Law / United States / Utah

Utah Board of Higher Education rule on significant data breaches: risk assessment, exceptions, and written notice to each affected student

Utah Admin. Code R765-1010

In force since .

A breach notification rule binding government bodies.

Obligation class
Breach notice

What it requires

  • If you are the Utah Board of Higher Education or a Utah public college, university or technical college, and a significant data breach occurs at you or at a third-party contractor using student data you disclosed, notify in writing each student whose personally identifiable student data was disclosed, with every component of the model data breach notification (Utah Admin. Code R765-1010-5(1)).
  • Treat a data breach as significant where your risk assessment of the factors the rule lists finds a moderate or high probability of substantial harm to the student, unless an exception in the rule applies (Utah Admin. Code R765-1010-4).

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Rule R765-1010 of the Utah Administrative Code defines a significant data breach and establishes standards for an education entity to protect student data by notifying students of significant data breaches. Utah Code 53H-14-504(2) requires the Utah Board of Higher Education to make rules to define a significant data breach.

A data breach is significant if the education entity that maintains the personally identifiable student data determines, on a risk assessment of the factors the rule lists, that there is a moderate or high probability of substantial harm to the student.

The factors include the nature and extent of the data involved, the degree to which it could be used for unlawful purposes, the unauthorized person who used it or to whom it was disclosed, the likelihood that an unauthorized person acquired or viewed it, the extent to which the entity has mitigated the harm, and the extent to which prompt notice would let students further mitigate the harm.

A data breach is not significant to the extent that it involves data the entity made unreadable or unusable with safeguards such as encryption, data the entity lawfully published or that was already lawfully in the public domain, or the data of fewer than 25 individuals.

If a significant data breach occurs at an education entity or at a third-party contractor using data the entity disclosed, the education entity must notify in writing each student whose personally identifiable student data was disclosed. The notice must include every component of the model data breach notification, and the entity may send it by any written means it routinely uses for official communications with individual students.

For the rule, personally identifiable student data does not include information designated as directory information under the education entity's directory information policy. The rule took effect on .

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app serves colleges and universities.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .