Law / United States

Truth in Caller ID Act

47 U.S.C. 227(e)

In force since .

A telephone contact rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Prohibition

What it requires

  • Do not cause a caller identification service to knowingly transmit misleading or inaccurate caller identification information on a voice call or text message, with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value; this does not restrict blocking your own caller ID.
  • Expect Federal Communications Commission forfeiture liability of up to $10,000 per violation, three times that amount for each day of a continuing violation and capped at $1,000,000 for a single act or failure to act, and a criminal fine of up to $10,000 per violation for a willful and knowing violation; the subsection gives no private suit.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureYes

Private right of actionNo

Criminal exposure note

A person who willfully and knowingly violates this subsection is, upon conviction, fined not more than $10,000 for each violation, or three times that amount for each day of a continuing violation.

Penalty structure

Civil forfeiture of up to $10,000 for each violation, or three times that amount for each day of a continuing violation, capped in aggregate at $1,000,000 for any single act or failure to act (47 U.S.C. 227(e)(5)(A)); enforced by the Federal Communications Commission, not by a private plaintiff.

Rule
Per violation only
As of
Currency
USD
Fixed cap
1,000,000
Per violation unit
Violation
Per violation amount
10,000

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

Federal Communications Commission (civil forfeiture); United States Department of Justice (criminal prosecution); a State attorney general, suing as parens patriae after serving written notice on the Commission

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

It is unlawful for any person, in connection with a voice call or text message, to cause a caller identification service to knowingly transmit misleading or inaccurate caller identification information with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value; the subsection does not restrict a caller from blocking its own caller ID. Its enforcement provisions name a Federal Communications Commission forfeiture, a criminal fine and a State attorney general's civil action, and give no private suit.

A violation is punishable by a Federal Communications Commission forfeiture of up to $10,000 per violation, trebled for each day of a continuing violation and capped at $1,000,000 for any single act, and by a criminal fine of up to $10,000 per violation for a willful and knowing violation.

How courts have read itPremium data

Our analysis of this law draws on 1 court ruling.

What each ruling held, what it means for an app, and whether it still stands are premium data, in the Plus, Pro and Enterprise plans.

See the plansSign in

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app places automated calls or sends automated texts.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .