Law / United States / Minnesota

Identity Theft Using a Forged Digital Likeness

Minn. Stat. § 609.527, subd. 1(e), (f) and subd. 2

In force since .

An AI prohibited practices rule binding public and private bodies.

Instrument type
an act of a legislature
Obligation class
Prohibition
Audit expectation
none
Setting the rule reaches
General

What it requires

  • Do not transfer, possess or use an identity that is not your own, including a forged digital likeness of an actual individual, with the intent to commit, aid or abet any unlawful activity (Minn. Stat. § 609.527, subd. 1(f) and subd. 2).

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

What record it asks for

Logging duty

Section 609.527 criminalizes transferring, possessing or using an identity with the requisite intent, and states no duty to keep a log or record.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

A person who transfers, possesses, or uses an identity that is not the person's own, with the intent to commit, aid, or abet any unlawful activity, is guilty of identity theft. The definition of identity in the identity theft statute includes a forged digital likeness.

A forged digital likeness is a video recording, motion-picture film, sound recording, electronic image, or photograph, or a technological representation of speech or conduct substantially derivative of one, that was created, adapted, altered, or modified in a manner substantially dependent upon technical means, misrepresents the appearance, speech, or conduct of the individual, and is so realistic that a reasonable person would believe it depicts the image or speech of an actual individual.

The sentence is graded by the number of direct victims and the total combined loss to the direct and indirect victims, by reference to the theft sentencing tiers of section 609.52, subdivision 3. The court must order a person convicted of identity theft to pay restitution of not less than $1,000 to each direct victim of the offense. The 2026 omnibus public safety law that added forged digital likeness to the identity theft statute is effective , unless otherwise noted.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app generates audio with AI, generates images with AI or generates video with AI.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .