Law / Czech Republic

Autorský zákon Sections 39c-39d, Text and Data Mining Exception Bearing on News Indexing

Zakon c. 121/2000 Sb., o pravu autorskem (autorsky zakon), Sec. 39c and Sec. 39d, as inserted by Zakon c. 429/2022 Sb.

In force since .

A text and data mining (TDM) opt-out rule binding public and private bodies.

Instrument type
an act of a legislature

What it requires

  • You may reproduce a work, including a press publication, for automated textual and data analysis to obtain information such as patterns, trends and correlations, and keep the copy only as long as the analysis requires (Sec. 39c(1)).
  • Before mining, check whether the author has expressly reserved the analysis in a suitable way, including by machine-readable means for a work made available online (Sec. 39c(2)).
  • Do not mine a work whose author has reserved the analysis without the rightholder's authorization; a news aggregator indexing text so reserved needs it.
  • A university carrying out scientific research, or a legal person whose main purpose is scientific research or education including research, may mine a lawfully accessed work regardless of any reservation; this exception in Sec. 39d cannot be waived.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 4.1Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Who enforces it

Settledness

As of
Open questions
Does a reservation that a site states only in its terms of use count as one made 'vhodným způsobem' under § 39c odst. 2 of the Czech copyright act, or must a work made available under § 18 odst. 2 carry it in 'strojově čitelnými prostředky'?

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

A person does not infringe copyright by reproducing a work, including a press publication, for the purpose of automated textual and data analysis carried out to obtain information such as patterns, trends and correlations, and may keep the copy only for as long as that analysis requires, per Section 39c(1).

That general licence does not apply to a work whose author has expressly reserved the analysis in a suitable way, including through machine-readable means for a work made available online, per Section 39c(2); a news aggregator indexing text so reserved therefore needs the rightholder's authorization.

A separate, non-waivable exception in Section 39d lets a university carrying out scientific research, or a legal person whose main purpose is scientific research or education including research, mine a lawfully accessed work without regard to any rightholder reservation.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app reuses other publishers' content, crawls the web or trains models.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .