Law / Netherlands

Cyberbeveiligingswet, Significant-Incident Reporting Obligations

Cyberbeveiligingswet, Artt. 25-29

In force since .

A vulnerability and incident reporting rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Reporting, Security

What it requires

  • This binds an essential entity (Article 8 or 9) or an important entity (Article 12 or 13) drawn from Annex 1 or Annex 2, on the same scope as this jurisdiction's companion risk-management row: Annex 2's digital-provider entry names an online marketplace, an online search engine and a social-networking-services platform, and Annex 1 separately names a cloud-computing-service provider, a data-centre-service provider and a content-delivery-network provider, each at the medium-enterprise size threshold or above; the wider sector classes are reached as on that row. A financial entity covered by Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 reports under that Regulation instead, because Article 31 sets Articles 25 to 30 aside where a sector-specific act of the European Union is at least equivalent.
  • Give your computer security incident response team (CSIRT) and competent authority an early warning without delay, or within 24 hours of becoming aware of a significant incident if immediate reporting is not possible, stating whether the incident is suspected to result from unlawful or malicious action and whether it may have cross-border effects.NIST CSF 2.0RS.CO-02
  • Follow with a notification, without delay or, if that is not possible, within 72 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, updating the early warning with an initial assessment of the incident's severity and effects. If you provide a trust service and the incident affects its provision, file this notification without delay or, if that is not possible, within 24 hours of becoming aware of the incident instead.NIST CSF 2.0RS.CO-02
  • Submit an interim report if your CSIRT or competent authority asks for one.NIST CSF 2.0RS.CO-03
  • Submit a final report no later than one month after your notification, describing the incident in detail, its severity and effects, the likely threat or root cause, mitigating measures applied, and any cross-border effects; if the incident is still ongoing at that point, submit a progress report instead and the final report within one month of resolution.NIST CSF 2.0RS.CO-03
  • Where appropriate, inform the recipients of your service of the incident and of any measures they can take in response (Article 30).NIST CSF 2.0RS.CO-02

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text. Also read by: Nationaal Cyber Security Centrum (NCSC), Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid (guidance, recorded ).

In the frameworks

NIST Privacy Framework
  • CM.AW-P7Impacted individuals and organizations are notified about a privacy breach or event.
NIST CSF 2.0
  • RS.CO-02Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents
  • RS.CO-03Information is shared with designated internal and external stakeholders
CIS Controls
  • 17.2A maintained list of who to contact about a security incident, inside and outside the enterprise.
FINOS AIGF
ENISA NIS2 guidance
  • 3.1Incident handling policy
  • 3.4Event assessment and classification
  • 3.5Incident response
  • 3.6Post-incident reviews
  • 4.3Crisis management

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework, and in the NIST CSF 2.0, line by line beside each duty above. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

CIS Critical Security Controls® (CIS Controls®) v8.1 © Center for Internet Security, Inc. Safeguard numbers are used under a CIS Controls Supporter License; the one-line descriptions beside them are our own, not CIS text.

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureNo

Private right of actionNo

Criminal exposure note

The Act's own penalty provision for an Article 25 to 30 infringement is an administrative fine (bestuurlijke boete) under Article 80 (essential entity) or Article 87 (important entity), together with the corrective and enforcement powers of Chapter 15; the Act creates no criminal offence for the infringement.

Penalty structure

Article 80(3)(a) sets the maximum administrative fine for an essential entity's infringement of, among other provisions, Articles 25 to 30, at EUR 10,000,000 or 2 percent of the total worldwide annual turnover of the undertaking to which the entity belongs in the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. Article 87(3)(a), the mirror provision for an important entity, sets the equivalent cap at EUR 7,000,000 or 1.4 percent of that turnover, whichever is higher. Both mirror NIS2 Article 34(4) and (5).

Rule
Higher of
As of
Currency
EUR
Fixed cap
10,000,000
Turnover percentage cap
2

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

The Minister the Cyberbeveiligingswet designates as competent authority for the entity's sector, with the CSIRT designated under Article 16 receiving the notifications; the Nationaal Cyber Security Centrum (NCSC) serves as the sectoral CSIRT for a registered entity, per the NCSC's own description of its role under the Act.

Settledness

As of
Guidance link
https://www.ncsc.nl/cyberbeveiligingswet-nis2
Guidance body
Nationaal Cyber Security Centrum (NCSC), Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 25 requires an essential entity or an important entity to report every significant incident to its computer security incident response team (CSIRT) and competent authority in accordance with Articles 26 to 29. Article 26 requires an early warning without delay, or within 24 hours of becoming aware of the incident if immediate reporting is not possible, stating whether the incident is suspected to result from unlawful or malicious action and whether it may have cross-border effects.

Article 27 requires a notification, without delay or within 72 hours, updating the early warning with an initial assessment of the incident's severity and effect. Article 27, paragraph 2 sets a shorter clock for a trust service provider: where an incident affects the provision of its trust service, it files that notification without delay or within 24 hours instead of 72. Article 28 requires an interim report on request.

Article 29 requires a final report no later than one month after the Article 27 notification, describing the incident, its severity and effects, the likely threat or root cause, mitigating measures taken, and, where relevant, cross-border effects; an incident still ongoing at that point is instead covered by a progress report, with the final report due within one month of the incident's resolution.

Article 31 sets Articles 25 to 30 aside for an essential or important entity that a sector-specific act of the European Union already requires to notify significant incidents on at least equivalent terms. Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 is such an act for a financial entity identified as an essential or important entity, so that entity reports under that Regulation instead.

This Act transposes NIS2 Directive Article 23 and, by its own Article 106, repeals the Wet beveiliging netwerk- en informatiesystemen (Wbni), the predecessor NIS1 transposition, which lapsed on , the date this Act took effect.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app operates a social platform, runs an essential service or handles health records.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .