Law / United States / Louisiana

Louisiana

United States law applies in Louisiana Louisiana is a state of the United States, whose 32 researched instruments are listed on the United States page, not here. The law of Louisiana, described on this page below, applies here too.

16 of 20 named instruments researched to a stage, across five of the six areas of law we track: 9 in force, 6 enacted but not yet in force and 1 repealed, withdrawn or blocked. As of 14 September 2026.

When they take effect13 of 16 carry a date, 3 do not. Earlier is before 2015.
Before 2015: 3 instruments (3 in force) earlier 2015: 0 instruments 2016: 0 instruments 2017: 0 instruments 2018: 0 instruments 2019: 0 instruments 2020: 0 instruments ’20 2021: 0 instruments 2022: 0 instruments 2023: 1 instrument (1 in force) 2024: 0 instruments 2025: 2 instruments (1 in force, 1 repealed, withdrawn or blocked) ’25 2026: 3 instruments (3 in force) 2027: 4 instruments (4 enacted but not yet in force) ’27 today

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

  1. AI law 3
  2. Privacy law 8
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law 1
  5. Age gating law 3
  6. News aggregation law none researched

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

AI law3 instruments, 3 in force

Research summary (311 words)

Louisiana has enacted three AI-disclosure statutes. Act 806 (HB 459), signed June 9, 2026 and in effect since August 1, 2026, requires a clear disclosure on an electioneering communication that uses artificial intelligence to falsely depict a candidate's or elected official's speech or conduct; a substantially similar 2024 bill, SB 97, passed the Legislature but was vetoed by the Governor.

Act 559 (HB 639), signed May 29, 2026 and in effect since August 1, 2026, requires the same kind of disclosure at the start of a telephone campaign call created using an artificial-intelligence-generated voice of a public figure, enforced by the Board of Ethics.

Act 250 (HB 178), a broad 2025 revision of the Code of Civil Procedure recommended by the Louisiana State Law Institute, added to attorneys' professional-conduct rules a duty to exercise reasonable diligence to verify the authenticity of evidence, including evidence artificially generated or altered by any means, before offering it to a court, and treats an undisclosed offer of known artificially manipulated evidence as a violation subject to contempt of court and professional discipline.

Separately, Title 14's computer-crime subpart also contains R.S. 14:73.13 (unlawful deepfakes), 14:73.14 (unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another created by artificial intelligence), and 14:73.15 (unlawful possession of such images); their substantive provisions are not described here.

An August 2025 executive order, JML 25-103, paused executive-branch agencies' procurement of AI tools pending an acceptable-use framework and barred agencies from using AI to independently make business decisions or to produce unlabeled AI-generated material; a September 2025 amendment, JML 25-109, added a prohibition on state agencies, universities, and public schools using AI platforms controlled by a hostile foreign government.

Three 2026 Regular Session bills addressing AI in employment decisions (HB 421), health-insurance coverage determinations (SB 246), and mental-health chatbot disclosure (SB 5) did not advance out of committee and are not catalogued as instruments.

AI transparency

Act 250 (HB 178), attorney duty to verify and disclose AI-generated evidence

La. Code Civ. Proc. art. 371official enrolled Act No. 250 text (2025 Regular Session, House Bill 178), Louisiana Legislature

In force since 1 August 2025. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

As part of a broad, Louisiana State Law Institute-recommended revision of the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 371 was amended to add that an attorney shall not knowingly encourage or produce false evidence, including evidence that is artificially generated or altered by any means, and shall exercise reasonable diligence to verify the authenticity of evidence before offering it to a court.

Offering evidence that the attorney knew or should have known through reasonable diligence was false or artificially manipulated, without disclosing that fact, is a violation of the Article, subjecting the attorney to punishment for contempt of court and other professional discipline. Signed by Governor Landry on June 11, 2025 as Act 250 (House Bill 178) and in effect since August 1, 2025.

What it requires

Act 559 (HB 639), AI-generated voice telephone campaign communication disclosure

La. R.S. 18:1463.1(D) to (H)official enrolled Act No. 559 text (2026 Regular Session, House Bill 639), Louisiana Legislature

In force 53 days, effective 1 August 2026. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

No person may make or cause to be made a telephone call or automated call in a political campaign that is created using artificial intelligence and uses the voice of a public figure, an elected official, or a limited public figure, without a clear and understandable disclosure at the beginning of the call that it was created using artificial intelligence.

An interactive computer service, internet or telecommunications service provider, or broadcaster is not liable for content provided by another person. A first violation is punishable by a civil fine of not more than $2,500 and a second or subsequent violation by a civil fine of not more than $5,000; the Board of Ethics administers and enforces this Section. Signed by Governor Landry on May 29, 2026 as Act 559 and in effect since August 1, 2026.

What it requires

Act 806 (HB 459), AI-manipulated electioneering communication disclosure

La. R.S. 18:1463(F) to (I)official enrolled Act No. 806 text (2026 Regular Session, House Bill 459), Louisiana Legislature

In force 53 days, effective 1 August 2026. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

No person may make or cause to be made an electioneering communication that portrays a candidate for elective office or an elected official subject to recall and that is created, altered, or digitally manipulated using artificial intelligence in a manner that would falsely appear to a reasonable observer to be an authentic record of that person's actual speech or conduct, without a clear and understandable disclosure that it was created using artificial intelligence.

Artificial intelligence is defined by cross-reference to R.S. 14:73.14. A media entity that broadcasts a paid political communication over which it had no input or control is exempt. Signed by Governor Landry on June 9, 2026 as Act 806 and in effect since August 1, 2026; a substantially similar bill, SB 97 of the 2024 Regular Session, passed both chambers but was vetoed by the Governor on June 20, 2024.

What it requires

Privacy law8 instruments, 2 in force, 6 enacted but not yet in force

Research summary (251 words)

Louisiana enacted a comprehensive consumer data privacy law, the Louisiana Data Privacy Act (LDPA, Act No. 502 of the 2026 Regular Session, formerly SB 386), signed by Governor Landry on May 29, 2026 and effective January 1, 2027; it applies to a person or entity doing business in Louisiana that has annual gross revenue over $25 million, annually processes the personal data of 75,000 or more consumers, households, or devices, or derives 50% or more of its annual revenue from selling personal data.

The LDPA's biometric data definition excludes an identifier generated from a photograph, video, or audio recording unless that data is generated to identify a specific individual, so a voiceprint or faceprint deliberately extracted from a recording for identification remains sensitive data regardless of the recording's own public status.

The Attorney General has exclusive LDPA enforcement authority; the Act deems a violation an unfair trade practice under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL) but expressly excludes the UTPCPL's own private-action provisions, foreclosing a private right of action, with a time-limited cure period running January 1 to July 31, 2027. Separately, the pre-existing Database Security Breach Notification Law (La.

R.S. 51:3071 to 51:3077), in force since 2006, requires breach notice within 60 days and deems a violation an unfair trade practice under R.S. 51:1405(A) without excluding the UTPCPL's private-action provisions, so R.S. 51:1409(A) does arm a private plaintiff for a breach-notice violation, the opposite answer from the comprehensive Act in the same title of the same code.

Breach notification

Database Security Breach Notification Law, definitions

La. R.S. 51:3073official Louisiana Revised Statutes text, Louisiana State Legislature

In force since 1 January 2006. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Louisiana's pre-existing Database Security Breach Notification Law (La. R.S. 51:3071 to 51:3077), first enacted 2005 (effective January 1, 2006) and last substantively amended 2018, is independent of the LDPA and already in force.

Personal information is an individual's name combined with a Social Security number, driver's license or state ID number, financial account or card number with an access code, passport number, or biometric data used to uniquely authenticate identity when accessing a system or account (a narrower, authentication-scoped biometric definition than the LDPA's, with no recording-derived exclusion or clawback of its own), and excludes publicly available government-record information.

What it requires

Database Security Breach Notification Law, notice duty

La. R.S. 51:3074(C), (E), (I)official Louisiana Revised Statutes text, Louisiana State Legislature

In force since 1 January 2006. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Notice to affected Louisiana residents is required in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, no later than 60 days after discovery, with written reasons for any delay owed to the Attorney General. No notice at all is required if, after investigation, there is no reasonable likelihood of harm, subject to a five-year document-retention duty for that determination.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Louisiana Data Privacy Act (Act No. 502), applicability and controller duties

La. R.S. 51:1780.1, 1780.2, 1780.4official Louisiana Act No. 502 (2026 Regular Session) text, as signed, Louisiana Legislature

In force in 100 days, effective 1 January 2027. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Louisiana Data Privacy Act, enacted as Act No. 502 of the 2026 Regular Session (formerly SB 386) and signed by Governor Landry on May 29, 2026, applies to a person or entity doing business in Louisiana that meets any one of three independent thresholds: annual gross revenue exceeding $25 million, annually buying, receiving, selling, or sharing for commercial purposes the personal data of 75,000 or more consumers, households, or devices, or deriving 50% or more of annual revenue from selling personal data.

Exemptions include state agencies and political subdivisions, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)-regulated financial institutions, nonprofits, higher-education institutions, and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-covered entities and business associates, plus a separate household or personal-activity carve-out. Controllers and processors carry General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and VCDPA-style duties, including data protection assessments, processor contracts, and purpose limitation, under Sec. 1780.4. The Act takes effect January 1, 2027.

What it requires

Data subject rights

Louisiana Data Privacy Act (Act No. 502), consumer rights

La. R.S. 51:1780.3official Louisiana Act No. 502 (2026 Regular Session) text, as signed, Louisiana Legislature

In force in 100 days, effective 1 January 2027. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The LDPA gives a Louisiana consumer the right to confirm and access their personal data, correct inaccuracies, delete data, obtain a portable copy, and opt out of targeted advertising, sale of personal data, and profiling producing a legal or similarly significant effect.

A controller must respond without undue delay and no later than 45 days after receipt, with one additional 45-day extension available if the controller notifies the consumer of the extension and its reason within the initial period. An appeal of a denial must be answered within 60 days, and a denial must include an online mechanism to reach the Attorney General. Any contract provision waiving or limiting a consumer's rights under this section is void and unenforceable as against public policy.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Database Security Breach Notification Law, unfair trade practice deeming

La. R.S. 51:3074(J), 51:1405(A)official Louisiana Revised Statutes text, Louisiana State Legislature

Commencement not set. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

A violation of the Database Security Breach Notification Law is deemed an unfair act or practice under R.S. 51:1405(A), with no carve-out of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law's own private-action provision. This is the opposite private-right-of-action answer from the LDPA in the same title of the same code: the LDPA expressly excludes R.S. 51:1409 and 1409.1, while this breach statute's deeming clause carries no such exclusion.

The specific amendment that added subsection (J)'s deeming clause is not independently dated, so no effective date is recorded for this instrument beyond the statute's current codified text.

What it requires

Louisiana Data Privacy Act (Act No. 502), Attorney General enforcement

La. R.S. 51:1780.5official Louisiana Act No. 502 (2026 Regular Session) text, as signed, Louisiana Legislature

In force in 100 days, effective 1 January 2027. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Louisiana Attorney General has exclusive authority to enforce the LDPA. A violation constitutes an unfair and deceptive trade practice under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL), R.S. 51:1401 et seq., but the Act expressly excludes the UTPCPL's own private-action provisions, R.S. 51:1409 and 1409.1, foreclosing a private right of action under the LDPA.

From January 1 to July 31, 2027, before bringing an action the Attorney General must give a person 30 days' written notice identifying the specific provisions violated, and may not initiate an investigation if the person cures the violation and confirms the cure in writing within that period.

What it requires

Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, private right of action for a breach-notice violation

La. R.S. 51:1409(A)official Louisiana Revised Statutes text, Louisiana State Legislature

Commencement not set. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

R.S. 51:1409(A) lets any person who suffers an ascertainable loss from an unfair or deceptive practice declared unlawful by R.S. 51:1405 bring an individual action for actual damages, trebled if the practice was knowingly used after Attorney General notice, plus attorney fees and costs.

Because the Database Security Breach Notification Law's own deeming clause, R.S. 51:3074(J), routes a breach-notice violation into R.S. 51:1405(A) without excluding this section, a Louisiana resident harmed by a breach-notice violation can sue directly under this provision.

What it requires

Sensitive categories

Louisiana Data Privacy Act (Act No. 502), sensitive and biometric data

La. R.S. 51:1780.1(3), (29)official Louisiana Act No. 502 (2026 Regular Session) text, as signed, Louisiana Legislature

In force in 100 days, effective 1 January 2027. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Sensitive data under the LDPA includes personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, religious belief, a mental or physical health diagnosis, sexuality, or citizenship or immigration status; genetic or biometric data processed to uniquely identify an individual; a known child's personal data; and precise geolocation data.

Biometric data means data generated by automatic measurement of an individual's biological characteristics used to identify a specific individual, such as a fingerprint, voiceprint, or eye retina or iris scan.

The definition excludes a physical or digital photograph, or data generated from a photograph, video, or audio recording, but claws that exclusion back whenever the data is generated to identify a specific individual, so a voiceprint or faceprint deliberately extracted from a recording for identification purposes remains biometric and sensitive data regardless of the recording's own origin or public status.

A person selling sensitive data under the Act's revenue-from-sale applicability threshold must first obtain the consumer's consent.

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (192 words)

Louisiana's computer-crime statute, R.S. 14:73.7 (computer tampering), bars knowing access to a computer without the authorization of its owner and expressly extends to an action that intentionally exceeds the limits of authorization, closer to a bare Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)-style test than Virginia's malicious-intent requirement; a confidential or proprietary access code issued to someone else creates a rebuttable presumption that using it was unauthorized.

No Louisiana appellate decision applying this statute to a scraping or automated-collection fact pattern has been located. Terms-of-service enforceability rests on ordinary Louisiana contract law; no browsewrap-specific or clickwrap-specific Louisiana statute was located. Copyright, text-and-data-mining, and database rights are federal only; Louisiana adds nothing there.

The Louisiana Data Privacy Act's publicly-available-information exclusion, covered in full under the privacy topic, already narrows the state's privacy law reach over scraped public personal data at the definitional level.

Louisiana's civil-law tradition has no common-law hot-news or misappropriation tort; the closest state-law analogs are general delictual liability under the Louisiana Civil Code and the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, R.S. 51:1401 et seq., neither tested against scraping specifically. robots.txt carries no independent legal weight in Louisiana, and no AI-training-specific crawl statute was located.

Computer misuse

Louisiana Computer Tampering, unauthorized access and exceeding authorization

La. R.S. 14:73.7official Louisiana Revised Statutes text, Louisiana State Legislature

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Computer tampering under R.S. 14:73.7 is the intentional, knowing commission, without the authorization of the owner of a computer, of accessing or causing to be accessed a computer or any part of it, copying or otherwise obtaining a program or data, damaging or destroying a computer or its data, or introducing electronic information with the intent to damage or destroy.

Actions taken without authorization expressly include actions that intentionally exceed the limits of authorization, and using a confidential or proprietary access code that was not issued to the person creates a rebuttable presumption that the access was unauthorized or exceeded authorization.

Penalties are tiered: access or copying alone (paragraphs (A)(1) and (2)) is punishable by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars, imprisonment for not more than six months, or both; damage or destruction (paragraphs (A)(3) and (4)) by a fine of not more than ten thousand dollars, imprisonment with or without hard labor for not more than five years, or both; and damage or destruction intended to disrupt vital state, local, or utility services, or to cause death or great bodily harm, by a fine of not more than ten thousand dollars, imprisonment at hard labor for not more than fifteen years, or both.

Enacted by Acts 2001, No. 829, section 1.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (389 words)

Louisiana's product-security and cyber-resilience posture for the private-sector duty-bearer rests on one enacted instrument: a standalone reasonable-security-procedures duty inside the state's pre-existing Database Security Breach Notification Law, La.

R.S. 51:3074(A) and (B) (Acts 2005, No. 499, effective January 1, 2006), which requires any person conducting business in Louisiana, or any person or agency that owns or licenses computerized data including personal information, to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature of the information, and to destroy or arrange for the destruction of records containing personal information no longer to be retained.

No enacted Louisiana statute sets security requirements a connected device or software product must meet before or after it reaches the market, and no general private-sector duty exists to report an exploited vulnerability or a security incident to an authority; the one sector-specific regime located, the Insurance Data Security Law (La.

R.S. 22:2501 et seq., enacted 2020 as Act No. 283), requires a licensee of the Louisiana Department of Insurance to maintain a written information security program and to notify the Commissioner of Insurance of a cybersecurity event, but its bound party, an insurance licensee, is a role the LexLint activity vocabulary cannot yet express, so no instrument is filed for it here. Because La.

R.S. 51:3074(J) deems a violation of any provision of the chapter, including this safeguards duty, an unfair trade practice under R.S. 51:1405(A) without excluding R.S. 51:1409's private-action provision, a Louisiana resident harmed by a violation of the safeguards duty can bring the same private action already documented for the chapter's breach-notice duty, for actual damages trebled if the violation was knowing after Attorney General notice, plus attorney fees and costs; there is no separate statutory civil-penalty cap. Louisiana's breach-notification duty, the other half of the same Database Security Breach Notification Law (La.

R.S. 51:3074(C) through (I)), and the Louisiana Data Privacy Act's own controller security-of-processing duty at La.

R.S. 51:1780.4(A)(1)(b), are this jurisdiction's privacy-topic rows rather than repeated here; Louisiana Senate Bill 75 (2026), which directs the Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness to set cybersecurity standards for local governments seeking state assistance after a cybersecurity incident, and the Louisiana Cybersecurity Commission (Acts 2023, No. 245), both bind state and local government bodies rather than a private business, so neither belongs in this profile's private-sector scope.

Security baseline statutes

Database Security Breach Notification Law, reasonable security procedures and destruction duty

La. R.S. 51:3074(A), (B)official Louisiana Revised Statutes text, Louisiana State Legislature

In force since 1 January 2006. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Any person that conducts business in Louisiana, or any person or agency that owns or licenses computerized data including personal information, must implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature of the information, to protect it from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure, and must take all reasonable steps to destroy or arrange for the destruction of records containing personal information no longer to be retained.

Because the same chapter's deeming clause, R.S. 51:3074(J), reaches a violation of this safeguards duty exactly as it reaches the chapter's breach-notice duty, and carries no exclusion of R.S. 51:1409, a Louisiana resident harmed by a violation can bring a private action for actual damages, trebled if the violation was knowing after Attorney General notice, plus attorney fees and costs.

What it requires

Age gating law3 instruments, 2 in force, 1 repealed, withdrawn or blocked

Research summary (70 words)

Louisiana was the first state to require age verification for adult websites, in effect since 2023. Its 2023 social media age verification and parental consent law, effective July 1, 2025 after a one-year delay, was permanently enjoined by a federal court in December 2025. A 2025 App Store Accountability Act took effect July 1, 2026, putting age-verification and parental-consent duties on app developers. No design code law has been enacted.

Adult content age verification (AV)

Act 440 (HB 142), age verification for material harmful to minors

La. R.S. 9:2800.28official Louisiana Revised Statutes enrolled act text

In force since 1 January 2023. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Commercial entities whose websites contain a substantial portion (one third or more) of material harmful to minors must perform reasonable age verification of Louisiana visitors. A 2024 amendment added Attorney General enforcement alongside the original private right of action.

Note and primary source

App store age verification (AV)

Act 481 (HB 570), App Store Accountability Act

La. R.S. 51:1771 et seq., including R.S. 51:1773official Louisiana Revised Statutes text

In force 84 days, effective 1 July 2026. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Requires app developers, not app store providers, to verify a user's age category through the covered app store's data sharing methods, link a minor's account to a parent account, and obtain verifiable parental consent before the minor can download an app, purchase an app, or make an in-app purchase. Enacted in 2025 as Act 481 (HB 570), effective July 1, 2026.

Note and primary source

Social media and minors

Act 456 (SB 162), Secure Online Child Interaction and Age Limitation Act

La. R.S. 51:1751 to 51:1756official Louisiana Revised Statutes text and federal court judgment

Enjoined: enforcement paused by a court, effective 1 July 2025. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Required social media platforms with 5 million or more worldwide account holders to verify the age of Louisiana users and obtain parental consent for account holders under 16. Its original July 1, 2024 effective date was delayed one year to July 1, 2025 by Act 656 of 2024. A federal court held the act unconstitutional and permanently enjoined enforcement on First Amendment grounds in December 2025, and Louisiana has docketed its appeal at the Fifth Circuit.

Note and primary source

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.