Law / Moldova

Moldova

16 of 19 named instruments researched to a stage, across six of the ten areas of law we track: 15 in force and 1 proposed. As of .

When each starts15 of 16 carry a date, 1 does not.
2019: 1 instrument (1 in force) ’19 2020: 0 instruments 2021: 0 instruments 2022: 3 instruments (3 in force) 2023: 0 instruments 2024: 1 instrument (1 in force) 2025: 2 instruments (2 in force) 2026: 8 instruments (8 in force) ’26 today

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

  1. AI law 1
  2. Privacy law 7
  3. Scraping law 4
  4. Cybersecurity law 2
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law 1
  10. Reuse law 1

AI law1 instrument, 1 proposed

Research summary (301 words)

Moldova has no domestic statute imposing AI-transparency or output-labelling duties, AI-risk obligations, training-data duties, prohibited-practices bans, governance duties, or sector-specific AI rules.

Its notable development is signing, on and alongside roughly a dozen other Council of Europe member and observer states, the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225); the Council of Europe's own overview page lists Moldova among the treaty's signatories and lists only the European Union among the parties that have ratified it.

On the Ministry of Economic Development and Digitalisation and the Ministry of Education and Research launched the Sub-Council for Artificial Intelligence and Applied Research (SCIA), an interministerial coordination body succeeding an earlier Sub-Council for Artificial Intelligence and Data Governance, tasked with steering a future transposition of the EU AI Act and designating a competent national AI authority; it is a coordination platform rather than a source of enforceable obligations, so it is described here rather than recorded as an instrument.

The Ministry has also announced drafting a concept for a National Artificial Intelligence and Data Management Programme 2026-2030 and, separately, opened a public consultation on a draft AI law; the programme concept is in drafting and the AI law is a consultation draft, so neither is a source of enforceable behavioural obligations.

An earlier White Paper on Artificial Intelligence and Data Governance (October 2024) set non-binding strategic direction for public-administration AI use and has been superseded operationally by SCIA and the in-development National Programme.

Law No. 195/2024 on Personal Data Protection's right concerning decisions based solely on automated processing, including profiling, attaches to the processing of personal data rather than to an AI system as such, and is researched under this jurisdiction's privacy-topic document rather than here.

AI governance

Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Moldova

Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights Democracy and the Rule of Law, Council of Europe Treaty Series No. 225, opened for signature ; signed by the Republic of Moldova, not yet ratifiedOfficial description of the Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and its list of signatories and parties

Proposed. proposed Not law. It binds no one unless it is enacted.

Signed, with consent not yet expressed, dated , as of . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Council of Europe's own list of signatories to the Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence names the Republic of Moldova as a signatory. The Treaty Office's chart of signatures and ratifications records Moldova's signature on and no ratification by Moldova. The only ratification the chart records, as of its status date of , is the European Union's, on .

Under Article 30(3) the Convention enters into force on the first day of the month following three months after five signatories, including at least three Council of Europe member states, have expressed their consent to be bound by it.

The Convention requires each Party to adopt measures that keep activities within the lifecycle of an artificial intelligence system consistent with human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, privacy, transparency and accountability, including carrying out iterative risk and impact assessments on human rights, democracy and the rule of law and establishing prevention and mitigation measures.

It covers use of an AI system by a public authority, including a private actor acting on the authority's behalf, and by a private actor generally, and it requires each Party to seek to ensure, as appropriate for the context, that persons interacting with an AI system are notified that they are interacting with such a system rather than with a human being, and to adopt or maintain measures for accessible and effective remedies, as far as its international obligations require and its domestic legal system allows, including measures to ensure that information about an AI system is sufficient for affected persons to contest a decision made or substantially informed by its use.

What it requires

Privacy law7 instruments, 7 in force

Research summary (140 words)

Moldova is not a General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) jurisdiction, and its status is genuinely time-critical. Law No. 195/2024 on Personal Data Protection is dated to take effect , and its own Article 90(3)(b) repeals the prior Law No. 133/2011 the same date. That date fell one day before the date shown (), and no source confirms the transition actually landed as opposed to being merely scheduled.

Law No. 195/2024 is recorded here as the operative instrument on the strength of its own stated commencement date, and the repeal of Law No. 133/2011 as dated and immediately recent rather than as independently observed fact. Primary text confirms biometric data as an explicit special category naming facial images, a real cross-border transfer regime keyed to a National Centre-maintained adequacy list, a standalone civil damages right, and a 72-hour breach notification duty.

Breach notification

Moldova Law No. 195/2024, personal data breach notification

Legea Nr. 195 din 25 iulie 2024, articolele 33-34 (notificarea incalcarii securitatii datelor)Official statute PDF hosted by datepersonale.md, read in full (169,952 characters, untruncated)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 33(1) requires the controller, in the case of a personal data breach, to notify it to the National Centre for Personal Data Protection without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, and to accompany a later notification with reasons for the delay.

Article 33(2) requires the processor to notify the controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a breach.

Article 33(3) fixes what the notification must contain: the nature of the breach including, where possible, the categories and approximate number of data subjects and of personal data records concerned, the name and contact details of the data protection officer or other contact point, the likely consequences, and the measures taken or proposed to address it and mitigate its adverse effects.

Article 34(1) requires the controller to communicate the breach to the data subject without undue delay where it is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, in clear and plain language, and article 34(3) excuses that communication only where protective measures such as encryption render the affected data unintelligible, where subsequent measures make the high risk no longer likely, or where it would involve a disproportionate effort and a public communication of equal effect is made instead.

Article 89(1) enters the Law into force on the expiry of 24 months from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova. The Law's front matter dates that publication , so these provisions bind from .

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Law No. 195/2024 on Personal Data Protection

Legea Nr. 195 din 25 iulie 2024, articolele 1-7, 11 si 24-43 (principii, temeiuri legale si obligatiile operatorului)Official statute PDF hosted by datepersonale.md, read in full (169,952 characters, untruncated)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Articles 2 and 3 fix the law's material and territorial scope. Article 5 carries the processing principles, article 6 the lawful bases and article 7 the conditions for valid consent. Article 11 governs processing which does not require identification. Article 24 places responsibility on the controller, article 25 requires data protection by design and by default, article 26 governs joint controllers and article 28 the engagement of a processor.

Article 30 requires records of processing activities and article 32 technical and organisational measures giving a level of security appropriate to the risk. Article 35 requires a data protection impact assessment where processing is likely to result in a high risk, and article 36 prior consultation of the National Centre for Personal Data Protection where it shows that risk remains.

Articles 37 to 39 govern the designation, position and tasks of the data protection officer, and articles 40 to 43 the codes of conduct, their monitoring, certification and certification bodies. Article 89(1) enters the Law into force on the expiry of 24 months from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova. The Law's front matter dates that publication , so these provisions bind from .

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Moldova Law No. 195/2024, transfers of personal data abroad

Legea Nr. 195 din 25 iulie 2024, articolele 44-50 (transferuri catre tari terte)Official statute PDF hosted by datepersonale.md, read in full (169,952 characters, untruncated)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 44 permits a transfer of personal data to a foreign country or an international organisation only on the conditions this chapter lays down, including for onward transfers. Article 45 governs transfer on the basis of an adequacy decision, article 46 transfer subject to appropriate safeguards including a standard transfer agreement the National Centre for Personal Data Protection approves, and article 47 binding corporate rules and what they must specify.

Article 49 sets the narrow derogations that permit a transfer in the absence of an adequacy decision or appropriate safeguards, including the data subject's explicit consent after being informed of the risks, contractual necessity, important reasons of public interest, legal claims, vital interests and a transfer from a public register. Article 89(1) enters the Law into force on the expiry of 24 months from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova. The Law's front matter dates that publication , so these provisions bind from .

What it requires

Data subject rights

Moldova Law No. 195/2024, automated decisions

Legea Nr. 195 din 25 iulie 2024, articolul 22 (automated individual decisions)Official statute PDF hosted by datepersonale.md (National Center for Personal Data Protection), read in full

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 22(1) gives the data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects concerning them or similarly significantly affects them. Paragraph 2 lists exceptions, including where the decision is necessary for a contract with the data subject.

Where a carve-out applies, the controller must implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights, freedoms and legitimate interests, including at least the right to obtain human intervention, express a point of view, and contest the decision.

What it requires

Moldova Law No. 195/2024, rights of the data subject

Legea Nr. 195 din 25 iulie 2024, articolele 12-21, 23 (drepturile subiectului de date)Official statute PDF hosted by datepersonale.md, read in full (169,952 characters, untruncated)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Articles 13 and 14 fix the information a controller gives when it collects personal data from the data subject and where the data came from elsewhere. Article 15 gives a right of access, article 16 a right to rectification, article 17 a right to erasure, article 18 a right to restriction of processing, article 19 the duty to notify recipients of a rectification, erasure or restriction, article 20 a right to data portability and article 21 a right to object, including to direct marketing.

Article 23 sets the restrictions on those rights. Article 89(1) enters the Law into force on the expiry of 24 months from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova. The Law's front matter dates that publication , so these provisions bind from .

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Moldova Law No. 195/2024, the Centre, complaints, compensation and sanctions

Legea Nr. 195 din 25 iulie 2024, articolele 55-86 (Centrul National, plangeri, despagubiri si sanctiuni)Official statute PDF hosted by datepersonale.md, read in full (169,952 characters, untruncated)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Articles 55 to 71 establish the National Centre for Personal Data Protection, fix its status, funding, mission, tasks and powers, its leadership and the appointment of its Director and Deputy Directors, and the appointment and liability of data protection inspectors. Article 72 gives a data subject the right to lodge a complaint with the Centre, and article 73 the right to challenge the Centre's actions or inactions.

Article 76 entitles any person who has suffered material or non-material damage from an infringement of the law to compensation from the controller or processor, a claim that runs in court separately from a complaint to the Centre. Article 77 opens the Centre's examination procedure, and the articles that follow govern how it is conducted and the sanctions that close it.

Article 89(1) enters the Law into force on the expiry of 24 months from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova. The Law's front matter dates that publication , so these provisions bind from .

What it requires

Sensitive categories

Moldova Law No. 195/2024, special categories, a child's consent and conviction data

Legea Nr. 195 din 25 iulie 2024, articolele 8-10 (categorii speciale de date si consimtamantul copilului)Official statute PDF hosted by datepersonale.md, read in full (169,952 characters, untruncated)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 8 fixes the conditions on which a child's consent to an information society service offered directly to a child is lawful, and requires the controller to make reasonable efforts to verify that the holder of parental responsibility gave or authorised it, taking available technology into account.

Article 9(1) prohibits processing personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, of biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person, and of data concerning health or a natural person's sex life or sexual orientation; the law names facial images as a qualifying example of biometric data, so biometric material derived from an ordinary recording is not carved out of the prohibition.

Article 9(2) lifts that prohibition only in the cases it lists, beginning with the data subject's explicit consent to one or more specified purposes and running through employment and social security law, vital interests, the legitimate activities of a not-for-profit body confined to its members, data manifestly made public by the data subject, legal claims, substantial public interest, occupational medicine and health or social care provided under a duty of secrecy, public health, and archiving, research or statistics.

Article 10 governs the processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences. Article 89(1) enters the Law into force on the expiry of 24 months from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova. The Law's front matter dates that publication , so these provisions bind from .

What it requires

Scraping law4 instruments, 4 in force

Research summary (255 words)

Moldova has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately. The Criminal Code's illegal-access offence requires infringing a protection system, connecting to communication channels, or using special technical means as an aggravating circumstance, and its base offence turns on acting without authorization under law or contract, so a plain reading does not clearly reach reading a public, unauthenticated page, and no reported case has tested the point.

No Moldovan court decision on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper was located.

The Law on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights confers a sui generis database right on a producer who made a substantial investment in a database's contents, but its English text carries no text-and-data-mining opt-out mechanism of the kind the EU's Digital Single Market Directive introduced, despite the World Intellectual Property Organization's own record listing that Directive among the instruments the Law implements; the Law's general reproduction exceptions (education, quotation, and a mass-media current-events exception) are the only exceptions reaching a scraper's reproduction of copyrighted text.

The Law on Personal Data Protection applies to personal data without a general carve-out for information a person made public themselves, other than a narrow exception for special-category data manifestly made public by the data subject, so scraping ordinary personal data from a public Moldovan website remains subject to the Law's lawful-basis, purpose-limitation, and cross-border-transfer duties.

No Moldovan statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Criminal Code, Illegal Access to a Computer System

Codul penal al Republicii Moldova (Legea nr. 985-XV din 18 aprilie 2002, cu modificarile ulterioare), art. 259Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2025. Publisher's page: https://legislationline.org/sites/default/files/2025-03/MDA-64897.pdf

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 259(1) punishes illegal access to a computer system by a person not authorized under the law or a contract, who exceeds the limits of an authorization, or who lacks the permission of the competent person to use, administer, or control a computer system or conduct scientific research or another operation in it, with a fine of 550 to 850 conventional units (27,500 to 42,500 Moldovan lei), community service, or up to one year of imprisonment.

Because the base offence's trigger is acting without authorization or exceeding it, a scraper reading a public, unauthenticated page falls outside a plain reading of paragraph (1), and no reported case has tested the point.

Paragraph (2) raises the fine to 850 to 1,350 conventional units (42,500 to 67,500 lei) or up to three years' imprisonment where the same act is committed by violating a protection system, connecting to electronic communication channels, using special technical means, using the access to commit a further listed crime, targeting legally protected information, or causing large-scale damage.

Paragraph (3) sets a fine of 1,500 to 3,000 conventional units (75,000 to 150,000 lei) or three to five years' imprisonment where either paragraph's conduct causes particularly large-scale damage. A legal person faces a separate, higher fine scale at each tier, up to 10,000 to 30,000 conventional units (500,000 to 1,500,000 lei) with liquidation at the top tier.

What it requires

Copyright and text and data mining (TDM)

Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Law, Reproduction Exceptions and No Text-and-Data-Mining Opt-Out

Legea nr. 230 din 28 iulie 2022 privind dreptul de autor si drepturile conexe, art. 55-57 (exceptii si limitari la dreptul de reproducere)Law No. 230 of on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights, official English translation, WIPO Lex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Law's stored full English text carries no text-and-data-mining exception or machine-readable opt-out mechanism of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive introduced, and no defined term or provision for 'text and data mining' or 'text mining' was found anywhere in it, even though the World Intellectual Property Organization's own record for the Law lists Directive (EU) 2019/790 among the instruments it implements.

The exceptions actually reaching an automated reproduction of text are general ones: article 55 exempts a temporary act of reproduction that is transient or incidental, an integral and essential part of a technological process, and made solely to enable a network transmission or a lawful use with no independent economic significance; article 57(1)(c) permits, without consent or remuneration, reproduction by mass media or communication to the public of published articles on current economic, political, or religious topics where such use is not expressly reserved, to the extent justified by an informatory purpose; and article 57(1)(d) permits quoting a work already lawfully made public for criticism or review, consistent with fair practice and to the extent the specific purpose justifies.

None of the three requires a text-and-data-mining-specific lawful basis, and none is limited to or shaped around automated collection.

What it requires

Database right

Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Law, Sui Generis Database Right

Legea nr. 230 din 28 iulie 2022 privind dreptul de autor si drepturile conexe, art. 48-53 (dreptul sui generis asupra bazelor de date)Law No. 230 of on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights, official English translation, WIPO Lex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 50(1) entitles the producer of a database who proves a qualitatively or quantitatively substantial investment in obtaining, verifying, or presenting its contents to prohibit the extraction or re-utilization of the whole, or a qualitatively or quantitatively substantial part, of that database; article 50(4) also bars the repeated and systematic extraction or re-utilization of insubstantial parts where this conflicts with the database's normal exploitation or unreasonably prejudices the producer's legitimate interests.

The right is transferable, applies regardless of whether the database or its contents separately qualify for copyright protection, and runs for fifteen years from completion, restarting on a substantial new investment in the database's contents.

Article 51 exempts a lawful user's extraction of a substantial part for private, non-electronic-database purposes, for study or research with the source indicated, for public security, or for administrative or judicial proceedings, and a database producer may not prevent a lawful user from extracting insubstantial parts for any purpose.

A person compiling scraped data from Moldovan sources into a database, and a person extracting a substantial part of an existing Moldovan database to train or populate a model, both fall within article 50's restricted acts.

What it requires

Personal data

Personal Data Protection Law, Reach Over Scraped Public Personal Data

Legea nr. 195/2024 privind protectia datelor cu caracter personal, art. 6, art. 9(2)(e)Law No. 195/2024 on Personal Data Protection, official statute PDF hosted by the National Centre for Personal Data Protection

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 6(1) requires a lawful basis, such as consent, a contract, a legal obligation, or a legitimate interest, before processing personal data at all, with no exception for personal data that happens to be publicly accessible; article 6(1)(f)'s legitimate-interest ground is the one most likely to be invoked to justify scraping ordinary personal data from a public page, but it still requires weighing the data subject's rights and interests rather than acting as a blanket carve-out.

Article 9(1) separately prohibits processing special-category data, including biometric data, without a ground listed in article 9(2); the only publicly-available-adjacent ground there is article 9(2)(e), which reaches special-category data the data subject manifestly made public themselves, and does not extend to ordinary personal data, or to special-category data another party (rather than the data subject) posted or that became public through a third party's disclosure.

A scraper collecting the personal data of a person in Moldova from a public, unauthenticated page must therefore still establish an article 6 lawful basis for the collection and any later use, including for training a model, and must treat any biometric or other special-category data derived from public photographs, video, or audio as subject to article 9's narrower regime.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (228 words)

Moldova's Law No. 48/2023 on cybersecurity, in force since , sets security duties and a 24-hour incident notice for designated providers of essential services and public electronic-communications providers, filed as rows of their own; no standalone product-security or general security-baseline statute reaching a private software or platform provider is confirmed for Moldova.

The Criminal Code's illegal-access offence (article 259) binds an intruder who accesses a computer system without authorization, not the system's own operator or manufacturer, so it is a computer-misuse offence that belongs to scraping rather than a security-topic presence.

Law No. 195/2024 on Personal Data Protection carries its own security-of-processing duty at article 32, written as a section inside that comprehensive data-protection act in the same shape as the General Data Protection Regulation's article 32, so it stays filed under privacy rather than being restated here.

The National Bank of Moldova's own site offers no static search result for a cybersecurity or information-technology risk regulation, so any binding directive for licensed financial institutions likewise remains unconfirmed. Law 48/2023 on cybersecurity enters into force on . Article 11 of Law 48/2023 obliges a service provider to apply security measures continuously.

Article 12 of Law 48/2023 requires a service provider to notify the competent authority of a significant cyber incident without undue delay and no later than 24 hours after becoming aware of it.

Sector security regimes

Law 48/2023 on Cybersecurity: Service Provider Security Measures

Law 48/2023 on Cybersecurity, arts. 3, 11, 14 and 19 (Legea nr. 48 din 16 martie 2023 privind securitatea cibernetică)Text of Legea nr. 48 din 16 martie 2023 privind securitatea cibernetică (Law 48 of on cybersecurity)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 3(1) applies the Law to private-law legal persons that are medium-sized enterprises or larger, provide services in a critical sector or subsector the Government sets, and are identified as service providers by the competent authority.

Article 3(2) applies the Law, whatever the size of the entity, to a legal person of a type the Government sets that is a public electronic-communications network or service provider, a trust-service provider, the registrar of the .md top-level domain, a domain-name registration service, the sole national provider of an essential service, or a public-law legal person.

Article 11(1) obliges a service provider to apply security measures continuously to prevent and resolve cyber incidents and to limit their effect on service continuity and on network and system security. Article 11(2)(1) obliges it to assess the vulnerabilities and security risks of its networks and information systems and to write an assessment report.

Article 11(2)(6) obliges it to verify that its security measures are complete and compliant, including through security audits, and to document the results. Article 14 applies the measures of Article 11(1) to (3) and the notification duties of Article 12 to public-law legal persons. Article 19 provides for state control over private-law service providers under Law 131/2012. Article 23 sets the Law in force on .

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

Law 48/2023 on Cybersecurity: Cyber Incident Notification

Law 48/2023 on Cybersecurity, art. 12 (Legea nr. 48 din 16 martie 2023 privind securitatea cibernetică)Text of Legea nr. 48 din 16 martie 2023 privind securitatea cibernetică (Law 48 of on cybersecurity)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 12(1) requires a service provider to inform the competent authority, without undue delay and no later than 24 hours after becoming aware, of a cyber incident with a significant impact on network or system security or on service continuity, of an incident whose significant impact is not evident but can reasonably be presumed, and of the significant impact on its service of an incident that affected a third party it depends on.

Article 12(3) requires an update and an initial assessment of the incident within 72 hours of becoming aware. Article 12(8) requires a final report within one month after the updated information is sent. Article 12(6) requires a service provider to inform the users who may be affected by a significant cyber threat, within 24 hours of becoming aware, of the measures they can take, and to inform the general public where it cannot notify them individually.

Article 12(5) sets the conditions under which an incident counts as having a significant impact. Article 13 lets any legal person not identified as a service provider, and any natural person, notify the competent authority voluntarily of significant incidents, cyber threats and near misses.

What it requires

Age gating law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (125 words)

Moldova's Code of Audiovisual Media Services (Law No. 174/2018), in force since , requires linear (broadcast) and on-demand audiovisual media service providers to restrict minors' access to content likely to affect their physical, mental or moral development, naming pornography and unjustified violence as prime examples: a linear broadcaster may show such content only behind a conditional access system, and an on-demand provider only behind access restriction measures that keep minors from normally viewing or hearing it.

A separate law, Law No. 30/2013 on the protection of children against the negative impact of information, also addresses classification and access restrictions for content reaching children, but its text is not confirmed in an accessible primary source, so it is not catalogued as an instrument here.

Adult content age verification (AV)

Code of Audiovisual Media Services, Protection of Minors and On-Demand Providers

Code of Audiovisual Media Services, Law No. 174/2018, arts. 15, 61, 84English-language text of the Code of Audiovisual Media Services (Law No. 174/2018)

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2024. Publisher's page: https://venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-REF(2020)046-e

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 15 binds every media service provider to the minor's best interest and, at paragraph (6), prohibits linear broadcasting of programmes likely to affect a minor's physical, mental or moral development, especially those containing pornography or unjustified violence; paragraph (7) allows such content in linear services only behind a conditional access system, and paragraph (8) allows it in on-demand services only where access restriction measures keep minors from normally seeing or hearing it.

Article 61(1)(a) extends this protection-of-minors duty by name to providers of on-demand audiovisual media services, covering on-demand video and rerun-video services under Moldovan jurisdiction. The Broadcasting Council (Consiliul Audiovizualului) is tasked under Article 15(9)-(10) with fixing the detailed content classification, scheduling and access-restriction rules in its own Audiovisual Content Regulation, whose own provisions are not described here.

A first violation of Article 15 draws a public warning under Article 84(3)(a); failing to comply with a Broadcasting Council decision enforcing the minors-protection duty draws a fine of MDL 10,000 to 15,000 under Article 84(6)(a). This provision applies to both private and public (state) media service providers alike.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (260 words)

Moldova has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the general copyright framework of the Law on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights, 2022 (Law No. 230/2022) is the only law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content.

Its article 57(1)(c) exception permits, without the rightholder's consent or payment of remuneration, reproduction by mass media, communication to the public, or making available of published articles on current economic, political, or religious topics, or of broadcast works of the same character, where such use is not expressly reserved, to the extent an informatory purpose justifies it; the provision carries no headline-length or short-extract cap distinct from that informatory-purpose test, and no reported Moldovan decision applies it to a systematic news aggregator as opposed to conventional press-review reproduction.

The English text of Law No. 230/2022 carries no press-publisher neighbouring right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive Article 15 creates, even though the World Intellectual Property Organization's own record lists that Directive among the instruments the Law implements; the Law's neighbouring-rights chapter protects performers, phonogram and videogram producers, and broadcasting organisations, not print or online news publishers.

No statute or case law addresses whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public, or whether framing or inline display changes the answer, and Moldovan law has no hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law. Despite implementing several other Digital Single Market Directive provisions, the Law carries no text-and-data-mining reservation or machine-readable opt-out mechanism, so no opt-out regime of that kind exists for a news aggregator's indexing.

Snippet reproduction

Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Law, Mass-Media Current-Events Exception

Legea nr. 230 din 28 iulie 2022 privind dreptul de autor si drepturile conexe art. 57(1)(c) (excepţie pentru reproducerea de catre mass-media)Law No. 230 of on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights, official English translation, WIPO Lex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 57(1)(c) of Law No. 230/2022 permits, without the rightholder's consent and without payment of remuneration, the reproduction by mass media, communication to the public, or making available of published articles on current economic, political, or religious topics, or of radio or television broadcast works or other subject-matter of the same character, in cases where such uses are not expressly reserved, and permits use of works or other subject-matter for broadcasting current events, to the extent an informatory purpose justifies it.

Article 57(1)(d) separately permits quoting a work already lawfully made available to the public for criticism or review, consistent with fair practice and to the extent a specific purpose justifies. Neither provision carries a headline-length or short-extract cap distinct from the informatory-purpose or fair-practice test, and no reported Moldovan decision applies either to a systematic news aggregator rather than conventional press-review reproduction.

The Law's neighbouring-rights chapter, covering performers, phonogram and videogram producers, and broadcasting organisations, does not extend to a print or online news publisher's own reporting, and the Law carries no press-publisher neighbouring right or text-and-data-mining opt-out mechanism.

What it requires

Case law

  • No current case law for Moldova AI law
  • No current case law for Moldova privacy law
  • No current case law for Moldova scraping law
  • No current case law for Moldova cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Moldova communications law
  • No current case law for Moldova content moderation law
  • No current case law for Moldova product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Moldova digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Moldova age gating law
  • No current case law for Moldova reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here2 instruments

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Moldova comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

24 hours
Incident notificationsecurity law
72 hours
Incident notificationsecurity law
Breach notificationprivacy law
1 month
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Moldova

24 hours72 hours1 month

Law 48/2023 on Cybersecurity: Cyber Incident Notification

Law 48/2023 on Cybersecurity, art. 12 (Legea nr. 48 din 16 martie 2023 privind securitatea cibernetică)security law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Notify the competent authority without undue delay, and no later than 24 hours after you become aware, of any cyber incident with a significant impact on the security of your network or system or on the continuity of your service, and of one whose significant impact is not evident but can reasonably be presumed (Article 12(1)(a) and (b)).

Notify the competent authority within the same 24 hours of the significant impact on your own service of a cyber incident that affected a third party your service depends on (Article 12(1)(c)).

Submit to the competent authority, no later than 72 hours after you become aware of the incident, an update of the information already sent and an initial assessment of the incident, including its severity, its impact and indicators of compromise where available (Article 12(3)).

Inform the users of your services who may be affected by a significant cyber threat, without undue delay and no later than 24 hours after you become aware of it, of the measures they can take, and inform the general public if you cannot identify and notify them individually (Article 12(6)).

Send the competent authority a final report within one month after the updated information, covering at least the causes of the incident, how long it took to resolve, the measures applied and its impact (Article 12(8)).

72 hours

Moldova Law No. 195/2024, personal data breach notification

Legea Nr. 195 din 25 iulie 2024, articolele 33-34 (notificarea incalcarii securitatii datelor)privacy law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Notify the National Centre for Personal Data Protection without undue delay, and within 72 hours where feasible, after becoming aware of a personal data breach affecting a person in Moldova, unless the breach is unlikely to risk their rights and freedoms.

Communicate the breach to the affected data subject without undue delay where it is likely to result in a high risk to their rights and freedoms, in clear and plain language.

As a processor, notify the controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a personal data breach.

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.