Law / Latvia

Electronic Communications Law, Articles 37(2) and 36(3), contract information made available to an end-user with a disability on request, and the contract summary's features for end-users with disabilities

Elektronisko sakaru likums, 37. panta otrā daļa un 36. panta trešā daļa

In force since .

An accessibility requirements rule binding public and private bodies.

What it requires

  • If you are an electronic communications merchant, make the information you include in the service contract and the contract summary available to an end-user with a disability on that end-user's request (Electronic Communications Law, Art. 37(2); Directive (EU) 2018/1972, Art. 102(1)).
  • If you cannot give the information in the contract and the contract summary on a durable medium, make it available in another way as an easily downloadable document (Art. 37(2)).
  • Include in the contract summary, under the heading Features for end-users with disabilities, information on the main products and services for end-users with disabilities (Art. 36(3); Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2243, Annex, Part B).
  • These duties do not apply to a contract for an interpersonal communications service that does not use numbering, or for a machine-to-machine service (Arts. 36(10) and 37(2)).
  • The Article 37 requirements on contract information apply only to contracts concluded after the Regulator's contract rules entered into force on (transitional provision 8; Regulator's decision 1/30, point 32).

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

If you get it wrong

Penalty structure

Article 118 of the Electronic Communications Law sets a warning or a fine of 56 to 2,800 fine units for a legal person for violating end-user rights in providing electronic communications services, which is EUR 280 to EUR 14,000 at EUR 5 a fine unit under Article 16(2) of the Administrative Liability Law; Article 118 names no fine for a natural person. Article 118 excludes a violation of the general authorisation conditions, which under Article 20(2) include the Regulator's rules on contract information, and Article 120 sets the same range for those, with Article 21(5) letting the Regulator exclude the merchant from the list for up to five years for a material or repeated violation. The general ceiling for a legal person is 4,000 fine units under Article 16(4) of that Law. A decision of the Regulator ordering a merchant to remedy deficiencies is an administrative act that Article 368 of the Administrative Procedure Law enforces by a coercive fine, EUR 100 to 10,000 for a legal person under Article 370(3), repeatable no sooner than seven days after the previous one.

Rule
Fixed only
As of
Minimum
280
Currency
EUR
Fixed cap
14,000

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

the Public Utilities Commission (Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija, the Regulator), which conducts the administrative offence proceedings under Article 125(2) and hears end-user complaints under Article 44(2) of the Electronic Communications Law

What it reaches

Instrument type

an act of a legislature

Obligation class

Disclosure

Applicability criteria

As of
Combinator
All of
Criteria
  • a contract for an electronic communications service other than an interpersonal communications service that does not use numbering or a machine-to-machine service (Article 37(2): "Šī daļa neattiecas uz līgumiem par starppersonu sakaru pakalpojumu, neizmantojot numerāciju, vai M2M pakalpojumu"; Article 36(10) excludes the same contracts from Article 36(3))
  • a contract concluded after the Regulator's contract rules under Article 37(1) entered into force on (transitional provision 8: "piemēro tikai tiem līgumiem, kuri noslēgti pēc šā likuma 37. panta pirmajā daļā minēto noteikumu stāšanās spēkā")

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 37(2) of the Electronic Communications Law requires the merchant to give a consumer the information included in the service contract and the contract summary clearly and comprehensibly on a durable medium. Where the merchant cannot give that information on a durable medium, Article 37(2) requires it to ensure the information is available in another way as an easily downloadable document.

Article 37(2) requires the merchant to make that information available to an end-user with a disability on that end-user's request. Article 37(2) does not apply to contracts for an interpersonal communications service without numbering or for a machine-to-machine service. Article 36(3) makes the contract summary an integral part of the electronic communications service contract and requires it to follow Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2243, which sets the contract summary template.

Part B of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2243 requires the contract summary section headed Features for end-users with disabilities to include information on the main products and services for end-users with disabilities. That section may include, where available, real-time text, total conversation, relay services, accessible emergency communications, specialised equipment, special tariffs and accessible information.

Article 36(10) excludes contracts for an interpersonal communications service without numbering or for a machine-to-machine service from Article 36(3). Article 35(2) extends the consumer rights in Chapter VI, other than those linked to an interpersonal communications service without numbering, to a microenterprise, a small enterprise, a foundation and an association unless it has expressly waived them.

Article 37(1) makes the Regulator the body that determines the information to include in an electronic communications service contract. The Regulator's decision of numbered 1/30, the Electronic Communications Service Contract Rules, is issued under Article 37(1) of the Law and sets the information a contract must include.

Transitional provision 8 applies the requirements of Article 37 on the information to include in a contract only to contracts concluded after the rules referred to in Article 37(1) entered into force. Decision 1/30 entered into force on . Article 37 is in the version amended by the law of , which entered into force on .

Article 1(1) point 22 defines an end-user as a natural or legal person, or an association of such persons, that requests or uses electronic communications services without providing electronic communications services or networks to others or reselling services.

Article 102(1) of Directive (EU) 2018/1972 requires the contract information to be provided, upon request, in an accessible format for end-users with disabilities in accordance with Union law harmonising accessibility requirements for products and services. The Law was adopted by the Saeima on and promulgated by the President in Riga on . The Law enters into force on the day after its promulgation.

The legal act passport gives as the day the Law entered into force. Article 37(2), with its sentence on an end-user with a disability, is in the text of the Law as it stood on . Article 1(1) point 13 names the Public Utilities Commission as the Regulator. Article 1(1) point 12 defines an electronic communications merchant as a merchant that has the right to provide an electronic communications network and to provide an electronic communications service.

The Law lists Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Directive (EU) 2019/882 among the directives it includes provisions from. Article 125(2) makes the Regulator the authority that conducts the administrative offence proceedings for the violations in Articles 116 to 120 and 122 to 124. Article 118 sets a warning or a fine of 56 to 2,800 fine units for a legal person for violating end-user rights in providing electronic communications services.

The heading of Article 118 excludes a violation of the general authorisation conditions from it. Article 20(2) makes the Regulator's rules on the information to include in an electronic communications service contract part of the general authorisation. Article 120 sets a warning or a fine of 56 to 2,800 fine units for a legal person for violating the general authorisation conditions.

Article 21 lets the Regulator, for a violation of the rules referred to in Article 20, inform the merchant and set a time limit to remedy it. Article 21(5) lets the Regulator exclude a merchant from the list of electronic communications merchants for up to five years where it has committed a material violation, or a repeated violation within a year, and its remedial measures were not effective. Article 16(2) of the Administrative Liability Law sets one fine unit at EUR 5.

Article 16(4) of that Law sets the general maximum fine for a legal person at 4,000 fine units. Article 10 lets the Regulator demand information from persons active in the sector, visit premises and equipment used for providing electronic communications services after advance warning, and demand documents proving rights to them.

Article 44(1) requires a complaint about the provision of an electronic communications service to be submitted first to the merchant, which examines it in the manner the Law on Regulators of Public Utilities sets. Article 44(2) lets a complainant who is dissatisfied with the merchant's answer go to the Regulator where the complaint concerns a regulated electronic communications service, and the Regulator may decide to order the merchant to remedy the deficiencies found.

Article 368(1) of the Administrative Procedure Law has an administrative act that obliges its addressee to perform an action enforced by substitute performance, a coercive fine or direct force. A coercive fine under Article 370(3) of that Law is EUR 50 to 5,000 for a natural person and EUR 100 to 10,000 for a legal person. Article 370(2) of that Law lets the coercive fine be imposed again, no sooner than seven days after the previous one, until the addressee complies.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app ships a consumer interface or provides telecom services.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .