RussiaCivil Code Part IV Article 1274, Free Use of a Work for Informational, Scientific, Educational or Cultural Purposes
Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part IV, Art. 1274
In force since .
A snippet reproduction rule binding public and private bodies.
- Instrument type
- an act of a legislature
- Categories
- TDM opt-out
What it requires
- You may quote lawfully published works, in the original or in translation, without the rightholder's consent or payment, for scientific, polemical, critical, informational or educational purposes or to reveal the author's creative intent, as far as the purpose justifies, including newspaper and magazine article excerpts as press reviews (art. 1274).
- Name the author and the source of every quotation.
- You may reproduce in a periodical print publication, and communicate to the public, lawfully published articles on current economic, political, social or religious topics, unless the author or rightholder has specifically prohibited that use.
- You may reproduce and communicate works seen or heard in covering current events, in reviews of current events, within the bounds an informational purpose justifies.
- Do not treat article 1274 as covering text-and-data-mining, mass scraping for indexing, aggregation beyond quotation-length excerpts, or model training: it names no exception for them, so the ordinary reproduction right applies.
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.
In the frameworks
- NIST AI RMF
- MAP 4.1Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights.
Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law
What this law does
Article 1274 permits, without the rightholder's consent and without payment but with mandatory attribution of the author and the source, quotation of lawfully published works in the original or in translation for scientific, polemical, critical, informational, or educational purposes, or to reveal the author's creative intent, to the extent justified by the purpose of the quotation, including reproducing excerpts of newspaper and magazine articles in the form of press reviews.
It separately permits reproducing in a periodical print publication, and communicating to the public, lawfully published articles on current economic, political, social, or religious topics broadcast or communicated to the public, unless the author or rightholder has specifically prohibited such use, and permits reproduction and communication, within the bounds justified by an informational purpose, of works seen or heard in the course of covering current events, in reviews of current events.
The article names no exception at all for automated text-and-data-mining or bulk machine reproduction of protected works; its enumerated free uses cover quotation, illustration in educational material, periodical press reproduction, political speeches, reviews of current events, non-profit live performance in institutions, dissertation abstracts, formats for people with print disabilities and parody, so mass scraping of copyrighted content for indexing, aggregation beyond quotation-length excerpts, or model training draws on none of them and falls back to the ordinary reproduction right.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app reuses other publishers' content.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .