Law / United States / Arkansas

Act 900 of 2025 (SB611), Social Media Safety Act amendments (addictive design)

Act 900 of 2025 (SB611), amending Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-1401 et seq.

A social media and minors rule binding private bodies.

Age threshold
16
Covered services
Social media platforms as statutorily defined.
How the hook was established
express
What makes it apply
User location
Verification methods
Gov ID, Digital ID
Audit expectation
periodic
Who audits it
Self

What it requires

  • Applies to social media platforms as statutorily defined; the Act lowers the covered minor age from 18 to 16.
  • Do not use addictive design features (these duties carried a delayed effective date of ).no control in the NIST Privacy Framework
  • Provide default privacy settings.NIST Privacy FrameworkGV.PO-P2
  • Disable non-essential notifications between 10 PM and 6 AM.no control in the NIST Privacy Framework

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text. Also read by: NetChoice, LLC v. Griffin, No. 5:25-CV-5140 (W.D. Ark. ) (recorded ).

In the frameworks

NIST Privacy Framework
  • GV.PO-P2Processes to instill organizational privacy values within system/product/service development and operations are established and in place.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework, and in the NIST Privacy Framework, line by line beside each duty above. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Who enforces it

Litigation

Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Docket
NetChoice, LLC v. Griffin, No. 5:25-cv-05140 (W.D. Ark.)
Posture
Preliminarily enjoined on , one day before the delayed addictive design provisions were to take effect; the injunction has been reported as on appeal to the Eighth Circuit.

Settledness

The preliminary injunction enjoins the defendants from enforcing the provisions of Act 900 against NetChoice's members.

As of
Case link
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-arwd-5_25-cv-05140/pdf/USCOURTS-arwd-5_25-cv-05140-1.pdf
Case citation
NetChoice, LLC v. Griffin, No. 5:25-CV-5140 (W.D. Ark. )
Under challenge
Yes
Open questions
  • Which practices 'evoke any addiction or compulsive behaviors' under Section 4-88-1402(d)(1), and whose 'contemporary understanding of addiction, compulsory behavior, and child cognitive development' sets the test?
  • Does 'artificial sense of accomplishment' in Section 4-88-1402(d)(1) reach ordinary engagement features such as streaks, badges or like counts?

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Act 900 orders no log or record by name. It requires a social media platform to monitor for suspicious activity, including false or repeated credentials, to prevent circumvention of age verification, which cannot be done without keeping a record of the credentials used. The quarterly audit in Sec. 4-88-1402(d)(3) examines the platform's products for addictive behavior, not an age-check record. The Act sets no retention rule; any retention limit sits in the base Social Media Safety Act, which this row does not cite.

Kind
Implicit
As of
Provision
Ark. Code Ann. Sec. 4-88-1405(a)(1), added by Act 900 Section 5
Trigger
age_assurance

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Amends the Social Media Safety Act to lower the covered minor age from 18 to 16, prohibit addictive design features, require default privacy settings, and disable non-essential notifications between 10 PM and 6 AM. Signed ; most provisions took effect , while the addictive design and notification duties in Section 2 carried a delayed effective date of , one year after enactment.

How courts have read itPremium data

Our analysis of this law draws on 1 court ruling.

What each ruling held, what it means for an app, and whether it still stands are premium data, in the Plus, Pro and Enterprise plans.

See the plansSign in

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app operates a social platform.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .