Operational Policy establishing guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence systems in the Judiciary (Política Operacional que establece directrices para el uso de sistemas de inteligencia artificial en el Poder Judicial), Supreme Court of Justice Resolution No. 12,677
Supreme Court of Justice Resolution No. 12.677 of Operational Policy for the use of artificial intelligence systems in the Judiciary, version 1, arts. 3 to 17
An AI risk obligations rule binding government bodies.
- Obligation class
- Governance, Disclosure
What it requires
- This policy binds the magistrates and officials of the Paraguayan Judiciary who use, develop, acquire or supervise AI systems, and places no duty on a private party (art. 4).
- If you are a magistrate or official of the Judiciary, keep an adequate level of human control and participation in every process where an AI system is used (art. 6).
- Do not delegate decision-making in judicial or administrative resolutions to an AI system (art. 8).
- Inform the parties of the use of an AI system in the proceeding or in judicial decision-making (art. 10(a)).
- Disclose the use of generative AI to draft judgments, orders, opinions and other documents that may have legal consequences (art. 10(b)).
- Do not use an AI system without informing the procedural parties (art. 11).
- Do not use an AI system that stores data on external servers without security and regulatory-compliance guarantees (art. 17(c)).
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.
What this law does
Resolution No. 12,677 of of the Supreme Court of Justice of Paraguay approves a policy that sets guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence systems in the Judiciary. Article 3 of the Resolution authorizes the application of the policy in the Judiciary. The policy applies to the magistrates and officials of the Judiciary who use, develop, acquire or supervise artificial intelligence systems.
Article 6 of the policy requires an adequate level of human control and participation in every process where these systems are used. Article 8 of the policy prohibits delegating decision-making in judicial and administrative resolutions to artificial intelligence. Article 10 of the policy requires the parties to be informed of the use of artificial intelligence systems in the proceeding or in judicial decision-making.
Article 10 of the policy also requires the use of generative artificial intelligence to draft judgments, orders, opinions and other documents with legal consequences to be disclosed. Article 11 of the policy prohibits using artificial intelligence systems without informing the procedural parties. Article 17 of the policy prohibits using artificial intelligence systems that store data on external servers without security and regulatory-compliance guarantees.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app generates content with AI or makes justice decisions.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .