Law / Canada / British Columbia

British Columbia

In the catalog: 54 entries apply to software that reaches people in British Columbia, by what it does. See them

All 2 named instruments researched to a stage, across two of the ten areas of law we track: 2 in force. As of .

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 1
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law
  5. Communications law not assessed
  6. Content moderation law not assessed
  7. Product and AI liability law not assessed
  8. Digital accessibility law not assessed
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

Case law

Our analysis of British Columbia law draws on 2 court rulings.

AI law0 instruments

Research summary (83 words)

In Moffatt v. Air Canada, 2024 BCCRT 149, the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal held that a company is responsible for all the information on its website, whether it comes from a static page or a chatbot, and that failing to take reasonable care to ensure a chatbot was accurate supported a claim of negligent misrepresentation. The decision is a small claims ruling applying the tort of negligent misrepresentation. The province's statutes and regulations that bear on AI systems are not described here.

Privacy law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (158 words)

British Columbia's private-sector personal-information regime is the Personal Information Protection Act (chapter 63 of the Statutes of British Columbia, 2003), which applies to every organization other than a public body and is administered by the commissioner. The Act does not apply to collection, use or disclosure to which the federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act applies.

It rests on consent and on purposes a reasonable person would consider appropriate, allows personal information available to the public to be collected, used and disclosed without consent from the four kinds of source the Regulations prescribe, and gives individuals rights of access and correction.

The Act sets out no duty to notify a person or the commissioner of a security breach, no restriction on transferring personal information outside British Columbia or Canada, no automated-decision right and no biometric or other special category of personal information, although the sensitivity of the information bears on implicit consent by notice and opt-out.

Comprehensive regime

Personal Information Protection Act, comprehensive regime

Personal Information Protection Act, S.B.C. 2003, c. 63Consolidated text of the Personal Information Protection Act, King's Printer for British Columbia (BC Laws)

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/03063_01

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Act applies to every organization, which it defines to include a person, an unincorporated association, a trade union, a trust or a not for profit organization, and defines not to include a public body. An organization must not collect, use or disclose personal information about an individual unless the individual consents, the Act authorizes the collection, use or disclosure without consent, or the Act deems it to be consented to by the individual.

Each collection, use or disclosure must also be for purposes that a reasonable person would consider appropriate in the circumstances. One exception to the consent rule covers personal information that is available to the public from a source prescribed for that purpose.

The Personal Information Protection Act Regulations prescribe four such sources: a telephone directory or directory assistance service, a professional or business directory, a registry to which the public has a right of access, and a printed or electronic publication that is available to the public, including a magazine, book or newspaper.

The directory sources apply only where the individual is permitted to refuse to be included, and the registry source applies only where the information is collected under the authority of an enactment, the laws of Canada or a province, or a municipal bylaw. The Regulations withdraw the publication source where a court has prohibited the publication of the personal information or the commissioner has ordered that it was published contrary to the Act.

The Act does not apply to collection, use or disclosure for an individual's personal or domestic purposes and no other purpose, for journalistic, artistic or literary purposes and no other purpose, or where the federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act applies to it.

On request, an organization must give an individual their personal information under its control, the ways it has been and is being used, and the names of the individuals and organizations to whom it has been disclosed, subject to the exceptions in section 23. An organization must protect personal information in its custody or under its control by making reasonable security arrangements.

An organization must destroy documents containing personal information, or remove the means by which it can be associated with particular individuals, as soon as it is reasonable to assume that the purpose of collection is no longer served and retention is no longer necessary for legal or business purposes. Using deception or coercion to collect personal information in contravention of the Act, and failing to comply with an order of the commissioner, are among the offences the Act creates.

An individual who commits an offence is liable to a fine of not more than $10,000, and a person other than an individual to a fine of not more than $100,000. An individual affected by a commissioner's order that has become final has a cause of action against the organization for damages for actual harm suffered as a result of its breach of the Act.

A person affected by the conduct behind an offence of which an organization has been convicted, where the conviction has become final, has a cause of action against the organization for damages for actual harm.

What it requires

Our analysis of this law draws on 1 court ruling.

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (146 words)

British Columbia has no provincial computer-misuse, anti-scraping, database-right, text-and-data-mining or robots.txt statute. Unauthorized use of a computer and copyright are federal matters, described in Canada's national entry, and personal information collected from public web pages falls under the Personal Information Protection Act, described in British Columbia's privacy entry.

The Trespass Act defines premises as land and anything on the land, such as a building, a vessel, a vehicle or a trailer, and contains no provision on computers, data or electronic access.

The one provincial statute on whether terms formed online bind is the Electronic Transactions Act, which gives legal effect to a contract expressed by clicking and to one formed by the interaction of electronic agents but does not mention browsewrap terms, crawling or scraping, so whether terms posted on a site bind a crawler that never clicked is left to the common law of contract.

Contract terms of service (ToS)

Electronic Transactions Act, electronic contracts

S.B.C. 2001, c. 10, ss. 15-17Electronic Transactions Act, consolidated text published by the King's Printer for British Columbia (BC Laws)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Unless the parties agree otherwise, an offer or the acceptance of an offer, or any other matter that is material to the formation or operation of a contract, may be expressed by means of information or a record in electronic form, or by an activity in electronic form, including touching or clicking on an appropriately designated icon or place on a computer screen.

A contract is not invalid or unenforceable solely by reason that information or a record in electronic form was used in its formation. A contract may be formed by the interaction of an electronic agent and an individual or by the interaction of electronic agents.

An electronic agent is a computer program, or other electronic means, used to initiate an activity or to respond to electronic information, records or activities in whole or in part without review by an individual at the time of the response or activity. An electronic record created by an individual with an electronic agent of another person is invalid and unenforceable if the individual made a material error in the record and the conditions in section 17 are met.

The Act does not limit the operation of a law that expressly authorizes, prohibits or regulates the use of information or records in electronic form. The Act received assent on . Sections 1 to 21 were brought into force on by British Columbia Regulation 122/01.

What it requires

Where nothing was found3 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

Cybersecurity law

British Columbia has no statute that sets security requirements for a software product or connected device, requires a private organization to report a cyber incident or an exploited vulnerability to an authority, or imposes a sector cyber-resilience regime on a software or platform provider.

Its only general security duty sits inside the privacy regime: section 34 of the Personal Information Protection Act requires an organization to protect personal information in its custody or under its control by making reasonable security arrangements, and it is described in British Columbia's privacy entry. That Act sets out no duty to notify an individual or the commissioner of a security breach, and breach notification is a privacy question in any case.

The Emergency and Disaster Management Act (S.B.C. 2023, c. 37) provides in section 48 that a system, network, facility or asset, physical or virtual and publicly or privately owned, is critical infrastructure if it is prescribed or falls within a prescribed class, and section 49 lets the regulations require a critical infrastructure owner to prepare emergency management plans.

The Province lists the critical infrastructure owners' planning duties among the provisions that take effect only when regulations are made, and the Act does not use the word cyber. The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act governs the information handling of public bodies and is outside this topic. The federal Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act, which reaches federally regulated sectors, is described in Canada's national entry.

As of .

Age gating law

British Columbia has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store or device age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code. No Act in the province's consolidated statute list is titled for, or directed at, age verification, minors' use of social media, app stores or age-appropriate design, and no bill on those subjects has been located.

The federal proposals, Bill S-209 on young persons' exposure to pornography and Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, are before Parliament and are described in Canada's national entry.

As of .

Reuse law

British Columbia has no provincial press-publisher right, news-bargaining code, hot-news misappropriation rule, linking or framing statute, or text-and-data-mining opt-out. Copyright, including fair dealing, and the news-bargaining regime are federal law, found in the Copyright Act and the Online News Act and described in Canada's national entry.

The province's defamation statute, the Libel and Slander Act (R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 263), deals with defamation in broadcasts, privileged newspaper reports of court proceedings and public meetings, and the filing of a notice of civil claim, and contains no provision on hyperlinks, the internet or online publication.

As of .

Reporting clocks that run here3 instruments

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of British Columbia comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

72 hours
Incident notificationsecurity law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Canada, which applies in British Columbia

72 hours

Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act, Reporting of Cyber Security Incidents

Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act (S.C. 2026, c. 9, s. 11), ss. 17, 18 and 136security law, enacted, not yet in force

The sentences the clocks are read from

Report a cyber security incident in respect of any of your critical cyber systems to the Communications Security Establishment, in accordance with the regulations, within the period the regulations prescribe, which may not exceed 72 hours (section 17).

Immediately after reporting, notify the appropriate regulator that the report was made, in the form and manner the regulations prescribe, and give it a copy of the report (section 18).

as soon as feasible

PIPEDA breach of security safeguards regime

S.C. 2000, c. 5, ss. 10.1-10.3privacy law, in force since

The sentence the clocks are read from

Report any breach of security safeguards involving personal information under the organization's control to the Privacy Commissioner as soon as feasible, if it is reasonable to believe the breach creates a real risk of significant harm to an individual.

without delay

Retail Payment Activities Act, Notification of Incidents

Retail Payment Activities Act (S.C. 2021, c. 23, s. 177), ss. 2, 18, 19 and 76security law, in force since

The sentence the clocks are read from

Without delay after you become aware of an incident that has a material impact on an end user, on another payment service provider that performs retail payment activities, or on a clearing house of a designated clearing and settlement system, notify that individual or entity and the Bank of Canada of the incident (section 18(1)).

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page lists the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage, and the count in the head can be larger than the list. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.