Law / European Union

Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD), Articles 6a and 28b

Directive 2010/13/EU, as amended by Directive (EU) 2018/1808, Articles 6a and 28b

In force since .

An adult content age verification (AV) rule binding private bodies.

Criminal exposure
No
Private right of action
No
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • This Directive binds member states, which must ensure that audiovisual media service providers and video sharing platform providers under their jurisdiction meet the duties below; they reach you through the national law that transposed it (transposition was due by ).
  • Take appropriate measures, such as age verification tools, parental controls and restricted broadcast times, so that content that may impair minors' physical, mental or moral development is not normally seen or heard by them; the strictest measures apply to the most harmful content, such as gratuitous violence and pornography.no control in the NIST Privacy Framework
  • Do not process minors' personal data that you collected or generated through the protection measures above (for a video sharing platform, its age verification and parental control systems) for commercial purposes such as direct marketing, profiling or behaviourally targeted advertising.NIST Privacy FrameworkCT.PO-P1

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text. Also read by: Joined Cases C-188/24 and C-190/24 WebGroup Czech Republic and NKL Associates and Coyote System, judgment of (Grand Chamber) (recorded ).

In the frameworks

NIST Privacy Framework
  • CT.PO-P1Policies, processes, and procedures for authorizing data processing (e.g., organizational decisions, individual consent), revoking authorizations, and maintaining authorizations are established and in place.
FINOS AIGF

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework, and in the NIST Privacy Framework, line by line beside each duty above. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

National audiovisual and media regulators designated by each member state

Litigation

Court
Court of Justice of the European Union
Docket
Joined Cases C-188/24 WebGroup Czech Republic and NKL Associates and C-190/24 Coyote System
Posture
Judgment of on references from the French Conseil d'État: Article 3 of the e-Commerce Directive precludes a member state from applying a general and abstract criminal-law obligation, intended to prevent access by minors to pornographic content, to providers established in other member states; it does not preclude, subject to the conditions of Article 3(4) and without prejudice to Article 3(5), measures requiring providers of a given service established in other member states to establish a system for verifying the age of users of pornographic sites where those providers have not taken the appropriate measures referred to in Article 28b of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive.

Settledness

Under Article 30(1), each Member State designates the national regulatory authorities that enforce the Directive, so guidance construing Articles 6a and 28b is issued by each Member State's regulator and sits in the national files.

As of
Case link
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0188
Case citation
Joined Cases C-188/24 and C-190/24 WebGroup Czech Republic and NKL Associates and Coyote System, judgment of (Grand Chamber)
Open questions
  • Which of the measures listed in Article 28b(3) must a video-sharing platform provider take before it can be said to have 'taken the appropriate measures referred to in Article 28b', the test on which Joined Cases C-188/24 and C-190/24 let a Member State require an age verification system of a provider established in another Member State?
  • Does a site that offers pornographic videos under its own editorial responsibility fall under Article 6a, which binds media service providers, rather than Article 28b, given that Article 1(1), point (aa), defines a video-sharing platform service by the absence of the provider's editorial responsibility for the content?

What it reaches

Age threshold

18

Covered services

Audiovisual media service providers and video sharing platform providers under a member state's jurisdiction.

How the hook was established

express

What makes it apply

Operator establishment

Obligation class

Age verification, Design code, Prohibition

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Articles 6a and 28b require age verification and other protective measures, reporting and complaint systems, and bar commercial use of minors' data collected for them; they state no duty to create or keep a log or record. Article 28b(5) asks Member States to assess the measures through national regulators and sets no duty on providers to keep records for it.

Kind
None
As of

Also on the record

EEA status

Annex
XI.V
Status
Incorporated
Force date
Joint committee decision number
337/2022
Source link
https://www.efta.int/eea-lex/32018l1808
Decision date

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Requires member states to ensure audiovisual media services and video sharing platforms take appropriate measures, such as age verification tools, parental controls, and restricted broadcast times, so that content that may impair minors' physical, mental, or moral development is not normally seen or heard by them, with the strictest measures required for the most harmful content such as gratuitous violence and pornography.

Also bars using minors' personal data that media service providers or video sharing platforms collect or generate through those protection measures (for a video sharing platform, its age verification and parental control systems) for commercial purposes such as direct marketing, profiling and behaviourally targeted advertising.

Member states had to transpose the 2018 amendments by ; specific national enforcement actions are recorded in each jurisdiction's own file rather than here.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app publishes adult content.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .