Law / United States / Colorado

SB 24-041 (2024), Privacy Protections for Children's Online Data

Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 6-1-1305.5, 6-1-1308.5, 6-1-1309.5 (amending the Colorado Privacy Act)

In force since .

An age-appropriate design code rule binding private bodies.

Private right of action
No
Penalties
Violations are deceptive trade practices under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act.
Audit expectation
continuous
Who audits it
Self
Where the report goes
Produced on request

What it requires

  • Applies to a controller offering any online service, product or feature to a Colorado consumer it actually knows or willfully disregards is a minor (under 18), without the Colorado Privacy Act's usual volume thresholds.
  • Use reasonable care to avoid a heightened risk of harm to minors.no control in the NIST Privacy Framework
  • Conduct data protection assessments.NIST Privacy FrameworkID.RA-P4
  • Without consent (the minor's, or a parent's for a child under 13), do not process a minor's data for targeted advertising, sale or significant profiling.NIST Privacy FrameworkCT.PO-P1
  • Without that consent, do not use a system design feature to significantly increase, sustain or extend the minor's use.no control in the NIST Privacy Framework
  • Without that consent, do not collect precise geolocation except as specified.NIST Privacy FrameworkCT.PO-P1

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST Privacy Framework
  • ID.RA-P4Problematic data actions, likelihoods, and impacts are used to determine and prioritize risk.
  • CT.PO-P1Policies, processes, and procedures for authorizing data processing (e.g., organizational decisions, individual consent), revoking authorizations, and maintaining authorizations are established and in place.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework, and in the NIST Privacy Framework, line by line beside each duty above. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

Colorado Attorney General and district attorneys

Settledness

The Department of Law filed proposed draft amendments to the Colorado Privacy Act Rules on to clarify the changes made by Senate Bill 24-041.

As of
Open questions
  • What facts show that a controller 'willfully disregards' that a consumer is a minor under Section 6-1-1308.5(1)(a), given that Section 6-1-1304(3)(f) does not require a controller to collect the age of consumers?
  • What does 'reasonable care to avoid any heightened risk of harm to minors' require of a controller under Section 6-1-1308.5(1)(a), beyond the data protection assessment that Section 6-1-1309.5 requires?

What it reaches

Age threshold

18

Covered services

Controllers offering any online service, product, or feature to Colorado consumers known or willfully disregarded to be minors, without the Colorado Privacy Act's usual volume thresholds.

How the hook was established

express

What makes it apply

Operator establishment, Market targeting

Verification methods

Parental consent

What it makes you log

Who may demand the log

Regulator

Log retention

The period is the longer of three years after the processing operations cease or the date the controller ceases offering the service, product or feature.

Unit
Years
As of
Basis
Fixed
Minimum value
3

Logging duty

The duty is to document and keep the assessment of a service offered to known minors, not a log of age checks. Section 6-1-1304(3)(f) says the act does not require an age verification or age-gating system.

Kind
Implicit
As of
Provision
C.R.S. 6-1-1309.5(2)(b): maintain documentation concerning a data protection assessment for the longer of three years after the processing operations cease or the date the controller stops offering the service; 6-1-1309.5(6)(b)(I): make the assessment available to the Attorney General on request
Trigger
personal_data_processing

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Requires a controller offering an online service, product, or feature to a consumer it actually knows or willfully disregards is a minor (under 18) to use reasonable care to avoid a heightened risk of harm to minors and to conduct data protection assessments.

Without consent (the minor's, or a parent's for a child under 13), the controller may not process a minor's data for targeted advertising, sale, or significant profiling, use a system design feature to significantly increase, sustain, or extend the minor's use, or collect precise geolocation except as specified. Signed .

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app serves under-18s.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .