Law / San Marino

San Marino

11 of 13 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the ten areas of law we track: 11 in force. As of .

When each starts10 of 11 carry a date, 1 does not.
2016: 1 instrument (1 in force) ’16 2017: 0 instruments 2018: 0 instruments 2019: 7 instruments (7 in force) 2020: 0 instruments ’20 2021: 0 instruments 2022: 0 instruments 2023: 0 instruments 2024: 0 instruments 2025: 0 instruments 2026: 2 instruments (2 in force) ’26 today

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 7
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law 2
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

Privacy law7 instruments, 7 in force

Research summary (120 words)

San Marino is not a General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) jurisdiction. Its comprehensive regime is Law No. 171 of on the Protection of Natural Persons with regard to the Processing of Personal Data, a close structural parallel of the GDPR, in several places sharing GDPR's own article numbers for the same content. San Marino does not currently hold an EU adequacy decision.

Article 8(1) prohibits processing biometric data, which it names among the special categories without a unique-identification qualifier, and Article 8(2) lists the permitted exceptions. The law also gives a complete GDPR Article 22 equivalent right against solely automated decisions, a GDPR Chapter V-style cross-border transfer regime, 72-hour breach notification, and a full GDPR Article 82 equivalent civil damages right.

Breach notification

San Marino Law No. 171, personal data breach notification

Legge 21 dicembre 2018 n. 171, articoli 34-35 (violazione dei dati personali)Law 171 of

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 34(1) requires the controller, in the case of a personal data breach, to notify it to the Data Protection Authority without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, and to accompany a later notification with reasons for the delay.

Article 34(2) requires the processor to notify the controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a breach, and article 34(3) fixes what the notification must describe: the nature of the breach including, where possible, the categories and approximate number of data subjects and of personal data records concerned, the name and contact details of the data protection officer or other contact point, the likely consequences, and the measures taken or proposed to address it and mitigate its adverse effects.

Article 34(5) requires the controller to document every breach, its effects and the remedial action taken.

Article 35(1) requires the controller to communicate the breach to the data subject without undue delay where it is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, in clear and plain language, and article 35(3) excuses that communication only where protective measures such as encryption render the data unintelligible, where subsequent measures make the high risk no longer likely, or where it would involve a disproportionate effort and a public communication of equal effect is made instead.

Law 171/2018 was approved by the Great and General Council on and promulgated by the Captains Regent on , the date carried in the law's own official title. Article 129 provides that the law enters into force on the fifteenth day after its legal publication. The Bollettino Ufficiale records its publication on , so the law entered into force on .

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

San Marino Law No. 171 on the Protection of Natural Persons

Legge 21 dicembre 2018 n. 171, articoli 1-7, 9-11 e 23-44 (principi, basi giuridiche e obblighi del titolare)Law 171 of

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 3 fixes the law's territorial and material scope. Article 4 carries the processing principles and article 5 the lawful bases, while article 6 sets the conditions for valid consent and article 7 the conditions for a child's consent to an information society service. Articles 10 and 11 govern data on criminal convictions and processing that does not require identification.

Article 26 places responsibility for compliance on the controller, article 27 requires data protection by design and by default, article 28 governs joint controllers, article 29 the engagement of a processor and article 30 processing under the authority of either. Article 31 requires records of processing activities and article 32 cooperation with the Data Protection Authority. Article 33 requires technical and organisational measures giving a level of security appropriate to the risk.

Article 36 requires a data protection impact assessment where processing is likely to result in a high risk, and article 37 prior consultation of the Authority where the assessment shows that risk. Articles 38 to 40 govern the designation, position and tasks of the data protection officer, and articles 41 to 44 the codes of conduct, their monitoring, certification and certification bodies.

Law 171/2018 was approved by the Great and General Council on and promulgated by the Captains Regent on , the date carried in the law's own official title. Article 129 provides that the law enters into force on the fifteenth day after its legal publication. The Bollettino Ufficiale records its publication on , so the law entered into force on .

What it requires

Cross border transfer

San Marino Law No. 171, transfers of personal data abroad

Legge 21 dicembre 2018 n. 171, articoli 45-50 (trasferimenti verso paesi terzi)Law 171 of

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 45 permits a transfer of personal data to a foreign country or an international organisation only on the conditions this Title lays down, including for onward transfers from there to another country or organisation.

Article 46 governs transfer on the basis of a decision that the destination affords an adequate level of protection, article 47 transfer subject to appropriate safeguards such as standard data protection clauses, article 48 binding corporate rules and what they must specify, and article 49 the recognition of judgements and decisions of foreign countries.

Article 50 sets the narrow derogations that permit a transfer in the absence of an adequacy decision or appropriate safeguards, including the data subject's explicit consent after being informed of the risks, contractual necessity, important reasons of public interest, legal claims, vital interests, and a transfer from a public register.

Law 171/2018 was approved by the Great and General Council on and promulgated by the Captains Regent on , the date carried in the law's own official title. Article 129 provides that the law enters into force on the fifteenth day after its legal publication. The Bollettino Ufficiale records its publication on , so the law entered into force on .

What it requires

Data subject rights

San Marino Law No. 171, automated decisions

Legge 21 dicembre 2018 n. 171, articolo 22 (automated individual decisions)Official consolidated statute text ('testo consolidato'), Autorita Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (garanteprivacy.sm)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 22(1) gives the data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects concerning them or similarly significantly affects them. Paragraph 2 lists exceptions, including where the decision is necessary for a contract or rests on explicit consent.

Paragraph 3 requires the controller, in those cases, to implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights, freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention, express a point of view, and contest the decision.

What it requires

San Marino Law No. 171, rights of the data subject

Legge 21 dicembre 2018 n. 171, articoli 12-21 (diritti dell'interessato)Law 171 of

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 13 fixes the information a controller gives when it collects personal data from the data subject, and article 14 the information due where the data came from elsewhere.

Article 15 gives a right of access, article 16 a right to rectification, article 17 a right to erasure described as the right to be forgotten, article 18 a right to restriction of processing, article 19 the duty to notify recipients of a rectification, erasure or restriction, article 20 a right to data portability and article 21 a right to object, including to direct marketing.

Articles 23 and 24 set the restrictions on those rights, including for reasons of justice, and article 25 carries the rights of deceased persons. Law 171/2018 was approved by the Great and General Council on and promulgated by the Captains Regent on , the date carried in the law's own official title. Article 129 provides that the law enters into force on the fifteenth day after its legal publication. The Bollettino Ufficiale records its publication on , so the law entered into force on .

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

San Marino Law No. 171, the Data Protection Authority, remedies and fines

Legge 21 dicembre 2018 n. 171, articoli 51-75 (Autorita Garante, rimedi e sanzioni)Law 171 of

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 52, paragraph 1 establishes the Data Protection Authority as an independent public authority responsible for monitoring the application of the law in order to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons with regard to personal data processing.

Article 52, paragraph 2 makes the Authority a collegial body of three regular members and two substitute members appointed by the Great and General Council, which designates the President and Vice-President when it appoints the board. Members serve four-year terms, renewable for two further mandates.

Article 53 requires members to meet integrity requirements and to be chosen from experts of proven experience and competence in personal data protection, in particular in legal and information technology disciplines. Article 54 guarantees the Authority full autonomy and independence, provides it with the human, technical and financial resources it needs, and bars its members from seeking or accepting instructions from anyone.

Article 58, paragraph 1 sets the Authority's tasks, which include supervising and ensuring application of the law, promoting data protection culture among controllers and processors, advising the Great and General Council and the State Congress on legislative and administrative measures, examining complaints, and conducting investigations on the application of the law.

Article 59, paragraph 1 gives the Authority investigative powers, including ordering a controller or processor to provide any information it needs, conducting data protection audits, and obtaining access to all personal data and information and to all premises of the controller and processor.

Article 59, paragraph 2 gives it corrective powers, including issuing warnings and reprimands and ordering a controller or processor to meet a data subject's requests and to bring processing into compliance with the law. Articles 60 to 63 let it request information and documents and carry out verifications, including special ones. Article 65 provides that a data subject has administrative protection, through complaints and reports to the Authority, and judicial protection under Article 70.

Article 66 gives a data subject who considers that the processing concerning them violates the law the right to lodge a complaint with the Authority if the alleged violation occurred in San Marino. Article 67 requires the Authority to decide a complaint by a reasoned measure within 90 days of receiving it, extendable by at most two months, and declares a complaint inadmissible if the complainant has brought an action before the judicial authority.

Article 68 lets anyone submit a report to the Authority if they believe the law has been violated. Article 69, which provided for opposition to the Authority's measures, has been repealed. Article 70, paragraph 1 gives the Administrative Judge exclusive jurisdiction over disputes on the application of the law, including those concerning the sanctioning measures the Authority issues.

Article 71 entitles any person who has suffered material or non-material damage from an infringement of the law to compensation from the controller or processor, makes each controller involved liable for the damage caused by infringing processing, and makes a processor liable where it has not complied with obligations directed to processors or has acted outside the controller's lawful instructions, with joint and several liability where more than one is involved.

Article 72, paragraph 1 subjects the controller's and processor's own obligations to administrative fines of up to five million euros or two per cent of total annual turnover of the previous financial year, whichever is higher, and article 72, paragraph 2 sets the higher tier for the basic principles, the data subject's rights and the transfer rules.

Article 73 fixes the procedure for imposing fines, and article 75 bars publishing or disseminating news or images identifying a child involved in legal proceedings. Law 171/2018 was approved by the Great and General Council on and promulgated by the Captains Regent on , the date carried in the law's own official title. Article 129 provides that the law enters into force on the fifteenth day after its legal publication. The Bollettino Ufficiale records its publication on , so the law entered into force on .

What it requires

Sensitive categories

San Marino Law No. 171, special categories of personal data

Legge 21 dicembre 2018 n. 171, articolo 8 (categorie particolari di dati personali)Law 171 of

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 8(1) prohibits processing personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, of biometric data, and of data concerning health or a natural person's sex life or sexual orientation.

Article 8(2) lifts that prohibition only in the cases it lists, which mirror the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)'s: the data subject's explicit consent to one or more specified purposes; obligations and rights in the field of employment, social security and social protection law; the vital interests of the data subject or another person where the data subject is incapable of consenting; processing in the course of the legitimate activities of a foundation, association or other not-for-profit body with a political, philosophical, religious or trade union aim, confined to its members and not disclosed onward without consent; data manifestly made public by the data subject; legal claims and courts acting judicially; substantial public interest; preventive or occupational medicine and the provision of health or social care by or under the responsibility of a professional bound by secrecy; public health; and archiving in the public interest, scientific or historical research or statistics.

Article 2(1)(p) defines biometric data as personal data obtained from specific technical processing relating to the physical, physiological or behavioral characteristics of a natural person that allow or confirm unique identification, such as facial images or fingerprint data. Law 171/2018 was approved by the Great and General Council on and promulgated by the Captains Regent on , the date carried in the law's own official title.

Article 129 provides that the law enters into force on the fifteenth day after its legal publication. The Bollettino Ufficiale records its publication on , so the law entered into force on .

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (314 words)

San Marino has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

Law No. 114 of inserted Article 182-bis into the Criminal Code, criminalising unlawful access to a computer or telematics system protected by security measures; because the offence's trigger is unlawful entry against a security measure, reading a public, unauthenticated page without defeating any access control falls outside a plain reading of the provision, and no reported San Marino decision has tested the point.

No San Marino court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper.

Law No. 8 of on copyright protection permits, as a free use, brief analysis and quotation justified by a critical, polemic, pedagogic, scientific or informative character, and separately permits reproduction of news and information in conformity with journalists' codes of conduct and source attribution, but San Marino has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception of the kind now found in the EU's Digital Single Market Directive, so training a model on scraped copyrighted text rests only on those general free-use grounds.

The 1991 law confers no sui generis database right, and its neighbouring rights, added by Law No. 63 of , cover only performers and artists, not compilations.

San Marino's comprehensive data protection statute, Law No. 171 of , applies to personal data without a general carve-out for information the data subject has not manifestly made public, so scraping personal data from a public San Marino website remains subject to that law's lawful-basis and cross-border-transfer duties (see the privacy topic for that instrument).

No San Marino statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation or trespass doctrine beyond the 1991 copyright law's narrow rule against reproducing the regular columns or repeating the title of a periodical, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Computer Crimes Law, Unlawful Access to Computer or Telematics Systems

Legge 23 agosto 2016 n. 114 (Computer Crimes), art. 2, inserting art. 182-bis of the Criminal CodeOfficial English translation of Law No. 114 of , published by the Consiglio Grande e Generale (San Marino's parliament)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Law No. 114 of introduced criminal-law protection against computer crimes by inserting new articles into the Criminal Code.

Article 182-bis punishes anyone who unlawfully enters a computer or telematics system protected by security measures, or remains there against the express or tacit will of the person entitled to exclude them, with second-degree imprisonment; the punishment rises to third-degree imprisonment for a public official, a private investigator, a system operator, or where violence or destruction of data is involved, and to third or fourth-degree imprisonment where the system is one of public interest.

A separate paragraph punishes, with first-degree imprisonment and a fine of up to 5,500.00 euro, anyone who holds or has access to means suited to enter a protected system in order to obtain an undue profit or cause damage, rising to second-degree imprisonment and a fine from 5,500.00 to 10,500.00 euro where the public-official or system-operator aggravating circumstance applies; a further paragraph punishes, with second-degree imprisonment and a fine of up to 10,500.00 euro, anyone holding or accessing without justified reason equipment or programmes designed to alter a system or its data.

Because the core offence's trigger is defeating a security measure or exceeding an express or tacit exclusion, a plain reading does not reach reading a public, unauthenticated page. The same law separately inserted an interception offence (art. 190-bis), a data and system damage offence (art. 203-bis), and a computer fraud offence (art. 204-ter) into the Criminal Code, not further detailed on this instrument.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (300 words)

San Marino has no standalone product-security, vulnerability-or-incident-reporting, sector cyber-resilience, or reasonable-security-baseline statute reaching a software or platform provider.

Its Computer Crimes Law (Law no. 114 of ) added unlawful-access, interception, and computer-fraud offenses to the Criminal Code; it binds the person who attacks a computer or telematics system, not the operator or manufacturer of one, so it is documented under the scraping topic's computer-misuse family rather than repeated here.

San Marino is not a European Union or European Economic Area member, and no transposition of the Network and Information Security Directive (NIS2) or the Cyber Resilience Act into San Marino law is confirmed.

Banca Centrale della Repubblica di San Marino (BCSM), the Central Bank that licenses and supervises San Marino's banks, insurers, investment firms, payment institutions, and crypto-asset firms, publishes its complete catalog of Regolamenti (through Regolamento n. 2026-02) and Circolari covering that sector; none of the titles in either catalog names a dedicated information-security, cyber-resilience, or ICT-risk directive, but the Regulations on crypto-assets (2024-03) and on investment services (2024-05) each require the information systems of the firms they license to guarantee high levels of security, and those duties are filed as rows of their own.

San Marino's own security-of-processing duty for personal data sits inside Law no. 171 of on the protection of natural persons and is documented as this jurisdiction's privacy-topic instrument rather than repeated here. San Marino's Central Bank Regulation no. 2024-03 on crypto-assets requires a crypto-asset firm to keep its information systems secure to a high level, with the safeguards named in article VII.V.13, paragraph 4.

San Marino's Central Bank Regulation no. 2024-05 on investment services and activities requires an investment firm to keep its information systems secure to a high level, with the safeguards named in article VII.VI.13, paragraph 4.

Sector security regimes

San Marino Central Bank Regulation on Crypto-Assets, Information System Security

Regolamento BCSM n. 2024-03 in materia di cripto-attività, articolo VII.V.13, commi 4 e 5Consolidated text of the Regulation as published by the Banca Centrale della Repubblica di San Marino

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Article VII.V.13, paragraph 4 of Regulation no. 2024-03 on crypto-assets requires the information systems of a crypto-asset firm to guarantee high levels of security, with documented safeguards for the physical and logical security of hardware and software, data back-up and disaster recovery, authorised access, and traceability of changes to data.

Article VII.V.13, paragraph 5 requires a specific section of the crypto-asset firm's business continuity plan to cover the information and accounting systems. Article I.I.1 provides that the sanctioning powers of the Central Bank are governed by article 31 of Law no. 96 of and that violations of the Regulation are punished under Decree no. 76 of .

Article VII.I.2 provides that a violation of Part VII of the Regulation, which contains article VII.V.13, is punished by the sanctions decree at its articles 7, 8, 15, 18 and 18-bis. The Regulation defines a crypto-asset firm as a company that provides exclusively asset-referenced crypto-asset issuance services, crypto-asset services, or both, besides any connected and ancillary activities the Regulation permits. The version of the Regulation read for this row is the consolidated text in force from .

What it requires

San Marino Central Bank Regulation on Investment Services and Activities, Information System Security

Regolamento BCSM n. 2024-05 in materia di servizi e attività di investimento, articolo VII.VI.13, commi 4 e 5Consolidated text of the Regulation as published by the Banca Centrale della Repubblica di San Marino

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Article VII.VI.13, paragraph 4 of Regulation no. 2024-05 on investment services and activities requires the information systems of an investment firm to guarantee high levels of security, with documented safeguards for the physical and logical security of hardware and software, data back-up and disaster recovery, authorised access, and traceability of changes to data.

Article VII.VI.13, paragraph 5 requires a specific section of the investment firm's business continuity plan to cover the information and accounting systems. Article I.I.1 provides that the sanctioning powers of the Central Bank are governed by article 31 of Law no. 96 of and that violations of the Regulation are punished under Decree no. 76 of .

Article VII.I.2 provides that a violation of Part VII of the Regulation, which contains article VII.VI.13, is punished by the sanctions decree at its articles 7, 8, 15, 18 and 18-bis. The Regulation defines an investment firm by reference to article 1 of the LISF. The version of the Regulation read for this row is the consolidated text in force from .

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (268 words)

San Marino has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; San Marino is not a European Union member state, so the Digital Single Market Directive's Article 15 neighbouring right has no domestic force absent its own implementing statute, and none has been identified.

Law No. 8 of on copyright protection, as amended, is the only law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content: it permits brief quotation of another work for a critical, polemic, pedagogic, scientific or informative purpose, and separately permits the reproduction of news and information generally, conditioned on conformity with journalists' codes of conduct and on the source being quoted, while separately prohibiting the reproduction of the regular columns of a periodical and the reuse of a periodical's own title within three years of its prior use.

No San Marino statute or reported decision addresses whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public, or whether framing or inline display changes the answer, and no hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law has been identified. The 1991 law predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists.

Law No. 211 of on publishing and the profession of media operators separately defines and licenses 'news outlets' and 'online news outlets', and excludes a site that only republishes articles not produced within the publication itself from that licensed category, but this is a professional-registration and licensing framework rather than a reproduction-rights mechanism, so it does not itself create or limit any of the six registered aggregation law families.

Where nothing was found2 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

San Marino has no AI-transparency, output-labelling, high-risk-system, training-data, prohibited-practices, governance, or sector-specific AI statute as of this date. San Marino signed the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS 225) on , among the first ten signatories, but has not ratified it, and no domestic implementing legislation has been identified.

Law No. 171 of on the protection of personal data gives a person in San Marino a right against a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal or similarly significant effects, but that right attaches to the processing of personal data rather than to an AI system as such, so it is filed under the privacy topic rather than here.

Law No. 16 of , which inserted an offence of illicit dissemination of sexually explicit images or videos into the Criminal Code, addresses images and videos that were taken of a real person, without addressing AI-generated, synthetic, or manipulated content, so it does not reach an AI-generated or deepfake prohibition of the kind that would be recorded here.

No statute or reported decision imposing an AI-specific duty of the kind the six registered law families describe has been identified.

As of .

Age gating law

San Marino has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code as of this date.

Law No. 211 of on publishing and the profession of media operators requires the Code of Conduct for Media Operators to address the protection of minors and other physically and socially disadvantaged persons, but this is a professional journalism-ethics standard rather than a duty on a service to verify or gate a user's age, and it does not bind a provider or publisher outside the licensed press and media-operator profession.

Law No. 171 of on the protection of personal data separately prohibits, at article 75, publishing or disseminating news or images identifying a child involved in legal proceedings, but that duty attaches to personal data about a specific class of minor rather than establishing age verification or age-gating for a service generally (see the privacy topic for that instrument).

No statute or reported decision imposing an age-verification or age-gating duty of the kind the four registered law families describe has been identified.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for San Marino AI law
  • No current case law for San Marino privacy law
  • No current case law for San Marino scraping law
  • No current case law for San Marino cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for San Marino communications law
  • No current case law for San Marino content moderation law
  • No current case law for San Marino product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for San Marino digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for San Marino age gating law
  • No current case law for San Marino reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here1 instrument

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of San Marino comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

72 hours
Breach notificationprivacy law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of San Marino

72 hours

San Marino Law No. 171, personal data breach notification

Legge 21 dicembre 2018 n. 171, articoli 34-35 (violazione dei dati personali)privacy law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Notify the Data Protection Authority without undue delay, and within 72 hours where feasible, after becoming aware of a personal data breach affecting a person in San Marino, under Article 34.

Communicate the breach to the affected data subject without undue delay where it is likely to result in a high risk to their rights and freedoms, in clear and plain language.

As a processor, notify the controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a personal data breach.

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.