Codice Privacy art. 52(4)-(5), Omitting Identifying Data when Disseminating Judgments
Decreto Legislativo 30 giugno 2003, n. 196, art. 52, commi 4-5
In force since .
A de-identification rule binding public and private bodies.
- Audit expectation
- none
What it requires
- When you disseminate, in any form, a judgment or other judicial measure that carries the annotation provided for in Article 52, paragraph 2, or the legal maxims drawn from it, omit the data subject's name and other identifying data (Article 52, paragraph 4).
- When you disseminate judgments or other judicial measures of any court, omit in every case, with or without the annotation, the names and other identifying data, including data relating to third parties, from which the identity of a minor, or of the parties to family-law and personal-status proceedings, can be inferred even indirectly (Article 52, paragraph 5).
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.
What record it asks for
Logging duty
The provision states no duty to create, keep or produce a log or record.
- Kind
- None
- As of
What this law does
Under paragraph 4 of Article 52 of the Codice Privacy, a person who disseminates judgments or other judicial measures that carry the annotation of paragraph 2, or their legal maxims, omits the name and other identifying data of the data subject.
Under paragraph 5, anyone who disseminates judgments or other judicial measures of any court must in every case omit the data from which the identity of minors, or of the parties to family-law and personal-status proceedings, can be inferred even indirectly.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app processes personal data or processes de-identified data.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .