Paraguay has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately, and no reported case addresses any of them in a scraping context.
The Código Penal, as amended by Ley N° 4439/2011, criminalizes accessing a computer system while using one's own or another's identity, or exceeding an authorization (art. 174 b), and separately criminalizes circumventing a security measure to reach data specially protected against unauthorized access (art. 146 b), neither of which has been tested against a scraper reading a public, unauthenticated page.
No Paraguayan court decision addresses the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper. Ley N° 1328/1998 excludes the news of the day and mere facts or data from copyright protection outright and permits quotation and press or current-events reproduction under narrow conditions, but Paraguay has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception, so training a model on scraped copyrighted text rests only on those general exceptions.
The same law protects a database only as an original compilation, by virtue of the selection, coordination or arrangement of its contents, and confers no separate sui generis database right.
Personal data scraped from a public Paraguayan website is subject to Ley N° 7593/2025's lawful-basis, purpose-limitation and cross-border-transfer duties once that comprehensive law enters into force on 27 November 2027, since it carries no general carve-out for information found in a publicly accessible source; only sensitive data the data subject has manifestly made public themselves is exempted, and until 2027 only Ley N° 6534/2020's narrower, credit-data-specific duties apply.
No Paraguayan statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation or trespass doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.