Data Protection and Privacy Act, 2019, breach notification
Data Protection and Privacy Act, 2019, s. 23 (breach notification)
archived copy
Read from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2024. Publisher's page: https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/act/2019/9/eng@2019-05-03In force since .
A breach notification rule binding public and private bodies.
- Obligation class
- Breach notice, Reporting
- Audit expectation
- none
What it requires
- Notify the National Information Technology Authority immediately after you believe personal data has been accessed or acquired by an unauthorised person, describing the access or acquisition and the remedial action taken.
- Wait for the Authority to determine whether you must also notify the affected data subject of the breach; the Act sets no separate deadline for that notice.
- Where the Authority determines the data subject must be notified, do so by registered mail to their last known address, electronic mail to their last known address, prominent placement on your website, or publication in the mass media, giving sufficient information for them to take protective measures.
- Publicise the breach in the manner the Authority specifies if it directs you to, where the Authority has grounds to believe publicity would protect an affected data subject.
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.
In the frameworks
- NIST Privacy Framework
- CM.AW-P7Impacted individuals and organizations are notified about a privacy breach or event.
- NIST CSF 2.0
- RS.CO-02Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents
- FINOS AIGF
- AIR-DET-001AI Data Leakage Prevention and Detection
- AIR-DET-004AI System Observability
- AIR-DET-021Agent Decision Audit and Explainability
Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law
What it makes you log
Logging duty
Section 23 requires a controller, processor or collector that believes personal data has been accessed or acquired by an unauthorised person to notify the Authority immediately, in the prescribed manner, of the access and the remedial action taken, and the Authority decides whether the data subject is told. It is a duty to notify only; the section does not tell the controller to document breaches or keep a register of them. No scope clause.
- Kind
- None
- As of
What this law does
Section 23(1) requires a data collector, processor or controller that believes a data subject's personal data has been accessed or acquired by an unauthorised person to notify the Authority immediately, in the prescribed manner, of the access or acquisition and the remedial action taken; the Act states no numbered grace period, the clock is 'immediately' from the point the collector, processor or controller believes the breach occurred.
Section 23(2) leaves the decision on whether the data subject must also be told to the Authority rather than to the data collector, processor or controller, and the Act sets no independent deadline for that data-subject notice; it runs from the Authority's own determination, not from the breach.
Where the Authority does direct notice to the data subject, section 23(3) requires it by registered mail to their last known address, electronic mail to their last known address, a prominent position on the responsible party's website, or publication in the mass media, and section 23(4) requires it to carry sufficient information for the data subject to take protective measures.
Section 23(5) lets the Authority direct the responsible party to publicise the breach where the Authority has grounds to believe publicity would protect an affected data subject.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app handles health records, runs an essential service or processes personal data.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .