinking, framing, or inline display, and no reported case law applies articles 29, 30, or 31 to a systematic aggregator rather than a traditional press or broadcast outlet.

Loi n° 2000/011 is dated . Its last article, article 97, orders that the law be registered and published by the urgent procedure and then inserted in the Journal officiel. The law's final articles state no day of its own for its entry into force. Under article 4 of Ordonnance n° 72-11 du 26 août 1972, a law published by the urgent procedure is brought to the population's knowledge by all means, notably radio, and is executory immediately.

No record of the day on which the law was communicated under that procedure, and no issue of the Journal officiel carrying it, has been located.

What it requires

Where nothing was found1 area of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Cameroon has not enacted a binding statute imposing an AI-transparency or output-labeling duty: a duty to disclose that content is AI-generated, to label or watermark synthetic output, or to disclose that a user is talking to a bot.

In July 2025 the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications unveiled a National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (Stratégie Nationale d'Intelligence Artificielle, SNIA), built around seven pillars, governance, data infrastructure, multilingual AI, edge computing, human capital, innovation, and regional cooperation, targeting Cameroon as a leading African AI hub by 2040.

Its governance pillar calls for creating a Cameroonian AI Authority and a Presidential Council on AI, and for drafting a framework law addressing ethical considerations and inter-ministerial coordination, but as of no numbered bill or public draft legal text implementing the strategy is publicly available, and the AI Authority the strategy calls for had not been created by presidential decree or made operational.

Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024 relative à la protection des données à caractère personnel au Cameroun was not confirmed to carry a right against purely automated decision-making comparable to the automated-individual-decision provisions some other African comprehensive data-protection statutes carry; its own text is not confirmed against a directly read primary source (see the privacy topic document for that limitation), so this is an absence in the secondary sources consulted rather than a confirmed absence from the statute itself.

Cameroon's existing binding statutes touching AI-adjacent activity address other duties: Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010 relative à la cybersécurité et à la cybercriminalité au Cameroun criminalizes computer-misuse conduct that could be carried out with AI tooling but imposes no AI-specific duty.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Cameroon AI law
  • No current case law for Cameroon privacy law
  • No current case law for Cameroon scraping law
  • No current case law for Cameroon cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Cameroon communications law
  • No current case law for Cameroon content moderation law
  • No current case law for Cameroon product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Cameroon digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Cameroon age gating law
  • No current case law for Cameroon reuse law
Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.