Law / Netherlands

UAVG Articles 30-33 and 46, Health, Criminal-Conviction, and National-ID-Number Data

UAVG, Arts. 30-33, 46

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force since 25 May 2018.

A sensitive categories rule binding public and private bodies.

As of 24 August 2026.

What it requires

  • Obtain a General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 9(2) basis before processing health, genetic, racial or ethnic origin, political opinion, or religious-belief data of a person in the Netherlands, following UAVG's Chapter 3 exceptions where one applies to your processing purpose.
  • Do not treat the citizen service number (BSN) as a general-purpose identifier; UAVG Article 46 restricts its processing.

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

UAVG Chapter 3 Section 3.1 (Arts. 22-30) implements General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 9's special-category regime with article-by-article national exceptions: research and statistics, racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, and genetic data (Arts. 24-28), a health-data exception for administrative bodies, pension funds, and employers (Art. 30), and rules on criminal-conviction data (Art. 33, corrected during the #8352 wave 4 review from a mistyped Art. 31, which is a distinct provision on processing under governmental oversight).

Article 46 restricts processing of the citizen service number (BSN) to statutory or law-designated purposes; corrected during this review, its full text is in fact present and readable on the stored page, not truncated as previously stated. The AP's own scraping guidance (published 1 May 2024, as described in secondary commentary) states that publicly available information does not become lawfully processable merely because the source was public.

When LexLint raises it

  • crawls_web
  • trains_models
  • high_risk_decisions

Read the law

wetten.overheid.nl, UAVG Arts. 1, 22, 24-31
AP scraping guidance, as characterized by secondary commentary

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app