Law / United States / Montana

Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act, Attorney General enforcement

Mont. Code Ann. §§ 30-14-2817, 30-14-2820

In force since .

An enforcement supervision rule binding private bodies.

Private right of action
No
Audit expectation
on_request
Who audits it
Regulator
Where the report goes
Produced on request

What it requires

  • Expect MCDPA violations to be enforced exclusively by the Montana Attorney General, never by a private plaintiff.
  • Do not assume a notice-and-cure opportunity before an enforcement action. As of , the Attorney General may proceed directly to a civil penalty without a mandatory cure step.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text. Also read by: Montana Department of Justice, Office of Consumer Protection (guidance, recorded ).

Who enforces it

Settledness

As of
Guidance link
https://doj.mt.gov/office-of-consumer-protection/montana-consumer-data-privacy/
Guidance body
Montana Department of Justice, Office of Consumer Protection
Open questions
What is the "30-day period described in 30-14-2817(3)" that section 30-14-2820(2) makes a condition of civil penalty liability, when section 30-14-2817(3) provides for a civil investigative demand and states no 30-day period?

What it makes you log

Who may demand the log

Regulator

What the log must hold

Decision basis

Logging duty

Section 2817(3)(b) lets the Attorney General, as part of a civil investigative demand, ask a controller to disclose any data protection assessment relevant to an investigation and evaluate it for compliance, which presupposes a documented assessment. The duty to conduct and document the assessment is in section 30-14-2814(1), which this row does not cite and is not borrowed. Section 2820 sets the civil penalty (up to $7,500 per violation) and injunction. The cited sections name no log contents beyond the assessment, no retention period and no public access. They state no territorial test of their own.

Kind
Implicit
As of
Provision
30-14-2817(3)(b) (the Attorney General may request that a controller disclose any data protection assessment relevant to an investigation)
Trigger
personal_data_processing

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

The Montana Attorney General has exclusive authority to enforce MCDPA; the chapter creates no private right of action. Civil penalties run up to $7,500 per violation.

As currently codified, section 30-14-2817 (Enforcement) contains no notice-and-cure text in its five subsections following the S.B. 297 amendment, yet section 30-14-2820(2) cross-references a '30-day period described in 30-14-2817 (3)', which as read describes the Attorney General's civil-investigative-demand authority rather than a cure mechanism.

That cross-reference is an open citation-accuracy question rather than a resolved one; the operative, secondary-corroborated finding is that no mandatory pre-action cure right survives as of , so a first violation can lead directly to a penalty.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app processes personal data.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .