Croatian Act Articles 21-23, Biometric Data by Sector
Zakon o provedbi Opce uredbe o zastiti podataka, Arts. 21-23
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force since 25 May 2018.
A biometric privacy rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 24 August 2026.
What it requires
- Obtain the data subject's explicit General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliant consent before processing biometric data of a person in Croatia for the individual, secure identification of a service user, per Act Article 22(2).
- Offer a non-biometric alternative and obtain explicit consent, or rely on a legal prescription, before deploying employee biometric time-and-attendance or access-control processing in Croatia, per Act Article 23.
What it reaches
Excludes recording-derived identifiersNo
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Croatia regulates biometric processing by sector rather than a single undifferentiated rule, read verbatim from the gazette text. Article 21 permits public-authority biometric processing only where provided by law and necessary to protect persons, property, classified data, or business secrets, or to fulfil international border-crossing identification obligations.
Article 22 permits private-sector biometric processing where prescribed by law or necessary for those same protective purposes, or for the individual, secure identification of service users, with the last purpose requiring the data subject's explicit General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliant consent as its legal basis; the other Article 22(1) grounds do not require consent on this reading.
Article 23 permits employee biometric processing for recording working time or entry to and exit from official premises where prescribed by law, or as an alternative to another solution for the same purpose, on condition the employee has given explicit consent.
When LexLint raises it
processes_biometricshigh_risk_decisions
Read the law
narodne-novine.nn.hr, gazette issue 42/2018, Arts. 21-23 (verbatim)
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.