Law / Tonga

Tonga

20 of 22 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the ten areas of law we track: 5 in force, 14 not yet in force and 1 no longer in force. As of .

When each starts6 of 20 carry a date, 14 do not. Earlier is before 2014.
Before 2014: 3 instruments (2 in force, 1 no longer in force) earlier 2014: 0 instruments 2015: 0 instruments ’15 2016: 0 instruments 2017: 0 instruments 2018: 0 instruments 2019: 0 instruments 2020: 0 instruments ’20 2021: 2 instruments (2 in force) 2022: 0 instruments 2023: 0 instruments 2024: 0 instruments 2025: 1 instrument (1 in force) 2026: 0 instruments ’26 today

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 12
  3. Scraping law 3
  4. Cybersecurity law 4
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

Privacy law12 instruments, 12 not yet in force

Research summary (176 words)

Tonga enacted its first comprehensive data-protection statute, the Privacy Act 2025 (Act 34 of 2025), which King Tupou VI assented to on after the Legislative Assembly passed it on .

The Act binds public authorities and private organisations alike, requires a lawful basis (ordinarily consent) for processing personal information and a heightened basis for sensitive categories including biometric data, and grants data subjects rights of access, correction, deletion, objection to direct marketing, and protection from a decision based solely on automated processing.

It restricts transferring personal information outside Tonga absent Privacy Commission consent or an adequate-protection safeguard, requires breach notification to the new Privacy Commission within 72 hours (a duty that does not begin until the second anniversary of commencement), and enforces its duties through civil pecuniary penalties of up to TOP 100,000 rather than criminal liability.

Tonga's Constitution has no general right to privacy; its Bill of Rights restrains entering or searching premises without a warrant, which is a property and search-and-seizure protection rather than a right over personal information.

Breach notification

Personal Health Information Protection Act 2025, notification of theft, loss and unauthorized use or disclosure

Act 31 of 2025, ss. 14(2)-(3), 19(5)(b) and 70(6) (Personal Health Information Protection Act 2025)Official English text

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 14(2) requires a custodian whose personal health information about a person is stolen or lost, or is used or disclosed without authority, to notify the person at the first reasonable opportunity and to state in the notice that the person is entitled to complain to the Chief Executive Officer responsible for health.

Section 14(3) requires the custodian to notify the Chief Executive Officer of the theft, loss or unauthorized access, use or disclosure where the circumstances meet the requirements the Regulations prescribe. Section 19(5)(b) requires an agent of a custodian to notify the custodian at the first reasonable opportunity if personal health information the agent handled for it is stolen or lost or is used or disclosed without authority.

Section 70(6) requires a custodian responsible for collecting personal health information about a person without authority by means of the National Health Information System to notify the person at the first reasonable opportunity.

What it requires

Privacy Act 2025, personal information breaches

Privacy Act 2025, s. 37 (personal information breaches)Official English text, Privacy Act 2025 (Act 34 of 2025), Tonga Attorney General's Office legislation database, archived copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2026. Publisher's page: https://ago.gov.to/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2025/2025-0052/PrivacyAct2025_1.pdf

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 37(1) requires a data processor that becomes aware of a personal information breach to notify the data controller or the data processor that engaged it within seventy-two hours, describing the nature of the breach including, where possible, the categories and approximate numbers of data subjects and records concerned, and to respond without undue delay to information requests from whoever engaged it.

Section 37(2) requires a data controller to notify the Commission within seventy-two hours of becoming aware of a breach that is likely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of individuals, with the same description.

Section 37(3) requires the controller to communicate a breach likely to result in a high risk to a data subject to that data subject without undue delay, in plain and clear language, with advice on measures they could take to mitigate the adverse effects, and allows a public communication through widely used media where direct communication would involve disproportionate effort or expense.

Section 37(11) provides that section 37 does not apply until the second anniversary of the commencement date. Section 1(2) provides that the Act comes into force on a date proclaimed by Cabinet. No notice appointing the day the Act comes into force has been located.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Privacy Act 2025, comprehensive personal information protection regime

Privacy Act 2025 (Act 34 of 2025), ss. 1-6, 27, 30-32, 34-36 and 38Official English text, Privacy Act 2025 (Act 34 of 2025), Tonga Attorney General's Office legislation database, archived copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2026. Publisher's page: https://ago.gov.to/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2025/2025-0052/PrivacyAct2025_1.pdf

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 27 bars a data controller from processing personal information, or permitting a data processor to do so on its behalf, except on a lawful basis it lists, beginning with the data subject's consent to the specific purpose and running through contractual necessity, a legal obligation, vital interests and the public interest.

Section 31 governs reliance on consent and section 32 requires processing to be for a lawful purpose related to the controller's function or activity, personal information to be accurate, complete, not misleading and up to date to the extent the purpose requires, and the information held to be adequate, relevant and limited to that purpose.

Section 34 bars retention for longer than the purpose requires and requires the information to be returned, destroyed, rendered inaccessible or permanently de-identified within a reasonable time once retention is no longer necessary.

Section 35 governs the engagement of a data processor, section 36 requires appropriate and reasonable technical and organisational measures to prevent accidental, unauthorised or unlawful loss, misuse, destruction, damage or access, and section 38 lets the Minister make regulations requiring a personal information protection impact assessment for high-risk processing. Section 1(2) provides that the Act comes into force on a date proclaimed by Cabinet.

No notice appointing the day the Act comes into force has been located. Separately, press reporting (Tonga Independent News, ) states the Act was gazetted into force alongside a package of other 2025 governance-reform statutes, and no Cabinet proclamation confirming that has been located.

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Personal Health Information Protection Act 2025, disclosure of personal health information outside Tonga

Act 31 of 2025, s. 54 (Personal Health Information Protection Act 2025, disclosure outside Tonga)Official English text

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 54(1) allows a custodian to disclose personal health information about a person collected in Tonga to a person outside Tonga only if the person consents, the Act permits the disclosure, the recipient performs functions comparable to those of a person to whom the Act permits disclosure in Tonga, the disclosure is reasonably necessary for the person's health care, or it is reasonably necessary for payments in connection with that care.

A custodian prescribed by the Regulations may also disclose personal health information to the government of the place where a person now resides, for health planning or health administration, if the information relates to health care provided in Tonga to that person. If the person's express instruction stops a custodian disclosing all the information it considers reasonably necessary for the person's health care, section 54(2) requires the custodian to notify the recipient of that fact.

What it requires

Privacy Act 2025, transfers of personal information outside the Kingdom

Privacy Act 2025, ss. 39-41 (transfers outside the Kingdom)Official English text, Privacy Act 2025 (Act 34 of 2025), Tonga Attorney General's Office legislation database, archived copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2026. Publisher's page: https://ago.gov.to/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2025/2025-0052/PrivacyAct2025_1.pdf

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 39(1) bars a data controller or data processor from transferring personal information to a country or territory outside the Kingdom unless the Commission has given written consent to the transfer or the recipient is subject to a law, binding corporate rules, contractual clauses, code of conduct or certification mechanism affording an adequate level of protection under section 40.

Section 39(2) disapplies that bar where the data subject has given and not withdrawn consent after being informed of the risks of transferring without adequate protection, or another listed situation applies. Section 40 sets out how adequacy is determined, and section 40(3) to (6) provides for the Commission's related designations, approvals and determinations. Section 1(2) provides that the Act comes into force on a date proclaimed by Cabinet. No notice appointing the day the Act comes into force has been located.

What it requires

Data subject rights

Personal Health Information Protection Act 2025, access to and correction of personal health information

Act 31 of 2025, ss. 57-60 (Personal Health Information Protection Act 2025, access and correction)Official English text

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 57(1) gives a person a right of access to a record of personal health information about them that is in the custody or under the control of a health information custodian, subject to the exceptions the section lists, including legal privilege, a prohibition in another Act or a court order, and a risk of serious harm. Section 57(2) extends the right of access to access in an electronic format that meets the requirements the Regulations prescribe.

Section 58(1) lets a person exercise the right by making a written request to the custodian that has custody or control of the information. Section 59(3) requires the custodian to respond to a request for access as soon as possible and no later than 30 days after receiving it.

Section 59(4) lets the custodian extend that limit by up to a further 30 days, on written notice to the person, where meeting it would unreasonably interfere with its operations or the consultations needed would make a timely reply not reasonably practical. If the custodian refuses a request for access in whole or in part, section 59(1)(c) requires a written notice giving the reason and stating that the person may complain to the Chief Executive Officer under Part 8.

Section 60(1) lets a person to whom access has been granted request in writing that the custodian correct a record they believe is inaccurate or incomplete. Section 60(2) requires the custodian to grant or refuse a correction request, or extend the deadline by up to 30 days in the cases it lists, by written notice no later than 30 days after receiving it.

Section 60(7) requires the custodian to grant a correction request if the person demonstrates, to its satisfaction, that the record is incomplete or inaccurate for the purposes for which the custodian uses the information and gives it the information needed to correct the record.

If a custodian refuses a correction, section 60(10) requires it to give reasons and to tell the person that they may prepare a statement of disagreement, require the custodian to attach and disclose it, and complain to the Chief Executive Officer.

What it requires

Privacy Act 2025, automated decisions

Privacy Act 2025, s. 44 (right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing)Official English text, Privacy Act 2025 (Act 34 of 2025), Tonga Attorney General's Office legislation database, archived copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2026. Publisher's page: https://ago.gov.to/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2025/2025-0052/PrivacyAct2025_1.pdf

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 1(2) provides that the Act comes into force on a date proclaimed by Cabinet. No notice appointing the day the Act comes into force has been located.

Section 44 gives a data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing of personal information, including profiling, that produces legal or similarly significant effects concerning them, except where the decision is necessary for entering into or performing a contract, is authorized by a written law with suitable safeguards, or is authorized by the data subject's consent.

What it requires

Privacy Act 2025, notification to data subjects and rights of data subjects

Privacy Act 2025, ss. 33, 42-43, 45-47 (notification and rights)Official English text, Privacy Act 2025 (Act 34 of 2025), Tonga Attorney General's Office legislation database, archived copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2026. Publisher's page: https://ago.gov.to/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2025/2025-0052/PrivacyAct2025_1.pdf

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 33 requires a data controller collecting personal information directly from a data subject to tell them, at the time of collection, the controller's identity and contact details, that personal information is being collected, the purpose including any direct marketing, whether sensitive personal information is collected and of what nature, and the intended recipients.

Section 42 gives a data subject the right to obtain, without constraint or unreasonable delay and at no expense, confirmation of whether their personal information is being processed and its source, a copy in a commonly used electronic format, and correction or deletion of information that is inaccurate, out of date, incomplete or misleading or that the controller is not entitled to retain.

Section 43 lets a data subject stop direct marketing by written notice, which the controller must act on as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event within 30 days. Sections 45 and 46 give the rights to object to processing and to withdraw consent, and section 47 empowers the Minister to make regulations under section 68 to establish a right to portability of personal information. Section 1(2) provides that the Act comes into force on a date proclaimed by Cabinet. No notice appointing the day the Act comes into force has been located.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Personal Health Information Protection Act 2025, complaints, directions, penalties and offences

Act 31 of 2025, ss. 76-81, 87 and 89 (Personal Health Information Protection Act 2025, enforcement)Official English text

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 76(1) lets a person who has reasonable grounds to believe that another person has contravened or is about to contravene the Act or its Regulations make a complaint to the Chief Executive Officer responsible for health. Section 76(2) requires the complaint to be in writing and filed within one year after the subject-matter first came, or should reasonably have come, to the complainant's attention, or a longer period the Chief Executive Officer permits.

In a review, section 78(2) lets the Chief Executive Officer or an authorised officer demand production of relevant records and documents and inquire into a custodian's information practices. Section 79(1) lets the Chief Executive Officer, after a review, direct a person to perform a duty the Act imposes, to cease accessing, collecting, using or disclosing personal health information in contravention of the Act, or to change, cease or implement an information practice.

Section 79(1)(i) lets the Chief Executive Officer require a person who has contravened the Act or its Regulations to pay an administrative penalty, and section 80(2) provides that the amount is determined as prescribed in the Regulations. Section 81 lets a person affected by most of the Chief Executive Officer's directions appeal to the Minister within 21 days after receiving a copy, and then to the Supreme Court.

Section 87 bars anyone from dismissing, suspending, demoting, disciplining, harassing or otherwise disadvantaging a person for disclosing to the Chief Executive Officer that another person has contravened or is about to contravene the Act. Section 89(1) makes it an offence to wilfully access, collect, use or disclose personal health information in contravention of the Act, or wilfully to fail to comply with a direction of the Chief Executive Officer.

On conviction under section 89, a natural person is liable to a fine not exceeding $200,000 or imprisonment of not more than 7 years, or both, and a person who is not a natural person to a fine not exceeding $1,000,000.

What it requires

Privacy Act 2025, penalties, enforcement and third party actions

Privacy Act 2025, ss. 52-66 (penalties, enforcement and investigation)Official English text, Privacy Act 2025 (Act 34 of 2025), Tonga Attorney General's Office legislation database, archived copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2026. Publisher's page: https://ago.gov.to/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2025/2025-0052/PrivacyAct2025_1.pdf

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 52 deems every omission or failure to comply with the Act, and every act contrary to it, a contravention. Section 54 lets a court order a pecuniary penalty for a contravention, capped by section 54(4) at TOP 5,000 for an individual's first contravention and, for a subsequent one, the greater of TOP 30,000 or three times the benefit obtained, and at TOP 30,000 for an organisation's or public authority's first contravention rising to TOP 100,000 for a subsequent one.

Section 55 lets the Commission serve an enforcement notice specifying the provisions it considers contravened and the reasons, section 56 provides for enforceable undertakings, and section 57 lets a data subject who has sustained loss or damage recover it by action, with the Commission able to bring the proceeding as representative of a class or to intervene. Sections 58 to 66 provide for information notices, investigation of complaints and the Commission's related powers.

Section 1(2) provides that the Act comes into force on a date proclaimed by Cabinet. No notice appointing the day the Act comes into force has been located.

What it requires

Sensitive categories

Personal Health Information Protection Act 2025, consent, security, genetic and sensitive personal health information

Act 31 of 2025, ss. 10, 14(1), 31-32, 40 and 55 (Personal Health Information Protection Act 2025)Official English text

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

A health information custodian includes a health care practitioner, a person who operates a hospital or a pharmacy, an employer, and an insurer or insurance agent, that has custody or control of personal health information in connection with its powers, duties or work. The Act binds the Crown, including all ministries, agencies and employees of the Crown.

Section 31 bars a custodian from collecting, using or disclosing personal health information about a person unless it has the person's consent under the Act and the collection, use or disclosure is necessary for a lawful purpose, or the Act permits or requires it. Section 32 bars a custodian from collecting, using or disclosing personal health information if other information will serve the purpose, and from collecting, using or disclosing more than is reasonably necessary to meet it.

Section 14(1) requires a custodian to take steps that are reasonable in the circumstances to protect personal health information in its custody or control against theft, loss and unauthorized access, use or disclosure. Section 10 requires a custodian that uses electronic means to handle personal health information to maintain an electronic audit log of each time a record is viewed, handled or modified, and to audit and monitor the log as often as the Regulations prescribe.

Section 40 requires a custodian to keep genetic test information that relates to a person in a separate record from the rest of the person's personal health information. Section 55 treats as sensitive personal health information what a person has identified to the custodian as sensitive, and information about genetic test information, HIV or AIDS, a sexually transmitted disease, a mental disorder, a pregnancy, or sexual assault or abuse.

Before disclosing sensitive personal health information, section 55(3) requires a custodian to inform the person to whom it relates, the recipient and why the disclosure is necessary, to consider the person's views and to note the record, though the duty to inform and consider views does not apply where the need is urgent, the disclosure is required by law or the person has consented.

Section 55(5) bars a custodian from disclosing sensitive personal health information if other personal health information will serve the same purpose.

What it requires

Privacy Act 2025, sensitive personal information and children

Privacy Act 2025, ss. 28-29 (sensitive personal information and children)Official English text, Privacy Act 2025 (Act 34 of 2025), Tonga Attorney General's Office legislation database, archived copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2026. Publisher's page: https://ago.gov.to/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2025/2025-0052/PrivacyAct2025_1.pdf

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 28 bars a data controller from processing sensitive personal information, or permitting a data processor to process it on its behalf, unless a section 27 condition has first been met and, in addition, the data subject has given and not withdrawn consent to the specific purpose, or the processing is necessary on one of the grounds the section lists, such as protecting the vital interests of a data subject who cannot consent.

Section 3 defines sensitive personal information to include biometric data.

Section 29 requires the consent of a parent or other appropriate legal guardian before processing the personal information of a child or an individual lacking legal capacity to consent, and requires appropriate mechanisms, including presentation of government approved identification documents, to verify age and consent, except where the processing is necessary to protect that person's vital interests or falls within the other exception the section states.

Section 1(2) provides that the Act comes into force on a date proclaimed by Cabinet. No notice appointing the day the Act comes into force has been located.

What it requires

Scraping law3 instruments, 2 in force, 1 no longer in force

Research summary (372 words)

Tonga has no scraping-specific statute, so general law addresses each dimension separately, and its computer-misuse regime was replaced on .

The Computer Crimes Act 2003 (Act 14 of 2003) criminalised wilfully accessing any computer system without lawful excuse, with no requirement that a security measure be circumvented; the Computer Crimes Act 2025 (Act 15 of 2025), which Cabinet proclaimed in force on , repeals the 2003 Act by its section 78(1) and now makes it an offence to cause unauthorised access to or modification of computer data, knowing the access is unauthorised and intending to cause it.

No Tongan court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper.

The Copyright Act 2002 permits quoting a short part of a published work, and separately permits reproducing a whole newspaper or periodical article on current economic, political, or religious topics unless the right to do so is expressly reserved, but Tonga has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception, so training a model on scraped copyrighted text rests only on those general grounds if they can be stretched to fit.

The Copyright Act protects a collection of mere data as a work only where the collection is original by reason of the selection or arrangement of its contents, a compilation-style protection rather than a European sui generis database right, and its related rights cover only performers, phonogram producers, and broadcasting organisations.

Tonga enacted a Privacy Act 2025 (Act 34 of 2025) covering personal data generally, and whether or how it reaches scraped public personal data is not established here. The Protection Against Unfair Competition Act 2002 makes an act or practice, in the course of industrial or commercial activities, that departs from fair dealing in commercial practice an act of unfair competition actionable by whoever it damages, but no reported Tongan case has applied that general clause to a scraper's conduct.

A Cybersecurity Act 2025 (Act 14 of 2025), which Cabinet proclaimed in force on , addresses digital-system security through duties on operators of designated critical infrastructure, and its text does not mention crawling or scraping. No Tongan statute or reported case assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Computer Crimes Act 2003, unauthorised access

Computer Crimes Act, 2003 (Act 14 of 2003), s. 4 (Illegal access)Official English text, WIPO Lex

No longer in force. since repealed Repealed. The page is kept as a record.

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 4(2) made it an offence for a person to wilfully, without lawful excuse, access any computer system, on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or imprisonment not exceeding two years, or both; unlike some other jurisdictions' computer-misuse statutes, the offence does not require that the accused defeat a security measure to gain access.

Section 4(3) set a materially higher penalty, a fine not exceeding $100,000 or imprisonment not exceeding twenty years, or both, where the computer accessed is a 'protected computer' tied to security, defence, or international relations; the identity of a confidential law-enforcement source; communications, banking, financial, public-utility, transport, or public-key infrastructure; or public-safety and emergency services, and the accused knew or ought reasonably to have known of that use.

Section 3(1) of the Interpretation Act, as it stood in 2003, provides that an Act to which His Majesty's Assent has been given comes into operation on the day on which it receives His Majesty's Assent, unless the contrary intention appears. The Computer Crimes Act 2003 contains no provision on the day it comes into operation. The Act carries the King's assent dated . Section 78(1) of the Computer Crimes Act 2025 (Act 15 of 2025) repeals the Computer Crimes Act.

The Computer Crimes Act 2025 comes into force, under its Section 1(2), on a date proclaimed by Cabinet. Cabinet proclaimed that the Computer Crimes Act 2025 would come into force on . Section 78(2) of the 2025 Act saves any offence committed under the repealed Act and any proceeding pending under it.

What it requires

Computer Crimes Act 2025, unauthorised access to or modification of computer data

Computer Crimes Act 2025 (Act 15 of 2025), s. 6 (Unauthorised access to or modification of computer data)Official English text, Tonga Attorney General's Office

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 6(1) makes it an offence for a person to cause unauthorised access to or modification of computer data, knowing the access or modification is unauthorised and intending to cause it. On conviction an individual faces a fine not exceeding $10,000, or imprisonment not exceeding 3 years, or both, and a corporation faces a fine not exceeding $50,000.

Under Section 5(1) access is unauthorised if the person is not entitled to cause it, and under Section 5(2) it is not unauthorised only because the person has an ulterior purpose for causing it. Section 2 defines access to computer data to include the display of the data by a computer system or any other output of the data from the computer system. The Act was passed by the Legislative Assembly on . It carries the King's assent dated .

Under Section 1(2) the Act comes into force on a date proclaimed by Cabinet. Cabinet proclaimed that the Act would come into force on . Section 78(1) repeals the earlier Computer Crimes Act.

What it requires

Unfair competition

Protection Against Unfair Competition Act 2002, general unfair-competition clause

Protection Against Unfair Competition Act 2002 (Act No. 19 of 2002, 2020 Revised Edition), s. 4Official English text, 2020 Revised Edition, WIPO Lex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 4(1) provides that, in addition to the specific acts sections 5 to 9 separately address (causing confusion, damaging goodwill, misleading the public, discrediting an enterprise, and misusing secret information), any act or practice, in the course of industrial or commercial activities, that departs from fair dealing in commercial practice constitutes an act of unfair competition.

Section 4(2) preserves for any person damaged or likely to be damaged by an act of unfair competition the remedies obtainable under the general law of Tonga; the Act itself grants no cause of action and states no penalty or damages figure. The Act's own text records its commencement as ; the WIPO Lex database record for the same consolidated text separately lists an entry-into-force date of , a discrepancy left unreconciled here.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law4 instruments, 2 in force, 2 not yet in force

Research summary (626 words)

Tonga enacted two distinct cybersecurity statutes in 2025, following the same split Singapore draws between a standalone Cybersecurity Act and a separate computer-misuse statute.

The Cybersecurity Act 2025 (Act 14 of 2025), passed by the Legislative Assembly on and assented to by King Tupou VI on , creates a Cybersecurity Advisory Board and a Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT), and empowers the Minister responsible for cybersecurity policy and regulation (Minister CPR) to designate, by publication in the Government Gazette, any physical, electronic or virtual infrastructure asset, system or network as critical infrastructure where it is essential to national security or to the Kingdom's economic or social well-being, including infrastructure necessary for electronic communications, banking or other financial services, electrical energy, public transportation, other public utilities, or public health and emergency services.

Once designated, an operator of critical infrastructure must register with the Minister CPR and keep the register current, comply with the minimum standards the Minister CPR issues and submit to periodic or ad hoc audits, conduct and submit periodic cybersecurity self-assessments, report a cybersecurity incident affecting its systems to the CERT within 24 hours of becoming aware of it, comply with any order to take remedial action, and develop, implement, communicate to staff, and keep records of policies and procedures for detecting, sharing information about, mitigating and responding to cybersecurity threats.

A contravention of these operator duties is pursued as a civil action the Attorney General brings in a court of competent jurisdiction for a pecuniary penalty, capped by section 19(3) at $500,000 for an individual and $1,000,000 for a body corporate; the Act does not itself define what currency the bare "$" denotes, and Tonga's legal tender is the Pa'anga (ISO 4217: TOP).

No enacted Tongan instrument sets security requirements a software product or connected device must meet before or after it is placed on the market, and there is no general reasonable-security or baseline data-security-program duty reaching a business simply because it holds data: the Act's duties bind only a designated critical-infrastructure operator. Section 1(2) makes the whole Act commence on a date proclaimed by Cabinet.

The companion Computer Crimes Act 2025 (Act 2025-0030), enacted the same year and superseding the Computer Crimes Act 2003, is the jurisdiction's computer-misuse statute; its title and its place in the same enactment cycle as the Cybersecurity Act point toward the same intruder-offense shape already tracked under the scraping topic elsewhere in this corpus, but the publisher's own host answers the direct PDF, a guessed legislation-index page, and the site root alike with an automated bot-verification challenge, and no Internet Archive capture of the 2025 Act exists, so its content is unconfirmed and nothing from it is filed under any topic below.

The Privacy Act 2025 (Act 2025-0052) is Tonga's comprehensive personal-data statute and belongs to the privacy topic's own coverage of a comprehensive regime's security-of-processing and breach-notification articles, rather than restated below; the same publisher bot wall and the absence of a working Internet Archive capture leave its text unconfirmed, so that placement rests on the seam rule rather than a verified reading of the Act.

The National Reserve Bank of Tonga's Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 (2021) on cybersecurity binds licensed banks and is filed as rows of its own; no network-security regulation from the Tonga Communications Commission is held. Paragraph 1 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 of the National Reserve Bank of Tonga requires a bank to have a framework for cybersecurity risk management.

Paragraph 106 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires a bank to notify the National Reserve Bank of Tonga not later than sixty minutes after becoming aware of an information security incident that materially affects or could materially affect the bank or its depositors.

Sector security regimes

Cybersecurity Act 2025, Critical Infrastructure Operator Obligations

Act 14 of 2025, ss. 11-14, 16-17Official Act text (Cybersecurity Act 2025, Act 14 of 2025), Attorney General's Office of Tonga, archived copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2026. Publisher's page: https://ago.gov.to/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2025/2025-0037/CybersecurityAct2025_1.pdf

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Sections 11 to 14, 16 and 17 of the Cybersecurity Act 2025 let the Minister responsible for cybersecurity policy and regulation designate any physical, electronic or virtual infrastructure asset, system or network as critical infrastructure by publication in the Government Gazette, on grounds that include electronic communications, banking or other financial services, electrical energy, public transportation, other public utilities, and public safety or public health including emergency services.

A designated operator must register and keep the register current, comply with the Minister's minimum standards and submit to periodic or ad hoc audits, conduct and submit periodic cybersecurity self-assessments, comply with any order to take remedial, protective or preventative action, and develop, implement, communicate to staff, and keep records of policies and procedures for detecting, sharing information about, mitigating and responding to cybersecurity threats and incidents.

Section 1(2) provides that the Act comes into force on a date proclaimed by Cabinet. No notice appointing the day the Act comes into force has been located.

What it requires

Prudential Banking Standard No. 15, Cybersecurity risk management for banks

Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 - 2021, Cybersecurity, paras. 1-3, 99-103 and 107Text of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15, Cybersecurity (2021), issued by the National Reserve Bank of Tonga

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Paragraph 108 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 applies it to banks licensed under the Banking Act 2020 and makes it effective from . Paragraph 1 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires a bank to have a framework for cybersecurity risk management, which should be an integral part of its enterprise risk management framework. Paragraph 2 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires the framework to be documented and approved by the Board and reviewed regularly.

Paragraph 3 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires a bank to have a designated cybersecurity risk management function. Paragraph 3(e) of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires the function to be headed by a person designated as the Chief Information Security Officer or an equivalent senior officer. Paragraph 5 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires a bank to develop and document an enterprise wide cybersecurity risk strategy approved by the Board.

Paragraph 8 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires a bank to have in place a cybersecurity policy framework commensurate with its exposures to vulnerabilities and threats. Paragraph 103(a) of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires a bank to conduct security audits and tests, including vulnerability scans and penetration tests, at regular intervals for high risk systems and processes and before such systems are put in production.

Paragraph 99 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires a bank to have a cybersecurity incident management process governed by documented policy and procedures. Paragraph 107 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 provides that non-compliance with it is subject to corrective actions as provided under section 39 of the Banking Act 2020. Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 states that it is issued under section 20(3) of the Banking Act 2020.

Section 19(3) of the Banking Act 2020 allows the Reserve Bank to issue in writing prudential banking standards. Section 39(1)(a) of the Banking Act 2020 allows the Reserve Bank to impose the measures in that section where a bank contravenes a prudential banking standard.

Section 39(3) of the Banking Act 2020 allows the Reserve Bank to issue written warnings, enter into a written agreement with the board of directors of the bank providing for a program of remedial action, and issue written orders to cease and desist.

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

Cybersecurity Act 2025, Duty to Report a Cybersecurity Incident

Act 14 of 2025, s. 15Official Act text (Cybersecurity Act 2025, Act 14 of 2025), Attorney General's Office of Tonga, archived copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2026. Publisher's page: https://ago.gov.to/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2025/2025-0037/CybersecurityAct2025_1.pdf

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 15 requires an operator of critical infrastructure designated under section 11 to report a cybersecurity incident to the Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) within 24 hours of becoming aware of it, whether the incident affects the information systems of the designated infrastructure itself, any information system interconnected with or communicating with those systems, or any other incident the Minister responsible for cybersecurity policy and regulation has designated as requiring notification, in a form that Minister prescribes.

Section 1(2) provides that the Act comes into force on a date proclaimed by Cabinet. No notice appointing the day the Act comes into force has been located.

What it requires

Prudential Banking Standard No. 15, Cybersecurity incident reporting by banks

Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 - 2021, Cybersecurity, paras. 105-106Text of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15, Cybersecurity (2021), issued by the National Reserve Bank of Tonga

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Paragraph 105 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires a bank to provide quarterly reporting on all cybersecurity incidents in the format prescribed in Appendix I. Paragraph 106 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 requires a bank to notify the National Reserve Bank of Tonga as soon as possible but not later than sixty minutes after becoming aware of an information security incident that materially affects or has the potential to materially affect the institution or the interests of depositors.

Paragraph 107 of Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 provides that non-compliance with it is subject to corrective actions as provided under section 39 of the Banking Act 2020. Section 39(1)(a) of the Banking Act 2020 allows the Reserve Bank to impose the measures in that section where a bank contravenes a prudential banking standard.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (308 words)

Tonga has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the general copyright framework of the Copyright Act 2002 (Act No. 12 of 2002, 2020 Revised Edition) is the primary law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content.

Section 13(a) permits reproducing, in a newspaper or periodical, or broadcasting or otherwise communicating to the public, an article published in a newspaper or periodical on current economic, political, or religious topics, or a broadcast work of the same character, without the author's authorisation, unless the right to authorise that reproduction has been expressly reserved on the copies or acknowledged in connection with an earlier broadcast of the work; section 10 separately permits quoting a short part of any published work, subject to a fair-practice and extent-justified test with source and author attribution.

Neither provision carries a headline-length or short-extract cap of its own, and no reported Tongan decision applies either to a systematic news aggregator as opposed to a single act of quotation or republication. Section 5(a) excludes any idea, procedure, system, concept, principle, discovery, or mere data from copyright protection, so a fact reported in the news carries no protection distinct from the specific words describing it, and no separate hot-news or misappropriation doctrine exists.

Neighbouring rights under Part II of the Act protect performers, phonogram producers, and broadcasting organisations, not a print or online news publisher's own reporting, so Tonga has no press-publisher right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive Article 15 creates. No statute or reported case addresses whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public, or whether framing or inline display changes the answer.

The Act predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, and its section 9 temporary-reproduction exception addresses only transient technical copies made in the course of a digital transmission, not a text and data mining (TDM)-specific opt-out.

Where nothing was found2 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Tonga has no AI-transparency, output-labelling, high-risk-system, training-data, prohibited-practice, governance, or sector-specific AI statute.

Its recently enacted digital-law package (a Privacy Act 2025, a Computer Crimes Act 2025, and a Cybersecurity Act 2025; the Computer Crimes Act 2025 comes into force on a date Cabinet proclaims) addresses personal-data protection, unauthorised computer access, and cybersecurity generally; none of those duties attaches to a system because it is an AI system, so none is recorded here.

As of .

Age gating law

Tonga has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code.

Section 115A of the Criminal Offences Act [Cap 18] makes it an offence to publish, produce, or possess child pornography, carrying a fine of up to $100,000 or imprisonment of up to 10 years, and separately states that child pornography is prohibited; the Pornography Control Act 2002 separately prohibits the production of pornographic material in general (s. 4) and its sale or hire (s. 5).

None of these provisions imposes an age-verification or age-gating duty on a service provider; each runs to the person who creates, produces, sells, or hires the prohibited material, not to a platform that must verify a user's age before granting access to adult content. The Family Protection Act 2013 (Act No. 19 of 2013) protects family members, including children, from domestic violence and does not address an online service.

What is stated here about the Criminal Offences Act and the Pornography Control Act rests on a 2014 submission by Tonga's Solicitor-General (Attorney General's Office) to the US Department of Labor describing these sections, rather than on the statutes' own words.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Tonga AI law
  • No current case law for Tonga privacy law
  • No current case law for Tonga scraping law
  • No current case law for Tonga cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Tonga communications law
  • No current case law for Tonga content moderation law
  • No current case law for Tonga product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Tonga digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Tonga age gating law
  • No current case law for Tonga reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here3 instruments

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Tonga comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

60 minutes
Incident notificationsecurity law
24 hours
Incident notificationsecurity law
72 hours
Breach notificationprivacy law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Tonga

60 minutes

Prudential Banking Standard No. 15, Cybersecurity incident reporting by banks

Prudential Banking Standard No. 15 - 2021, Cybersecurity, paras. 105-106security law, in force since

The sentence the clocks are read from

Notify the National Reserve Bank of Tonga as soon as possible and not later than sixty minutes after becoming aware of an information security incident that materially affects, or has the potential to materially affect, the institution or the interests of depositors, financially or non-financially (paragraph 106).

24 hours

Cybersecurity Act 2025, Duty to Report a Cybersecurity Incident

Act 14 of 2025, s. 15security law, enacted, not yet in force

The sentence the clocks are read from

Within 24 hours of becoming aware of it, report to the Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) a cybersecurity incident relating to the information systems of your designated critical infrastructure, an incident relating to any information system interconnected with or communicating with those systems, or any other cybersecurity incident or occurrence the Minister CPR has designated as requiring notification.

72 hours

Privacy Act 2025, personal information breaches

Privacy Act 2025, s. 37 (personal information breaches)privacy law, enacted, not yet in force

The sentences the clocks are read from

Notify the Privacy Commission within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal information breach that is likely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of individuals, describing its nature and, where possible, the categories and approximate numbers of data subjects and records concerned.

As a data processor, notify the data controller or the data processor that engaged you within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal information breach, and answer their information requests without undue delay.

Communicate a breach likely to result in a high risk to a data subject to that person without undue delay, in plain and clear language, with advice on how to mitigate the effects, or through widely used media where direct communication would take disproportionate effort or expense.

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.