Loi n° 18-07 relative à la protection des personnes physiques, contrôle, sanctions et voies de recours
In force since .
An enforcement supervision rule binding public and private bodies.
- Enforcement body
- Autorité nationale de protection des données à caractère personnel (ANPDP)
- Obligation class
- Governance, Reporting
- Audit expectation
- continuous
- Who audits it
- Regulator
What it requires
- Expect a person in Algeria harmed by an infringement of this law to be able to seek protective measures or reparation from the competent court.
- Expect the ANPDP to fine you 500,000 DA for refusing a data subject's information, access, rectification or objection rights without legitimate reason, or for not making a required notification, doubling on a repeat violation.
- Answer the ANPDP's own inspections and audits, and expect the tiered criminal penalties this law sets, from a fine alone up to five years' imprisonment, for the specific duty you breach.
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.
In the frameworks
- NIST Privacy Framework
- GV.PO-P5Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding privacy are understood and managed.
- FINOS AIGF
- AIR-PREV-005System Acceptance Testing
- AIR-PREV-006Data Quality & Classification/Sensitivity
- AIR-PREV-024Human-in-the-Loop Action Approval Gate
- AIR-DET-004AI System Observability
- AIR-DET-011Human Feedback Loop for AI Systems
- AIR-DET-021Agent Decision Audit and Explainability
Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law
If you get it wrong
Criminal exposureYes
Private right of actionYes
Criminal exposure note
Loi n° 18-07 arts. 54 to 74 set a tiered set of criminal offences rather than one penalty: unlawful processing of sensitive data or processing that breaches the law's dignity and privacy principles carries two to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 200,000 to 500,000 DA (art. 54, art. 57); processing without a lawful basis or against a data subject's objection carries one to three years and 100,000 to 300,000 DA (art. 55); processing without complying with the prior-declaration or authorization conditions of art. 12 carries two to five years and 200,000 to 500,000 DA (art. 56); processing for a purpose other than the one declared or authorized carries six months to one year and 60,000 to 100,000 DA (art. 58); fraudulent collection carries one to three years and 100,000 to 300,000 DA (art. 59); letting an unauthorized person access personal data carries two to five years and 200,000 to 500,000 DA (art. 60); obstructing the ANPDP carries six months to two years and 60,000 to 200,000 DA (art. 61); revealing information protected under the law, by a person bound by professional secrecy under arts. 23 and 27, carries the penalty set by Penal Code art. 301 (art. 62); unauthorized access to the national register of art. 28 carries one to three years and 100,000 to 300,000 DA (art. 63); a controller's unjustified refusal of a data subject's information, access, rectification, or opposition rights carries two months to two years and 20,000 to 200,000 DA (art. 64); a breach of the security duties of arts. 38-39, or retaining data beyond its authorized duration, carries a fine of 200,000 to 500,000 DA (art. 65); a service provider's failure to notify a breach carries one to three years and 100,000 to 300,000 DA (art. 66); an unauthorized foreign transfer carries one to five years and 500,000 to 1,000,000 DA (art. 67); unauthorized retention of offence or conviction data carries six months to three years and 60,000 to 300,000 DA (art. 68); and negligently facilitating misuse or unauthorized disclosure of processed data carries one to five years and 100,000 to 500,000 DA (art. 69). Penalties double on recidivism (art. 74). A legal person is punished with a fine under the Penal Code's rules for legal persons (art. 70).
Penalty structure
The highest criminal fine on the tiered scale set by arts. 54 to 74 is the 500,000 to 1,000,000 DA range for an unauthorized foreign transfer (art. 67); most other offences carry a lower fine within a 20,000 to 500,000 DA range depending on the provision breached (art. 64's refusal-of-rights offence sets the floor) (see the criminal exposure note for the full table). Separately, art. 47 lets the ANPDP itself impose a direct administrative fine of 500,000 DA on a controller that refuses a data subject's rights or fails to make a required notification. All figures double on recidivism under art. 74.
- Rule
- Fixed only
- As of
- Currency
- DZD
- Fixed cap
- 1,000,000
What it makes you log
Logging duty
Articles 47, 52 and 54 to 74 set the administrative fine, the court remedy and the criminal offences. None of them tells a controller to create or keep a record. Article 61 punishes refusing to hand the authority's members and agents the information and documents they need, and giving information that does not match the records at the time of the request; that is a power to demand documents, with no record named. Article 27 bis, inserted by Law n° 25-11, gives the authority regional bodies for control and audit. The register and the operations log of articles 41 bis 2 and 41 bis 3 are in another row. The provisions cited here contain no scope clause, so no territorial hook is recorded.
- Kind
- None
- As of
What this law does
Article 27 bis, inserted by loi n° 25-11 of , gives the ANPDP regional units in charge of oversight and audit of the institutions and persons that process personal data.
Article 47 lets the ANPDP itself fine a controller 500,000 DA for refusing, without legitimate reason, the information, access, rectification or objection rights of articles 32, 34, 35 and 36, or for not making the notifications required by articles 4, 14 and 16, doubling on recidivism to the penalties article 64 sets. Article 52 lets the holder of a right under the law who claims to be harmed by its infringement seek protective measures or reparation from the competent court.
Articles 54 to 74 set a tiered set of criminal offences: unlawful processing that breaches the law's dignity and privacy principles under article 2 carries two to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 200,000 to 500,000 DA (art. 54); processing without a lawful basis or against a data subject's objection carries one to three years and 100,000 to 300,000 DA (art. 55); processing without the prior declaration or authorisation article 12 requires carries two to five years and 200,000 to 500,000 DA (art. 56); unauthorised access to the national register of article 28 carries one to three years and 100,000 to 300,000 DA (art. 63); a controller's unjustified refusal of a data subject's information, access, rectification or objection rights carries two months to two years and 20,000 to 200,000 DA (art. 64); breaching the security duties of articles 38 and 39, or retaining data beyond its authorised duration, carries a fine of 200,000 to 500,000 DA (art. 65); a service provider's failure to notify a breach under article 43 carries one to three years and 100,000 to 300,000 DA (art. 66); an unauthorised foreign transfer carries one to five years and 500,000 to 1,000,000 DA (art. 67); and obstructing the ANPDP's own inspections carries six months to two years and 60,000 to 200,000 DA (art. 61).
Penalties double on recidivism (art. 74), and a legal person is punished with a fine under the Penal Code's own rules for legal persons (art. 70). Existing data controllers had one year from the installation of the Autorité nationale de protection des données à caractère personnel (ANPDP) to comply, which Algeria's state press agency reported took place on , placing that compliance deadline on .
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app processes personal data.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .