Law / Italy

Legge sul Diritto d'Autore Art. 70, Quotation and Criticism Exception

Legge 22 aprile 1941, n. 633, art. 70

In force since .

A snippet reproduction rule binding public and private bodies.

Instrument type
an act of a legislature

What it requires

  • You may summarise, quote or reproduce passages or parts of a work, and communicate them to the public, for criticism or discussion, within the limits that purpose justifies and provided the use does not compete with the work's economic exploitation.
  • For teaching or scientific research, the use must also be illustrative in purpose and non-commercial.
  • Accompany every summary, quotation or reproduction with the work's title and the names of the author, publisher and (for a translation) the translator, where they appear on the reproduced work.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text. Also read by: Case C-516/17 Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, judgment of (Grand Chamber) (recorded ).

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 4.1Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Who enforces it

Settledness

As of
Case link
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0516
Case citation
Case C-516/17 Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, judgment of (Grand Chamber)
Open questions
Does an aggregator's reproduction of a passage of an article, shown with a link and no commentary, serve 'critica o di discussione' and avoid being a use that 'costituiscano concorrenza all'utilizzazione economica dell'opera' under Article 70, comma 1 of Law 633/1941?

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

The summary, quotation or reproduction of passages or parts of a work, and their communication to the public, is free if done for criticism or discussion, within the limits justified by that purpose and provided it does not compete with the work's economic exploitation; if done for teaching or scientific research, the use must also be illustrative in purpose and non-commercial (comma 1).

A summary, quotation or reproduction must always be accompanied by the title of the work, the names of the author, publisher and, for a translation, the translator, where those appear on the reproduced work (comma 3). Commas 1 and 3 have had their present wording since , when Legislative Decree 68 of came into force.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app reuses other publishers' content.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .