Law / Malaysia

Computer Crimes Act 1997, unauthorised access to computer material

Computer Crimes Act 1997 (Act 563), s. 3 (Unauthorised Access to Computer Material)

In force since .

A computer misuse rule binding public and private bodies.

What it requires

  • Do not cause a computer to perform a function to secure access to a program or data where that access is unauthorised and you know it to be unauthorised.
  • Reading a public, unauthenticated page without defeating any access control falls outside a plain reading of this section, though no reported Malaysian decision addresses the point either way.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 4.1Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureYes

Private right of actionNo

Criminal exposure note

A fine not exceeding fifty thousand ringgit or imprisonment not exceeding five years, or both, on conviction (s. 3(3)); higher penalties apply under s. 4 (up to RM150,000 or ten years) for unauthorised access committed with intent to commit or facilitate fraud or an offence causing injury, and under s. 5 (up to RM100,000 or seven years, rising to RM150,000 or ten years where done with intent to cause injury as defined in the Penal Code) for unauthorised modification of the contents of a computer.

Penalty structure

Section 3 fine only; the same subsection also allows imprisonment of up to five years instead of or in addition to the fine. Sections 4 and 5 carry separate, higher fixed caps (up to RM150,000) for aggravated unauthorised access and unauthorised modification, not reflected in this cap.

Rule
Fixed only
As of
Currency
MYR
Fixed cap
50,000

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Section 3 makes it an offence to cause a computer to perform a function with intent to secure access to a program or data held in any computer, where that access is unauthorised and the person knows at the time that it is unauthorised; the intent need not be directed at any particular program, data, or computer.

Section 2(5) defines access as unauthorised only where the person is not entitled to control access of that kind and does not have consent from, or exceeds a right or consent given by, a person who is so entitled.

Because the offence turns on whether the access itself is unauthorised rather than on the manner of access, reading a public, unauthenticated page without defeating any access control falls outside a plain reading of the provision, though no reported Malaysian decision addresses the point either way.

Sections 4 and 5 separately punish, at higher penalties, unauthorised access committed with intent to commit or facilitate a further offence, and unauthorised modification of the contents of a computer.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app crawls the web or trains models.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .