Law / Kazakhstan

Penal Code, unauthorized access to information

Penal Code No. 226-V (), Art. 205

In force since .

A computer misuse rule binding public and private bodies.

Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Do not intentionally access legally protected information on an electronic medium without authorization where doing so causes significant harm; the offence is not confined to defeating a technical access control.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 4.1Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureYes

Private right of actionNo

Criminal exposure note

A fine of up to 160 monthly calculation indices, correctional labour of the same amount, public works up to 160 hours, or arrest up to 40 days for the base offence (Art. 205(1)); up to 2,000 monthly calculation indices or imprisonment up to 2 years where the act causes grave consequences through negligence (Art. 205(3)).

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Article 205(1) makes intentional unauthorized access to legally protected information on an electronic medium, causing significant harm, a criminal offence. It imposes no duty to create, keep, produce or review a log or record. The Code's general territorial articles are not invoked by this article, so no hook is read from it.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 205(1) punishes intentional unauthorized access to legally protected information held on an electronic medium, at an informatization object, that causes significant harm, with a fine up to 160 monthly calculation indices, correctional labour of the same amount, public works up to 160 hours, or arrest up to 40 days, plus an optional bar of up to 2 years from holding certain positions or engaging in certain activities.

Article 205(2) raises the penalty where the target is critically important information and communication infrastructure, and Article 205(3) raises it further where the act, under either paragraph, causes grave consequences through negligence, reaching a fine up to 2,000 monthly calculation indices or imprisonment up to 2 years.

The offence's trigger is unauthorized access to protected information causing significant harm; the text read does not require defeating a technical security measure, so it reaches unauthorized access more broadly than a security-circumvention-only standard would. The article's heading was reworded by Law No. 210-VIII ().

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app crawls the web or trains models.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .