Law / United States / Nebraska

Nebraska Computer Crimes Act, unauthorized access defined against a statutory computer security system

Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-1343, 28-1343.01

In force since .

A computer misuse rule binding public and private bodies.

Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Section 28-1343.01 by itself applies only to a computer security system, so a public page with no login, access code, or conspicuous security warning is outside that section.
  • Defeating a login wall or an access-code challenge is what this statute reaches: it is a Class IV felony where it creates a grave risk of causing the death of a person, a Class I misdemeanor where it creates a risk to public health and safety, and a Class II misdemeanor where it compromises the security of data.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 4.1Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Who enforces it

Settledness

As of
Open questions
  • Does a terms-of-use notice or a robots.txt directive amount to "a conspicuous warning to a user that the user is entering a secure system" under Neb. Rev. Stat. section 28-1343(5)?
  • Is a login that accepts any self-registered account a system that "requires a person seeking access to knowingly respond by use of an authorized code" under Neb. Rev. Stat. section 28-1343(5)?

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Section 28-1343.01 makes it an offense to penetrate a computer security system intentionally and without authority, and section 28-1343 defines the terms, including a computer security system as a program or device that protects data and displays a warning or requires an authorized code. Neither section requires a person to create, keep, produce or review a log or record, and neither states a territorial clause.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Section 28-1343.01 provides that a person commits the offense of unauthorized computer access if the person intentionally and without authority penetrates a computer security system, with penalty tiers running from a Class II misdemeanor, where the offense compromises the security of data, up to a Class IV felony, where it creates a grave risk of causing a person's death.

Section 28-1343(5) defines computer security system precisely as a program or device that is intended to protect the confidentiality and secrecy of data and information stored in or accessible through the computer system, and that either displays a conspicuous warning to a user that the user is entering a secure system or requires a person seeking access to knowingly respond by use of an authorized code to gain access.

Taken together, a page with no login wall, no access code, and no conspicuous entry warning does not meet the definition of a computer security system, so a plain crawl of such a page does not penetrate one under this section.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app crawls the web.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .