Law on Copyright and Related Rights, quotation and news-article reproduction exceptions
Law No. 6-I (), Art. 19(1), (3)
In force.
A snippet reproduction rule binding private bodies.
What it requires
- You may quote lawfully published works without the author's or rightsholder's consent or payment, for scientific, research, polemical, critical or informational purposes and as far as the purpose justifies, including excerpts from newspaper and magazine articles in press reviews; attribute the author and source (Article 19(1)).
- You may reproduce in newspapers, or communicate by broadcast or cable, lawfully published newspaper or magazine articles on current economic, political, social and religious topics, or broadcast works of the same character, unless the author has specially prohibited it (an author opt-out, Article 19(3)).
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.
In the frameworks
- NIST AI RMF
- MAP 4.1Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights.
Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law
What this law does
Article 19(1) permits, without the author's or rightsholder's consent and without payment but with mandatory attribution of the author and source, quotation in the original or in translation for scientific, research, polemical, critical or informational purposes from lawfully published works, to an extent justified by the purpose of the quotation, including the reproduction of excerpts from newspaper and magazine articles in the form of press reviews.
Article 19(3) separately permits reproducing in newspapers, or communicating by broadcast or cable to the public, lawfully published newspaper or magazine articles on current economic, political, social and religious topics, or broadcast works of the same character, in cases where the author has not specially prohibited such reproduction, broadcast or cable communication, so the exception is an author opt-out rather than an unconditional licence.
Article 19 carries no headline-length or short-extract cap distinct from the fair-practice and purpose-justified tests in its own text. The Article's heading and adjoining provisions were most recently touched by Law No. 233-VIII (), a terminology-only amendment on the text read. No commencement day for the Law has been located.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app reuses other publishers' content.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .