Law on Personal Data and Their Protection, comprehensive regime and lawful bases
Law No. 94-V (21 May 2013), as amended through Law No. 256-VIII (09.01.2026), Arts. 1, 4-9
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force since 25 November 2013.
A comprehensive regime rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 29 August 2026.
What it requires
- An app that collects, uses, or discloses the personal data of individuals in Kazakhstan must obtain the subject's consent, or rely on one of the Law's limited consent-free grounds, before processing, and must confine that processing to the stated purpose of collection.
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Law No. 94-V is Kazakhstan's single personal-data statute, reaching the owner, operator, and third party generally with no separate public and private carve-out found in the text read. Art. 8 requires the subject's written or otherwise confirmable consent for processing, subject to Art. 9's consent-free grounds (law enforcement, court proceedings, state statistics, and others), and confines processing to the stated purpose of collection.
The Law was adopted 21 May 2013, officially published 25 May 2013, and entered into force 25 November 2013 (Art. 31(1), six months after first official publication); Arts. 8 and 9 have each been amended multiple times since, most recently in 2025 and 2026, without displacing the base consent framework this instrument describes.
When LexLint raises it
crawls_webtrains_modelsgenerates_contentdeploys_chatbotautomated_outreachhigh_risk_decisionsprocesses_voiceprocesses_biometrics
Read the law
official statute text, Adilet Legal Information System, consolidated English translation
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.