Law / Greece

Law 4624/2019, Greek GDPR Implementation Law (Nomos 4624/2019, N. 4624/2019)

Law 4624/2019, FEK A' 137/29-08-2019

In force since .

A comprehensive regime rule binding public and private bodies.

How the hook was established
express
What makes it apply
Operator establishment, Market targeting, User location, Place of effect
Audit expectation
on_request
Who audits it
Regulator
Where the report goes
Produced on request

What it requires

  • Establish a General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 6 lawful basis before processing personal data of a person in Greece, including data collected by crawling.
  • Where an employee's consent is used by way of exception as the legal basis for processing the employee's personal data in Greece, take into account the employee's dependence under the contract of employment and the circumstances in which consent was given, and give the consent in writing or electronically, clearly distinguishable from the contract of employment (Law 4624/2019, Article 27(2)).

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text. Also read by: Case C-34/21 Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium v Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums, judgment of the Court of Justice of (First Chamber) (recorded ).

In the frameworks

NIST Privacy Framework
  • CT.PO-P1Policies, processes, and procedures for authorizing data processing (e.g., organizational decisions, individual consent), revoking authorizations, and maintaining authorizations are established and in place.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Who enforces it

Settledness

As of
Case link
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62021CJ0034
Case citation
Case C-34/21 Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium v Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums, judgment of the Court of Justice of (First Chamber)
Open questions
Does Article 27(1) of Law 4624/2019, which permits processing of employees' personal data where strictly necessary for the contract of employment, contain the 'suitable and specific measures' that Article 88(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 requires of a national 'more specific rule', or does it only repeat the Regulation, which Case C-34/21 holds such a rule may not do?

What it makes you log

Who may demand the log

Regulator

What the log must hold

Event time, Actor identity, Access record, Decision basis, Data lineage

Log retention

Logs are deleted at the end of the year following the year in which they were created, so a log is kept for at least one and at most two years.

Unit
Years
As of
Basis
Fixed
Maximum value
2

Logging duty

Articles 68 and 74 are in Chapter D, which transposes Directive (EU) 2016/680 and applies under Article 43 to processing by public authorities competent for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences, the execution of criminal penalties and the prevention of threats to public security. Article 74 requires the controller and processor to keep logs of collection, alteration, consultation, disclosure including transfers, combination and erasure. For consultation and disclosure the log must make it possible to establish the justification, the date and time, as far as possible who consulted or disclosed, and who received the data. The logs may be used only to verify lawfulness, for self-monitoring, to ensure integrity and security, and in criminal proceedings, and are deleted at the end of the year after the year they were created (between one and two years). Article 68 requires a written record of processing activities. Both must be made available to the Authority on request. The private-sector provisions this row summarizes (Articles 21 and 27) set no record duty of their own.

Kind
Explicit
As of
Provision
Law 4624/2019, Articles 74 and 68
Trigger
personal_data_processing

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Greece's private-sector regime is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) plus Law 4624/2019 (Greek: Nomos 4624/2019), FEK A' 137/29-08-2019, in force from publication on , which supplies domestic derogations and procedural rules, including an employment article (Article 27) narrowing consent as a lawful basis for employee data processing and separately regulating workplace video surveillance. The Hellenic Data Protection Authority (HDPA) is the supervisory authority.

Article 21(1) of the Law provides that, for information society services offered directly to a minor, processing on the basis of consent is lawful where the minor is at least 15 years old. Article 27(2) of the Law provides that, where an employee's consent is used by way of exception as the legal basis, the employee's dependence under the contract of employment and the circumstances in which consent was given are to be taken into account in deciding whether it was freely given.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app crawls the web or processes personal data.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .