United States law applies in IowaIowa is a state of the United States, whose 134 researched instruments are listed on the United States page, not here. The law of Iowa, described on this page below, applies here too.
All 29 named instruments researched to a stage, across five of the ten areas of law we track: 28 in force and 1 not yet in force. As of .
When each starts21 of 29 carry a date, 8 do not. Earlier is before 2015.
in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force
AI law4 instruments, 3 in force, 1 not yet in force
Research summary (181 words)
Iowa diverges from the federal baseline chiefly through two criminal code extensions that reach AI-generated and manipulated imagery, plus a 2026 conversational-AI consumer-protection statute whose duties apply from . Iowa Code 728.12's sexual-exploitation-of-a-minor offense reaches a visual depiction created, adapted, or modified to give the appearance that an identifiable minor is engaged in a prohibited sexual act, covering AI-generated child sexual abuse material.
Iowa Code 708.7's harassment offense similarly reaches a visual depiction manipulated to falsely place an identifiable person in a state of nudity or a sex act, covering nonconsensual synthetic intimate images of any person.
Senate File 2417 (2026), signed and enacted as Iowa Code chapter 554J, requires an operator of a conversational AI service to disclose AI status to users and to minors, restrict sexualized or human-simulating content directed at minors, and adopt a suicide and self-harm referral protocol, and its own applicability section defers every duty in the chapter to .
Iowa has not enacted an election-deepfake disclosure statute: Iowa Code chapter 68A (campaign practices) contains no synthetic-media disclosure duty.
Iowa's harassment offense reaches a person who disseminates, publishes, distributes, or posts a visual depiction showing another person in a state of full or partial nudity or engaged in a sex act, without that person's consent, and defines the other person to include an individual who is recognizable by face, likeness, or other distinguishing features whose image is used to create, adapt, or modify a visual depiction to depict them in that manner, reaching a nonconsensual synthetic or deepfake intimate image.
A violation is harassment in the first degree, an aggravated misdemeanor, and an offender eighteen or older must register as a sex offender. Exceptions apply to voluntary exposure in public or commercial settings, disclosures made in the public interest, and disclosures by an interactive computer service under 47 U.S.C. 230.
The provision binds any person and is not limited to an AI developer or platform; a private civil action under this section is available only for a different subparagraph, the false reporting of a crime, not for this one. The synthetic and deepfake image language was added by 2024 Iowa Acts, chapter 1065 (House File 2240), section 3, whose effective date the Iowa Legislature's own bill history record states as .
Iowa's sexual-exploitation-of-a-minor offense reaches a visual depiction that has been created, adapted, or modified to give the appearance that an identifiable minor is engaged in a prohibited sexual act, which extends the offense to AI-generated and digitally manipulated depictions and does not require proof of the actual identity of the depicted minor.
Purchasing or possessing such a depiction is a class D felony for a first offense and a class C felony for a second or subsequent offense; knowingly promoting one is a class C felony; employing, using, or causing a minor to engage in the underlying act is a class B felony, with a court-imposable fine of up to fifty thousand dollars per offense in addition to any other sentence. The provision binds any person and is not limited to an AI developer or platform.
The AI-generated and manipulated depiction language, paragraph f, was added by 2024 Iowa Acts, chapter 1015 (Senate File 2243), section 1, whose effective date the Iowa Legislature's own bill history record states as .
House File 2635, 2026 Iowa Acts chapter 1087, was signed by the Governor on and adds subsection 2A to Iowa Code section 514F.8, in the division on health insurance trade practices. A utilization review organization may use an artificial intelligence-based algorithm or system to provide an initial review of a request for prior authorization.
For a prior authorization request for a health care service based on medical necessity, the organization may not use such an algorithm or system as the sole basis for its decision to deny, delay, or downgrade the request. To downgrade means to change an expedited or urgent request for prior authorization to a standard determination, or otherwise to modify the health care service that is the subject of the request to a lower-level service. The bill history states an effective date of .
Not yet in force.from ,in 8 months It starts to bind on .
Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
An operator of a conversational AI service accessible to the public must clearly and conspicuously disclose to a minor account holder that the minor is interacting with artificial intelligence, and must disclose to any user that the service is artificial intelligence whenever a reasonable person could otherwise believe they are interacting with a human.
An operator may not give a minor user points or similar rewards at unpredictable intervals intended to increase engagement, must take reasonable measures to prevent the service from producing sexual content involving a minor account holder, urging a minor toward sexual conduct, sexually objectifying a minor, claiming to be sentient or human, or simulating a romantic or emotionally dependent relationship with a minor.
An operator must offer minor account holders, and the parents or guardians of minors under thirteen, tools to manage privacy and account settings, must adopt a protocol for responding to suicidal ideation or self-harm, and may not represent that the service provides licensed psychology or behavioral health services.
The Act was signed into law on as 2026 Iowa Acts chapter 1068, but its own applicability section defers every duty in the chapter to , and it does not create a private right of action.
The chapter does not limit an operator to a private actor, and Iowa's general definitions statute includes a government or governmental subdivision or agency within the word person unless a chapter otherwise provides, so a government body operating a covered conversational AI service is bound in the same way as a private one.
The Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act (ICDPA), Iowa Code ch. 715D, is Iowa's comprehensive consumer-privacy regime, and its codified caption reads 'CONSUMER DATA PROTECTIONS' rather than the popular bill name. Enacted as Senate File 262 (90th General Assembly), signed , and section 10 of the act sets its effective date as .
ICDPA is the weakest of the seven states researched on data-subject rights: it grants no right to correct inaccurate personal data, requires only an opt-out (not opt-in consent) for sensitive-data processing, and gives a 90-day base response window, double the 45-day window used by the other six states in this batch. Iowa's definitions section is codified at Iowa Code section 715D.1, not 715D.2, which is Scope and exemptions, a different section.
Genetic or biometric data collected to identify a person is one of ICDPA's enumerated sensitive-data categories, so biometric data itself is a heightened category here. Separately, Iowa's biometric-data definition carries a blanket, unconditional exclusion for recording-derived data with no identification-purpose clawback, the same structure as Virginia's, so a voiceprint or faceprint extracted from a recording falls outside biometric, and therefore sensitive, data regardless of purpose.
A separate chapter, Iowa Code ch. 715C, governs breach notification; that chapter lets the Attorney General recover damages on an injured person's behalf but does not itself arm the person with a direct private right of action.
The ICDPA Attorney General has exclusive enforcement authority over the comprehensive act, with a mandatory 90-day cure notice carrying no sunset date in the text read, distinctively permanent relative to Connecticut's, Delaware's, and Montana's time-limited or eliminated cure rights. No active 2026 reform vehicle for ICDPA itself is identified, so this jurisdiction is recorded as settled rather than fast-moving.
Section 729.6(2) of the Iowa Code bars an employer, employment agency, labor organization or licensing agency from soliciting, requiring or administering a genetic test of a person as a condition of employment, preemployment application, labor organization membership or licensure. Section 729.6(3) of the Iowa Code bars a person from obtaining genetic information or samples for genetic testing from an individual without first obtaining informed and written consent.
Section 729.6(4) of the Iowa Code bars a health insurer from using genetic information or genetic testing for underwriting health insurance in the individual and group markets. Section 507F.7 of the Iowa Code requires an insurance licensee to notify the commissioner of insurance no later than three business days from the date of the licensee's confirmation of a cybersecurity event if a listed condition applies.
Rule 191-90.17 of the Iowa Administrative Code bars an insurance licensee from disclosing nonpublic personal health information about a consumer or customer unless an authorization is obtained from that consumer or customer. Section 279.71 of the Iowa Code bars an operator of a kindergarten through grade twelve site, service or application from knowingly engaging in targeted advertising based on information acquired through that use.
Section 228.2 of the Iowa Code bars a mental health professional, data collector, or employee or agent of one or of a mental health facility from disclosing or permitting the disclosure of mental health information. Rule 191-90.9 of the Iowa Administrative Code bars an insurance licensee from disclosing nonpublic personal financial information about a consumer to a nonaffiliated third party unless the consumer has had a notice and a reasonable opportunity to opt out and does not opt out.
Section 228.7 of the Iowa Code bars an employee or agent of a third-party payor or of a peer review organization from using or disclosing mental health information to any person, except to the extent necessary to administer claims, to conduct a utilization and quality control review, to audit claims paid, or as otherwise authorized by law.
Iowa Code § 507F.7Official text of the Iowa Code, Iowa Legislature (legis.iowa.gov)
In force since .Binds private bodies.
What this law does
Section 507F.7 of the Iowa Code requires a licensee to notify the commissioner of insurance no later than three business days from the date of the licensee's confirmation of a cybersecurity event if a listed condition applies. Section 507F.7(1)(b) reaches a licensee that reasonably believes that nonpublic information compromised by the cybersecurity event involves 250 or more consumers.
Section 507F.7(2) requires the notice to the commissioner to provide, in the form and manner the commissioner prescribes by rule, as much of the listed information as is available to the licensee at the time of the notification. Section 507F.7(3) gives the licensee a continuing obligation to update and supplement the initial notification to the commissioner as material changes to information previously provided occur.
In chapter 507F, a licensee is a person licensed, authorized to operate, or registered, or required to be licensed, authorized to operate, or registered, under the insurance laws of Iowa.
Section 507F.13 exempts a licensee that is subject to and in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, which must annually certify its compliance to the commissioner, and a licensee owned or controlled by a federally insured depository institution that complies with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act or comparable federal law. Section 507F.14 subjects a licensee that violates chapter 507F to penalties under section 505.7A and chapter 507B of the Iowa Code.
Section 507F.2 provides that chapter 507F is not to be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for a violation of its provisions. Chapter 79 of the 2021 Acts, House File 719, added chapter 507F, the Insurance Data Security Act, to the Iowa Code.
Iowa Code § 507F.6Official text of the Iowa Code, Iowa Legislature (legis.iowa.gov)
In force since .Binds private bodies.
What this law does
A licensee must maintain all records and documentation related to its investigation of a cybersecurity event for a minimum of five years from the date of the event and must produce them upon demand of the commissioner. Where a cybersecurity event has or may have occurred in an information system maintained by a third-party service provider, the licensee must complete an investigation or confirm and document that the provider has completed one.
A licensee is a person licensed, authorized to operate, or registered, or required to be, under the insurance laws of Iowa.
Notification of a breach of security must be made in the most expeditious manner possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with the legitimate needs of law enforcement. A business subject to a breach requiring notification to more than 500 Iowa residents must also give written notice to the director of the consumer protection division of the Attorney General's office within five business days of notifying consumers.
A violation is an unlawful practice under section 714.16, and the Attorney General may recover damages on behalf of an injured person, but that recovery runs through the Attorney General rather than arming the person with a direct private right of action. The provisions this entry describes came into force on different days.
ICDPA governs private-sector processing of Iowa consumers' personal data. Enacted as Senate File 262 (90th General Assembly, 2023 session), signed (2023 Iowa Acts ch. 17), effective per consistent secondary reporting; the effective date was not independently pulled as an explicit sentence from the primary code text, since Iowa's official code PDF does not print effective dates inline the way some peer states' history lines do. Controller duties are allocated at section 715D.4 and processor duties at section 715D.5.
Chapter 90 of the Insurance Division's rules governs the treatment of nonpublic personal financial information and nonpublic personal health information about individuals by all licensees of the insurance division.
Chapter 90 also applies to information about individuals who obtain, or are claimants or beneficiaries of, products or services primarily for personal, family or household purposes from licensees, and does not apply to information about individuals or companies that obtain products or services for business, commercial or agricultural purposes.
Rule 90.9 bars a licensee from disclosing nonpublic personal financial information about a consumer to a nonaffiliated third party, except as the rules authorize, unless the licensee has provided the initial notice and an opt-out notice and a reasonable opportunity to opt out and the consumer does not opt out.
Rule 90.9 treats a licensee that mails the notices and allows the consumer to opt out by mailing a form, calling a toll-free telephone number or any other reasonable means within 30 days from the date of mailing as having given a reasonable opportunity to opt out.
Rule 90.6 requires the opt-out notice to state that the licensee discloses or reserves the right to disclose nonpublic personal financial information about its consumer to a nonaffiliated third party, that the consumer has the right to opt out, and a reasonable means to exercise the right.
Rule 90.11 bars a licensee from disclosing a policy number or similar access number or code for a consumer's policy or transaction account to a nonaffiliated third party, other than a consumer reporting agency, for use in telemarketing, direct-mail marketing or marketing through electronic mail to the consumer.
Rule 90.23 bars a licensee from unfairly discriminating against a consumer or customer because that consumer or customer has opted out of the disclosure of nonpublic personal financial information. Rule 90.3 requires a licensee to give an individual who becomes the licensee's customer a clear and conspicuous notice that accurately reflects its privacy policies and practices not later than when the licensee establishes a customer relationship.
Rule 90.3 also requires a licensee to give a consumer such a notice before the licensee discloses any nonpublic personal financial information about the consumer to a nonaffiliated third party, other than as two exception rules authorize. Rule 90.4 requires a licensee to give customers a clear and conspicuous notice of its privacy policies and practices not less than annually during the continuation of the customer relationship.
Rule 90.5 requires each initial, annual and revised privacy notice to state the categories of nonpublic personal financial information the licensee collects and discloses, and the categories of affiliates and nonaffiliated third parties to which it discloses.
Rule 90.5 also requires each such notice to explain the consumer's right to opt out of disclosure to nonaffiliated third parties and the methods for exercising it, and to describe the licensee's policies and practices for protecting the confidentiality and security of nonpublic personal financial information.
Rule 90.7 bars a licensee from disclosing nonpublic personal financial information to a nonaffiliated third party other than as the initial notice described unless it has provided a clear and conspicuous revised privacy notice and a new opt-out notice, among other conditions. Rule 90.26 provides that the rules became effective , and extends the time for compliance until . Rule 90.1 as currently printed was adopted by ARC 7741C, effective .
Rule 90.25 provides that an insurer, producer or licensee that violates a requirement of the rules has committed a violation of Iowa Code section 507B.4, in addition to any other penalties provided by the laws of Iowa.
Section 507B.7 lets the Commissioner of Insurance order a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for each act or violation, up to $10,000 in the aggregate, or up to $5,000 for each act or violation, up to $50,000 in any one six-month period, if the person knew or reasonably should have known of the violation.
ICDPA gives an Iowa consumer the right to confirmation of processing, access, deletion, a portable copy, and an opt-out of the sale of personal data, and no right of correction or to opt out of profiling. Section 715D.3 lists no opt-out of targeted advertising, but a controller that sells personal data to third parties or engages in targeted advertising must clearly and conspicuously disclose it and the manner in which a consumer may opt out of it (section 715D.4(6)).
A controller must respond without undue delay and within 90 days of receipt, with one 45-day extension available; an appeal of a refusal must be decided within 60 days.
The Iowa Attorney General has exclusive authority to enforce ICDPA. Before suing, the Attorney General must give a controller or processor 90 days' written notice identifying the specific provisions violated; unlike Connecticut's, Delaware's, and Montana's time-limited or eliminated cure rights, this 90-day cure right carries no sunset date in the text read. Civil penalties run up to $7,500 per violation, and the chapter creates no private right of action.
In chapter 228 of the Iowa Code, mental health information means oral, written or recorded information which indicates the identity of an individual receiving professional services and which relates to the diagnosis, course or treatment of the individual's mental or emotional condition.
Section 228.2 bars a mental health professional, data collector, or employee or agent of a mental health professional, of a data collector, or of or for a mental health facility from disclosing or permitting the disclosure of mental health information, except as the chapter specifically authorizes. Section 228.2 requires the person disclosing mental health information to enter a notation with the individual's record stating the date of the disclosure and the name of the recipient.
Section 228.2 also requires the person disclosing to give the recipient a statement that unauthorized disclosure of mental health information is unlawful and that civil damages and criminal penalties may be applicable. Section 228.2 bars a recipient of mental health information from disclosing the information received, except as the chapter specifically authorizes.
Section 228.3 lets an individual eighteen years of age or older, or the individual's legal representative, consent to disclosure of mental health information by signing a voluntary written authorization that must specify the nature of the information, the persons authorized to disclose it and the purposes of use. Section 228.4 lets an individual or the individual's legal representative revoke a prior authorization in writing, effective on receipt by the person previously authorized to disclose.
Chapter 1082 of the 1986 Acts, Senate File 2247, added chapter 228 on the disclosure of mental health information to the Iowa Code. The Secretary of State certified that Senate File 2247 was published in the Quad-City Times on , and in The Anamosa Journal-Eureka on .
Iowa Code § 729.6(4)Official text of the Iowa Code, Iowa Legislature (legis.iowa.gov)
In force.Binds private bodies.
What this law does
In section 729.6 of the Iowa Code, a health insurer means a carrier as defined in section 513B.2, and a third-party administrator has the meaning given in section 510.11. Subsection 4 of section 729.6 bars a third-party administrator or health insurer from releasing genetic information pertaining to an individual without the individual's prior written authorization.
Subsection 4 of section 729.6 lifts the authorization requirement for individuals participating in research settings, for tests conducted purely for research, for tests for somatic mutations, for forensic testing, for newborn screening, for paternity testing and for criminal investigations. Subsection 4 of section 729.6 bars a health insurer from discriminating against an individual or a member of the individual's family on the basis of genetic information or genetic testing.
Subsection 4 of section 729.6 bars a health insurer from using genetic information or genetic testing for underwriting health insurance in the individual and group markets. Subsection 4 of section 729.6 makes a violation of that subsection an unfair insurance trade practice under section 507B.4.
Section 507B.7 lets the Commissioner of Insurance order a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for each act or violation, up to $10,000 in the aggregate, or up to $5,000 for each act or violation, up to $50,000 in any one six-month period, if the person knew or reasonably should have known of the violation. Chapter 1153 of the 2010 Acts, Senate File 2215, added subsection 7A, release or use of genetic information, to section 507B.4.
Under section 729.6 of the Iowa Code, an employer includes the state of Iowa and any political subdivision, board, commission, department, institution or school district, and every other person employing employees within the state.
Subsection 2 of section 729.6 bars an employer, employment agency, labor organization or licensing agency from soliciting, requiring or administering a genetic test of a person as a condition of employment, preemployment application, labor organization membership or licensure. Subsection 2 of section 729.6 also bars the same persons from affecting the terms, conditions or privileges of employment, or terminating employment, membership or licensure, of a person who obtains a genetic test.
Subsection 5 of section 729.6 bars a person from selling to or interpreting for an employer, employment agency, labor organization or licensing agency a genetic test of an employee, member or licensee or of a prospective one. Subsection 6 of section 729.6 prohibits an agreement offering employment, membership, licensure or any pay or benefit in return for taking a genetic test.
Subsection 7 of section 729.6 requires compensation for lost wages and benefits for a person discharged, disciplined or discriminated against in violation of the section.
Subsection 9 of section 729.6 allows genetic testing of an employee who requests it and gives written and informed consent, to investigate a workers' compensation claim or, if the employer takes no adverse action as a result of the test, to determine the employee's susceptibility or level of exposure to potentially toxic chemicals or substances in the workplace.
Subsection 8 of section 729.6 lets an aggrieved employee, member, licensee or prospective one recover affirmative relief including reinstatement or hiring, with or without back pay, and attorney fees and court costs, from a person who violates subsection 2, 3, 5, 6 or 7.
Subsection 8 of section 729.6 also lets an aggrieved employee, member, licensee or prospective one, the county attorney or the attorney general seek an injunction in district court against an act that violates subsection 2, 3, 5, 6 or 7. Chapter 1059 of the 1992 Acts, Senate File 2145, added section 729.6 to the Iowa Code, in an act relating to the use of genetic testing in employment situations by employers, employment agencies, labor organizations and licensing agencies.
Iowa Code § 729.6(3)Official text of the Iowa Code, Iowa Legislature (legis.iowa.gov)
In force.Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
Subsection 3 of section 729.6 of the Iowa Code bars a person from obtaining genetic information or samples for genetic testing from an individual without first obtaining informed and written consent from the individual or the individual's authorized representative.
Subsection 3 of section 729.6 also bars a person from performing genetic testing of an individual, or collecting, retaining, transmitting or using genetic information, without the informed and written consent of the individual or the individual's authorized representative.
Subsection 3 of section 729.6 lifts the consent requirement for collection, retention, transmission or use that federal or other state law permits without consent, for identifying an individual in a criminal investigation by a law enforcement agency, for identifying deceased individuals, for establishing parental identity, for screening newborns, and for research, education and medical repositories whose information contains no personally identifiable information.
In section 729.6, genetic information has the meaning given in section 1191b(d)(6) of title 29 of the United States Code, and genetic testing has the meaning given to genetic test in section 1191b(d)(7) of that title.
Subsection 8 of section 729.6 makes a person who violates subsection 3 liable to an aggrieved employee, labor organization member, licensee or prospective one, and lets an aggrieved employee, member, licensee or prospective one, the county attorney or the attorney general seek an injunction against an act that violates subsection 3. Chapter 1153 of the 2010 Acts, Senate File 2215, added the consent requirement to section 729.6 as new subsection 2A.
Chapter 90 of the Insurance Division's rules governs the treatment of nonpublic personal financial information and nonpublic personal health information about individuals by all licensees of the insurance division. Rule 90.17 bars a licensee from disclosing nonpublic personal health information about a consumer or customer unless an authorization is obtained from the consumer or customer whose information is sought to be disclosed.
Rule 90.17 leaves a licensee or its insurance affiliate free to disclose nonpublic personal health information without an authorization for listed insurance functions, among them claims administration, fraud detection and underwriting.
Rule 90.18 requires a valid authorization to be in written or electronic form and to identify the consumer or customer, describe the types of information, the recipients, the purpose and use, carry the signature and date, and state how long it is valid and how it may be revoked. Rule 90.18 limits an authorization to no more than 24 months, lets the individual revoke it at any time, and requires the licensee to retain the authorization or a copy in the individual's record.
Rule 90.26 provides that the health information rules are effective , and that no administrative action against noncompliance will be taken until that date. Rule 90.25 provides that an insurer, producer or licensee that violates a requirement of the rules has committed a violation of Iowa Code section 507B.4, in addition to any other penalties provided by the laws of Iowa.
Section 507B.7 lets the Commissioner of Insurance order a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for each act or violation, up to $10,000 in the aggregate, or up to $5,000 for each act or violation, up to $50,000 in any one six-month period, if the person knew or reasonably should have known of the violation.
ICDPA classifies data revealing racial or ethnic origin, religious beliefs, mental or physical health diagnosis, sexual orientation, or citizenship or immigration status (with a discrimination-avoidance carve-out not seen in the other six states in this batch), the processing of genetic or biometric data to uniquely identify a person, a known child's data, and precise geolocation data as sensitive data, but requires only an opt-out mechanism for sensitive-data processing rather than the opt-in consent every other state in this batch requires.
Genetic or biometric data collected to identify a person is itself an enumerated sensitive-data category (§ 715D.1(26)(b)), so biometric data is a heightened category here.
Separately, 'Biometric data' (§ 715D.1(4)) carries the same blanket, unconditional exclusion for recording-derived data as Virginia's VCDPA, word for word: no clawback for data generated to identify someone, so a voiceprint or faceprint extracted from a recording is not biometric data under ICDPA regardless of purpose, and therefore is not sensitive data either. These definitions sit at § 715D.1, not at § 715D.2, which is a different section (Scope and exemptions).
Iowa Code § 228.7Official text of the Iowa Code, Iowa Legislature (legis.iowa.gov)
In force.Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
In chapter 228 of the Iowa Code, a third-party payor is a person which provides accident and health benefits or medical, surgical or hospital benefits, including insurers, nonprofit health service corporations, health maintenance organizations, governmental agencies and self-insured employers.
Section 228.7 lets a mental health professional, data collector or mental health facility disclose mental health information, on the prior written consent of the patient or the patient's legal representative, to a third-party payor or peer review organization that has filed a written statement with the commissioner of insurance.
Section 228.7 bars an employee or agent of a third-party payor or of a peer review organization from using or disclosing mental health information to any person, except to the extent necessary to administer claims, to conduct a utilization and quality control review, to audit claims paid, or as otherwise authorized by law.
Section 228.7 bars routine or ongoing access to mental health information for employees and agents of a self-insured employer that has not filed the statement, unless they have signed a statement that they are aware of the limits on use and of the penalty for unauthorized disclosure.
Section 228.7 makes an employee or agent of a third-party payor or a peer review organization who willfully uses or discloses mental health information in violation of subsection 2 guilty of a serious misdemeanor, with a fine not to exceed $500 for a first offense and $5,000 for each subsequent offense. The history note of section 228.7 cites section 1 of chapter 1226 of the 88 Acts.
Iowa Code § 279.71Official text of the Iowa Code, Iowa Legislature (legis.iowa.gov)
In force.Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
Section 279.71 of the Iowa Code defines an operator as the operator of an internet site, online service, online application or mobile application with actual knowledge that it is used primarily for kindergarten through grade twelve school purposes and was designed and marketed for such purposes.
Section 279.71 bars an operator from knowingly engaging in targeted advertising based on information acquired through use of its site, service or application for kindergarten through grade twelve school purposes, and from knowingly using such information to amass a profile about a student except in furtherance of those purposes. Paragraph 2(a)(3) of section 279.71 lists selling or renting a student's information, including covered information, among the acts that paragraph 2(a) bars.
Paragraph 2(a)(4) of section 279.71 bars disclosure of covered information unless it is made for a purpose the paragraph lists.
Subsection 3 of section 279.71 requires an operator to implement and maintain security procedures and practices consistent with current industry standards and applicable law, and to delete a student's covered information as soon as reasonably practicable when the school district or attendance center requests deletion, unless the student or parent or guardian consents to keeping it.
Section 279.71 does not apply to general audience internet sites, online services, online applications or mobile applications, even if login credentials created for an operator's site, service or application may be used to access them. House File 2354 of the 2018 session added the student online personal information protection section to the Iowa Code.
Iowa's computer-crime statute punishes a person who knowingly and without authorization accesses a computer, computer system, or computer network (Iowa Code § 716.6B(1)): a simple misdemeanor for any access, a serious misdemeanor if computer data is copied, altered, or deleted, and an aggravated misdemeanor if the data accessed contains a confidential record under section 22.7, operational or support data of a public utility, rural water district, municipal utility or public airport, or a trade secret.
Section 702.1A defines computer access to include retrieving data from a computer, computer system, or computer network, and neither that section nor § 716.6B defines authorization. The offense has no security-measure, harm or purpose element, no exception for a page the owner serves openly, and no rule on how authorization is withdrawn, so it turns on whether the owner gave permission, read in its ordinary sense.
Iowa Code § 714.1(8) separately makes it theft to access a computer, computer system, or computer network knowingly and without authorization for the purpose of obtaining computer services, information, or property, on the same undefined word; the purpose element is met by any crawler that reads a page to obtain its information, so it adds no limit.
No Iowa decision applies either section to a crawler or to a page open to the public, so whether serving a page to anyone is authorization to read it is open, as is whether a robots.txt directive withdraws that authorization. A CAPTCHA, IP block or rate limit is different in kind: it is the operator refusing access, so knowing access past one is access without authorization in full, and the section adds no element beyond knowing access without authorization.
A cease and desist letter states the same refusal, but the page stays open to everyone, and no Iowa statute or decision says whether a letter alone withdraws authorization.
Subsection 2 lets the prosecuting attorney or an aggrieved person institute civil proceedings in district court seeking relief from conduct constituting a violation or to prevent, restrain, or remedy a violation; it uses the section's own elements, so it widens who can raise these questions and changes none of the answers.
Website terms are governed by Iowa's general law of assent.
The Iowa Supreme Court holds that a party who signs an agreement is bound by it although the party did not read it, including terms in a document the agreement incorporates by reference (Bryant v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc., 595 N.W.2d 482, 486 (Iowa 1999)), and that an offeree must know of an offer before there can be mutual assent, a rule it relaxed only for employee handbooks (Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Co., 540 N.W.2d 277, 283-84 (Iowa 1995)).
Applied to websites, terms accepted at signup bind, and terms shown only through a link bind only where the visitor knew of them.
A federal court in Iowa enforced a forum-selection clause in website terms printed above an order form whose submit statement said the user had read and agreed to them, although the plaintiffs had not read them, and saw no inherent problem in clickwrap or scrollwrap terms, in a transfer ruling under federal forum-selection doctrine (Witt v. Nation-Wide Horse Transportation, Inc., 197 F. Supp. 3d 1146 (S.D. Iowa 2016)).
No Iowa appellate decision applies either rule to a crawler or to terms shown only through a link, and none applies the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act or unfair-competition law to scraping. Neither § 716.6B nor any Iowa decision says whether access in breach of accepted terms is access without authorization.
A federal court applying Iowa law declined to dismiss a claim of trespass to chattel over use of another's telecommunications network without authorization, stating the tort in the terms of Restatement (Second) of Torts § 217 as intentionally dispossessing another of a chattel or using or intermeddling with a chattel in another's possession, and noting that no Iowa state court had expressly recognized or rejected it (McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corp., 469 F. Supp.
2d 677 (N.D. Iowa 2007)); it does not address harm.
The only Iowa court text that states a harm condition is a plurality opinion of the Iowa Supreme Court in a dog-sniff search case decided under the federal and Iowa constitutions, which quotes a federal district court's account of Restatement (Second) of Torts § 218 comment e: liability arises only if the intermeddling harms the possessor's materially valuable interest in the chattel's physical condition, quality, or value, deprives the possessor of its use for a substantial time, or affects some other legally protected interest of the possessor (State v. Bauler, No. 22-1232 (Iowa )).
Whether an Iowa court would require harm in a civil claim for trespass to chattels is open, and no Iowa decision applies the tort to server load or crawling.
Copyright, text-and-data-mining and database rights are governed by federal law alone, including the unsettled question whether commercial mining is fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107, and Iowa adds no mining exception, opt-out or database right.
No Iowa statute specifically governs the data used to train an AI model: Senate File 2417 (2026) regulates operators of conversational AI services, applies from , and mentions training only to provide that a developer is not liable solely because a third party used its model to create or train such a service. No Iowa statute or decision gives robots.txt legal weight of its own.
The Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act (Iowa Code ch. 715D), in effect since , excludes publicly available information from personal data, and it treats information a consumer has restricted to a specific audience as not publicly available (§ 715D.1).
Section 716.6B, titled Unauthorized computer access, penalties, civil cause of action, provides that a person who knowingly and without authorization accesses a computer, computer system, or computer network commits a simple misdemeanor for any access that is not an aggravated or serious misdemeanor, a serious misdemeanor if computer data is copied, altered, or deleted, and an aggravated misdemeanor if the data accessed contains a confidential record as defined in section 22.7, operational or support data of a public utility, rural water district, municipal utility or public airport, or a trade secret.
Subsection 2 provides that the prosecuting attorney or an aggrieved person may institute civil proceedings against any person in district court seeking relief from conduct constituting a violation of the section or to prevent, restrain, or remedy such a violation. Section 716.6B was added by 2000 Iowa Acts, chapter 1201, section 11, approved , as a simple misdemeanor for knowing access without authorization.
The serious and aggravated tiers and the civil proceedings in subsection 2 were added by 2002 Iowa Acts, chapter 1049, section 2, approved . Acts of a public nature passed at a regular session take effect on the first day of July following their passage unless the act provides otherwise, so section 716.6B took effect .
Section 715D.1(18) defines personal data to exclude de-identified or aggregate data and publicly available information, and section 715D.1(24) defines publicly available information as information that is lawfully made available through federal, state, or local government records, or information that a business has reasonable basis to believe is lawfully made available to the general public through widely distributed media, by the consumer, or by a person to whom the consumer has disclosed the information, unless the consumer has restricted the information to a specific audience.
The exclusion is built into the definition of personal data itself, so personal data lawfully made available through government records or widely distributed media falls outside the Act's scope by definition. The Act applies to persons conducting business in Iowa or targeting Iowa residents who, during a calendar year, control or process the personal data of at least 100,000 consumers, with a second, lower-threshold prong for entities deriving a substantial share of revenue from data sales.
Iowa's private-sector security posture rests on a cybersecurity tort-liability affirmative defense, Iowa Code chapter 554G (554G.1 to 554G.4, added by 2023 Acts, ch. 63 (H.F. 553)), reaching a covered entity, a business defined to include a financial institution and an entity organized under chapter 28E but not a municipality, that accesses, receives, stores, maintains, communicates, or processes personal information or restricted information.
A covered entity that creates, maintains, and complies with a written cybersecurity program with administrative, technical, operational, and physical safeguards, funded at or above its own calculated maximum probable loss from a data breach, and that reasonably conforms to a named industry-recognized framework (the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework, NIST SP 800-171, NIST SP 800-53 and 800-53A, the FedRAMP Security Assessment Framework, the CIS Critical Security Controls, or the ISO/IEC 27000 family) or an applicable regulatory regime (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)'s Security Rule, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Title V, the federal Information Security Modernization Act, HITECH, or Iowa's own Insurance Data Security Act, chapter 507F) gains an affirmative defense to a tort claim alleging that a failure to implement reasonable information security controls caused a data breach.
The chapter imposes no duty to adopt a program, names no regulator and no penalty, and, under 554G.4, creates no private right of action of its own: it is a defendant's shield raised in litigation another statute or the common law already permits, never a plaintiff's remedy.
Separately, the Insurance Data Security Act, Iowa Code chapter 507F (2021 Acts, ch. 79), requires a licensee under Iowa's insurance laws (with carve-outs for a licensee already compliant with HIPAA or Gramm-Leach-Bliley) to develop, implement, and maintain a risk-assessment-based information security program, investigate a cybersecurity event, and notify the commissioner of insurance within three business days of confirming a reportable event; a licensee with fewer than twenty workers, under five million dollars in gross annual revenue, or under ten million dollars in year-end total assets is exempt.
No Iowa statute setting security requirements a connected device or software product must meet before or after it reaches the market, comparable to California's, Oregon's, or the Cyber Resilience Act's connected-device or product duties, is described here; none was located across the source dossier already researched for this jurisdiction (Iowa Code chapters 103A, 335, 414, 423, 455B, 476, 507F, 554G, 700 through 728) or in a further search for one, so this is a researched absence rather than a gap in coverage.
No general Iowa statute requires a private business to report an exploited vulnerability or a security incident to an authority, a computer security incident response team (CSIRT), or users, outside the insurance-sector duty above and the Utilities Commission's cyberattack reports for water, sanitary sewage and storm water utilities, which are filed as rows of their own.
Iowa's breach-of-security notification duty, Iowa Code 715C.2 (Personal Information Security Breach Protection), is already this jurisdiction's privacy row and is not repeated here.
The Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act's own security-of-processing clause, Iowa Code 715D.4(1), requiring a controller to adopt and implement reasonable administrative, technical, and physical data security practices appropriate to the volume and nature of the personal data at issue, is a section of that comprehensive privacy regime and stays with this jurisdiction's privacy row rather than being researched a second time here.
Iowa Code 716.6B, unauthorized computer access, is an offense committed by the person accessing a system rather than a duty on the system's operator or manufacturer, so it belongs to this jurisdiction's scraping row and is not a security-topic presence on its own. Section 507F.4 of the Insurance Data Security Act requires each insurance licensee to develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program.
Rule 199-21.9 of the Iowa Administrative Code requires a water utility to notify the Iowa Utilities Commission about any incident involving a cyberattack affecting the well-being of the utility, its customers, or the environment. Rule 199-21.16 of the Iowa Administrative Code requires a sanitary sewage utility to notify the Iowa Utilities Commission about any incident involving a cyberattack affecting the well-being of the utility, its customers, or the environment.
Rule 199-21.20 of the Iowa Administrative Code requires a storm water drainage utility to notify the Iowa Utilities Commission about any incident involving a cyberattack affecting the well-being of the utility, its customers, or the environment. Iowa Code section 8.77(1)(o) lists, among the powers of the chief information officer, requiring supported state entities to report information technology security incidents to the department in a timely manner.
Iowa Code section 8.77(1)(f) makes the cybersecurity policies and rules that the chief information officer prescribes binding on all supported state entities except as the subchapter otherwise provides.
A licensee must develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program based on its risk assessment, commensurate with its size and complexity, the nature and scope of its activities including its use of third-party service providers, and the sensitivity of the nonpublic information it holds.
A licensee is a person licensed, authorized to operate, or registered, or required to be, under the insurance laws of Iowa, and does not include a purchasing group, a risk retention group chartered and licensed in another state, or a person acting as an assuming insurer that is domiciled in another state or jurisdiction.
Section 507F.4 does not apply to a licensee that has fewer than twenty individuals on its workforce, including employees and independent contractors, has less than five million dollars in gross annual revenue, or has less than ten million dollars in year-end total assets.
A licensee must exercise due diligence in selecting its third-party service providers, conduct oversight of all third-party service provider arrangements and require each provider to implement appropriate administrative, technical and physical measures to protect and secure the information systems and nonpublic information it can access or holds. Licensees had to comply with the third-party service provider section no later than .
A licensee with a board of directors must have the board or an appropriate committee require executive management to develop, implement and maintain the program and to provide the board a written report at least annually. The chapter does not apply to a licensee that is subject to, and in compliance with, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, and that licensee must annually submit to the commissioner a written certification of its compliance.
The chapter does not apply to a licensee that is owned or controlled by a federally insured depository institution that is subject to, and in compliance with, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act or comparable federal law and corresponding regulations. A licensee that violates the chapter is subject to penalties under section 505.7A and chapter 507B of the Iowa Code. The chapter does not create or imply a private cause of action for a violation of its provisions.
Iowa Code sec. 8.77(1)(f)Text of Iowa Code chapter 8, subchapter XI, published by the Iowa Legislature
In force.Binds government bodies.
What this law does
Among the powers and duties of the chief information officer is prescribing policies and adopting rules relating to cybersecurity, which are binding on all supported entities except as otherwise provided in the subchapter. A supported entity is a unit of state government that is an authority, board, commission, committee, council, department or independent agency as defined in section 7E.4, including each principal central department enumerated in section 7E.5.
Among the powers and duties of the chief information officer is developing and maintaining security policies and systems to ensure the integrity of the state's information resources and to prevent the disclosure of confidential records.
A covered entity is a business that accesses, receives, stores, maintains, communicates, or processes personal information or restricted information in or through a system, network, or service located in or outside Iowa. Business is defined to include a financial institution and an entity organized under Iowa Code chapter 28E, but not a municipality.
A covered entity that satisfies this chapter's requirements gains an affirmative defense to a tort claim alleging that a failure to implement reasonable information security controls caused a data breach concerning personal information or restricted information. To satisfy those requirements, a covered entity must create, maintain, and comply with a written cybersecurity program that reasonably conforms to a named industry framework or an applicable regulatory regime.
The program's scale and scope is appropriate if it is funded at or above the covered entity's own most recently calculated maximum probable loss from a data breach. The chapter imposes no independent duty to adopt a program and creates no private right of action of its own for failing to comply with it.
A sanitary sewage utility must notify the Iowa Utilities Commission about any incident involving a cyberattack affecting the well-being of the utility, its customers, or the environment, and about three other listed kinds of incident. The utility must notify the commission immediately, or as soon as practical, of any reportable incident, by emailing the commission duty officer or, when email is not available, by calling the duty officer.
The utility will notify the commission when the incident has ended and normal sanitary sewage service has been restored. The chapter's term utility means a water, sanitary sewage or storm water drainage public utility under Iowa Code section 476.1(2) and does not include a county or an entity organized under chapter 28E that is composed entirely of counties.
The Iowa Code chapter on utility regulation does not apply to municipally owned sanitary sewage or storm water drainage systems, sanitary districts or districts organized under chapter 468.
A public utility that, after written notice by the commission of a specific violation, violates the same provision of the chapter, the same commission rule or the same provision of a commission order is subject to a civil penalty, which the commission may levy, of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than two thousand five hundred dollars per violation.
A public utility that willfully violates the same provision, rule or order after that written notice is subject to a civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars nor more than ten thousand dollars per violation.
Iowa Code sec. 8.77(1)(o)Text of Iowa Code chapter 8, subchapter XI, published by the Iowa Legislature
In force.Binds government bodies.
What this law does
Among the powers and duties of the chief information officer is requiring supported entities to report information technology security incidents to the department in a timely manner, to provide comprehensive information concerning the information technology security they employ and to forecast their projected future information technology security needs and capabilities.
A supported entity is a unit of state government that is an authority, board, commission, committee, council, department or independent agency as defined in section 7E.4, including each principal central department enumerated in section 7E.5.
A supported entity does not include the office of the governor or the office of an elective constitutional or statutory officer, the general assembly, the judicial branch, a political subdivision of the state or the state board of regents and the institutions it operates.
A storm water drainage utility must notify the Iowa Utilities Commission about any incident involving a cyberattack affecting the well-being of the utility, its customers, or the environment, and about three other listed kinds of incident. The utility must notify the commission immediately, or as soon as practical, of any reportable incident, by emailing the commission duty officer or, when email is not available, by calling the duty officer.
The utility will notify the commission when the incident has ended and normal storm water drainage service has been restored. The chapter's term utility means a water, sanitary sewage or storm water drainage public utility under Iowa Code section 476.1(2) and does not include a county or an entity organized under chapter 28E that is composed entirely of counties.
The Iowa Code chapter on utility regulation does not apply to municipally owned sanitary sewage or storm water drainage systems, sanitary districts or districts organized under chapter 468.
A public utility that, after written notice by the commission of a specific violation, violates the same provision of the chapter, the same commission rule or the same provision of a commission order is subject to a civil penalty, which the commission may levy, of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than two thousand five hundred dollars per violation.
A public utility that willfully violates the same provision, rule or order after that written notice is subject to a civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars nor more than ten thousand dollars per violation.
A water utility must notify the Iowa Utilities Commission about any incident involving a cyberattack affecting the well-being of the utility, its customers, or the environment, and about five other listed kinds of incident. The utility must notify the commission immediately, or as soon as practical, of any reportable incident, by emailing the commission duty officer or, when email is not available, by calling the duty officer.
The utility will notify the commission when the incident has ended and normal water service has been restored. The chapter's term utility means a water, sanitary sewage or storm water drainage public utility under Iowa Code section 476.1(2) and does not include a county or an entity organized under chapter 28E that is composed entirely of counties.
The Iowa Code chapter on utility regulation does not apply to municipally owned waterworks, waterworks having less than two thousand customers, joint water utilities, rural water districts and cooperative water associations.
A public utility that, after written notice by the commission of a specific violation, violates the same provision of the chapter, the same commission rule or the same provision of a commission order is subject to a civil penalty, which the commission may levy, of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than two thousand five hundred dollars per violation.
A public utility that willfully violates the same provision, rule or order after that written notice is subject to a civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars nor more than ten thousand dollars per violation.
Iowa requires operators of websites and apps with a substantial portion of content pornographic for minors to perform reasonable age verification, effective . No social media age verification, app store accountability, or design code law has been enacted; bills addressing parental consent for minor social media accounts and app store age verification were introduced in the 2026 session but did not pass either chamber.
Operators of internet sites, apps, or segments of apps containing a substantial portion (one third or more) of material pornographic for minors must perform reasonable age verification of Iowa users before granting access, and may not retain, sell, or disseminate identifying information. Signed .
Filed and counted under Cybersecurity law. Gives an affirmative defense to a tort claim over a data breach to a business that kept a written cybersecurity program conforming to a named framework or regulatory regime.
Where nothing was found1 area of law
These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.
Reuse law
Iowa has not enacted a press-publisher neighbouring right, a mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, or a hot-news misappropriation statute, and no bill comparable to California's since-died Journalism Preservation Act, Australia's News Media Bargaining Code, or the federal Journalism Competition and Preservation Act has been introduced in the Iowa General Assembly as of the date shown.
Iowa's Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act, Iowa Code chapter 714H, expressly excludes the publisher of a newspaper, magazine, or other print or electronic media, and the broadcaster of an advertisement, from liability over an advertisement it merely carries, so it reaches deceptive advertising rather than the reproduction, framing, or aggregation of news content.
Iowa's Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Iowa Code chapter 550, reaches only information that derives value from not being generally known and that is the subject of reasonable efforts to keep secret, which published news reporting is not, so it supplies no basis for a claim against an aggregator.
Snippet reproduction, linking and framing, and text-and-data-mining questions in Iowa are governed by the federal Copyright Act and the federal hot-news and linking case law already catalogued in the national document; no Iowa court decision addressing any of those questions under Iowa law was identified, and no Iowa-specific news-bargaining proposal was found in a search of current legislative coverage.
As of .
Case law
No current case law for Iowa AI law
No current case law for Iowa privacy law
No current case law for Iowa scraping law
No current case law for Iowa cybersecurity law
No current case law for Iowa communications law
No current case law for Iowa content moderation law
No current case law for Iowa product and AI liability law
No current case law for Iowa digital accessibility law
No current case law for Iowa age gating law
No current case law for Iowa reuse law
Reporting clocks that run here21 instruments
The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Iowa comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.
Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.
As an insurance licensee, notify the Commissioner of Insurance no later than three business days after you confirm a cybersecurity event if you are a domiciled insurer or a producer whose home state is Iowa and a law requires notice to a government body, self-regulatory agency or other supervisory body or the event has a reasonable likelihood of causing material harm to a material part of your normal business, operations or security (Iowa Code 507F.7(1)(a)).
Notify the Commissioner within the same three business days if you reasonably believe the nonpublic information compromised involves 250 or more consumers and either a law requires notice to a government body, self-regulatory agency or other supervisory body or the event has a reasonable likelihood of causing material harm to a consumer or to a material part of your business, operations or security (507F.7(1)(b)).
Notify affected Iowa residents of a breach of security in the most expeditious manner possible and without unreasonable delay.
Notify the Iowa Attorney General's consumer protection division within five business days of notifying consumers, if the breach requires notifying more than 500 Iowa residents.
Notify the commission immediately, or as soon as practical, of any reportable incident, by emailing the commission duty officer or, when email is not available, by calling the duty officer, and give the utility's name, the name and telephone number of the person making the report and of a contact person who knows about the incident, the location and time of the incident, the number of deaths or personal injuries and their extent, the number of services interrupted, and a summary of what is known about the likely cause and the estimated extent of damage.
Notify the commission immediately, or as soon as practical, of any reportable incident, by emailing the commission duty officer or, when email is not available, by calling the duty officer, and give the utility's name, the name and telephone number of the person making the report and of a contact person who knows about the incident, the location and time of the incident, the number of deaths or personal injuries and their extent, the number of services interrupted, and a summary of what is known about the likely cause and the estimated extent of damage.
Notify the commission immediately, or as soon as practical, of any reportable incident, by emailing the commission duty officer or, when email is not available, by calling the duty officer, and give the utility's name, the name and telephone number of the person making the report and of a contact person who knows about the incident, the location and time of the incident, the number of deaths or personal injuries and their extent, the number of services interrupted, and a summary of what is known about the likely cause and the estimated extent of damage.
The law of the United States, which applies in Iowa
Notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center via the Emergency Notification System within one hour after discovery of a cyberattack that adversely impacted safety-related or important-to-safety functions, security functions, or emergency preparedness functions (including offsite communications), or that compromised support systems and equipment resulting in adverse impacts to those functions.
Also notify within one hour after discovery of a cyberattack that adversely impacted the safety, security, and emergency preparedness functions performed by digital assets described in 10 CFR 73.77(a)(1)(ii).
Notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center within four hours after discovery of a cyberattack that could have caused such an adverse impact, after discovery of a suspected or actual cyberattack initiated by personnel with physical or electronic access to the systems in scope, or after notifying a local, State, or other Federal agency of an event related to your cyber security program that does not otherwise require notification.
Notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center within eight hours after receipt or collection of information regarding observed behavior, activities, or statements that may indicate intelligence gathering or pre-operational planning related to a cyberattack against the systems in scope.
Use the site corrective action program to record vulnerabilities, weaknesses, failures and deficiencies in your cyber security program, and the notifications you make, within twenty-four hours of their discovery.
Once the final rule takes effect, report a covered cyber incident to the Agency not later than 72 hours after your organization reasonably believes that the covered cyber incident has occurred.
Once the final rule takes effect, report a ransom payment to the Agency not later than 24 hours after your organization makes the payment, even where the underlying ransomware attack is not itself a covered cyber incident.
Once the final rule takes effect, promptly submit an update to a previously submitted covered cyber incident report whenever substantial new or different information becomes available or a ransom payment is later made, continuing until your organization notifies the Agency that the incident has concluded and been fully mitigated and resolved, and preserve data relevant to the incident or payment under the procedures the final rule establishes.
Upon any responsible SCI personnel having a reasonable basis to conclude that an SCI event has occurred, begin appropriate corrective action and notify the Commission of the SCI event immediately.
Within 24 hours of that conclusion, submit a written notification to the Commission, made on a good faith, best efforts basis, that describes the SCI event and the systems affected and, to the extent available, your assessment of the market participants potentially affected, the potential impact on the market, and the steps you have taken, are taking or plan to take.
If the SCI event is resolved and the investigation closed within 30 calendar days, submit a final written notification within five business days after resolution. If not, submit an interim written notification within 30 calendar days after the event, and a final one within five business days after resolution and closure.
If your organization is a banking organization, notify your primary federal banking regulator, the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, or the FDIC, whichever supervises it, about a notification incident, as soon as possible and no later than 36 hours after your organization determines that a notification incident has occurred.
A notification incident is the subset of computer-security incidents that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, your ability to serve customers, a business line, or an operation whose failure would threaten the financial stability of the United States, so a computer-security incident that falls short of that threshold does not by itself start this clock.
If your organization is a bank service provider, notify at least one bank-designated point of contact at each affected banking organization customer as soon as possible after your organization determines that it has experienced a computer-security incident that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, covered services provided to that banking organization for a period of four hours or more.
This duty carries a standard, as soon as possible, rather than a fixed number of hours to notify by, and that disruption threshold is what engages the duty rather than a period to notify within.
If you are a developer or provider of a frontier AI model, or an operator of critical infrastructure that uses an AI model to manage industrial control systems or other operational technologies, report any confirmed AI safety incident or AI security incident within 30 days of confirmation, and within 72 hours if the incident poses an imminent threat to national security, critical infrastructure or public safety.
If your organization is a federally insured credit union, notify the NCUA-designated point of contact of a reportable cyber incident by email, telephone, or another method the NCUA prescribes, so that the NCUA receives the notification as soon as possible and no later than 72 hours after your organization reasonably believes it has experienced a reportable cyber incident.
Where the reportable cyber incident is a disruption of business operations or unauthorized access to sensitive data facilitated through, or caused by, a compromise of a credit union service organization, cloud service provider, or other third-party data hosting provider, or by a supply chain compromise, the NCUA must receive the notification within 72 hours of your organization being notified by the third party if that is sooner.
Send the notice as soon as practicable, but not later than 30 days, after becoming aware that unauthorized access to or use of customer information has occurred or is reasonably likely to have occurred, delaying it only for the period the United States Attorney General specifies where the Attorney General determines that notice poses a substantial risk to national security or public safety (17 CFR 248.30(a)(4)(iii)).
Maintain written policies and procedures reasonably designed to require oversight, including through due diligence and monitoring, of service providers, including that a service provider notify you as soon as possible, and no later than 72 hours, after becoming aware of a breach in security resulting in unauthorized access to a customer information system it maintains (17 CFR 248.30(a)(5)(i)).
Rapidly report a cyber incident to the Department of Defense within 72 hours of discovering it, at the Department's DIBNet portal (dibnet.dod.mil), using a DoD-approved medium assurance certificate that you must obtain before you need to file a report.
Make those policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that each service provider takes appropriate measures to protect against unauthorized access to or use of customer information, and to notify you as soon as possible, but no later than 72 hours after becoming aware that a breach in security has occurred resulting in unauthorized access to a customer information system the service provider maintains.
If your organization is an Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting company, determine, without unreasonable delay after you discover a cybersecurity incident, whether the incident is material, and if it is, file a Form 8-K under Item 1.05 within four business days after you make that determination.
If the information called for in Item 1.05 is not determined or is unavailable when you file, state that in the filing and file an amendment to the Form 8-K within four business days after you determine it or it becomes available.
After you reasonably determine that a breach of your customers' CPNI has occurred, electronically notify the United States Secret Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation through the central reporting facility as soon as practicable, and in no event later than seven business days (47 CFR 64.2011(b)).
Do not notify customers or disclose the breach where the relevant investigating agency directs you in writing not to, for an initial period of up to 30 days that the agency may extend (47 CFR 64.2011(b)(3)).
If you are a vendor of personal health records (an entity that offers or maintains an electronic record of health information that can draw information from multiple sources and is managed, shared and controlled by or primarily for the individual) or a PHR related entity, notify each affected individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, in plain language and without unreasonable delay, no later than 60 calendar days after you discover a breach of security of unsecured PHR identifiable health information.
Notify prominent media outlets serving a State or jurisdiction, without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after you discover the breach, when the unsecured PHR identifiable health information of 500 or more of its residents is, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired during the breach.
If you are a third party service provider, notify the official designated in a written contract by the vendor of personal health records or PHR related entity you serve (or else a senior official of that vendor or entity), without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after you discover the breach; identify each customer of that vendor or entity whose unsecured PHR identifiable health information has been, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired during the breach; and obtain acknowledgment that the notice was received.
Notify affected individuals without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovering a breach of unsecured protected health information.
For a breach of unsecured protected health information involving more than 500 residents of a State or jurisdiction, notify prominent media outlets serving that State or jurisdiction without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.
If you are a business associate, notify the covered entity of a breach of unsecured protected health information without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.
If your organization is a derivatives clearing organization, notify staff of the Division of Clearing and Risk promptly of any hardware or software malfunction, security incident, or targeted threat that materially impairs, or creates a significant likelihood of material impairment of, automated system operation, reliability, security, or capacity, and of any activation of your business continuity and disaster recovery plan.
If your organization is a designated contract market, notify Commission staff promptly of all cyber security incidents or targeted threats that actually or potentially jeopardize automated system operation, reliability, security, or capacity, as well as electronic trading halts and significant systems malfunctions and activations of your business continuity-disaster recovery plan.
If your organization is a swap execution facility, notify Commission staff promptly of all cyber security incidents or targeted threats that actually or potentially jeopardize automated system operation, reliability, security, or capacity, as well as electronic trading halts and material system malfunctions and activations of your business continuity-disaster recovery plan.
Evidence of sabotage, subversive activity, or an actual or threatened cyber incident involving or endangering any vessel, harbor, port, or waterfront facility must be reported immediately to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (for any cyber incident), and the Captain of the Port, or to their respective representatives.
Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.
AIDrafted with AI
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made
This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched
to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are
counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own
primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal
advice.